Although, the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 is one of the most interesting topics of like-minded Conspiracy Theory. It is very strange, but these events, which took place before our eyes, did not receive an answer to the fact that happened in 1991,
a huge number of Soviet citizens are still wondering who destroyed the USSR - why and who led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. There are many different versions of the collapse of the Soviet Union, such as the fall in energy prices, and Gorbachev's "dry law", and the defeat of the Soviet wars in the war by Afghanistan. Although the best version of all that existed is the intrigues of the United States of America and the conspiracy in Belovezhskaya Pushcha. Although many writers and documentary films associate its collapse with such leaders as Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich, they go so far as to claim that these three characters were spies and were accountable for every step they took with foreign leaders.
Most historians are inclined to believe that these individuals of the collapsed Soviet unions were simple criminals, although it would be possible to call people convicted by the courts as criminals, and their guilt was not proven by the court, since there was no trial of these individuals at all, nor Neither Yeltsin, Kravchuk and Shushkevich were responsible for the collapse of the Soviet Union, nor were they involved in its collapse, but only had anything to do with the creation of the Commonwealth of Independent States. This is not a criminal activity related to the creation of the CIS. Is it possible to call the creation of the CIS an organization that carries out criminal activities? Here is a typical passage on the collapse of the Soviet Union. N. Laktionova in her work “Was Russia a“prison of peoples”? Historical myth as a mechanism of destruction "(was reflected in the magazine" Russian entrepreneur ",Moscow, Oct. 2004, No. 10) narrated that the collapse of the great state was of a nature that was created artificially. Before the collapse of the Soviet Union, on March 17, 1991, a referendum was held, which showed that the majority of voters voted for the desire to remain citizens of the Soviet Union, out of 80 percent of those present, 77 percent voted for the desire to remain citizens of the great state.
But first they brought up the topic of the creation of historical Russia, to which it could be attributed, only the creation of the RSFSR, and not the union of Soviet socialist republics - although this is not true since the Leninist government of the RSFSR stated that Soviet Russia is not the legal successor of Tsarist Russia (not in debt, neither in contracts, nor in obligations, nor in boundaries). Moreover, Vladimir Ilyich destroyed not the monarchy, but the Russian Democratic Republic of Kerensky's provisional government. And although even before the emergence of the Soviet Union (before the conclusion of the Union Treaty), the RSFSR, in order to solve its assigned tasks, mainly recognized the statehood of the BSSR, the Ukrainian SSR and other Soviet republics.
Today, the government of the Russian Federation is shouting in the media that Russia has lost a large amount of land associated with the collapse of the Soviet Union. In this regard, it is possible to name the fact that historians are delusional about the fact that the Soviet Union is historical Russia and this has led to the creation of various kinds of myths and legends.
In fact, connected with the collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia had no changes in relation to its borders, and today's standards of borders exactly coincide with those borders that belonged to the RSFSR. And at the same time, different opinions arise, which in the future lead to misleading readers, for example, that the Soviet Union is the Russian Empire, which is subsequently asked the same questions, so who led to the collapse of the Soviet Union?
When answering it, many of whom are already beginning to assert that anti-Russian forces are to blame for the disintegration, although in fact at that time they did not exist at all. And on the basis of the above thoughts, Laktionova, on the basis of her published articles, concludes that the "violent collapse of our country is historical Russia." And secondly, the most interesting and the most excellent is the enormous ignorance of practically all the writers who set forth their thoughts and release films on the subject of the split of the Soviet state. These authors are arguing that the agreement. Which was compiled in Belovezhskaya Pushcha is of a criminal nature, i.e. according to all canons, the rights are not legal, allegedly "illegal", and together with other authors referred to a referendum held in mid-March 1991, in which, in their opinion,a large number of voters expressed their will for the intact integrity of the Soviet Union.
Although the wording looked like this: “Do you want to live in a free and rich union state? This phrase was not very correct, since the essence of the question put to the referendum changed. In this regard, there was a version of these events that connected Kravchuk's arrival to meet with Boris Nikolaevich, in order to recognize the conducted survey among the population as invalid. This was not true. So at that moment Ukraine held its plebiscite together with the holding of the first presidential elections, in which the question of Ukraine's withdrawal from the union state was raised. And the Ukrainians, by a majority vote, including eastern Ukraine, voted to secede from the union state. At the request of Gorbachev, Kravchuk flies out to meet with Yeltsin,to regulate the conflict that has arisen on the territory of Ukraine while preserving the union state. Based on this, the CIS was created. The main reason for the collapse of the Soviet Union is the plebiscite that took place in Ukraine since early December 1991, but supporters of the collapse of the "great state" hardly remember it. This, of course, is a gross mistake - most of the authors are aware of this, while the rest simply do not know the history and do not know the topic in relation to the blebiscite of what happened in Ukraine. I note that a documentary film entitled "The End of the USSR" was shown on the Discovery TV channel (very original and far from the Conspiracy Theory), in which it was never voiced about the popular poll that took place in Ukraine at the end of 1991, which said on the secession from the Soviet state of Ukraine. From the beginning, Boris Nikolaevich assumed that the reunification of the Slavic countries and Bulgaria (they were talking about the inclusion of Bulgaria). He proposed to unite in a new form of the future, which would be called Slavic and would unite the three peoples into a union (although Yeltsin did not come to life in going to the union of the Baltic countries), this happened after Nazarbayev called him on the phone and persuaded him to be included in the union and Kazakhstan (although there is another approach to these events, in which it is said that the "conspirators" themselves proposed to include with the union after their conversation with Bush and Gorbachev).this happened after Nazarbayev called him on the phone and persuaded him to include Kazakhstan in the union (although there is another approach to these events, which says that the "conspirators" themselves proposed to include with the union after their conversation with Bush and Gorbachev).this happened after Nazarbayev called him on the phone and persuaded him to include Kazakhstan in the union (although there is another approach to these events, which says that the "conspirators" themselves proposed to include with the union after their conversation with Bush and Gorbachev).
Promotional video:
Have conferred. It would be very difficult to refuse them. And in the wake of Kazakhstan, all other southern republics pulled up, which together wanted to join the newly formed "Slavic Union". This is how the CIS was formed. Without Bulgarians and other Slavs, but with former members of the Soviet Union.
On December 26, a meeting of the House of the Council of the Republic of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR will take place, at which a decision is made on the disintegration of the Soviet Union as a state and subject according to international canons.
Now we can summarize all of the above and say that the USSR ceased to exist on December 26, 1991, and not during the signing of an agreement that took place in Belovezhskaya Pushcha.
Shloma Evgeny Arkadievich