“Keep in mind that ignorance never does evil; only delusion is harmful. People are mistaken not because they do not know, but because they imagine themselves to be knowledgeable. (J. J. Rousseau)
Either it was intended by God, or the matrix "freezes", but the phenomenon of historical doubles haunts researchers. Here and there people appear strikingly similar to famous historical characters. While trying to solve the riddle of the legendary Huns, I came to astounding conclusions. No Attila is Mongol.
Dmitry Nagiyev is a descendant of Attila. (joke).
They say Attila lived in the 5th century. Interestingly, then there were already engravings? Or is it a copier with a bas-relief on copper?
Many European and Christian priests of those years tried to understand how the people who had appeared from nowhere so suddenly rose above everyone. They called Attila "The Scourge of God." “For the debauchery that reigned in Europe, God sent the Huns and their ruler against us,” they said. And some blessed the arrival of Attila. For example, Lou, the Archbishop of Trouiss, left the following words about him: “Blessed be thy coming, the Scourge of God, whom I serve. And it's not for me to stop you."
"Let your spirit rise, let your rage boil."
"The arrow does not reach the one who goes to victory."
"Who is at rest when Attila fights, he is already buried"
Promotional video:
It's just that fear has big eyes, here in Europe they still frighten children with terrible cruel barbarians. But here's the question: - Why didn't he touch Russia? Did you kill no one and destroy the city? The answer suggests itself. Russia is his home. However, this is not a secret. Everyone knows that he was born in the glorious city of Itil (Atil) on the banks of the RA River - Mother Volga. Here is the first discovery. Attila is not a name at all. This is a misreading of his title - ATILLE HUN (later the spelling was changed to ATTILA REX, and to this day there are two spellings - ATTila and AtiLLa, this is due to the fact that different scribes wrote as they hear) - Khan Atilsky. So the city in the Volga delta gave the name to the khan himself and to the whole people in the mouths of the "enlightened" Europeans. KHAN (HUN) was transformed into “GUNN”, or “Hunn-Aryan” - HUNGARI.
It is Attila who is the only character who fits the definition of "Great Khan". Why am I convinced of this? Because the biography of Attila coincides in detail with the legend of the "ruler of the Great Mughals." Even the burial ceremony of these historical counterparts is described almost word for word. The same three coffins, the diversion of the river bed, the subsequent flooding of the grave, and the killing of everyone who participated in the burial and who knew the place of burial. By the way, this is just a beautiful legend. In fact, the Great Khans were buried in the most usual way, only the grave was dug under the roots of the oldest tree in the forest. And it was not one and a half thousand years ago, but only about eight hundred. As soon as I realized this, everything else fell apart as if on shelves.
Empire of the Huns.
Country of the Huns.
And who are the Sarmatians?
The country of the Sarmatians.
Reconstruction of the appearance of a Sarmatian girl - an Amazon.
Well, who are the Alans then?
Alania.
Alans.
This is how the Alans looked at the end of the nineteenth century. Not reconstruction. Real photo. At a time when steam locomotives and the London Underground already existed, some tribes existed in the Middle Ages.
A pot discovered during excavations in North Ossetia.
Alan pot. Nothing moved? Such are apparently - invisible in the Russian north.
And where was Scythia?
Scythia.
As you can see, all the cards are superimposed on each other, like cabbage leaves. With minor discrepancies, typical, natural, because each country has borders constantly changing over time.
A fragment of a Scythian bas-relief on bronze dishes.
A fragment of a Scythian vase - a purebred Mongol nomad. Yes?
So, the results of reflections on: - All these "countries" are simply "subjects of the federation", and one and the same subject, which was called differently, in different periods of time. I am moved by historians who sadly exclaim: - "A people that appeared out of nowhere and disappeared into nowhere." Well yes … Of course … Let's introduce the historians of the future. They will also write treatises on the topic "Where did the Soviet nation disappear?"
And what kind of tribe was Krasnodar? And what kind of people were the people of Murmansk? Now look at the modern map of Russia and get the answer. All these peoples Vyatichi, Krivichi, Dregovichi, Drevlyane, Polyana, Smolyan, etc. were united into republics under the rule of a prince or a khan. Often, secular power and military power were represented by one person. The rulers had more than one name from that. The sacred, which was known only by the man himself and the sorcerer, who named the youth at the age of twelve, and a household nickname.
