For a long time, there have been disputes about who our ancestors were and debates on this topic still do not subside in the vast information space. Some say that they were Scythians, others were Aryans, and still others were Rus. In fact, if we talk about the majority of the peoples of the peoples of modern Russia, then it is so. But in relation to the "state-forming" Russian people, it turned out to be not so simple, even in relation to the ancestors of the main haplogroup R1A1. Although for a long time the confusion in the minds was supported by many scientists who themselves did not fully understand this issue. Thus, in many of his earlier publications, Professor A. Klesov argued that the Rus, Aryans and Scythians are essentially the same people.
However, later he changed his mind by telling completely new information on the Day TV channel about these undoubtedly closely related peoples who have common ancestors of the happlogroup R1A1. In the video of this channel from 20.05.2017 under the title “Professor Klesov 'Russians through the Millenniums'” he tells us about this.
About 5.5 thousand years ago, on the Russian Plain, the common ancestors of the R1A1 haplogroup were divided into northern (Rus) and southern (Aryans or Indo-Europeans). The ancestors of modern ethnic Russians from the Russian Plain with the Z645 mark came from the northern ones, and the Z93 mark went from the southern ones. And the latter are the ancestors of modern Tatars, Bashkirs, Karachay-Balkars, Chuvashes. But both of these labels come from the common ancestors of the R1A1 haplogroup.
Now, what does he say there about the "Scythians"? He geographically relates them to Altai and says that both haplogroups Z93 and Z645 were also present in their genotype. But at the same time he says that these Siberian Scythians are not the ancestors of modern Russians from the Russian Plain. So, apparently, they were the ancestors of the Siberian Rus or Chaldons (Z93). And by this speech, he indirectly confirms the existence of this people in Siberia, almost completely destroyed in the past centuries, first by the masters of the Vatican, and then by their servants - the Romanovs, who were developing Siberia after the cataclysm that destroyed almost all of its cities.
I think that in fact in Siberia in ancient times there was exactly the same division of these Altai "Scythians" into northern and southern ones as in the Russian Plain. And the northern ones with the Z645 mark, like our direct ancestors from the Russian Plain, are the Siberian Rus - Chaldons. But the Kirghiz descended from the southern ones with the Z93 label. And their ancestors, in fact, are the real "Scythians". Only in those days, the people of both haplogroups practically did not differ in appearance. They were fair-haired and fair-eyed Caucasians. Only the Rus were agriculturalists, led a sedentary lifestyle and built cities, and the "Scythians" were nomadic livestock breeders. Both related cultures actively interacted and exchanged products of production, which was beneficial to both of them.
To be more precise, the Scythians (Z93) lived in the steppes of Southern Siberia and in the steppes of the south of the Russian Plain. And the Rus both in Siberia and on the Russian Plain lived where the forest zone began and further to the northernmost coast of the ocean. Why didn't A. Klesov think of this? I think I figured it out. But he will never openly say about it, because this is a "forbidden topic", because of which the Vatican started the whole total project of falsification of history. And if he tells about it, then he will not have long to live. It is no coincidence that the Vatican expressed extreme displeasure even regarding the discovery and study of the megaliths of Mountain Shoria. After all, we must believe in the pseudo-historical myths of the falsifiers of history aboutthat allegedly Siberia has always been a "wild and sparsely populated" territory, and did not become so just a few centuries ago because of the Flood that came from the Arctic Ocean.
Why do we need to believe this? But if the historical truth is revealed, then everyone will know that the Russians lived not only on the Russian Plain, but also in the north of Siberia and in its middle - taiga zone, along the entire Northern Sea Route and up to Vladivostok itself, and were an autochthonous population there. This, incidentally, explains why there are ancient Russian settlements near Vladivostok, and old Russian boats rest at the bottom of the bay. By the way, there are ancient Russian settlements of "Krivichi" even in Alaska. But historians-Russophobes carefully hide this information from us. Because then their whole false myth about the Russians as about the evil conquerors who "took" Siberia away from its "indigenous peoples" collapses. It must be understood that this myth has been formed over the centuries in order toto justify the seizure or separatist alienation of Siberia from Russia by a parasitic Western civilization led by the United States and Britain.
Promotional video:
But in fact, the historical truth is that it was the Siberian Rus that were this "indigenous people of Siberia", just as the Russians from the Russian Plain were the indigenous people of the Russian Plain. But, many other peoples came to these places later than them and were taught by them the skills of agriculture (Russian Plain), as well as hunting and fishing (Siberia). This is what A. Klesov was afraid to tell openly as a professor at an American university. But all the same, thanks to him for bringing to interesting conclusions, which very well explain all this confusion in the minds about the "Scythians, Aryans and Rus."
