When we say, “I am in this world,” what does that really mean? After all, we are, as it were, inside ourselves, as in a certain limited space. A person has 5 senses, "sensors": hearing, sight, smell, touch, taste. What a person feels inside himself through these 5 receptors, as if summing up the result, passing through the program and subprograms that are embedded in every living being, and recreates the picture of the surrounding world, let's call it “my world”.
Let us pose a simple question: is what we project into ourselves really the very thing that is outside of us? Even from laboratory experiments on animals that are close to us in structure, we are surprised to make sure that, apparently, we do not feel the real, true picture of the world around us, the "external" world. For example, a wasp or a cat feels it in a completely different way.
If, as a result of some hypothetical restructuring, the subroutines that control our senses changed, we would perceive the external world in a completely different way than now. A simple example - a person's eardrum is injured and stops functioning, and it begins to seem to this person that there is no sound at all. But is it really, or does he just feel that way? The answer is obvious - because he feels that way.
Human nature and physiological nature is internal nature, with its own internal laws, and external nature can be fundamentally different, but we can hardly understand how different, because we can hardly go beyond our senses, our subprograms that control and process them. information in a digestible form for us, but does not mean that in a true form, which is real and corresponds to the external order of things. Therefore, we will never be able to fully experience the external world that exists around us, since we perceive secondary reactions to the external environment and objects that affect our senses, but not ourselves.
It probably sounds strange, but nevertheless it is so: one should not talk about comprehending the world around us, but one should talk about comprehending our reactions to something that affects us from the outside. Apparently, it is generally difficult to talk about what the external world represents, the world in which we all exist. That is, we get certain impressions, sensations, only due to the fact that this is how we are “designed”. And if our senses, their priorities, the breadth of perception, or other senses that are not known to us, would appear in us, then our impression of the world around us would be completely different, unlike what we feel now.
Proceeding from this, can we, by some incomprehensible method, define or understand what the world around us really is, or even this version of the question: is there something outside of ourselves? If so, then nature, the entire environment, the universe in the end, ourselves or others - is it just an illusion? It is a pity that it is impossible to answer this question, guided by the very five senses that are present in us.
At the present moment in history, scientists have already faced the limited approaches to studying natural phenomena and relationships. This is very clearly seen in quantum physics, where we especially often encounter special, paradoxical phenomena. In earlier times, for example Newton, it was believed that the world is as we see it, human perception was considered a sufficient measure and scale for understanding nature. It was believed that there is a person - an observer, and what he observes is in front of him in the form in which he perceives everything. People live, die, but the picture of the world remains constant, that is, constant. The whole picture of the surrounding world naturally or otherwise changes by itself, due to the fact that the universe is developing and man cannot influence this permanent picture. This method for understanding the role of science was seen as correct and the only possible one - to Newton.
But later, other, more adequate and modern views of this connection appear - human perception and the external order of things in the world. There is a person who observes this world, but the picture that appears to him is not the same … It is the sum of the physiological properties of a person and the properties of what he is observing at the moment. Humanity has come to understand this relationship as a result of centuries of studying ourselves. Humanity began to study its physiology and saw that depending on our abilities, sense organs, on their expansion and increase in accuracy with instruments, we now see a completely different picture than we would have seen it before, for example, in the time of Newton. This means that we not only objectively observe some aspects of the world, but also participate in the process of observing it. This method is close to the methods and point of view of the famous modern scientist Hugh Everett.
Promotional video:
In the present period of time, we are approaching the presentation of a picture of the world, a completely different, radically different representation. There is a person who feels something inside himself - a cast, a reflection, as it were, of the external world. But what exactly? He feels a vast and evenly distributed field, he is in this field, and everything else, that is, images, ideas about the external and internal world are formed within each individual person and often these ideas are formed according to very different scenarios, depending on the development of each individual individual, from its specific features. There are worlds inside each person, and outside of him there is nothing. Absurd?! Many researchers in the field of quantum physics are beginning to agree on this concept, and the mainstream, natural sciences are already coming close to this view.
The degree to which a person comprehends the world has a huge impact on how he tries to define the world in which he exists. Until he reaches such a completely new level of comprehension that he will understand: everything depends only on his inner characteristics, personality traits of each.
We can feel and perceive the world as it could well be, for example, bringing only joy and pleasure. We wish all our readers to be convinced of this for themselves, to carry out individual work, to reshape, to change the worldview as such!