Nicknames are widely known. These are Mamai, Kuchubei, Nogai, Dogonyai, Batu, Chelombey, etc. from the world of reality (worldly), such as Vladimir, Olga, Igor, Svyatoslav, Yaropolk, etc., did not always become the property of rumors and chronicles.
Secular Princes are known by their obvious names, and the warlords of the hordes (orders) were called by nicknames. So we have eliminated the contradiction - from which on the obverse of old coins there is the Russian name "Svyatoslav", and on the reverse - the Tartar name (Khan Mamai). This is one face! Governor General. And writing in Tartary was divided according to the level of access to information. The Magi wrote in runes (letters of initiates), the people wrote with lines and cuts, the nobility wrote in verb, and the eastern and southern provinces wrote mainly in what we now call "Arabic script." But the letter and the ligature were equally understood by all Tartars.
Let's go further. Large formations remained in history as the Scythians and Alans. But they all did not have clear boundaries; at different times the administrative map was different. Only the map of the whole country did not change significantly. And the differences in cultures are so minimal that it is simply ridiculous to pay attention to them. Even now, any of us sees how different the culture and life, for example, of Donetsk and Perm people. And the Pomors? In general, they seem to be foreigners. But, the common core is undoubtedly one. Here's a look at what archaeologists unearthed in the Hunnic burial mound near Kursk:
Spearman.
So what do you think? And you continue to believe that there is some kind of George on our money, coats of arms and banners? I don't think this is the case. This is perhaps the oldest image of who we call Saint George. And he was a symbol of tartar even then, when Christianity had not yet been invented, then. But this is something else … Look at the jewelry made of gold, which the Huns had in countless quantities. Not only with what the highest skill it was done, but also what a huge amount of precious metals was used, just in everyday life! Where did the dense nomads have such wealth? It is clear from where. The contemporaries of Attila's campaigns on Europe themselves spoke of the untold treasures of the land of the Huns. After all, they were paid tribute by both Rome and Byzantium! It is clear why Tartaria was so hated and feared in Europe.
Admire the skill level of the Hunnic barbarians, nomads from the steppes:
Gold decor is all that remains of the Scythian sword.
It is strange that all this remained in the provincial museum in Kursk.
Jewelry of Scythian women of fashion.
Women's bracelet. Gold, garnet.
Hair comb. Gold. From the Scythian collection of the Crimea.
This is how much gold it was necessary to have, that even hair combs could be made of it! You can admire this thing endlessly!
It is obvious, however, that nomadic peoples cannot have developed crafts and, moreover, production. We see convincing evidence that the Huns or Tartars, or Scythians or Sarmatians, and also Gogs and Magogs, Vents, Wends, Pelasgs, Sklovens, Slavs, Rus, Rus, Muscovites, Katsap, Soviet, Russian (what name am I have you forgotten?) were a powerful centralized state, with developed crafts, a well-functioning political and judicial system, and an invincible army. There are many names, one people! We need to focus on one. Let us be Tartars, since that was the name of our Motherland all over the world a couple of hundred years ago. It's okay that we have forgotten our name and family. It is not too late to shake things up, think, and rethink your past in order to change the present and build the future.
Here is “a savage barbarian, a Hun, a brutal murderer and robber who brought Europe to its knees. I didn't get off my horse, even to pee :
Hun (Scythian, Sarmatian, Russian, Soviet).
“ Enslaved disenfranchised Slavic woman. ”
The defeated enemies considered the Huns to be enslavers, and the supporters claimed that Attila had not joined anyone by force. As is the case with Armenia and Georgia. Well, who captured them !? They themselves understood that not a single Georgian or Armenian would remain if Russia did not take them under protection. The Turks would have cut them out for a clean one. They didn't even need slaves, only territories and no memory of who lived here before, and whose land it really was.
This year (2012) the city of the Huns was also excavated in the Lipetsk region. Its size and perfection amaze today. It was a city of metallurgists and gunsmiths. Weavers, potters, jewelers and merchants. What nomads! Fear God!
