Our father … Genghis Khan! or real facts about our ancestors
1. Introduction …
Almost all of you, readers, have knowledge about Genghis Khan - from the school / college history course. That's just almost everything described about Genghis Khan in numerous books of the XIX-XX centuries and filmed in films - lies and inventions, but due to repetition, alas, they have become almost reality. The lie that Genghis Khan is a bloodthirsty Mongol khan of the Mongolian steppe empire, obsessed with a thirst for conquest, is repeated in pro-Western textbooks, films and literature so often that most people do not even think to ask - what are these conclusions based on? Where is the proof? Below are the facts of history, clearly showing that textbooks-TV - lie, lie and lie. That there are many historical facts that indicate the exact opposite of fantasies and lies. After all, the counterfeiters did not succeed in hiding and destroying all-all artifacts. You are welcome,while reading this text, try to forget the lies of the West, which were hammered into you at school and college. For this lie has no evidence. It is very important to find the truth of real facts among the imposed sea of falsifications, as well as to catch a centuries-old lie. These falsifications are not accidental, they are a large-scale system of distortion of the facts of the past organized by the West. Study the facts ladies and gentlemen, as they say - "teach materiel."
2. Education and two different stories …
The destroyed Soviet education today has been recognized by UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) one of the best in the world. Let me remind you that this is the UN agency for education, science and culture. Both in 1953 and in 1990 - see the graph. The index is compiled on the basis of adult literacy and the cumulative share of students from kindergarten to postgraduate education in the country as a whole, so someone's personal concepts do not affect at all. Our education was recognized even by Americans, for example, President John F. Kennedy (1917-1963) in his speech of January 29, 1963 ("Special Message to Congress on Education") said about us: "This nation's passion for education is certainly enough to surpass the achievements of any other nation. … ". But even in Soviet times, there were only a couple of lines about Genghis Khan in textbooks. Today the situation with history has become worse, much worse. Through the efforts of the American special services, a belt of hatred is being formed around Russia. Of course, through the falsification of history and ideas of exclusivity. As well as attributing to oneself an ancient pedigree, sucking it out of the thumb. Everyone knows about Ukrainian textbooks with 140 thousand years of great ukrov (for example, see Roman Lyakh's 2005 textbook). But the same thing is happening throughout the post-Soviet territory. Great Turks, etc. Nowadays information about Chinggisids is either a lie from history textbooks, or - a lot of delusional fantasies and sheer nonsense on the Internet. Publicist and writer Nikolai Viktorovich Starikov (1970) not in vain writes that "today's history textbooks are written with grants from Soros and the United States." Plus discussion of Internet nonsense by ignoramuses (bots of the "new generation"). The funny thing iswhen some Mitrofanushki send other Mitrofanushki to read school textbooks.
Unfortunately, very little truthful information can now be found about the Mughals. This is not a misprint - specifically Moguls see - an engraving by the French cartographer and engineer Male (Allain Manesson Mallet, 1630-1706), which clearly says "Mogols" and Caucasian appearance. I repeat once again - the Mughals, not the Mongols or Mongol-Tatars invented by the Germans of the 18th century. However, "gentlemen from history" everywhere repeat about serious research of this era. That, against the background of the Soviet government's ban on research on the Golden Horde and massive falsifications, sounds like a mockery.
Promotional video:
In the last centuries of the Russian Empire, society has always had two different stories. The first is the official German-Romanov lie, the second is the "Slavophil" noble-philosophical trends. The authors of the first, deceitful one are the Germans Gerhard Friedrich Miller (1705-1783), Gottlieb Siegfried Bayer (1694-1738), August Ludwig Schlözer (1735-1809). It is the Germans, it is the Western interpretation of history that is in the textbooks today. Many already know that the German version is falsified, tendentious and is silent on many historical facts. Here are just three quotes from famous people: English writer Samuel Butler (1835-1902): "God cannot change the past, but historians can", Irish playwright George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950): "History, sir, lies, as always", the founder of scientific communism Karl Marx (1856-1950): “That,what we consider to be history is just tales told by the winners."
On the other hand, there are Russian noble currents of the 18th-19th centuries and real history. There were until the 1917 revolution, the latter disappeared until the end of the 20s. The image above is the largest Russian geographer and philosopher, one of the founders of Eurasianism, an emigrant Peter Nikolaevich Savitsky (1895-1968). The phrase in the title of the lecture - Savitsky, literally: "You are our father, Genghis Khan!" And the Russian nobles have always had such views. Let me remind you of the movement of active "Slavophiles", which took shape in the 30-40s of the XIX century. These are such celebrities as the philosopher and poet Alexei Stepanovich Khomyakov (1804-1860), the philosopher and publicist Ivan Vasilievich Kireevsky (1806-1856), the historian and linguist Konstantin Sergeevich Aksakov (1817-1860), the poet and influential publicist Ivan Sergeevich Aksakov (1823- 1886), publicist and philosopher Yuri Fedorovich Samarin (1819-1876),publicist Alexander Ivanovich Koshelev (1806-1883). They defended our real history in such a way that Aksakov was even called "the defender of the Russian land." But there were even much more moderate Slavophiles, who, trying to hide today, are divided into groups by the name of the leader or just by name (like “Pochvenniki”). This is the giant of Russian thought, philosopher Konstantin Nikolaevich Leontiev (1831-1891), sociologist Nikolai Yakovlevich Danilevsky (1822-1885), philosopher Nikolai Nikolaevich Strakhov (1828-1896), poet Apollon Alexandrovich Grigoriev (1822-1864), Russian writer and philosopher Fyodor Mikhailovich Dostoevsky (1821-1881). Among the famous Slavophiles were the poet Fedor Ivanovich Tyutchev (1803-1873), the folklorist Alexander Fedorovich Gilferding (1831-1872), the ethnographer and lexicographer Vladimir Ivanovich Dal (1801-1872), the poet Nikolai Mikhailovich Yazykov (1803-1847).
We look even earlier - the XVIII century. Our great Mikhail Vasilyevich Lomonosov (1711-1765) never hid his Slavophil views and fought all his life with the Germans and their lies. Known hero of the war of 1812, hussar, Russian poet Denis Vasilyevich Davydov (1784-1839). Even young people are known for Davydov - at least from the Soviet film "Squadron of flying hussars" in 1980. But few people know Davydov's poems "To Count P. A. Stroganov for chekmen" in 1810 - see below:
3. Eastern Scythians …
Now let's move on to the history of the emergence of the Mughal tribes, or more correctly - the Moals, Moguls. To understand the falsifications, we will start from the distant antiquity - from the Scythians, our distant ancestors. Precisely falsifications, since the German Gerhard Miller (1705-1783) repeated many times “Siberia does not eat the land of history” (in disputes with Lomonosov), and many of our modern historians sacredly honor the German precepts.
The father of history, the Greek Herodotus (~ 484-425 BC) wrote: "The common name of all of them (Scythians) is chipped … the Greeks call them Scythians." The Scythians were also called Saks - that's what the Persians called us. It is chipped off from the ancient Slavic "kolo" - a circle. This is the cult of the Sun, the round Sun. The stamps of the West for all the tribes of Eurasia are the same. The official false story to please the West says: the Scythians are wild nomads who do not know cities and urban culture. It's a lie. But the dirtiest and cynical lie of textbooks "named after Soros's money" that the Scythians never had their own state, they say, they lived only on the northern coast of the Black Sea and did not have a written language. These are the three main falsifications.
The first Russian historian Vasily Tatishchev (1686-1750) directly led the genealogy of the Slavs (and therefore the Russians) from the Scythians, while the area of their settlement spread far to the North and Siberia, calling our distant northern ancestors - Hyperborean Scythians. The great Mikhail Lomonosov wrote, quote: among the "ancient ancestors of the present Russian people … the Scythians are not the last part." The great Russian poet Alexander Pushkin constantly used to say: “We are Scythians” … In Alexander Blok (in “Scythians”) it is no less expressive: “Yes, we are Scythians! Yes, Asians - we, / With slanted and greedy eyes! ". The Scythians are our great-grandfathers. But let's take a look at the three falsifications of the 5th column, which are important for the logical chain.
The first is their own state … Even according to the official false history, the statehood of the Scythians (with us!) Was 12 twelve centuries, 1200 years: from the VIII century BC. to the 4th century AD, but even this is distorted. The real statehood of the Scythians is forty (40!) Centuries, 4,000 years, of which 30 centuries the Scythians ruled in Eurasia: 15 centuries at the Black Sea-Don-Volga, and earlier in the east - another 15 centuries. The second 15 centuries, this is the XVI-II century BC. According to the ancient Greek historian Herodotus, the beginning of the reign of the first Scythian kings falls on 1500 BC. And the first 15 centuries: XXXVI-XXI centuries BC - wrote the Roman historian of the 1st century Gnei Pompey Trogus (Pompeius Trogus, 1st century BC - 1st century AD) “Asia paid them tribute to the Scythians for 1500 years; the end of payment was put by the Assyrian king Nin”). The same is with the Christian historian Orosius. Well, why liethat the Scythians did not have their own state? It's just that ancient historians are objective, while modern liars replace science with pro-Western groveling.
