Valery Spiridonov, the first candidate for a body transplant, shares his thoughts on how humanity can control the weather, and tells what attempts have already been made in this regard in Russia, the United States and other countries.
Slowly but surely, the huge, monumental armies of the last century, capable of capturing half of the continent at once, with a huge arsenal of various firearms, artillery and even nuclear weapons, are becoming a thing of the past. All this remained there, in the bloodiest century in the history of mankind that has already passed away from us. Today people have already entered a new technotronic era, the era of hybrid influences and “soft”, but no less cruel forces.
Is it possible that these changes are intentional and climate weapons are not hypothetical gloomy installations in the tundra of Siberia or the forests of Alaska in the best traditions of anti-utopian novels, but real and functioning systems? The answer, as usual, is both simple and complex at the same time.
ria.ru
It is important to immediately draw a line of distinction between the conventionally "skeptics" and "confident": climate control is indeed possible, and the development of climate weapons was 100% conducted in the twentieth century and certainly continues to this day. In favor of the fact that such weapons really existed and were developed by the leading powers of that time, at least the fact that in 1978 an official convention was adopted prohibiting state influence on the climate speaks. The then world leaders of the USSR and the USA signed the treaty. Since then, there have been no proven cases of military use of climate weapons, but accusations of the involvement of certain forces in natural disasters continue.
An important fact: climate control, influence on it for various purposes is a reality. It is obvious that the reality is well hidden, it is quite possible that the reality is unpleasant, but from this it does not cease to be less real. This is due to two important factors. First, man has always tried to keep everything under control, and modern mankind would hardly want to depend on unpredictable weather. And secondly, unfortunately, the climate is also a weapon.
However, it is necessary to very soberly assess the capabilities of a person in managing such large energies as weather phenomena. So, for example, in one day, an average hurricane releases an amount of thermal energy equivalent to that which all power plants in the world generate in 200 days. And the energy of a strong hurricane can range from 50 to 200 million megawatts. It is logical that it is impossible to simply oppose brute force to such phenomena. Rather, it is necessary to consider directed point effects that can trigger a chain reaction of change.
Promotional video:
To date, climate control systems are being developed in a number of countries, primarily in the United States of America. Scientists from all over the world, versed in the so-called geoengineering, propose the following developments aimed at changing the earth's climate to combat global warming or other purposes:
- Installation of reflecting mirrors in orbit in order to reflect or concentrate sunlight at given points on the planet. This is an almost ideal project, but its implementation requires colossal funds.
- Spraying sulfur in the earth's atmosphere. This is, in fact, the same first item, but cheaper. Sulfur is an excellent shield that will reflect excess sunlight. However, due to the obvious harm to the environment, this option is not the most popular today.
- Increasing the ability of the earth's surface to reflect excess solar fluxes from the earth's surface. There is a legion of proposals in this plane, in particular, dressing glaciers in special insulating covers, "painting" white rocks, sand masses in deserts, roofs of houses, as well as genetic modification of woody plants (trees with foliage reflecting light) and much more.
- Stimulation of the growth and reproduction of unicellular algae in the world's oceans, which should contribute to the intensive absorption of CO2 from the Earth's atmosphere. It is also possible to artificially obtain a number of species of unicellular algae. This method is associated with a radical restructuring of the ecosystems of the world's oceans, so its application in practice today is unlikely.
As for the existence and functioning of climate-related weapons directly, everything is not so simple. It is quite obvious that such a weapon existed before. This is evidenced by both indirect facts and a number of revelations of former intelligence officers, and quite official documents and conventions on the non-proliferation of climate weapons signed by representatives of the Soviet Union and the United States of America.
However, it is one thing to prohibit and promise not to do it with honest eyes, and it is another thing to really adhere to the obligations assumed. All countries of the world have agreed that they will not produce new nuclear weapons, but Iran and North Korea, despite the sanctions, continue to develop them. Even earlier, Israel and Pakistan acquired atomic bombs in a similar way with the connivance of the United States. Today there is talk that even the terrorists of the "Islamic State" banned in Russia are developing their atomic bomb. So is it possible to trust any international treaties at all, especially when it comes to weapons issues? The answer, unfortunately, is obvious: hardly.
In a number of states today there are specialized installations officially engaged in the study of climate. First of all, this is the well-known American HAARP, which plays the role of a kind of "Area 51" in conspiracy theories (a "dummy" specially launched by the American government to divert attention from serious projects).
Antennas of the American research project HAARP. Photo: AP Photo / Mark Farmer
However, few people know that there are similar bases in the United States that are really hidden from public attention: these are the Arecibo Telescope in Puerto Rican and the HIPAS observatory in Alaska. On the territory of Europe, it is reliably known about the functioning of two complexes of the same class: this is EISCAT in Norway and SPEAR on the island of Spitsbergen.
By the way, several of the same stations exist today in the Russian Federation, and one - "URAN-1", now abandoned, but for some reason still guarded by the military, is located in Ukraine, a few kilometers from Kharkov. It should be noted that this is only publicly available data on such stations, which are officially engaged only in the peaceful study of the atmosphere. However, how true is this?
You need to understand that real systems for weather correction today either already exist, or are actively being developed. In the United States, cloud dispersal and seeding are regularly carried out. One of the richest people in the world - Bill Gates - will provide hundreds of millions of US dollars for projects to neutralize hurricanes and tsunamis. In the UAE, like the shamans of antiquity, they really know how to make rain on a land languishing with heat. In the PRC, before the next Olympics, the government announced that it uses weather regulators to ensure the most comfortable weather conditions. And the former Iranian leader Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has more than once directly accused the United States and the EU of causing an unprecedented drought in the region with the help of climate control systems.
The cold summer in Russia this year can also play into the hands of those countries that suffered losses from food anti-sanctions. Weather conditions in our country are now clearly not conducive to a bumper harvest, and whether this will affect the weakening of measures aimed at protecting our agricultural sector from imports remains to be assessed.
Climate control systems are an objective reality today. How to use them is another matter. It is time for mankind to think about why everything, even peaceful developments, is constantly used for military purposes. We all live on the same planet and climate problems threaten each of us. So isn't the general welfare more important than the enmity of individual states? This question, however, should be addressed to world leaders, not ordinary inhabitants of the Earth.
Valery Spiridonov
