Our civilization is developing badly - many people already understand this. But as it was accepted and introduced into mass circulation by the patriarch (of intellectual thought) Jung - (within the earthly limits), development can only be earthly and on the basis of that it is not subject to any condemnation, but is subject only to research
But who is able to propose recipes for correcting the imperfect development of society? When the constant attempts of the church (with its religion) are also imperfect in this regard, since they fail to correct human morality. What is the reason for this? Could it be that the technologies that have evolved have always been accompanied by those interested in profit? I do not presume to consider the follies of people, but it is clear that our possibilities of realization are connected with the decisions that we make. And since there are gaps - white spots in the scientific regularities already studied, does this not tell us that we do not get the facts and often make hasty conclusions? And yet, it is still possible to predict the behavior of a civilization with a sharp change in values. We must try to redirect everything to the study of alternative energy sources.
With one caveat, as long as there will be “color differentiation of pants” in society - no reset (even in relationships) for civilization should occur. But we do not need the path of revolutions, which lead to thoughts that everything needs to be “selected and divided” - it is necessary to create conditions for changing people's consciousness. And it is necessary to stop using oil and gas, which are catastrophically disappearing from the depths and affecting the ecology of the planet. Perhaps, at this stage, this is the only acceptable way to quickly change it (in moral terms). Moreover (since for a long time - from the beginning of the 20th century) there is a possibility of replacing hydrocarbons with a more environmentally friendly form of energy. And such an opportunity has appeared since the discovery of the law of energy (when a conductor moves in a magnetic field).
There are certain needs that a person cannot do without. First of all, it is electricity. And you can live and make do with a minimum, and many people of the middle and older generations would gladly change their life in a large metropolis to the "wilderness". The main thing is to provide them with electricity (without wires) which they are able to receive in any quantity. And see what happens! Some people will want to live apart - especially since the squares allow you to find a corner of nature to your liking. And they will not be afraid of the risk factor. When they are sure that in any place (wherever fate throws them) they will be provided with heat and electricity, they will provide themselves with comfort.
There will soon be transport on the water, no matter how hard corporations try to clean up these technologies (some corporations are really already trying to establish catalysts and other newfangled things). But this cannot be compared with what they - the nouveau riche will lose - power over people. Gold, diamonds, money - these are not the same values without which a person cannot live. Entertainment, yes, is the privilege of megacities, but it can be replaced with modern technology, books, the Internet, etc., etc.
It is impossible to simplify the world in which we live. Numerous cases of disappearance of ships, planes, the absence of people in our space and the subsequent promotion of their consciousness under hypnosis. And such materials about the "unidentified", according to some data, more than five million and for more than fifty years, there are clear contradictions between our knowledge and the abundant material on UFO sightings.
These devices are based on the technology that exists! After all, such devices are capable of not only instantly changing the speed and angle of attack, but also slowly changing the property of matter to move in time, thereby changing the physical structure of their starships.
Proceeding from modern fundamental scientific concepts, including the theory of relativity, no one could come to us. Too large spaces separate star systems (where intelligent life is possible). However, if we take the position of multidimensionality of space, then the UFO problem takes on a completely different character. And they have been here for a long time, but this means that our worldview concepts have not been finalized to the required stage. What is the reason for this?
With the fact that the scattered links of science have not yet reached those limits at which the knowledge already available began to work in the right direction. Yes, everything seems to be quite stable in the world of our proportions and can be verified, both with the help of formulas and with the help of logic. In fact, all our formulas are just a mirror image of laws. They do not contradict nature, but they capture only the extreme stage of the stability of matter in time. The fact is that it is very difficult for us to evaluate such patterns. Why? We are firmly attached to the surface of the planet, where our cycle of the same actions is set, which we perceive as a matter of course. If we can somehow imagine the monstrous magnitude of the cosmic distances of celestial bodies and compare them with the spatial scales of our galaxy. That other Universe, which is pressed into nuclear structures and comes into contact with us, we assimilate very, very superficially.
Using artificial measurements of duration, we often overlook the fact that we ourselves are part of a system that moves in time. And with a simplified time reporting system in our world - the duration of events in a "moment of time" (for a second, minute, year - the result of changes is taken into account, but the internal process of "events" preceding such changes is missed). Actually, the events themselves are countless and (in fact) endless for us (even in a second of time). But, nevertheless, it is in this version that a huge layer of facts is missing, which we, due to the impossibility of describing them, have been withdrawn from circulation. Incomplete data obtained due to changes, of course, carry information, but do not allow us to identify those inconsistencies that exist even in the patterns we have already (supposedly) studied. It was not wrong when, for example,Alchemists in ancient times divided the structure of matter according to its properties and determined its liquid, solid and gaseous state.
It still does not become a mistake when using mathematics to try to calculate the orbits of the planets or the motion of any material object with mass. This becomes a serious mistake when dealing with the essence of the structure of matter. We are not even able to determine those interactions that occur in the nuclear structure of a particular element. And all because the functional stability of each particle (in our world) is due to the very actions that occur (spread) in space - time. According to some researchers, the nuclear orbits of elements have speeds many times the speed of photons. This concerns, first of all, not the electrons themselves, but those particles that are closest to the proton nucleus. It is in this area that processes take place that are so difficult for us to explain. The speeds of movement of particles over the proton and neutron nuclei are so rapid that we not only fail to see the particles themselves, but also understand their purpose. The stable state of matter in space (definitely) is in direct proportion to the degree of the completed, stable cycle for each particle (time). It is another matter that such stability (in our world) is not just given to particles of the microcosm. Transformation, an accelerated procedure of changes, both physical particles and virtual ones, take place rapidly in the microcosm, and, first of all, because this comes from the initial dimensions of the particles themselves. Logically, this is how it should be - the microcosm should exceed ours in speed qualities, otherwise ours would be a "freak", and we would often notice inconsistencies (absurdities) in the moment of the present. In that moment of timedue to which we assimilate everything with the help of our senses. As before, only the next regularity of space remains revealed, but not the very action of the particles participating in this transformation.
And the transfer of energy due to the electron (as I believe) would be noticed by such global transformations, which would change the structure of matter in the proportions of our world (in such a way) that these changes would become a visual aid to catastrophic every second updates of many elements. After all, the loss (in the array of nuclear particles) of one electron from orbit entails a change in the structure of matter. Fortunately, this does not happen! Yes, ionization of the air was noticed during high-voltage discharges, we are even able to feel such changes with the help of our olfactory organs. But how big are they? Probably only enough to burn through the path of energy from nitrogen and oxygen atoms to the place where the equalization of charges takes place. Energy (let's not take kinematics - work) - what is it,In your? Charges? What are they made of? And why do they move in space? What makes them start the journey to move? Apparently, there are inconsistencies in the structure of matter. How is the fact of discrepancy recognized? Apparently due to the information present and distributed instantly. Why instantly? Because the connection has already been established and the structure of the field - the transmission of information has long existed, and does not arise anew. <> Even an unplanned change, event, self-movement in space, is displayed in the information field.and does not arise again. <> Even an unplanned change, event, self-movement in space, is displayed in the information field.and does not arise anew. <> Even an unplanned change, an event, a self-movement in space, is displayed in the information field.
Yes, there is a concept that there is an electric field, an electromagnetic, gravitational field, potential energy, kinetic energy, heat. But how to connect all these concepts and with what? Apparently with a huge variety of particles associated with these concepts. Can you name exactly what particles we are dealing with, and how does it all work in practice? Nobody can reliably answer this question, there are only assumptions, and poorly substantiated. The objective reality is that in the world of our proportions there is matter, energy, fields. And, there are examples that can be listed endlessly (for example, flares in the sun, their 12-year cyclicality - causing key moments in our history) … In the microcosm and space of the Universe (from the point of view of time), there is none of this, but there are many particles knocked down into arrays,which have certain properties, and particles moving at tremendous speeds. The transformation that can happen to them is not revealed. But it was revealed that (again - in the proportions of our world) the particles, designated by us as energy and field, are capable of transforming matter. Modern science advances only with the help of experiments, which can be verified by repeated repetition of them. But there are still structures of space, which science, with this approach, has not been able to master for a long time.which can be verified by repeating them repeatedly. But there are still structures of space, which science, with this approach, has not been able to master for a long time.which can be verified by repeating them repeatedly. But there are still structures of space, which science, with this approach, has not been able to master for a long time.
Why? She does not want to move even one step away from the directional vector, from visible reality. Meanwhile, each material particle is in contact with an ocean of smaller virtual particles. According to modern concepts (not mine, but already studied in quantum physics), all interactions are carried out in this way, the particles exchange other particles with each other, which are basically energy and field. And in our material world, matter itself creates around itself the most peculiar, multi-layered coats of virtual (must be taken into account) particles - and this is an indisputable fact. So virtuality is not my message, but the properties of particles, their ability to appear and disappear at the most unpredictable moment (as if on command). It follows from my conclusions that if the physical parameters are correctly determined,any point in space, then instantaneous movement to this point becomes possible. And those processes that occur in the nuclear structure (at the moment) cannot be submitted for consideration. Why?