The second lie is where the Scythians lived … Repeating the West, our 5th column under the territory of the Scythians understands only the steppes from the Dnieper to the Sea of Azov, including the steppe Crimea. But this is only part of the lands of the Scythians, these are the Western (European) Scythians. After all, there are works by a member of the Geographical Society of the Russian Academy of Sciences Ivan Evseevich Koltsov (1926-2012), who divided the Scythians into 23 peoples. I draw your attention to the territory of Siberia - see the basin of the Ob, Irtysh, Yenisei rivers; to the east - lands to Lake Baikal, to the south - beyond Lake Balkhash, to the north - to the coast of the Kara Sea, and then the Scythian Ocean. The entire center of Eurasia. Here are the places of residence of 10 peoples of the eastern Scythians: at the mouth, to the west of the Ob, near the Ural mountains, lived the "breakaway Scythians", not far from the modern Salekhard - the "Argippae", in the mountains of the coast of the "Issedona" (now the Pai-Khoi ridge). To the south, opposite Khanty-Mansiysk - the ancestors of the Kalmyks,not far from Novosibirsk - "Massagets", east of Tomsk - "royal Scythians", at the mouth of the Angara in the Yenisei lived "Scythians of the Yenisei", not far from Norilsk - "Arimasps", on Taimyr - "Hyperborea" and finally in the upper reaches of the Indigirka "Scythians of Indigir" …
The third lie - the Scythians had no written language … This is a very blatant lie. King of the Scythians back in 513 BC. called Darius to fight with an abusive letter. I will dwell on writing in more detail … According to the Western lie, the beginning of writing is the Phoenician Cadmus, who brought the alphabet to Greece, and then it went all over the world. They say that the Greek alphabet came from the Phoenician, Latin from Greek, runic from Latin … But the first alphabets "originate" from each other - they cannot, they are fundamentally different. This is a cynical deception, please take this noodle off your ears. The theory of the origin of Greek writing from Phoenician is based only (!) On one legend - about Cadmus. But the Phoenician writing is cuneiform. What, the cuneiform alphabet ?! You know, this is for a psychiatrist. Such a gross lie, but repeated everywhere. Going deeper along the chain - the hypothesis about the origin of the Phoenician alphabet from the ancient Sinai script - is nonsense. Wedb Sinai script - hieroglyphs and there is no similarity between Sinai and Phoenician characters. And in general, the principle of alphabetic, alphanumeric writing was alien to the Middle East. The Egyptians used hieroglyphs (ideographic rebus writing). Cadmus could not in any way "teach the Hellenes" the alphabet, all this is a lie.
But if you look at the primary sources, it turns out - in Greek myths, not one, but three (!) Versions of the origin of writing. The very first - the Phoenician Cadmus - is an official lie. The second version is the titan Prometheus, he not only stole fire for people, but taught people to write. It seems to be a myth, but the ancient Greek historian Herodotus of Heracles (~ 484-425 BC) wrote that the legendary Prometheus is a real historical person, that he was a Scythian king about 3,600 years ago. The kingdom of Prometheus stretched on both sides of the Ural (Ural!) Mountains from the Pechora River to the Ob (Istr) and from the Chusovaya River to the North Sea. And by the way, the patron saint of people Prometheus was chained in the mountains of the Scythian Caucasus. But there is a third version of the appearance of writing, the most real one is the sage Palamed, a participant in the Trojan War. Legends attributed to him the introduction of Greek measures of weight, length,time, calendar design. Lived Palamed in the XIII century BC. In the Villa Carlotta museum there is a sculpture of Palameda by the Venetian Antonio Canova (1757-1822). But something and false textbooks, and TV are stubbornly silent about Palamed. And they are silent because Palamed comprehended his wisdom (drum roll!) In the north, since he was a student of the centaur Chiron. A very wise centaur, because the same Chiron taught the art of healing to the god Asclepius and was the educator of Achilles. The Greeks / Achaeans themselves did not know horseback riding at that time, and the legends combined the horse and the rider into one whole. Centaur - i.e. rider. And in the north of the horsemen lived only the wise Scythians, our ancestors. Wise, for example, according to Ephor of Kim (405-330 BC, ancient Greek historian, student of Isocrates), the Scythian Anacharsis-Scythian was numbered among the seven wise men. The Scythians used the Aryan alphabet - after all, the Aryan peoples of Asia and the Turkic peoples in contact with them used only alphabets. I repeat: Palamed was taught by the centaur Chiron - the Scythian Chiron. The signs of the ancient alphabet of the Aryans are very similar to the Phoenician cuneiform, and to the ancient Slavic runes, and to the ancient Indian letter "brahmi". The alphabet came from our north! By the way, many runes-letters look like stylized trees and shrubs - after all, it was a secret Vedic alphabet (in its entirety, this is a priestly calendar) - the plant belonging to this letter (and used in rituals and ceremonies) was the plant of this month. And the Phoenician sailors simply accidentally learned the principle of letter-sound writing and, not understanding its sacred meaning, smashed it like magpies. Palamed was taught by the centaur Chiron - the Scythian Chiron. The signs of the ancient alphabet of the Aryans are very similar to the Phoenician cuneiform, and to the ancient Slavic runes, and to the ancient Indian letter "brahmi". The alphabet came from our north! By the way, many runes-letters look like stylized trees and shrubs - after all, it was a secret Vedic alphabet (in its entirety, this is a priestly calendar) - the plant belonging to this letter (and used in rituals and ceremonies) was the plant of this month. And the Phoenician sailors simply accidentally learned the principle of letter-sound writing and, not understanding its sacred meaning, smashed it like magpies. Palamed was taught by the centaur Chiron - the Scythian Chiron. The signs of the ancient alphabet of the Aryans are very similar to the Phoenician cuneiform, and to the ancient Slavic runes, and to the ancient Indian letter "brahmi". The alphabet came from our north! By the way, many runes-letters look like stylized trees and shrubs - after all, it was a secret Vedic alphabet (in its entirety, this is a priestly calendar) - the plant belonging to this letter (and used in rituals and ceremonies) was the plant of this month. And the Phoenician sailors simply accidentally learned the principle of letter-sound writing and, not understanding its sacred meaning, smashed it like magpies.many runes-letters look like stylized trees and shrubs - after all, it was a secret Vedic alphabet (in its entirety it is a priestly calendar) - the plant belonging to this letter (and used in rituals and ceremonies) was the plant of this month. And the Phoenician sailors simply accidentally learned the principle of letter-sound writing and, not understanding its sacred meaning, smashed it like magpies.many runes-letters look like stylized trees and shrubs - after all, it was a secret Vedic alphabet (in its entirety it is a priestly calendar) - the plant belonging to this letter (and used in rituals and ceremonies) was the plant of this month. And the Phoenician sailors simply accidentally learned the principle of letter-sound writing and, not understanding its sacred meaning, smashed it like magpies.
So, in Siberia there were Scythian states that ruled Eurasia for tens of centuries. Scythians who spread writing. By the way, I will give you one more hidden fact: in 1860 the book FRGrahame was published with the wonderful title "The Archer and the Steppe, or the Scythian Empire: the History of Russia and Tartaria, from the earliest time to the fall of the Mogul power in Europe, in the middle of the sixteenth century." And in it the author gives a definition of Tartary - "Tartary, or Asian Scythia".
4. Dinlins …
In addition to the Scythians, I would like to draw your attention to the Dinlin tribes, our "mysterious" Siberian ancestors. You will NOT be told about them either in textbooks or in films. Officially, the Dinlins were first mentioned in the Chinese description of the conquests of the Xiongnu Shanyu Mode around 202 BC, and the question of silence was raised by the Russian geographer and traveler Grigory Efimovich Grumm-Grzhimailo (1860-1936, see photo above) in "Western Mongolia and the Uryanhai Territory" … For which he was accused of racism. Even the Soviet paleoanthropologist Georgy Frantsevich Debets (1905-1969, see the photo above) discovered that, according to all physical characteristics, the Dinlins belonged to the same blond Caucasian race, which is considered the first (primitive) race in Europe by anthropologists. It is important that the Dinlins did not have a direct connection in the centuries of our era with the Europeans, and the branches of the tribes moved away from each other in the Paleolithic. They were the most eastern people of the Indo-European ethnogenetic field, who came from the Urals. In terms of the official pulling of one people into "different" archaeological cultures, the Dinlins are correlated with "Andronovskaya" (this is the 3rd-2nd millennium BC), "Afanasievskaya" (this is the 3rd-2nd millennium BC) and "Okunevskaya "(This is the II millennium BC)," Tagar "(this is VIII-III centuries BC) cultures. These tribes are familiar to us under the names Dinlins, Di, Dis, Chi-Di, Red Di, White Di, Northern Boma, Alachin, Bikin."Tagar" (this is VIII-III centuries BC) cultures These tribes are familiar to us under the names Dinlins, Di, Dis, Chi-Di, Red Di, White Di, Northern Boma, Alachin, Bikin."Tagar" (this is VIII-III centuries BC) cultures These tribes are familiar to us under the names Dinlins, Di, Dis, Chi-Di, Red Di, White Di, Northern Boma, Alachin, Bikin.
