About Pseudo-historical Myths About "wild Nomads" Who Conquered Half Of The World - Alternative View

About Pseudo-historical Myths About "wild Nomads" Who Conquered Half Of The World - Alternative View
About Pseudo-historical Myths About "wild Nomads" Who Conquered Half Of The World - Alternative View

Video: About Pseudo-historical Myths About "wild Nomads" Who Conquered Half Of The World - Alternative View

Video: About Pseudo-historical Myths About
Video: Your Perception of the WW2 Eastern Front is Wrong 2024, May
Anonim

Within the framework of the total falsification of history carried out under the leadership of the Vatican for several centuries, there are many pseudo-historical myths, striking in their obvious illogicality, clearly designed for people completely deprived of the ability to think independently. One of such pseudo-historical myths is the myth of "wild nomads" who periodically conquered almost half of the "civilized world" and kept many peoples in fear. But could the nasty nomads achieve such successes without first-class weapons and armor, for the production of which (all the more mass) one needs powerful metallurgy and blacksmithing, which means the presence of handicrafts and fortified cities.

This is where the main task of the forgers is hidden - to silence the presence in the distant past of a powerful state - designated on medieval atlases and maps as "Great Tartary", whose troops periodically came to Europe and China under the name of "Huns", "Scythians", "Mongolians -Tatar "and other pseudo-nomads from the myths of history falsifiers. Here's what you can read about this, for example, in the book of the Russian traveler, biologist and anthropologist G. Sidorov "The Legacy of the White Gods", based on the information he received from one of the Siberian hermits:

As you can see, where the pseudo-historical myths of the "official history" begin, elementary logic ends. It is also completely absent in the myth of the "Mongol-Tatars", who in fact have nothing to do with either the modern Mongols or the modern Tatars, who were previously called the "Volga Bulgars". The most important thing is that the myth of the "Mongol-Tatar invasion and yoke" is no more than 200 years old and comes from Russophobic Polish historians who, inventing an invasion of a horde of "wild Mongoloids", killed two birds with one stone.

First, they argued that their main competitors in the creation of a single "Slavic world" were the Russians. they allegedly lost their genetic purity and themselves became half-Asians, half-Mongoloids. It was this myth that the Vatican, the Zion-Anglo-Saxon empire and its colony Poland used to divide the once united people into Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians, as well as actively oppose them (especially Ukrainians) to the Russian people, who were credited with the image of the “oppressor-Horde”, the descendants of the mythical “Hordes ". In fact, the term "horde" is understood by the regular army of Great Tartary, in contrast to the princely squads, which were regional (and not federal) armed formations.

The second reason why the myth about the next “fierce and numerous Mongoloids” was invented is the justification for the military defeat of the opposing armies of “civilized” Europe, including Catholic Poland, which has always been an outpost of the Vatican in Eastern Europe. Well, like, the first-class armies of Europe could not do anything with the "huge" armies of "wild nomads" in the form of which, for some reason, Mongoloid features are completely absent in European and Old Russian engravings, as well as in the description of their appearance in ancient annals.

There was also a third reason for inventing the "Mongol-Tatar yoke" by the falsifiers, and also Russophobic. This is the "promotion" of the myth about the slavish nature of the Russian people, which, like 300 years, endured the yoke of the "conquerors-Mongoloids" who, during such a long time of their "yoke", did not leave any cultural, linguistic, genetic and other Mongoloid "traces" in Russia, including and archeological data - the absence of any mass graves of Mongoloid warriors. All the same applies to the rest of Europe, where the troops of the mythical "wild nomad Mongoloids" passed.

Could this be in reality, outside the pseudo-historical myths invented by the Jesuits? Obviously not. The pseudo-historical myths invented by falsifiers-Russophobes are clearly lying to us. There was no "Mongol-Tatar yoke", but there was an "anti-terrorist operation" of the federal troops of an ally of Russia - Great Tartary (previously known as "Great Scythia"), against the traitorous princes who decided to support the Catholic expansion of the Vatican and the "crusade" "To Russia. That is why Batu's army fell on the traitor-princes from among the separatists, who had conspired with the Vatican, as well as on the European armies of the crusaders, who were already ready to attack Russia, weakened by the internecine war with the traitorous princes. At the same time, few people know that the armed detachment of Batu's son - Sartak helped fight off the squad of Novgorod prince A. Nevsky from the invasion of the knights-crusaders of the Teutonic order.

This explains why the tribute imposed on Russia by the “wild nomads” was much lower than all the taxes that we now pay to our native state and why every tenth “conscript” served military service in the federal army of Tartary. The so-called "tithe" was a federal tax and this tax was collected by the Russian princes themselves, who played the role of regional authorities such as the current governors. Another interesting feature: for some reason, the Teutonic knights-crusaders staged a real genocide of the Rus in the captured Pskov and other Russian cities, including by destroying local churches. But the "wild nomads" of Batu - "infidels", did not destroy Russian churches and had a clear instruction "from above" about this.

Also, the behavior of the "Mongols-conquerors" in the territory of the allegedly "conquered" by them Russia and in other countries of Europe and Asia conquered by them is very different. And at the same time, many do not pay attention to one special detail - Batu's army did not invade those European lands that were not under the rule of Catholics, and therefore the Vatican. And such a selective action suggests that his main task was not the conquest of Europe, but the prevention of its catholicization and the end of the genocide unleashed by the Vatican against representatives of Vedic cultures in the occupied territories of Europe, which was the true hidden essence of the so-called. "Holy Inquisition". Of course, subsequently, under the leadership of this very Vatican, a total falsification of history was carried out,transformed from the light pen of Jesuit monks the federal army of Tartaria into the "hordes of Mongoloids" - the mythical "Mongol Empire". And later the Catholic historians of Poland came up with the very "Mongol-Tatar yoke" for the reasons that have already been voiced above.

michael101063 ©

Recommended: