The evidence suggests that the moon is not what we think it is.
The Facts: In 1962, Gordon MacDonald, a NASA scientist, published an article saying that the moon looked like it was hollow. Sean C. Solomon of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology confirmed this claim, citing knowledge of the moon's gravitational field as evidence.
Reflection: What do we really know about the moon? Why is there always so much evidence that challenges basic truths about various things? Are we really aware of the truth of the world around us?
The controversy has surrounded the Moon for a very long time … we have had leaks, research and information from some very reliable sources that have conveyed to the public for decades that our Moon is not what we think, and that there is even some kind of extraterrestrial presence on To the moon.
One example is the testimony of Colonel Ross Dedrickson, who was in charge of keeping the inventory of nuclear weapons for the United States, he worked for a long time in the US Atomic Energy Commission, you can see his obituary here.
Shortly before his death, he told the world that the United States was trying to detonate atomic weapons on the moon for scientific purposes, measurements and whatnot, and that this project was stopped by aliens who would not allow us to detonate any nuclear weapons in space. Those were interesting comments because he is one of hundreds of high-ranking military officials who have alluded to such things, and we also have a declassified report from the Air Force Nuclear Weapons Center from June 1959 that shows how seriously they took a plan called Project A119.
Then we have remote viewers from the STARGATE program who have “seen” strange structures and humanoid beings on the moon, such as Ingo Swann (from his book called Infiltration). He was not the only one from the program who knew this. I personally had interviews with Dr. Paul Smith, a retired veteran who spent a decade on this program. He also told me that something strange is happening on the moon. Many of this program spoke very frankly about the extraterrestrial presence.
Promotional video:
You can read more about the remote viewer here. We have published many articles about this.
Several insiders have also talked about strange structures on the moon, and it has become so obvious that some academics are trying their best to draw attention to it. For example, in a recently published article in the Journal of Space Exploration about some of the features on the far side of the moon that appear in the crater Paracelsus C., entitled "Image Analysis of Unusual Structures on the Far Side of the Moon in Crater Paracelsus C." that these features may be of artificial origin, that is, someone other than humans built them and placed them there.
It's Not Just The Moon, University of Tennessee Space Institute physicist Dr Horace Crater recently published an article in the Journal of Space Exploration that, along with NASA Viking images, openly alludes to "highly artificial surface interference."
The list is long, and the idea that someone else is on the moon is nothing new. Even the deputy chief of Clementine's mission to the moon in 1995 said it was indeed a photographic reconnaissance mission to check structures on the far side of the moon that had not been placed there by humans …
But this article is not about what is on the moon, but about what the moon is.
It should also be noted that the United States has been criticized by Russia for hiding artifacts collected from the moon.
I thought it was important to provide this brief overview before we get into this topic.
You can read the articles below in more detail before:
Dr. Steven Greer: “We did go to the moon, but the movie footage was Fake.”
Another interesting leak: "Already the second NASA scientist tells us that 'someone else' is on the Moon."
Neil Armstrong and his team encountered aliens on the moon.
What is the Moon?
Perhaps the strangest of all the anomalies are the numerous indications that the moon may be hollow. Studies of lunar rocks show that the lunar shell differs from the Earth's mantle in many voids and has either a very small core or does not have it at all. A 1962 study found that the interior of the moon was less dense than the exterior.”- Jim Mars in his book Our Occulted History.
Is the Moon Hollow? Many intellectual minds seem to think so, but despite what they actually say, these theories are still considered unconventional for mainstream science, which loves to promote its own theories and teach them as fact.
Perhaps the reason the United States did not reveal its artifacts from the Moon, including all the rocks, is precisely because, from what we have, studies of lunar rocks have shown that the inner part of the Moon is very different from the officially announced version of its structure.
In 1962, Gordon MacDonald, a NASA scientist, published a study that said, "Indeed, the Moon looks more like a hollow than a homogeneous sphere."
According to Sean C. Solomon of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, "The lunar orbiter experiments have greatly improved our knowledge of the moon's gravitational field … pointing to the daunting possibility that the moon could be hollow."
The most striking proof that the moon could be hollow came on November 20, 1969, when the Apollo-12 crew returned to their command ship and sent a lunar module (LM) crashing into the moon, creating an artificial earthquake for the moon. The LM struck the surface about forty miles from the Apollo 12 landing site, where ultrasensitive seismic equipment recorded something unexpected and startling - the moon rang like a bell for over an hour. Frank Press of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology stated: “… none of us have seen anything like this on Earth. In our experience, this is a rather unusual event. That this small collision … gave a signal that lasted 30 minutes is beyond our comprehension.”