Dinlins lived on the territory of present-day Tuva, the south of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, Altai, Khakassia, northern Mongolia and China. The artist and archaeologist Nicholas Roerich (1874-1947, philosopher), during his Central Asian expedition of 1923-1928, found evidence that all of Central Asia was originally inhabited by a Slavic ethnic group. Officially (more precisely, borrowing from the Chinese), the Chinese called the Sayan Mountains Dingling, hence the name. This is a lie. After all, the word "dinlin" is a distorted word "long". Small children even now say not “long”, but “long”. Representatives of this people had blonde and red hair, blue and green eyes, and bushy beards. Historian and archaeologist Lev Nikolayevich Gumilyov (in the "Dinlinskaya problem") writes: "The following signs: average growth, often tall, dense and strong physique, an elongated face,skin color is white with a blush on the cheeks, blond hair, nose protruding forward, straight, often aquiline, light eyes. They built themselves chopped (log) wooden huts, used ceramic dishes, bred dairy cattle, goats and pigs, good horses and camels.
The Dinlins never had a supreme ruler, each tribe was headed by an independent leader. The Dinlins were a very freedom-loving people, lived in many small clans and gathered even to repel the enemy only on rare occasions and for a very short time. But the lone Dinlins became military advisers to the Chinese Wangs, mercenaries in their armies. From the Dinlins, the Chinese recruited detachments of bodyguards, of whom they always made up the vanguard of their troops.
There were many dinlins in Asia, very many. Even Claudius Ptolemy (100-160gzh), astronomer and geographer of the II century) divided the inhabitants of the region into two peoples - "Sins" (Asians) and "Sera" (white race). All-all discoveries attributed by the Jesuits to the Chinese are the achievements of the Dinlins. Even according to legend, the Chinese civilization began with the fact that a White God named Huang Di flew to them from the north on a celestial chariot, who taught them everything: from cultivating rice fields and building dams to hieroglyphic writing. Huang Di - di, because the Chinese do not pronounce dingling. Instead of gratitude, the Chinese tried to destroy the Dinlins. For almost a thousand years, the Dinlins fought against the Chinese tribes, but were defeated. This war is described in the Chinese chronicles as a struggle between black-headed and red-bearded devils. The Chinese defeated them because they were not dealing with a united people,but with its individual groups; besides, the Chinese actively pitted the Dinlins against each other. As a result, some of the Dinlins were exterminated, some were pushed back (to the north-west - "chi-di / red di", to the south-west - "bai-di / white di"), and the rest were assimilated (Zhou tribes). It is known that around 487 the Dinlins tried to form a confederation of 12 tribes, led by two brothers Afuzhilo and Qionqi. Officially, Dinlins disappeared into an unknown place at the beginning of the 2nd millennium AD. (as usual with the officialdom), but out of nowhere in the arena of Asian history, Jurzhenes appear. Here are just the racial features of the Jurchen emperors (1115-1234) or, more correctly, the Jurchens in the X-XIII centuries show that they are people of the white race, i.e. European Slavs - see the busts in the Harbin Museum, for example Wanyan Aguda, the first Jurchen emperor (reigned 1115-1123). Dinlins are 100% of the power of the Jurchens. As part of the empire, the white race of the Slavs was at least 25%, although the 5th column is trying to lower it to 10%.
By the way, our Primorye with the Khabarovsk Territory and part of the Amur Region were included in the lands of the Golden Empire of the White Jurchens. (see map below). There were scandals with official historians, known for the indignation of the former governor of the Primorsky Territory, Yevgeny Ivanovich Nazdratenko (who headed the region from 1993 to 2001). Gentlemen historians-state employees, i.e. receiving state salaries, wrote works where they cynically gave our territory to China. Nazdratenko took and told the truth in a TV program: "I understand why the Chinese are proving that Primorye is their territory, but I do not understand why Russian historians are proving the same to me." Interestingly, right afterAs an underwater archaeologist Genrikh Petrovich Kostin from Vladivostok discovered irrefutable evidence of the existence in Primorye of a powerful Slavic civilization with a developed culture of navigation, Koreans (both southern and northern) classified archaeological research on the Korean Peninsula.
Dinlins are the ancestors of peoples such as the Tangut and Tibetans. The signs of Dinlins were noted among the Khitan, Koreans, Manchurians, Ainu, and Kumandins. The western Irtysh branch di mixed with the Ugrians and made up the Sabir people, who migrated to the Caucasus in the 5th century and there dissolved among the Caucasian peoples. Another branch of the blond people is the northern boma, they are also alachins and bikins. Boma inhabited the northern slopes of the Sayano-Altai. Until the 21st century, Dinlins survived in Siberia, where the Yenisei Ostyak-Kets belong to this people. The southern branch of the Dinlins became part of the Huns / Huns, passing them on some Caucasoid features (high noses, lush beards). Some of the Dinlins were assimilated by the Kyrgyz, Uighurs, Huns / Huns and Turks. A small example: the Siberian Kyrgyz up to the 9th century were distinguished by their tall stature, white or red hair, green and blue eyes. Black hair was considered a bad sign. black eyes attributed the person to the descendants of the Chinese.
Even Western historians, such as the German Wilhelm Heid in 1879 ("History of the Levantine trade in the Middle Ages") wrote about the "northern Scythians of Genghis Khan." French politician and philosopher Jean Boden (1530-1596, Jean Bodin), referring to Ayton (Armenian historian Hetum), in the 16th century reported that "Genghis Khan, the ruler of the Tartars, whom some call Scythians, expanded his empire up to Central Asia" …
The Mughals themselves considered themselves descendants of the Eastern Scythians. Quote by Andrey Lyzlov from his book of 1692: “But from five hundred years and more, when the Scythian people came from the country, spoken by their language Mongal, she and the inhabitants were called Mongail or Mongail, when they came to some states, changed their name, called Tartare, from the Tartarus river. And the lesser half of Scythia, even above the Assian Sea, is called the Great Tartaria. The Great Tartaria is divided from Scythia by the Imaus, a great and famous mountain [Ural mountains]: a hedgehog from one country is Tartaria, and a hedgehog from this country is Scythia. Historians have written many famous deeds about these Mongailian Tatars, who live like them in a smaller part of Scythia, which was named Tartaria from them, as if by their strength and reason, moreover, by their military deeds, I would be glorified throughout the world. There have never been victories, but everywhere they are victorious … ".
I am citing the book "Chronological and esoteric analysis of the development of modern civilization" (author - Sidorov GA): "… In Siberia, there was a large kingdom of blue-eyed and fair-haired strong people of Endri. Endries came to the Amur River after the Great Trouble from somewhere from the north. Legends say that they also had a kingdom there, but it was swallowed up by the coming cold waters … People are strong and kind. White-skinned, fair-haired … Shaman legends say that the Endri lived along the river banks. They built big cities for themselves on high yards. Houses were made from logs with stoves, bred in the south, where there are no white movers, cows and horses, and north of the moose and deer. Their nomadic roads crossed the whole of Siberia from south to north and from east to west … Along the banks of the rivers, here on Keti, on the Syma, on the Vakhe, Ob and Yenisei and further east, up to the Great Lama, there are hundreds of abandoned cities. The cities of the great people who went to the south. Not we, Evenks, and not Yakuts are the owners of this land. We are all guests there. Only guests who were once allowed to live here. The true masters of Siberia are you people - the direct descendants of the great endries. But you don't know anything about it!"
It is not profitable for our pro-Western scientists to admit the fact that the white race of Slavs lived beyond the Urals, because both the West and the Church have taught for centuries that people simply could not live in Siberia for so long and, according to their version, they came there from Europe, and much later. If you admit the truth, then you will have to revise the entire modern history, and neither would-be historians, nor Christian priests are interested in this - remember, history is based on the Biblical synopsis? Yes, and why now raise questions regarding Russenia, Tartaria, Aryans, Rus and Rusyns, the religion of antiquity, when so much has been done to destroy any mention of them?
5. What the Chinggisids looked like …
Let's start with the basics - with the races Homo sapiens of the planet Earth. For USE graduates, let me remind you that there are only three races of people: the Caucasian race, the Mongoloid race, the equatorial race in two branches (Negroid, Australoid). These three races make up 70% of the world's population, the rest are children of mixed marriages (mestizo, mulatto, sambo). Three races - well, if you do not take the tolerant fantasies of the West of recent decades about the absence of races and the existence of only "clinal variability".