Science has separated the processes of quantum mechanics from everything else, believing that it is possible to study nuclear structures in isolation. So they began to conduct experiments with individual particles, occasionally changing the configuration and set of elements. I do not quite understand the idea of the "tokomaks" and the giant "collider", in fact, they use a pattern that has long been identified (in electric motors, for example). Well, so what if their plasma rotates (after all, it is material), and any matter, even obviously not electrically conductive, can easily be made to rotate in a high-frequency field. Are they so? In my opinion, the focus is designed for simpletons in order to knock out new investments! According to the descriptions of scientists, there are already 318 types of particles (counted) and all have names. I advise you to read, (the work of Paul Davis - "Superpower") - that's where I discovered quantum virtual particles. Of course, this article is a "newfound dogma", but there is one (in my opinion) valuable quality in it, the article indicates that the world is full of virtual particles, which are many times more than observable physical ones. This is why there is no need to be introduced to Feynman mathematics. Moreover, all those processes that are described with the help of formulas are not based on what actually happens during the interaction of particles. In principle, if it was necessary to create a unified concept in quantum physics, then it would have to determine the existing identity, or, better to say, the ability to transfer between matter, energy and fields. After all, these structures form all the studied phenomena, including the particles determined by quantum physics. Many seem to be aware ofhow is the nucleus of any particle arranged? Or not? In fact (any nuclear structure) is not 2 tori (as Ukrainian scientists imagine) but a merkaba - the egg of life from sacred geometry. You can try to depict a spatial model by folding 8 balls into a sphere.
Then we see 2 torus as 6 such balls, rotating by 3 in 2 parallel planes, but in different directions. And where we see elongation (domed) - that's where there are 1 more ball. As a result, we have - 2 (regular) tetrahedrons rotating towards each other, inserted into one another. What is electino? Or maybe something else? A very complex movement takes place, and inside the tori, (as I think, the superconducting medium is the reason for this) it turns out - a perpetual motion machine in miniature. Electrons have the same mechanism. Some "meat grinders" for processing virtual particles. Scientists could not discern finer details, just as they could not understand the relationships that exist in this natural mechanism. It is clear that the frequency range of the formation of information wave structures is very high,a kind of "cornucopia" for changing smaller particles. There are poles, north and south - there is only no idea how it all works. So it turns out that this topic can only be worked out logically, and only with that set of material substances that we can observe with the naked eye.
And watching what? Is there a transformation of particles of one type into others? Yes, recently, when conducting experiments with water, the fact of obtaining elements previously absent in water was established (nature makes it possible to obtain such elements). Of course, under a certain condition, when the energy of the particles and the magnetic field is connected to the transformation process. Let us also recall the school experience with a “frame” and a permanent magnet. The impulse of energy spent on obtaining a magnet cannot be compared in any way with the one that we get as a result of rotating the frame - to receive energy (for a very, very long time). You can argue with me and say that it is we who rotate it and transform work into energy. But is it? No, the energy of space (the regularity of time) - converts the movement of a circuit in a magnetic field into electricity. I also believe that all our engines, generators (as constant,and alternating current) are already using the "effect - regularity" of the universe. It is only necessary to take the following logical steps to extract particle energies in a different wider range. And for this, at first, it is necessary (albeit mentally) to imagine at the expense of what our technical efforts we will be able to force the particles of space to "react" to such a device - a mechanism. Is it necessary to choose a key (mechanism, if you like) capable of changing the listed values and affecting their proportions? Only such a formulation of the question is able to more fully reveal the patterns we have already studied and determine the very possibilities that we have at our disposal. Of course, we are not gods to physically transform, for example, a material object (with predetermined forms) by introducing and changing its structure. This is not necessarybut if there are differences in the behavior of particles in the studied microcosm and they are determined by the proportions of energy and fields, then reincarnation is possible in the world of "our proportions". It is enough to change the energetics and fields over the material object so that (a conditional macro particle - a material object) begins to possess properties similar to neutrinos (or another virtual particle).
Thinking happens only through words. By connecting words together, we create thoughts. “You penetrate into the essence of every thing, if you truthfully name it,” Christian preachers taught. I cannot express my thought due to ignorance of the necessary words. Why is it that most physicists, and along with them and philosophers do not want to see the obvious. Well, with philosophers it is clear - this is a "freeman", which was necessary during the period of the initial settlement of the philosophical space, when each newcomer to its expanses found some separate concept for himself and independently comprehended (mastered) it. Now it has grown into something indigestible, and apparently the philosophers understand only each other? Meanwhile, philosophy (as well) and physics should have taken all the concepts of our mind, through which we comprehend this world,and bring them into a logically interrelated order.
