Richly illustrated article, which offers a version of the death of Great Tartary. Why didn't the great Empire leave behind several smaller states? And where did its multimillion population go? What kind of "little ice age" happened 200 years ago?
Great Tartary disappeared from the political map of the world about two hundred years ago.
More precisely, it was erased from this card (Fig. 1).
It was erased so thoroughly that no one had even heard of it for almost two hundred years. And I didn't know. Until the works of Academician Fomenko on the New Chronology appeared, which returned to scientific circulation a lot of evidence of the existence of this state. The largest that has ever existed on our planet.
Fig. 1 Expansion of the territory of Russia from 1613 to 1914 (official version).
The natural borders of Great Tartary, which in the Middle Ages occupied the entire Northern Hemisphere, were the ocean shores (Fig. 2, 3).
Figure: 2. Map of Eurasia (middle of the 18th century)
Figure: 3. Great Tartary (mid-15th century)
Promotional video:
Moreover, three oceans out of the four available - the Arctic, Pacific and Atlantic - were, in fact, its inland water bodies.
By the end of the eighteenth century (according to modern chronology), succumbing to the pernicious influence of monotheism (Judaism, Christianity and Islam), the population of the European part of Great Tartary plunged into the bloody horror of religious and conquest wars, political intrigues, rebellions and revolutions. And broke away from Asia. It managed to withstand the evil onslaught of the new world religions and retained the moral purity and faith of its Ancestors. The border between the Metropolis and the western, plague-ridden lands ran from the Arctic to the Indian Ocean. Along the Ural Mountains, the shores of the Caspian Sea and the Zagros peaks (Fig. 4, 5).
Figure: 4. Great Tartary (1680)
Figure: 5. Russian Empire (1755)
The last border war with Britain and Muscovy was unsuccessful for Great Tartary. After suffering a series of serious defeats, she was forced to admit the loss of some of her territories. In the Southern Urals, in the Northern Caspian and South-Western Siberia, in Central and North-Eastern India and on the east coast of North America. At present, various episodes of this war, truly Worldwide in scope and consequences, are known as the suppression of the Pugachev revolt and the development of Siberia, the colonization of India and the war for the independence of the British colonies in America (Fig. 6, 7, 8).
Figure: 6. The uprising led by EI Pugachev 1773-1775.
Figure: 7. India in 1784
Figure: 8. War of independence of the British colonies in North America and the creation of the United States.
Given the pathological tendency of professional historians to falsify, it can be assumed that this was not quite the case. But, even in the event of the victory of the Anglo-Russian coalition, by the beginning of the nineteenth century, Great Tartary, in any case, remained the largest and most powerful state in the world.
Suppose (as an exception) that this time, for some reason unknown to us, the official historiography describes the events that happened in reality.
Great Tartary suffered a military defeat and suffered territorial losses. So what? Such insignificant losses could not lead to the death of such a great power! Even if the defeat caused a serious internal political crisis. For no internal political crisis could lead to the collapse of Great Tartary. Because the people who inhabited Asia two hundred years ago were united and completely homogeneous. And by nationality, and by language, and by religion.
Two hundred years ago, in Great Tartary, on the land of Tarkh and Tara, only tartars lived (Fig. 9). Tall, fair-haired, white-skinned people with cornflower blue, green, fiery or silver eyes. Slavs-Aryans. Rus. Friendly and kind-hearted in times of peace, brave and merciless in battle, just and merciful in days of victory and steadfast in times of adversity. Because they have preserved the moral purity and faith of their Ancestors. From the Urals to Alaska. From Novaya Zemlya to Tibet.
Figure: 9. Tarh and Tara.
In order to destroy Great Tartary, it was first necessary to destroy her people. All! Until the last person! And that was still beyond my powers. Neither Britain nor Muscovy. Not their coalition. Even if the rest of Europe entered this filthy coalition.
The famous commander Alexander Suvorov (Fig. 10), who took part in the defeat of Pugachev (Fig. 11) and personally escorted him to Moscow (Fig. 12), could inflict a major defeat on the Tartar troops.
Figure: 10. Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov, Prince of Italy, Count of Rymnik, Count of the Holy Roman Empire, Generalissimo of the Russian land and naval forces, Field Marshal of the Austrian and Sardinian forces, Grand of the Sardinian Kingdom and Prince of the Royal Blood, Chevalier of all Russian military and foreign orders.