Now let's move on to the appearance of the Chinggisids … At the lessons of history teachers repeat about the "Mongolo-Tatars", who are Mongoloids; university professors are driving the same lies into the heads of students. Educators who are not afraid to go against the lies of the education system are a rare exception. Official history has recognized and allowed the only portrait of Genghis Khan (59 * 47 cm), which is kept in Taiwan in the Taipei Palace National Museum; this fake - see above (left portrait). They cynically lie to us that the portrait has survived from the time of the rulers of the Yuan Empire (1271-1368), created by Chinggisid Khan Khubilai. But modern studies of fabrics and threads have shown that the woven image belongs to the middle of the 18th century, that it is no older than 1748. The first to tell the truth was the Mongolian archaeologist and historian Dovdoin Bayar (1946-2010, Doctor of Science). But it was in the 18th century that the Jesuits wrote the fake history of China, and the Germans falsified the history of Russia. Let me remind you that Chinese history was changed under the idea of changing the alphabet. Then manuscripts were brought from all over the Chinese Empire and completely copied. And the "outdated" originals were simply destroyed. So the Taiwanese portrait is another falsification of historians. And they refer to him or ignoramuses, or traitors. The second fake, made with ink on silk fabric, is very widespread in the world - see above (right portrait). Until recently, the drawing was even considered "medieval", they say, by an unknown Chinese master. But this is not earlier than the 19th century. In the portrait, Temujin is depicted in full growth, on his head is a Mongolian hat, in his right hand is a Mongol bow, behind his back is a quiver with arrows, his left hand lies on the hilt of a saber in a painted sheath. Such a typical image of a representative of the Mongoloid race for ignoramuses.
In addition to this lies, real portraits of Genghis Khan have survived. First of all, these are three images of the ruler of the empire from the Venetian Marco Polo in a book of 1298. This is the drawing "The Wedding of Genghis Khan to the Kingdom" (Folio 25u, Le couronnement de Gengis Khan). Pure Caucasian, European clothes; Genghis Khan is crowned with a three-leafed crown, now an attribute of European rulers. The sword in the hands of Genghis Khan is truly Russian, as they say - heroic. The second drawing by Marco Polo is "Death of Genghis Khan" (Folio 27r. Death of Genghis Khan). Everything is the same, the face of a bearded Caucasian.
Now let's move on to two surviving chronicles of events in the history of the Mughal people and one legend. This is the "Secret History of the Mughals" 1240 ("The Secret History of the Yuan Dynasty" / "Yuan-chao bi-shi") in a terrible Chinese translation, and the "Golden Book" ("Altan Debter"), the official history of Genghis Khan from the "Collection of Chronicles" Rashid ad-din (1247-1318, minister of the Hulaguid ulus), composition 1300-1310. The first is that everything is distorted by Chinese names (transcribed Chinese characters), the second is not completely. Much is different in these two chronicles, but the history of the founding of the clan coincides. According to tribal chronicles, the ancestors of the people Borte-chino (Gray wolf) and Goamaral (Beautiful fallow deer), having crossed the Tengis internal sea (now Lake Baikal), settled in the Onon valley, this is Transbaikalia. See below the map of the Onon river. I repeat once more - they came from Siberia, having crossed Lake Baikal. In the twelfth generation, the tribe of Alans khuralas (not khori-tumat) migrated to the ancestral camps, and one of the elders (Dobun-Mergan) married a young beauty Alan-goa (khori-tumatke). The girl's name is Beautiful Alanka (Red-haired Alanka). I repeat - Alanka, a woman of the Sarmatian tribe! The tribe did not approve of this marriage, and the "young" were forced to secede. Soon Alan-goa became a widow. But years after her husband's death, the beautiful Alan-goa gave birth to three sons: “every night, it happened, through the chimney … at the hour when the light was inside, a light-blond man would come in to me; he strokes my womb, and his light penetrates into my womb … it turns out that my sons are marked with the seal of heavenly origin. " And the main thing here is not another immaculate conception a la the Virgin Mary, and not women's fantasies about a chimney - God be with them. A light blond man of heavenly origin could only be Dinlin, there were no other options.
We remember the races of people. If the mother is Alankan is a Caucasian race, father is a Dinlin, a Caucasian race. Well, what kind of children will they be? Of course, Caucasians. And our would-be historians have a Mongoloid. There is a famous portrait of Genghis Khan during a falconry. This is silk, which was made during the last years of Genghis Khan's life. It is clearly seen that the portrait depicts a man with a thick red beard and mustache, blue eyes, and Caucasian appearance. Well, it is very "similar" to a short nomad, where narrow-slanting eyes, prominent cheekbones, black hair, etc. features of a representative of the Mongoloid (yellow) race ?!
In the ancient Tatar dastan (legend) "On the family of Chyngiz Khan", the words of Genghis Khan's mother describe his appearance in the same way: "My son Chyngyz looks like this: he has a thick golden beard, in a white sheepskin coat, on a gray horse." Those. all Burjigins were representatives of the white frame (anthropological Rus, Indo-Europeans).
Even the Iranian chronicler Rashid ad-Din (1247-1318) explained that the Chinggisid clan observed the purity of blood. Those. they married and gave in marriage only to people of those clans, the origin of which was well known to the Burji-Gin. Since the Chinggisids did not mix even with the tribes that adopted their name, one can analyze the appearance and heirs of Genghis Khan. First, Batu Khan (1209-1255 / 1256gzh) is the grandson of Genghis Khan. Below is an image from the Ertogrul Museum (Turkey). Pay attention to Batu's Russian beard and the look of the leader. Batu is definitely a Caucasian, a red-haired Caucasian. By the way, the turban was worn in Russia for many, many centuries, i.e. very long. There is an interesting engraving by Stepan Razin in a turban, this is the 17th century. The second example of Batu is a miniature from the "Life of Euphrosyne of Suzdal" of the 16th century. List of the XVIII century ". It is called "Capture of Suzdal by Batu in 1238". The miniature depicts Khan Batu in a crown, on a white horse, who, accompanied by his squad, enters the city. His face is purely European, in no way Turkic. This is not a Mongoloid, but a Slav. Yes, and some kind of Slavic army … Let's see a quote on another heir - on the grandson, Khan Khubilai (1215-1294). Chronicler Rashid ad-Din writes: "Kubilai-kaan is the fourth son of Tului-khan … When Genghis-khan's gaze fell on him, he said:" All our children are red, and this boy is black, obviously he looks like an uncle … ". Everyone is red!“Kubilai-kaan is the fourth son of Tului-khan … When Genghis-khan's gaze fell on him, he said:“All our children are red, and this boy is black, obviously he looks like an uncle…”. Everyone is red!“Kubilai-kaan is the fourth son of Tului-khan … When Genghis-khan's gaze fell on him, he said:“All our children are red, and this boy is black, obviously he looks like an uncle…”. Everyone is red!
Another example - there is such a Russian saint - the Monk Peter, Tsarevich of Horde - see above the icon with his image. He was the great-grandson of Genghis Khan and the nephew of Khan Berke, Batu's brother (Batu and Berke had different mothers). But Russian Orthodox icon painting has always adhered to a strict canon. And the original national features of the saints on the icons have always been preserved. The Monk Peter is clearly not a representative of the Mongoloid race. And the gray beard is partially red. By the way, his descendant was Dionysius (~ 1440-1502) - the leading Moscow icon painter of the late 15th century.
Genghis Khan's red beard and mustache is also confirmed by the appearance of his heir - Timur / Tamerlane (1336-1405), the founder of the Mughal Empire (Timurids) - see the engraving with the wonderful name "Tamerlan - Emperor of Tartaria" ("Tamerlan, empereur des Tartares"). The face of a Slav and the emperor of Tartary. The tomb of Timur in Samarkand was opened in 1941 during excavations in the Gur-Emir mausoleum. We read the report: “Timur's hair is thick, straight, gray-red in color, with a predominance of dark brown or red … Timur's small thick beard had a wedge-shaped shape. Her hair is coarse, almost straight, thick, of bright brown (red) color … ".
By the way, modern Mongols have nothing to do with Chinggisids. The Western interpretation of history insists that the Mongols were formed as a result of the mixing of small nomadic peoples of the Khalku and Airats tribes. But these tribes in prionorie in the 12th century were NOT. Khalku and ayrats came from northeastern Tibet only in the XIV century (and then to the south - on the Gobi plateau). That is, two (!) Centuries later. I repeat: in the XII-XIII centuries on the territory of present-day Mongolia (and nearby) there were no khalku or airats, there are not even traces of them. There was a forest-steppe, the desert was formed later. And until the 18th century, a people like the Mongols was NOT known to science at all. And in the 1930s, the Bolsheviks came to the Hulk nomads and told them that they were the descendants of the great Mongols and that their “compatriot” had created the Great Empire at one time. The delighted Mongols erected in 2008 a grandiose monument in Tsongzhin-Boldog, 40 meters high. It is the largest equestrian statue in the world.
Borzhigin translated into Russian means blue-eyed. The eyes of the ancient Mughal family were "dark blue" or "blue-green", the pupil was edged with a brown rim. Well, the stupid question of who Genghis Khan is after all - a Turk or a Mongol, must be answered by a Slav! For it is increasingly difficult for liars to deny the obvious.