The Roman ambassador went to Atil to agree on the size of the Roman tribute to the Huns. After the visit, he wrote:
“The city was across three rivers east of the Danube and was built of wood. The royal palace with carved towers towered on the mountain. Guests were greeted with bread and salt, honey and kvass. And the girls in long dresses were dancing around to celebrate the arrival of the guests. The country was settled by Attila's great-grandfather - Bolomber (Volodimir? Bogomir?). Attila's brother was called Blat (Vlad?)."
Volga - Ra. Volgaria (Bulgaria).
And here's another trick … The Volgars (Bulgars) called Atilla Mstislav! Well, that's all. Now there is nothing to argue about. Where do so many myths come from? What was Attila doing in Europe? And what was the Russian army doing in the Caucasus? Same! Establishing constitutional order. Itals, Gauls, Franks and Nibelungs lived for themselves, did not interfere with anyone, they themselves did not want to join Tartaria, but paid tribute regularly. Then someone in Iberia (Spain) started encouraging everyone, saying, let's "reign" ourselves, without the Tartars. I had to go to war, and put things in order. Sorry Rome was spared. The Pope paid off Attila with a huge tribute. Oh, sorry! The tsar would have burned out this infection in the embryo, we would now live in a different world.
Attila storms Budapest.
Hungarians and Bulgarians all consider themselves descendants of the Huns. It is now clear why the Chuvash understand Hungarian without a translator?
But how did it happen that in the descriptions of contemporaries they say about the Huns: - "black, with slanting eyes, with scars on their cheeks so that the beard does not grow." It's simple.
Let's remember June 1941. When the Wehrmacht soldiers saw the first Russian prisoners, they were horrified. The heralds of Goebbels did not lie to them that the Russians are narrow-eyed barbarians, not even people, but so … Something like monkeys. Why did it happen so? Everyone who served in the Soviet army will understand: - Recruits from fraternal republics such as Turkmenistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, etc., whom could they have sent to the army? Shepherds and cotton growers. These fighters, who did not even know the Russian language, went to the most unqualified positions. Stroybat, support units, logistic services, etc.
It was these "knights" who were the most unprepared for the conduct of hostilities. That is why they were captured in droves. Look at these "Russians" for yourself. True, it is impossible to watch these photos without pain. I found them on one of the German forums about the war.
We were not shown such horrors. I have selected the most "traumatic" pictures for the Russian soul. And the Germans have this … even the half-eaten corpses of comrades who were allowed to eat in order to survive for others, in a prisoner of war camp. The camp is an open field fenced with thorns, and SS men with shepherd dogs around the perimeter. It was funny for them to watch how hungry people devoured their own compatriots. Enlightened Europe … Look:
Russian & quot; Finno-Ugro-Mongols & quot;.
Russian & quot; Finno-Ugro-Mongols & quot;.
Russian & quot; Finno-Ugro-Mongols & quot;.
Russian & quot; Finno-Ugro-Mongols & quot;.
Do you think anything has changed now? Yes, no … So the modern Russian army consists of representatives of the most diverse peoples. We are all Russians! What difference does it make which eye shape and skin color?
Russian army.
This is a modern motorized rifle brigade of the modern Russian army.
So in the troops of Attila there were different wars, different tribes and peoples, but the main thing is that they were tribes of a single kingdom. And the name of this kingdom is GREAT TARTARIA.
Addition:
While building a bridge over the Danube River in Hungary in 2014, workers unearthed a stunning sixth-century coffin. An analysis of the monument showed that it was the burial chamber of the great Hunnic leader. (I think one of Attila's generals):
Tomb of the General of the Huns.
“This burial is absolutely incredible!”Explains Albrecht Rümschtein, a historian at Eotvos Lorand University in Budapest and a member of the tomb research team. "We found many horse skeletons, as well as various weapons and other artifacts, all traditionally associated with the Huns. These objects include a great sword made of meteorite iron, which could certainly belong to the legendary Attila." Scythian "Sacred sword of war", allegedly presented to him, by Mars himself, the God of war."
There is not a word about the fact that he is a "Mongol" or "Chinese".
Author: kadykchanskiy
