A Version Of The Story From Oleg Pavlyuchenko - Alternative View

A Version Of The Story From Oleg Pavlyuchenko - Alternative View
A Version Of The Story From Oleg Pavlyuchenko - Alternative View

Video: A Version Of The Story From Oleg Pavlyuchenko - Alternative View

Video: A Version Of The Story From Oleg Pavlyuchenko - Alternative View
Video: Реальная РУСЬ! Вот как БЫЛО на САМОМ деле! Олег Павлюченко на Народном Славянском радио! 2024, May
Anonim

In recent years, among independent researchers of alternative history, the name of the Russian researcher, author of the channel "Alternative History of the Black Sea and the Caucasus" (AISPIK), Oleg Pavlyuchenko, has become more and more famous. It must be said that while examining the artifacts of ancient civilization, he created his own hypothesis concerning the true chronology of events in human history, which does not coincide with the official history. nor with the hypotheses of other "alternatives" based on the esoteric sources of antiquity. Nevertheless, this original hypothesis is noteworthy and is not devoid of a certain harmony and consistency in its construction, which cannot be said about the official history.

Image
Image

He believes that “megalithic”, “ancient” and “inter-flood” civilizations have consistently existed on our planet, each of which, after a global cataclysm, was revived from the remnants of the previous one and had less knowledge, abilities and less developed technologies. Wherein. the opinion of the majority of modern alternatives does not contradict this hypothesis at all, and all disputes usually boil down to the dating of the time of existence and death of these previous civilizations.

This is how his hypothesis, expressed by him in the film "How did the very first Flood deprive us of earthly Paradise?"

Of course, one can agree with O. Pavlyuchenko's hypothesis or not. It shocks people who blindly believe in the dogmas of "official history" especially strongly. But the "alternatives" to accept the probable possibility of just such a course of historical events is much easier. For, no matter how true or not the assumptions of this researcher, in the main, he is still right: in our past there were highly developed civilizations that left behind artifacts hushed up by historians and died for reasons unknown to us. But a collection of fantastic myths called "official history", in view of the presence of many inconsistencies, absurdities and outright falsifications of real historical events, is suitable only as dogmas of a new religion, which can only be believed blindly,without trying to test them in practice and completely ignoring the many artifacts found around the world.