6. Where did the Chinggisids live …
I repeat: the ancestors of the people settled in the Onon Valley, now it is Transbaikalia. Today, most of Transbaikalia (i.e., to the north of modern Mongolia) is occupied by steppe expanses, but there was a huge forest island - the Ononsky pine forest with an area of about a thousand square kilometers, preserved in a dry (arid) climate due to the fact that a huge fresh water body. Quoting Lev Gumilyov, the book "In Search of a Fictional Kingdom": "Ancient river and lake sediments have water-physical properties that allow trees to grow, which in turn simulate the microclimate and vegetation … bird cherry, wild rose, currant, hawthorn, hawthorn, poplar, birch, elm, wild apple, Siberian apricot, meadows and reed swamps are located in the lowlands … Even in the driest years, when the steppes around them burn out,and the earth cracks from the heat, in the Ononsky pine forest the herbaceous vegetation does not disappear, as it is fed by groundwater and protected from dry winds by the dismembered middle mountains … Persistent cold steppe winds are not terrible here … The world of animals, especially birds, is also abundant here. Capercaillies and bustards, hares and roe deer fill the pine forest, and from Mongolia, herds of gazelles come here every year. Even in the driest years, when the steppes around burn out, and the earth cracks from the heat, in the Ononsky pine forest, the herbaceous vegetation does not disappear, since it is fed by groundwater and protected from dry winds by dissected middle mountains with an elevation difference of 300-500 m. In short, even according to the conditions of the XX century, Ononsky Bor is a resort”. Even today, after black loggers and arson in 2012, there is the last of such pine forests - the Tsasuchei pine forest of the Don region,which is declared a nature reserve.
Even on the basis of the description made, it is clear that the Onon tribes in terms of the type of economy, and therefore culture, were very different from the steppe dwellers who surrounded him … The people who lived there preserved many old traditions and developed an original culture, to some extent similar to the steppe, but with its local differences”(continuation of the quotation by L. Gumilyov). So, the Chinggisids lived in a pine forest. By the way, even the tribes of the Merkits and Oirats lived not in the steppe either, but in the mountain TAIGA of the Sayan Range. Genghis Khan himself was born in the Delyun-Boldok tract - where the Onon River leaves the Khentei ridge. This tract and evidence was discovered by the Russian traveler, Nerchinsk local historian of the 19th century Ivan Aleksandrovich Yurensky Jr. (1824-ca.1868, Transbaikal traveler) more than 150 years ago. Today nobody knows this wonderful Russian patriot. But recently a book with his articles was published in Ulan-Ude (in 2014; p. 55: "The birthplace of Genghis Khan") - many thanks. Conclusion: Genghis Khan comes from the territory of Transbaikalia - the territory of the ancient East Siberian Scythian world.
Now we look again at what the Mughals lived in. It is clear that they lie to us “without blushing” about the yurt. Quote: "The main dwelling of the Mongol was the yurt …" - this is a 2012 textbook, History of Russia. From ancient times to the 16th century. Grade 6, page 137. Let me remind you that Dinlin not only bred good horses, but lived in log cabins. Petr Nikolaevich Savitsky (1895-1968, see image) everywhere pointed out that the Russian wooden house was used from the Carpathians to Mongolia. Savitsky's quote about the criterion for the unification of the peoples of the Eurasian Empire: "It is not at all accidental that the peoples of Eurasia have a unity of life."
Let us turn to the Venetian Marco Polo, who lived for 17 years in the capital of the Chinggisids - the city of Khanbalik (Kambala, Shamblay). Chapter LXXXIV - Description of the Khan's Palace - is "Khanbalyk, Khan's Palace" (Cambaluc palais de Grand Khan), Folio 38r. Quote: “there is his big palace, and this is what it is: first of all, a square wall; each side is a mile long, and around it is four miles; the wall is thick, about ten paces high, white and jagged all around; in every corner of a beautiful, rich palace; … there is also a palace at each wall, the same as coal ones; altogether there are eight palaces along the walls … There are five gates in the wall to the south … and in the corners there are also large gates, through which everyone enters. Behind this wall there is another … and there are eight palaces, the same as the first … The walls in large and small chambers are covered with gold and silver, and dragons and animals, birds are painted on them,horses and all kinds of animals, and so the walls are covered that, except for gold and painting, nothing is visible. The hall is so spacious, more than six thousand people can be there … ". Think about it - the reception hall could accommodate 6,000 people. Moreover, every second Marco Polo miniature depicts stone (or brick) city walls. Example: Folio 86v “Flounder Town” (La ville de Cambaet).
There is also archeological data … In the Borzinsky district of the Trans-Baikal Territory in the 50s of the 20th century, the estate of Isunke Khan, Genghis Khan's nephew, was found. It has been known since the 18th century, there were small excavations - this is the so-called. "Khirkhirinskoye town". Isunke is the son of Jochi-Kasar, brother of Genghis Khan. In 1206, Genghis Khan appointed him the foreman of the guards riflemen of his personal guard. Under the khans Mongke and Khubilai, he commanded the entire guard and ruled over the inheritance, which included a significant part of Transbaikalia. The Khirkhirinsky settlement of 1225 includes more than 100 houses of artisans and over 30 feudal estates. And all of them were made of baked bricks. Isunke Palace was built of solid mud bricks and covered with a tiled roof supported by 12 columns. fig. Stella. I repeat - made of bricks. Not far, in 60 km - "Konduisky town" and the palace of the XIV century. The Konduisky Palace generally had a brick floor of baked bricks. Five brick ramps led to the palace - two from the east and west, and the main entrance. Inside the building, 37 stone bases were located, which were the foundations of wooden columns. From above, the palace was covered with green glazed tiles and decorated with images of dragons. The remains of chimney structures were found inside - kans with 4-5 chimney channels. In addition to the kans, a stove made of bricks was found (Narsatui village). The remains of chimney structures were found inside - kans with 4-5 chimney channels. In addition to the kans, a stove made of bricks was found (Narsatui village). The remains of chimney structures were found inside - kans with 4-5 chimney channels. In addition to the kans, a stove made of bricks was found (Narsatui village).
A few words about the would-be textbooks "named after Soros's money" … In an effort to at least minimize criticism, officials have added a little bit of truth to the thoroughly false textbooks. It turned out even worse, because you cannot tell the truth if everything is based on lies. Let's take the same 2012 textbook “History of Russia. From ancient times to the 16th century. 6th grade". Moscow, three pages in a row. Page 137: "The main dwelling of the Mongol was the yurt …", page 138: "The houses of the Mongols were small, square and one-room, with wooden or adobe (raw) brick walls." What, a yurt with brick walls? Page 139: “The houses of the Mongol nobility were palaces. They were built from baked bricks using lime mortar, but without foundations. " How can you build a brick palace without a foundation? Insanity grew stronger …
In general, our textbooks "named after Soros's money" are a good example of brainwashing children. Page 122, election of Temuchin: the authors in quotation marks convey the goal and the highest values of the new khan, for some reason one to one coinciding with the Western values of the society of unlimited consumption. Page 124, a text about Yasu from a supposedly illiterate leader. Vaughn, Genghis Khan, was illiterate, but he created states, issued laws, won half the world, this is an example for you. Moral: Why Study? Parents, these psychological methods of influence even have a name - neurolinguistic programming (NLP).
And to finish about the dwellings of the Chinggisids, I will give two little-known engravings … After all, what are they constantly shown to us? Dirty nomads … But Genghis Khan is in the drawing of the French engraver Pierre Duflos (Pierre Duflos, 1742-1816). It is the Receuil des Estampes, representantles Rangs et les Dignites, suivant le Costume de toutes les Nations existantes, published in 1780, representing titles and titles based on the garments of all existing nations. There is also Borte, she is also in Chinese Hi-Chen. Pay attention to their clothes, especially Borte's. In such a luxurious dress with a hem and a dirty steppe wagon? "I congratulate you, citizen, you have lied!" (a phrase from "The Master and Margarita").
Conquest, military genius and lust for power
We are constantly told that Genghis Khan was obsessed with the idea of conquering the world, about his plans for conquest, that he was a military genius and so on. Forget it - these are all lies. Here are just three historical facts:
Fact number 1. About kurultai or talking about leadership … The election of Temujin as a khan in 1182 was recognized by the Kerait, but met resistance among the Honors themselves, most of whom did NOT join Temujin, but united around Jamukha. The formal reason for the war was the murder of Jamukha's brother, who was trying to drive the herd away from the Chinggis people. Jamukha brought 30 thousand horsemen who voluntarily joined him, and Genghis Khan was able to collect only 13 thousand people from different clans and tribes. What about the myth about the great leader Temujin, whom everyone follows? Moreover, in 1200, Jamukha was also elected to the gurkhans, and by the entire tribal aristocracy of the steppes.