Figure: 11. Emelyan Pugachev.
Fig. 12. Suvorov puts Pugachev in a cage.
And, apparently, he did. For which he was awarded a golden sword with diamonds (the cost of such a sword was equal to the sum of the annual salary of the whole regiment). And he received several higher orders of the Russian Empire (the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called and the Order of George and Vladimir, first class). Although the official historical science is silent about this. Like a fish on ice. More precisely, it hides the history of the Tartar wars of Muscovy among its wars with the Ottoman Turks. And other Crimean khans.
Note, however, that Russia has been at war with the Sublime Port for centuries. But she could not finally defeat it. Despite the glorious victories of Rumyantsev-Zadunaisky, Orlov-Chesmensky, Potemkin-Tavrichesky, Suvorov-Rymniksky, Kutuzov-Smolensky, Dibich-Zabalkansky and Paskevich-Erivansky. Although the Turkish Empire, even at the time of its heyday, was ten times smaller than Tartary (Fig. 13).
Figure: 13. Ottoman Empire (official version).
Turkey suffered defeats in battles many times, lost wars and lost territories, but it never disappeared from the political map of the world.
Unlike Great Tartary. Which was erased not only from the map. Tartary was erased from the face of the Earth. Together with the people who inhabited it …
***
This happened in February 1816. Which was later named "The Year Without Summer". In the United States, it is still called "Eighteen hundred and frozen to death", that is, "one thousand eight hundred and frozen to death." And the official science considers the beginning of the "Little Ice Age", which lasted three years.
In March, temperatures in North America remained wintry. In April and May there was an unnatural lot of rain and hail, a sudden frost destroyed most of the crops, in June two giant snowstorms killed people, in July and August, rivers froze even in Pennsylvania. It was freezing every night, and up to a meter of snow fell in New York and the northeastern United States. Germany was plagued by violent storms. Many rivers, including the Rhine, overflowed their banks. The weather in Switzerland was terrible, it snowed every month. The unusual cold has led to a catastrophic crop failure. In the spring of 1817, grain prices in Europe increased tenfold, and famine began among the population.
Darkness fell on the world. In the literal sense of the word. The sun could not break through the cloudy shroud and did not warm the earth. Lord Byron wrote in 1816: “The bright sun went out, and the stars / Wandered aimlessly, without rays / In eternal space; icy ground / Was rushing blindly in the moonless air. / The hour of the morning woke up and passed, / But he did not bring a day with him … / The dwellings of all those who had dwellings - / The cities burned into bonfires … / Terrible hunger / Took people … / And quickly perished people.
The solution to the three-year cold was "found" a hundred years later. American researcher W. Humphreys linked climate change in 1816-1819. with the eruption of the Tambora volcano on the island of Sumbawa. Currently, this hypothesis is considered generally accepted in the scientific world. Although it is not clear why the explosion of the volcano south of the equator affected the climate of the Northern Hemisphere so much? Without having any effect on the climate of the South. Eruptions of the same power (about eight hundred megatons), which occurred in 1883 in Indonesia (Krakatoa), in 1912 in Alaska (Katmai) and in 1991 in the Philippines (Pinatubo), led to a decrease in temperature by no more than half a degree (fig. 14, 15, 16). Without causing no midday darkness, no snow storms in the middle of summer, no massive overflow of rivers.
Figure: 14. The eruption of the Krakatoa volcano (1883)
Figure: 15. The eruption of Mount Pinatubo, (1991)
Figure: 16. The eruption of Mount Pinatubo (1991)
It is interesting to note that while Europe and America were freezing and starving, in Russia in 1816-1819. nothing unusual was noted. No cold, no hunger. "Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, and goodwill in men." I mean, everything is as usual. Both frosts and crop failures.
This is in Russia! And even after the recent invasion of twelve languages and the complete devastation of the western provinces! As they say, the tradition is fresh, but hard to believe! Even in ordinary years, winter in Russia lasts six months, the trunks of age-old trees crack from the frost, and by spring you cannot sweep a handful of flour on the bottom of the barrel. So the point is not in the habit of the Russian people to cold and fasting, but in the absence of rotten Western democracy. And the presence of reliable censorship.
Meanwhile, Russia, most likely, was the source of climate problems in both Europe and America. This is indirectly evidenced by the age of modern forests in Russia and Belarus. Which is no more than two hundred years old. All forests! And Siberian, and Russian, and Belarusian.
This fact can only be explained by the fact that two hundred years ago all Russian forests disappeared. In chorus. And the ancient (elm lives three hundred years, linden - four hundred, pine and larch - five hundred, spruce - six hundred, cedar - a thousand, oak - fifteen hundred), and young. Apparently, they burned down (Fig. 17).
Figure: 17. Are burning, burning fires & hellip; (artist K. Vasiliev).
And the current ones have grown in their place. On the central Russian plain, the forest was restored in the middle of the nineteenth century by mass planting in verst squares. And the Siberian taiga rose by itself. There was no one to plant trees here. But more on that later.
And now a few words about the so-called "karst" lakes. Very common in Russia. Especially near settlements. Especially in Siberia. Perfectly round (fig. 18, 19, 20, 21).
Figure: 18. Mertvoe lake, Penza district of the Penza region.
Figure: 19. Lake Krugloe, Fokinsky district, Bryansk region.
Figure: 20. Lake Dead, Penza District, Penza Region
Figure: 21. Lake Shaitan, Muromtsevsky district, Omsk region
Often having a higher water level (due to the dense bowl) than the surrounding bodies of water. Lakes that have arisen not only over karsts (cavities formed under the action of carbonated water in the thickness of soluble rock - gypsum or limestone), but even where there were no karsts. And some of them never filled with water (Fig. 22, 23).
Figure: 22. Funnels of unknown origin in the area of Sarapul.
Figure: 23. Funnels of unknown origin in the area of Sarapul.
The names of these lakes are Lake Adovo, Shaitan Lake, Devil's Lake, Dead Lake, etc. - completely meaningless. From the point of view of official science, of course. Which did not find anything unusual in them. Unlike the local population.
And further. Strangely enough, the diameter of these lakes correlates well with the diameter of craters from air nuclear explosions. With a capacity from one to ten megatons. But it is so. By the way.
For the sake of completeness, we note that, by an amazing coincidence, it was in the nineteenth century that mankind became acquainted with cancer. Where they came from to science is still unknown. Although today, none of the doctors any longer doubts that one of the main causes of cancer is radioactive radiation.
In any case, in the middle of the twentieth century, the outbreak of cancer incidence was caused precisely by an increase in the radioactive background. Because of the nuclear tests - 2422 nuclear and thermonuclear, incl. 525 atmospheric (Fig. 24, 25). But it is not important.
Figure: 24. Thermonuclear explosion.
Figure: 25. Thermonuclear explosion.
Indeed, in the nineteenth century, neither Muscovy, nor Britain, nor nuclear or thermonuclear weapons had yet. Consequently, neither one nor the other could apply it.
And if they had it?
Considering the level of philanthropy of the British colonialists (Fig. 26) and the tsarist satraps, there is no reason to doubt their determination to use the atomic bomb (if it was available). Even in the absence of modern means of delivery and detonation.
Figure: 26. Execution of the leaders of the sepoy uprising with the help of the "Devil's wind" (art director V. Verischagin)
But. One way or another, neither Muscovy nor Britain had an atomic bomb yet. But there seems to be a reason for its use. And very weighty …
***
Napoleon (Fig. 27) entered Moscow on September 2. After a terrible battle near the village of Borodino, the Russian troops, having successfully repelled all the attacks of the French, retaining reserves and having at their disposal excellent positions and strong rear lines, suddenly withdrew. And they did not just retreat, but gave the largest city in the country to the enemy to mock. Its historic center. Which Emperor Alexander I (Fig. 28) publicly proclaimed "the head of other Russian cities" as soon as Napoleon crossed the border. That he was not mistaken with the direction of the main blow, probably (Fig. 29).
Figure: 27. Napoleon I Bonaparte, Emperor of the French, King of Italy, Protector of the Rhine Union and Mediator of the Swiss Confederation.