However, this did not happen. The disunity of the concepts used, despite significant achievements in the field of applied research, establishes the fact that the understanding of the fundamental concepts of nature does not correspond to the truth and lags behind the facts. For the main part of the researchers of our world, a variant of wave, continuous action is considered. But apparently space is actually, first of all, discrete! That is why it is necessary to consider it precisely duality. There are many spaces and they are different, and each spatial area has its own material system. And depending on the amount of matter in such a sphere, an array of dimensions is formed. And the whole set of material objects, embedded in such an environment together with fields and energy, determines such a dimension! And in our world, it is already present in everything literally!- including the structures of the microcosm packed in us. Nevertheless, although space is considered as a single one, due to circumstances it is divided into spheres with different dimensions of time. That is why any luminary can be considered as the center of the universe, moreover, every planet, and even an atom. And in our world, we do not see an obvious connection between time and a material object, because everything material was already initially agreed both in terms of energy and in the arrangement of distances of nuclear structures. The changes that take place in time concern only individual nuclear elements, which are not capable of disrupting the form and the very structure of matter in the proportions of our world. Since the tension that arises in matter is mutually compensated by the equalization of charges.but due to circumstances it is divided into spheres with different dimensions of time. That is why any luminary can be considered as the center of the universe, moreover, every planet, and even an atom. And in our world, we do not see an obvious connection between time and a material object, because everything material was already initially agreed both in terms of energy and in the arrangement of distances of nuclear structures. The changes that occur in time concern only individual nuclear elements, which are not capable of disrupting the form and the very structure of matter in the proportions of our world. Since the tension that arises in matter is mutually compensated by the equalization of charges.but due to circumstances it is divided into spheres with different dimensions of time. That is why any luminary can be considered as the center of the universe, moreover, every planet, and even an atom. And in our world, we do not see an obvious connection between time and a material object, because everything material was already initially agreed both in terms of energy and in the arrangement of distances of nuclear structures. The changes that take place in time concern only individual nuclear elements, which are not capable of disrupting the form and the very structure of matter in the proportions of our world. Since the tension that arises in matter is mutually compensated by the equalization of charges. And in our world, we do not see an obvious connection between time and a material object, because everything material was already initially agreed both in terms of energy and in the arrangement of distances of nuclear structures. The changes that take place in time concern only individual nuclear elements, which are not capable of disrupting the form and the very structure of matter in the proportions of our world. Since the tension that arises in matter is mutually compensated by the equalization of charges. And in our world, we do not see an obvious connection between time and a material object, because everything material was already initially agreed both in terms of energy and in the arrangement of distances of nuclear structures. The changes that take place in time concern only individual nuclear elements, which are not capable of disrupting the form and the very structure of matter in the proportions of our world. Since the tension that arises in matter is mutually compensated by the equalization of charges.what arises in matter - is mutually compensated by equalization of charges.what arises in matter - is mutually compensated by equalization of charges.
But, if you create conditions that violate the proportions, then you will feel the full power of time! Why is it so difficult for us to understand all this? Due to the fact that we add views from elements taken from different weight categories. The presence of a physical vacuum field does not make this problem clearer. Since the reasons for its interaction with matter have not been established. And science at this stage is not able to understand the mechanism of nuclear interactions, due to the fact that the velocity properties of particles significantly exceed our capabilities (which we have). Apparently, in order to rethink the very foundations of scientific, it is necessary to create a precedent - to build a specific device with the help of which energy will begin to flow in a stream (in unlimited quantities). Moreover, space itself supplies any matter with all that energy,what it needs for movement in space - time. However, even with this approach, without explaining the essence of what is happening, it is still necessary to collect information, to comprehend it taking into account the preliminary (available in the mind) options and then draw conclusions. It is also clear that such simplified concepts of energy, field, matter arose among researchers who were not burdened with the task of understanding all of this thoroughly.
Many scientists are still convinced that absolutely everything can be explained in terms of the established laws of our physical world. And still there are many simple questions, which in terms of posing are undoubtedly appropriate, but no one living on this planet is able to answer “in the affirmative” and correctly, to any of them. It can even be argued that the electronic theory of electricity and specifically electric current is simply not true, and those postulates on which science still relies, in fact, carry a different meaning.
After all, the approach has always been practical without much pressure on the structures that have always been there. Of course, it is difficult to argue with the law of conservation of energy, but the law itself, like its famous formula, E = mC2 is only partially true. Since it only works in the world of our proportions. In the microcosm, the opposite is true - the less material, the greater the charge of energy particles can carry in their core. From the theorem of Emma Noether it follows that the law of conservation of energy is a consequence of the homogeneity of time. And if you in any way introduce the non-uniformity of the course of time, then - here is either a source or sink of energy. But if everything - there is a movement of electricity, particles - is it not a factor in the inhomogeneity of the course of time in separate areas of space?This argument allows us to speak about the discreteness of individual arrays of particles in a common space. And the direction of movement of the energy itself is determined from the time of creation of the particles. Time inconsistencies in the created particles of matter (by the space itself) determine whether a particle of matter needs additional energy.