In the battle at Dalan-balchjuts, Jamukha defeated the army of Chinggis and locked up its remnants in a gorge near the Onon River. But Jamukha, true to the traditions of inter-tribal wars, limited himself to the execution of prisoners and withdrew his troops. The "secret legend" reads: Jamukha locked "… Chinggis in the gorge, executed the princes from the Chonos clan and left.." Only thanks to this, Temujin survived and received a respite at the age of 18. Those. the myth of the "military genius" who has not lost a single battle can be forgotten. To put it simply, all the victories of both Genghis Khan and even Batu are victories of the commander Subedei (1176-1248), who did not lose a single battle.
Fact number 2: the war between the Mughals and the Jurchens of the Golden Empire in 1211-1234. (i.e. with the Jin empire). Now the same thing is constantly heard: "Genghis Khan longed for a great war with the Jin empire … the beginning of the external expansion of the Mongol Tatars … Aggression against the Jin." This is a lie. Firstly: in 1161-1189 (this is a whole 28 years), every three years the Jurchens sent punitive detachments to the Don region, killing Mughals and selling them into slavery. Pretty good? Therefore, all the Mughals considered the Jurchens to be the blood enemies of their people. Secondly: among the Chinggisids, the Nestorian church played the main role. But she had already experienced the horror of the Chinese persecution (about 1000), so the demands of the Jurchens in the XII century met with strong resistance from the church. Third: do you know the balance of power? It is suicidal for the Chinggisids - 1 to 11.2!Plus the Jurchen artillery and a huge number of their fortifications. In terms of the number of soldiers, the Jurchen army (the Jin army) was the strongest not only in Asia, but also in the world. Documents on the composition of the Jin army for 1161 have been preserved - these are 765,200 soldiers, plus squires (alish), plus a mobilization reserve = 300 thousand. Our contemporary, researcher E. D. Phillips writes in the book: "… the Jin empire had an army of about 500,000 people, of which 120,000 were horse archers, Jurchen nomads by origin" (2011. "Mongols. Founders of the Empire of the Great Khans", written in 2004). And Genghis Khan has about 95 thousand, with allies (Karluks, Onguts, Uighurs) a maximum of 130 thousand. Agree - that's not how wars start. There is no logic in such “conquests”. More precisely, it is not in the nonsense composed by historians. The truth is simple - until 1210, the Mughals paid tribute to the Jurchens. Which is unthinkable for the German version. And the new emperor (from 1208 the son of Ulu, in Chinese Yongzi) demanded even more. The Mughals had no choice - either die or fight.
Fact number 3. Officials are hysterical about "the conquest of Central Asia by Genghis Khan in 1219-1223 … plans for the conquest of the Khorezmshahs." It's a lie. It was like this … Firstly: in 1216, thanks to help from the Kypchaks, the Merkits tried to strike the Mughals in the rear. The situation was saved by hastily deployed two tumens of selected Mughal troops. The Merkit army was defeated, the remnants fled to the west, were overtaken by the Mughals at the Irgiz River and exterminated to the last man. But in the same place, near Irgiz, the Islamic troops of the Khorezmshah Mohammed II attacked the Mughals. At the beginning of the 13th century Khorezm was a large Islamic state, and Shah Mohammed II, who imagined himself "Alexander the Great the Second", was obsessed with a thirst for war "with the infidels." The Khorezmshahs created a huge state in which the main military force was made up of the Turks from the adjacent steppes: the Kangly (Pechenegs) and the Karluks. Very surprised by the sudden, unprovoked attack, the Mughals fought off the Khorezmians and returned home. Secondly, in 1215, Genghis Khan proposed to Khorezm to conclude peace between the two states with guarantees of security for merchants. Having concluded peace, Genghis Khan sent a large caravan to Khorezm. It consisted of five hundred camels that carried Chinese silk, spices and handicrafts that were so prized in Central Asia. The caravan was accompanied by 450 merchants. In the middle of 1218, the caravan arrived in the Khorezm border town of Otrar on the banks of the Syr Darya River, at the mouth of the Arys River, on the right bank (see the map above, the city is highlighted in color); now it is a settlement in the Otyrar district of the Turkestan region of Kazakhstan. All the merchants were killed, and the property was confiscated - the local ruler Inalchik Gair Khan (the nephew of the Sultan's mother,the all-powerful Terken-Khatun). The ruler of Otrar sent half of the loot to the city of Khorezm, and the Khorezmshah Ala ad-Din Mohammed II (1169-1220), took the booty, which means he shared responsibility for what he had done. Thirdly … Genghis Khan tried in every possible way to settle the problem peacefully and even sent ambassadors to find out what caused the incident and make peace. But Muhammad II beheaded one of the ambassadors of the Mongol Khan, and the rest, as it were, mockingly released. As if, for he ordered them to cut off their beards and strip them naked, which meant certain death in the steppe. According to the laws of the Great Yasa, the most terrible crimes took place: deceiving those who trusted and murdering guests. According to the Great Yasa, Genghis Khan could not leave unavenged either those merchants who were killed in Otrar, much less the ambassadors whom the Khorezmshah insulted and killed. Genghis Khan had to take revenge and revenge,having crushed the Samanids (emirs of Central Asia) and completely defeated the Khorezm troops. One of the first was captured the border Otrar, the siege of which lasted six months. By the way, about greed - Genghis Khan ordered to melt silver and pour it into the ears and eyes of the greedy Gair Khan.
8. Debunking lies and omissions …
Over the past century, historians have invented a huge amount of lies both about Genghis Khan and about the Mogul Empire. Lies on lies. Alas, a lie is the most effective propaganda technique if it is possible to introduce a lie into the mass consciousness. This is "they are Mongoloids"; and Khan's illiteracy; and "Genghis Khan forbade to wash"; and the size of Batu's horde is 300 thousand horsemen; and the Mongolian bow "Saadak", penetrating armor 300 meters; and mo (n) golsky horses, which provide their own food; fodder and supplies taken from nowhere; and huge siege weapons that destroyed cities; and the replenishment of the army with captives from the conquered tribes; and the destruction of people as an end in itself of Genghis Khan. It's all lies, lies and lies. Lies living because of the illiteracy and gullibility of deceived people. But even the Internet today is full of articles where they poke their noses into real facts, proving the impossibility. After all, one has only to dig the facts of real history - and all delusional fantasies collapse into dust. According to the above deceptions, you can easily find and read the material on the Internet, but I draw your attention to five historical facts. Just five important facts:
Fact number 1 - false name mo (n) goals in the term Mongolo-Tatars. There are no and never were in the XII-XIII centuries the Mongol tribes - this is a cynical lie of the later centuries, hammered into all textbooks-films in the XX century. Russian academician-orientalist of the 19th century Vasily Pavlovich Vasiliev (1818-1900, see photo above), dean of the Faculty of Oriental Studies of St. Petersburg University, based on the medieval oriental sources he translated, was the first to conclude that it was from the invented name of the Horde state that the “official, purely scientific "name of the subjects of this state -" Mongols ". In 1206, the Mongol Empire was not yet created - this is a falsification. In 1206, at the great kurultai, Chinggis was re-elected as khan, but already of all the tribes of the Eastern steppe. And according to custom, the new khan had to give the united ulus a name. Just a name, there is no Empire yet. Genghis Khan proclaimed "Mogul Ulus", where the Mogul is the Great. Russian Mongolian scholar, academician Boris Yakovlevich Vladimirtsov (1884-1931, see photo above) writes that Genghis Khan simply named the name of the united ulus "in memory of the glorious name … of an ancient and powerful people or clan." Named - in honor of his great Scythian ancestors, tk. every warrior from a young age carefully remembered his genealogy, and there was not a single Onor who did not know his tribe and origin. Just to the west of the Honora tribes (see the map above), there were earlier lands of the numerous Scythian clans that had partially gone to the west, which were here called the Mughals from their old name (see the quotation from Lyzlov's book).that Genghis Khan simply called the name of the united ulus "in memory of the glorious name … of an ancient and mighty people or clan." Named - in honor of his great Scythian ancestors, tk. every warrior from a young age carefully remembered his genealogy, and there was not a single Onor who did not know his tribe and origin. Just to the west of the Honora tribes (see the map above), there were earlier lands of the numerous Scythian clans that had partially gone to the west, which were here called the Mughals from their old name (see the quotation from Lyzlov's book).that Genghis Khan simply called the name of the united ulus "in memory of the glorious name … of an ancient and mighty people or clan." Named - in honor of his great Scythian ancestors, tk. every warrior from a young age carefully remembered his genealogy, and there was not a single Onor who did not know his tribe and origin. Just to the west of the Honora tribes (see the map above), there were earlier lands of the numerous Scythian clans that had partially gone to the west, which were here called the Mughals from their old name (see the quotation from Lyzlov's book).above the map) previously were the lands of the numerous Scythian clans that had partially gone to the west, which were here called the Mughals from their old name (see the quotation from the book of Lyzlov).above the map) previously were the lands of the numerous Scythian clans that had partially gone to the west, which were here called the Mughals from their old name (see the quotation from the book of Lyzlov).