Figure: 28. Alexander I Blessed, magnanimous powers-restorer, Emperor and Autocrat of All-Russia, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod, Kazan, Astrakhan Tsar, Siberian Tsar, Tavrichesk Tsar Chersonis, Sovereign of Pskov and Grand Duke of Smolensk, Lithuania, Volyn and Volyn and Estlyandsky. Liflyandsky, Kurlyandsky and Semigalsky, Samogitsky, Korelsky, Tversky, Yugorsky, Perm, Vyatsky, Bulgarian and others; Sovereign and Grand Duke of Novgorod Nizovsky land, Chernigov. Ryazan, Polotsk. Rostov. Yaroslavl, Beloozersky, Udora, Obdorsky, Kondiysky, Vitebsk, Mstislavsky and all Northern countries Lord and Sovereign of Iversk, Kartala, Georgian and Kabardian lands, Cherkassk and Mountain Princes and other hereditary Sovereign and Owner, Norwegian Heir,Duke of Schleswig-Golstinsky, Stormarnsky, Dietmarsen and Oldenburgsky and Sovereign Eversky and so on, and so on, and so forth.
Figure: 29. The invasion of the Napoleonic army in Russia in 1812
Figure: 30. Mikhail Illarionovich Golenishchev-Kutuzov, Most Serene Prince of Smolensk, Field Marshal General of the Russian troops.
A day before the shameful surrender of the "head of all other cities", the Commander-in-Chief of all Russian armies and militias, the Most Serene Prince of Smolensk (Fig. 30), who was promoted to general-field marshals of the Russian Empire by the imperial decree the other day and received one hundred thousand rubles for expenses, held a notorious military council in Filyakh (Fig. 31). And he insisted on leaving Moscow. Despite the fierce resistance of some of their generals. Young and stupid. Cut off all the screams and ordered to retreat. Although yesterday, in an order dated August 31, he swore to give the adversary a new decisive battle under the walls of Moscow.
Figure: 31. Military Council in Fili (art. A. Kivshenko)
During the retreat in Moscow, more than thirty thousand wounded and a huge amount of weapons were thrown (one hundred fifty-six guns and twenty-seven thousand cannonballs, seventy-five thousand rifles and forty thousand sabers, six hundred banners and a thousand standards).
This decision of the field marshal has not yet found an unambiguous interpretation. Someone justifies it. Based on the end result. Someone considers a traitor. Who sold himself to Jewish-Masons. In the face of the French. Or the British. Not a pinch. At his age! With everything you want. Including money, fame, orders and titles …
Why did Napoleon, famous for his decisiveness, sit on Poklonnaya Hill and wait for no one knows what? Not daring to enter Moscow. Although I already knew that it was empty. And no one is going to arrange street fights in it. Despite the old Russian habit of fighting for every house. As it was in Smolensk. And many other places.
Or maybe he finally smelled a trap? Maybe something told him that such experienced military leaders as Kutuzov, whom he knew well from previous wars, simply do not give up the historical centers of their homeland. Especially covered by well-fortified positions. Backed by strong rear. And also reserves.
However, there was nowhere to go. So I still had to enter Moscow. At least in order to have something to bargain for in peace negotiations. By this time, Napoleon had already lost his numerical advantage. And the most important thing is confidence in victory. “Of all my battles, the most terrible is the one I gave near Moscow. The French in it showed themselves worthy to win, and the Russians acquired the right to be invincible …”- he said after the battle (Fig. 32).
Figure: 32. Battle of Borodino (artist L. Lezhene)
This unfortunate Buonaparte had no idea that no one was going to enter into any negotiations with him. Because there is no need. For everything is already predetermined. Mene, Tekel, Peres. “Mene - God has numbered your kingdom and put an end to it; Tekel - you are weighed on the scales and found very light; Peres - your kingdom is divided and given to the Medes and Persians”(Daniel 5: 26-28).
Therefore, Kutuzov received the order to leave Moscow. Because his army fully fulfilled its task - lured the Corsican monster into a trap. Now the army had to be saved. Her Serene Highness saved her. For what he has Eternal Memory. Because it was precisely this army that led the remnants of the foreign troops back to the border (Fig. 33).
Figure: 33. Expulsion of Napoleon's army from Russia.
As for the Muscovites, they all knew that Moscow would be abandoned. And you have to get away with your feet. To avoid getting Buonaparte. Who will not stand on ceremony. And he will rob, kill and rape. So, as they say, who did not hide …
However, only a few remained. Only twenty thousand townspeople.