How did the moon end up where it is?
The mainstream theory tells us that yes, the Moon may have originated elsewhere and at some point entered our planet's orbit. They also say that it could have been formed from debris after a space object crashed into Earth. Another theory claims that the Earth took over the Moon as it wandered around the solar system …
Despite the fact that our modern theories are accepted as fact, there is absolutely no evidence for the generally accepted hypothesis. According to Isaac Asimov, an American writer:
It is too big to be captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture and launching it into an almost circular orbit around our Earth are too small to make such a possibility reliable.
Asimov also stressed that:
We cannot help but conclude that the Moon should not actually be there. The fact that this is still the case is one of those too fortunate cases to accept.
Other members of the Soviet Academy of Sciences (Vasin and Shcherbakov, 1970), led by the Russian Government, published an article entitled "Is the Moon an Alien Intelligence Creation?" This article offered a different explanation for how the moon could have been created. This seems to be the best hypothesis, because in fact there is a significant amount of evidence that something suspicious is happening on the moon.
It's easier to explain the moon's nonexistence than its existence - NASA scientist Robin Brett.
The best explanation for the Moon is observational error - the Moon does not exist - Irwin Shapiro, Harvard Astrophysicist.
Think about it …
Did the Sumerians know something?
Much on this topic is indeed found in ancient Greek and ancient Sumerian lore. For example, astronaut Al Worden, who made some very interesting comments about the Sumerians as well as extraterrestrial life in a live interview that you can watch here.
In the late 1960s, a senior fellow at the Institute of Planetology, William Kenneth Harmann, claimed that the Moon was the result of a collision of the Earth with another body, at least the size of Mars. This became known in the Big Whack theory, and it correlated with the story told in the ancient Sumerian tablets …
According to several interpretations of the Sumerian tablets, in particular from Zacharia Sitchin, more than 4 billion years ago, a large Water World called Tiamat was in orbit between Mars and Jupiter. Nibiru, a planet that allegedly enters our solar system once every 3600 years, caused Tiamat to crack under gravitational stress. Tiamat was split in half when one of the moons of Nibiru crashed into it, which also knocked off most of Mars.
This is very interesting because scientists recently confirmed that Mars was a very watery world, like the planet Earth. There is even ample evidence of ancient life on Mars up to what appears to be dramatic climate change. Scientists speculate that climate change was the result of a large collision … and most of Tiamat became planet Earth.
So it's interesting to make this connection.
Back to the moon
It is important to remember that something must have placed the Moon on or near its current circular orbit around the Earth. In the Apollo example, the Moon had to be given a certain required speed for its weight, a certain distance to the Earth to remain in orbit - and this is rarely noted when considering the origin of the Moon - the main thing is that it is extremely unlikely that any the object will simply stumble upon the right combination of factors required to stay in orbit. “Something” was supposed to put the moon at its height, on its course and at its speed. The question is, "what was that?" - Jim Mars
It is hard to believe that the exact and constant orbit of the Moon is just a coincidence …
Is it also a coincidence that the Moon is at the correct distance from Earth to completely cover the Sun during an eclipse? While the Moon is only 2,160 miles in diameter against the Sun's gigantic 864,000 miles, it is nevertheless in the correct position to block everything but the Sun's flaming corona as it moves between the Sun and Earth. - Jim Mars
According to Asimov:
There is no astronomical reason why the Moon and Sun should fit so well. This is the best of coincidence, and only the Earth among all the planets is blessed in this way.
With all the evidence that surfaced showing an extraterrestrial presence on the Moon, for me the spacecraft theory proposed by Mikhail Vasin and Alexander Shcherbakov (mentioned above) makes the most sense.
In the words of Jim Mars:
The spaceship-moon theory may prove truer than any other in reconciling the contradictions inherent in the origin and amazing orbit of the moon. However, such consideration should be outside the discussion of formal scientific and rational people. The circular logic of traditional science regarding the origin of the moon works like this: we know that aliens do not exist, but we know that the moon exists and has been mentioned throughout human history. We humans did not create it or place it in orbit around the Earth, it must have been done by aliens. But since we know they don't exist, we'll just call it an anomaly and won't talk about it publicly.