Fact number 2 - false the name of the Tatars in the term Mongolo-Tatars. Firstly, the Tatars of Asia of the XII century and the modern Tatars are completely different peoples. I repeat - different. The Volga Tatars, Chuvash and Crimean Tatars are the descendants of the Volga Bulgars, residents of the partially Turkic-speaking “Volga Bulgaria” of the VIII-XIII centuries. And our Islam as a religion came from the Volga Bulgaria - in 922 the emir Baltavar Almush (Almas-Khan; xx-925gzh, son of the Baltavar Shilka) officially declares Hanafi Islam as the state religion (this is one of the four schools of Sunni Islam). But in Bulgaria there were three tribes: Bulgars, Essegers and Bersul. The first two are the Turks (and the question is what), and the Barsul tribe is the Slavs! Those. at least a third of the inhabitants. And while the Slavs ruled there. An example is the text of the 10th century Arab traveler Ibn Fadlan (877-960gg;Ahmad ibn Fadlan ibn al-Abbas ibn Rashid al-Baghdadi) in the translation of A. P. Kovalevsky: “When the letter of Almush, the son of Shilka yyltyvar, king of the Slavs arrived” (translation of “Notes / Risale”). On the Crimean Tatars, a quote from the Venetian Marco Foscarino of the 16th century (wrote in 1553-1557) is indicative: "The Perekop Tatars came from the Volga, where they had many sovereigns of Scythian origin." The binding of the word "Tatars" to a certain ethnic group begins only in the 17th century. Secondly, the Tatars of Asia of the XII century are the tribes that lived in the Khalkhin-Gol river basin near the Buir-Nur lake - alukhai, alcha, dutaut, nerait, khoin and chigin (see the map - two lakes on the bottom right, Buir-Nur - bottom). There in the spring of 1202 the battle took place, the Tatars were defeated. The fate of the defeated Tatars was determined at a secret council (“The Great Family Council”). The decision of the council is to completely exterminate all Tatars: “The Tatar tribe is the primordial destroyers of our grandfathers and our fathers. Let us exterminate them, equal in height by the cart check, in revenge for the grandfathers and fathers. " Yes, there were exceptions. For children whose height does not exceed the height of the wheel axle. By the way, these are not only babies - look at the Scythian carriage, there is more than a meter to the axis. And the Chinggisids regretted some young and beautiful women, taking them as concubines. By the way, Genghis Khan himself took two Tatar sisters as his concubines, the beauties were called Esukat and Esulan. Those. There are simply no Tatars left. And the name "Tatars" remained, especially since in the Chinese chronicles ALL Eastern peoples of the steppe were called Tatars. Quoting the great Eurasianist Lev Gumilyov: "I, a Russian person, have been protecting the Tatars from slander all my life." This is the signature on the pedestal of the bust of L. Gumilyov in Kazan (on Petersburg street), see the photo above. So, there could be NO Tartars. And the lie "Mongol-Tatars" can speak either ignoramuses, or traitors serving the West.
Fact number 3 - a lie "about the terrible devastation of the Russian lands by Batu …" Soros textbooks and Internet-Mitrofanushki are trying hard "about burnt Russian cities", how Mongols razed 49 large Russian cities to the ground, how the population was massacred almost to the root, how about half of the population of Russia died from the horde of Batu's invasion. But! But!!! But!!! How do you decide these German fantasies are true? To begin with, the questions - what is the difference between the ruins of Russian cities as a result of internecine wars of snickering Russian princes from the ruins of Russian cities as a result of the invasion of the Moguls? Nothing … What are the archaeological signs that determine the exact date of the fire (at least up to a month) and its cause? There are no such … How do the ruins from Batu differ from those that formed a month or two or five before it? Nothing … Let's analyze the facts and start with nature … Did you knowthat the beginning of the XIII century was extremely unhappy for Russia - floods in summer, rains in winter, severe frosts in autumn, drought, storms and hurricanes, widespread crop failures, famine. In 1224 in Russia there was a terrible heat and a strong wind - forests and cities were burning. The smoke was so strong that people nearby could not distinguish one another. In 1230, from the Annunciation to Ilyin's day according to the new style (that is, from the beginning of April to August), it rained day and night, then the “great famine” lasted for about four years. According to the Novgorod Chronicle, this famine engulfed all of Russia, "great sorrow … and there was a need for people." More than 3 thousand people died of hunger in Novgorod, 32 thousand people were buried in mass graves in Smolensk. And in 1214-1216, and especially in 1230-1233. - the population of Rus dropped sharply. But until 1237 Batu was only four years old!
Now about the elite of the XIII century, about the Russian princes who have lost all sense of proportion … What, in our history (by the way, as in the history of other countries) there were no examples when snickering princes because of greed and conceit constantly fought among themselves and in fact - cut the people? At the neighboring unfriendly prince, to burn down the city and cut the little fellows - yes, that's a sweet thing! Or bring the steppe to a neighbor. So Batu walked through the fires and bodies. Mitrofanushki reproach the author for protecting the Horde. Why are you silent that for centuries one greedy prince Rurikovich went to war against another, and Russian blood "poured like a river"? And then the cousins came and stopped this genocide? Again, why don't you make claims to the two allies of Batu in Russia?
The textbooks are all lies. Here are just three examples of blatant substitution of facts.
According to the German false history, the Grand Duke of Vladimir Yuri Vsevolodovich (1188-1238, Georgy, son of Vsevolod the Big Nest) tried in vain to assemble a militia to resolutely repulse the "Mongolo-Tatars", but died in a battle on the Sit River on March 4, 1238. There is a painting by the 19th century artist Vasily Petrovich Vereshchagin (1835-1909) "Bishop Cyril finds the headless body of Grand Duke Yuri." Now the Sit River is in the north-west of the Yaroslavl region. The lines of the chronicles are really scary: "there was a slaughter of evil and great" (Resurrection Chronicle) and "And there was a great battle and an evil slaughter, and blood flowed like water" (unknown chronicler). But in the battle of March 4 on the City River there were no Genghisids at all! I repeat, there was no Mughal corps there. Well, there were no Batu tumens at all! On the part of the "evil Mongol-Tatars" only (!) Volga Bulgars and 4.000 Russian soldiers from Nizhny Novgorod and Rostov.
The second example … in 1246, Prince Mikhail Vsevolodovich (known as Mikhail Chernigovsky, 1179-1246) was killed in the Golden Horde. 300 years later, at the Council of 1547, the prince was canonized. There is a painting by the artist Vasily Sergeevich Smirnov (1858-1890) dated 1883 "Prince Mikhail of Chernigovsky in front of Batu's headquarters". Pro-Western textbooks hysterically lie “for refusing to worship their idols, by order of Batu, the holy prince was executed … this was the first Russian ruler - a martyr who perished at the hands of the Mongol-Tatars”, etc. fiction. Fact: some Roman from Putivl killed the prince, there was a quarrel … but what have the Genghisids and idol worship? The church wrote this, the plan of the storytellers is clearly visible in the phrase "to which Michael, a true Christian, responded …".
The third example - in 1300, after the defeat of the "Mughal Tatars" near Ryazan by the Moscow prince Daniel, the main defeated was (!) The Ryazan prince Konstantin Romanovich (killed in 1306).
That there was nothing at all? It was of course. First, our would-be princes, for the sake of their own conceit, were ready to "put in the grave" all the inhabitants of their city. Remember the "evil city" Kozelsk and its seven weeks of siege? Yes, there was Prince Vasilko! He is also the grandson of Prince Mstislav, who died in 1223 at the hands of the Mughals on Kalka. Secondly, southwestern Russia went under Catholicism. And for the betrayal of faith, she "got it in full." Actually the chronicles are from there. In addition to the lies about Batu, there are many omissions. I will only voice the return of the Russian regiments to Prince Alexander after the Battle of Legnica, and the participation of the Chinggisids in the Battle of the Ice on April 5, 1242 on the ice of Lake Peipsi.
Fact №4 - "300 years of the Mongol-Tatar yoke" … There was no yoke! Did not have!!! After all, you are not told at the school-institute that until the middle of the 19th century, the Russian people did not know at all that we had a yoke. The word yoke itself was invented by the Polish chronicler Jan Dlugosh (1415-1480, see engraving above, left). Then another Pole of the same century repeated it - a professor at the University of Krakow, Matvey Mekhovsky (1457-1523; see the engraving above, on the right), court physician and astrologer of King Sigismund, an ardent Russophobe. In 1576, the term "jugo Tartarico" was used in the record of Daniel Prince (1546-1608), the Holy Roman Ambassador to Ivan the Terrible. In 1817, the term "Mongol-Tatar yoke" was first introduced into scientific circulation by the German historian Christian Kruse (fr. Christian Kruse, 1753-1827),when he published the Atlas of European History (“Atlas and tables for reviewing the history of all European lands and states from their first population to our times”, this work was translated into Russian in 1845). Again a German, we were not satisfied with the forger Miller. It is believed that in Russia the term "Mongol-Tatars" was introduced into circulation by some Pyotr Nikolaevich Naumov in 1823 - unknown to anyone, as it were a historian. There is no evidence that the yoke existed. There is none. But back in 1972 it was proved that in the Laurentian Chronicle "three pages dedicated to Batu's campaign were cut out and replaced by others - literary clichés of battle scenes of the XI-XII centuries" (Prokhorov GM, Codicological analysis of the Laurentian Chronicle). What is? There is only the reasoning of "would-be historians" (starting from the 18th century), art books and paintings. Well, textbooks for ignoramuses. There are a lot of all these lies. And there is no evidence of yoke! By the way, in recent years, the concept of “Tatar-Mongol yoke” has finally been removed from Russian school textbooks.
