Today I will briefly tell you about 3 ancient artifacts, whose existence is difficult to explain.
The first 2 artifacts are in one of Chile's museums dedicated to the history of the ancient culture of the Mapuche Indians. There is practically no information on them, but even based on some of the available photos, very interesting conclusions can be drawn.
Compared to typical Mapuche crafts and their technical capabilities, these artifacts clearly do not resemble their work.
As for the information, I have vague suspicions that these exhibits are kept in storerooms and that no one is allowed to see them. The photos could have leaked onto the network over time, you never know who managed to get to these artifacts and secretly photograph them.
The artifacts themselves resemble either the result of high technologies or processing methods unknown to modern science. But if the Mapuche had such methods, then there would be not a few such artifacts, but several dozen, if not hundreds.
Promotional video:
Hence the logical conclusion that the Indians only found some ancient objects created using incomprehensible technologies.
And the meaning of the artifacts is highly questionable. If these are ordinary vessels for storing liquid, then why make such a unique and complex shape for them? After all, you can make the vessel simpler.
Moreover, among the objects of the Mapuche themselves we see quite ordinary vessels and ceramics, which do not raise any questions.
It's a pity there is no information about the material of manufacture, I believe he could become iron facts against the creation of these objects by the Indians.
The latest find is located in the Cairo Museum of Antiquities.
This artifact belongs to the civilization of ancient Egypt and belongs to the Sakkar collection. It is made of alabaster and has a monolithic structure.
Why the Egyptians needed to make objects with a similar shape is hard to imagine. There is no point in creating a container with such a shape, and if it is not a container, then what ?!
There is a version that such artifacts are a consequence of the Cargo cult, when the Egyptians tried to repeat the objects of the ancient gods.
There is common sense in this, because such finds are more reminiscent of elements of complex technical devices than simple containers. If we do not consider such finds separately, but take them together, then the version with the Cargo cult becomes more weighty.
There is another option that we cannot understand these artifacts due to the superiority of the technologies of their originals. In other words, the technologies of ancient civilization were so much superior to modern ones that we cannot understand even their approximate purpose.