By the way, an interesting comparison of numbers … Modern textbooks choke with indignation, as "enslaved" Russia paid tribute in 10%. Amid the false hysterics about such an overwhelming tribute, I ask you to remember modern taxes. The salary is 13% from the employee, and a single social tax of 30% from the employer, only 43%. And there is also income tax, VAT, etc. Compare this to the 10% tribute to the Mogul. Yes, a 10% tax is fantastic happiness!
The final logical question (quoting the famous Eurasian), "Black Legend": "Why and for what common interests did the Russian people need not to unite with the Mughals, but to fight with them and thus - to protect the German feudal lords, Hanseatic burghers, Italian prelates and French knights who, for their part, attacked Russia, either exterminating or enslaving the "schismatics of the Greek rite", whom they did not consider to be true Christians? Indeed, the theory of the salvation of Europe by Russia was an incomprehensible blinding, unfortunately - not obsolete until now”(Lev Gumilev, a categorical opponent of the lie about the yoke).
Fact # 5 - defaults. In two chronicles of the Chinggisids it is indicated that as early as 970 (historian H. Perlee) the ancestor of Genghis Khan was born in the ninth generation - Bodonchar, who mastered hunting with a falcon. And all the khans-heirs also knew how to hunt with a falcon. Above there was a mention of the famous portrait of Genghis Khan during a falconry - a bird sits on the left hand of Genghis Khan. Marco Polo also has a drawing called Kubilai a la chasse, this is Folio 31v. This is not just a hunting bird - the falcon is depicted on the banner of Genghis Khan (see above). But the diving falcon was also a symbol of Russia, a symbol of the Rurikovichs. See the picture above - the foundry form of the seal of the Rurikovichs (found in the excavations of Staraya Ladoga) and the banner of the Novgorodians. And there, and there - a falcon. In the literary monument of Ancient Russia "The Lay of Igor's Regiment" the falcon designates the princes of Rurikovich. In Russia, a falcon is a symbol of male beauty, intelligence, strength. There are thousands and thousands of examples. For example, in carols to the son of the owner at home they sing: “Sokolonka clear! Well done you are red!”, In wedding songs the falcon means the groom; the hero of Russian fairy tales is the hero Fenist Yasny Sokol. Why is the falcon the same among the Chinggisids and the Rus? It's just that the roots are one, Scythian. The Scythians called themselves the Falcon tribe. Russians and Chinggisids are Slavic cousins.
By the way, about two "coincidences" … With Russia: there are nine corners on the banner of Genghis Khan. And one of the main symbols of Slavic culture is the Star of Inglia with nine corners. In Slavic mythology, the world consists of three dimensions: Nav, Prav and Yav. In the first, the gods live, in the second - the souls of the departed, and in the third - living people. And do not lie to us - they say this is a coincidence. Coincidence with the Scythians: Our ancestors, the Scythians, constantly used a false retreat and shooting back at a gallop during the battle. In the West it was called the "Scythian shot". But the Chinggisids did the same in most battles, 1: 1.
9. Kazakhs and Genghis Khan …
I will repeat once again - through the efforts of the American special services, a belt of hatred is being actively formed around Russia. In fraternal Kazakhstan, they even officially believe that Kazakhstan is the heir of the ancient Turks, they say they have nothing to do with Genghis Khan, and in the 20th century Kazakhstan was supposedly a colony (!) Of Russia.
Let me remind you that the Kazakhs owe their statehood exclusively to Soviet power, and all articles about antiquity or about a thousand-year-old single Kazakh ethnos are charlatanism. The self-name of the indigenous people of these territories is the Cossack. It appeared in 1459, when two khans of the Chinggisids (Janibek / Zhanibek, son of Barak khan and Girey / Kerey, son of Bolat Sultan) left the Uzbek ulus with their clans and tribes. I repeat - the Chinggisid clan, i.e. Eastern Scythians, Slavs. And on the lands of the ruler of Moghulistan, Esen Bugi, they formed the Cossack Khanate. This is 1465. The tribes were also mentioned under the name of the Cossacks in the official documents of the Russian Empire - for example, see the journal of the Russian envoy to Dzungaria Ivan Unkovsky from 1722. Dutchman Nikolaas Witsen (1641-1717, Nicolaes Witsen) wrote about the city of Turgustan in the Cossack regions. In Russian documents and maps of the 16th-18th centuries, they were called “Cossacks”, and their state was called “Cossack Horde” or “Cossack Horde”. For the word "Cossack" means free. Since the 18th century, Russian sources (and then in European) began to call the Cossacks “Kyrgyz-Cossacks” or “Kyrgyz-Kaysaks” (“kaysak” is a distorted “Cossack”). The way of life of the Kirghiz-Kaisaks is described in the report of Russian officials in 1802.
In February 1936, a decree was issued by the Central Executive Committee and the Council of People's Commissars of the Kazakh SSR "On Russian pronunciation and written designation of the word" Cossack ". The decree says that the last letter "k" is replaced by the letter "x". In accordance with the decree, they began to write not “Cossack” and “Kazakstan”, but “Kazakh” and “Kazakhstan”. So much for all the fake antiquity. And all modern documents and maps with inscriptions like "Kazakhstan in the 17th century … Kazakhstan in the 12th century" are falsifications.
Well, I recommend to the Kazakh brothers not to forget that Batu Khan went on a campaign to the West in 1241-1242 with the troops of his Ulus and the Tumen of Subedei (i.e., with the Cossack tribes of the Middle and Younger Zhuzes) and Slavic regiments recruited in Russia. Our ancestors went together on Batu's western campaign. And they won together. It is estimated that at least 70-80% of the army of "Tatar-Mongols" were Russians, and only the remaining 20-30% were among the Turks (steppe peoples of Asia). By the way, there is a good portrait of Genghis Khan from the Kazakh artist Marat Nisupov (1959, our contemporary), a member of the Union of Artists of Kazakhstan.
10. Conclusion …
Both Genghis Khan and his successors had four official wives. Genghis Khan also has more than 500 concubines. The wives are Khulan (by 1215), Borte (by 1227), Yesui, Yesugen. It is interesting that exactly the same number of concubine wives had the Kiev prince Vladimir, whom the church made a saint. In addition to his five officially recognized children (sons) from his beloved wife Borte, there were also sons and grandchildren, who also became khans, who had their own harems and were also very prolific. One of his grandchildren had 22 legal wives and added 30 virgins a year to his harem. Genghisids ruled in the states of Asia for a very long time, both before the adoption of Islam and after. An important fact is the genealogical tree of the descendants of Genghis Khan. Note the text above - Empereurs Tartares, Emperors of Tartaria. Emperor - title of head of the empire,therefore, for those who deny Tartary, I will quote a phrase from "The Master and Margarita" - "I congratulate you, citizen, lied!"
It is common knowledge that Genghis Khan had a lot of women. After the Mogul horde took over the city, Chinggis was given a choice of the most beautiful women, and he took full advantage of this. The results of DNA research prove that Genghis Khan was quite loving. Today, in Central Asia alone, there are 16 million people who are descendants of the Mughal emperor. Today, the descendants of Genghis Khan own 8% of all men from the Caspian Sea to the Pacific Ocean, and every two hundred living men in the world.
Temujin can be condemned or praised - perhaps his actions are worthy of both (this is a debatable issue), but finding the truth among the imposed sea of falsifications is very important, as well as catching a lie. Representatives of the official (in fact, Westernizing) history never disobey their scientific leadership and will not "go beyond" the framework defined by the postulates of Eurocentric science, set by the Romanov Germans in compiling the "history of Russia". The same false "history" in which the main ethnic groups (peoples) of Russia-Eurasia, incl. Russians and Tatars, the role of "savages" and "slaves" is assigned. The problem of truth is rooted groveling before the West. After all, the arrogant Catholic West was the main opponent of the Chinggisids during the Horde rule in Muscovy-Russia.
I will end with two quotes from a remarkable person, philologist and historian, Prince Nikolai Sergeevich Trubetskoy (1890-1938): “In the historical continuity of Russia … there is a part of the great Mughal monarchy founded by Genghis Khan … We must get used to the idea that the Romano-Germanic world with its own culture is our worst enemy. We must mercilessly overthrow and trample the idols of those social ideals and prejudices borrowed from the West that have guided the thinking of our intelligentsia until now”.