Napoleon's chief equestrian, Marquis Armand de Caulaincourt, later recalled: “The city without inhabitants was engulfed in gloomy silence. During our entire long journey, we did not meet a single local resident ….
The trap slammed shut. The game was caught.
On the same night, a fire broke out in Moscow (Fig. 34, 35).
Figure: 34. Fire of Moscow in 1812 (artist I. Aivazovsky)
Figure: 35. Moscow fire (unknown German artist)
Brigadier General Count Philippe de Segur wrote in his memoirs: “Two officers settled in one of the Kremlin buildings, from where they had a view of the northern and eastern parts of the city. About midnight they were awakened by an extraordinary light, and they saw that the flames engulfed the palaces: at first it illuminated the graceful and noble outlines of their architecture, and then it all collapsed … The information brought by the officers who had gathered from all sides coincided with each other. On the first night, on the 14th to the 15th, a fireball descended over the palace of Prince Trubetskoy and set fire to this building."
A very strange fire. To put it mildly.
Extraordinary (!) Light. Fire ball. Flame that brings down (!) Palaces. Not adobe huts, but multi-storey buildings! Not igniting, but illuminating. First. And then crashing! About the ball - no comment at all. I mean, guess yourself. Once. What is this ball. And if you don’t guess, watch the newsreel of nuclear tests (Fig. 36, 37) …
Figure: 36. Nuclear tests.
Figure: 37. Nuclear tests.
The city center suffered the most. Despite the fact that it was built up exclusively with stone and brick buildings. Even the Kremlin has almost nothing left. Although it was separated from the surrounding buildings by wide areas and ditches. Such, for example, as the Alevizov ditch (thirty-four meters wide and thirteen meters deep). Which ran from the Arsenal Tower to Beklemishevskaya. After the fire, this huge moat was completely covered with debris and debris. After which it became easier to level it than to clear it.
By the way, Napoleon, who is accused of setting fire to Moscow and blowing up the Kremlin, barely survived this fire himself.
Count de Segur says: “Then after a long search ours found an underground passage near a pile of stones leading to the Moscow River. Through this narrow passage, Napoleon with his officers and guards managed to get out of the Kremlin."
Everyone who survived was in a state of shock.
De Segur recalls: “Those of ours who used to walk around the city, now, deafened by the storm of fire, blinded by ash, did not recognize the area, and besides, the streets themselves disappeared in smoke and turned into heaps of ruins … All that remained of great Moscow was several surviving houses scattered among the ruins. This slain and burned colossus, like a corpse, gave off a heavy smell. Heaps of ash, and in some places ruins of walls and fragments of rafters, some indicated that there had once been streets here. On the outskirts there were Russian men and women covered with burnt clothes. They are like ghosts, wandering among the ruins … From the French army, as well as from Moscow, only one third survived."
Further more. Diseases followed the fire.
A Moscow resident says: “The barracks were littered with sick soldiers, deprived of any supervision, and hospitals were wounded, dying by the hundreds from a lack of medicine and even food … the streets and squares were littered with dead bloody human bodies and horses … the soldiers passing by, out of compassion, pinned them up with exactly the same composure with which we kill a fly in summer … The whole city was turned into a cemetery."
In total, more than eighty thousand people died (for reference: during the atomic explosion in Hiroshima, seventy thousand people died, in Nagasaki - sixty). Of the nine thousand one hundred fifty-eight buildings, six thousand five hundred and thirty-two were destroyed.
Does this remind you of anything? From modern history?
Not surprising. After all, the Moscow fire occurred a hundred and fifty years before Hiroshima (Fig. 38, 39, 40, 41)! When no one had even heard of tactical nuclear weapons or radiation sickness. And I didn't know. Because they didn't exist yet. Or have you already been?
Figure: 38. The atomic explosion in Hiroshima 1945-06-08
Figure: 39. The atomic explosion in Nagasaki on 1945-09-08.
Figure: 40. Hiroshima after the atomic bombing.
Figure: 41. Nagasaki before and after the atomic bombing.
Incidentally, the increased level of background radiation in the center of Moscow forms a characteristic spot, with a "torch" stretching towards the south (Fig. 42).
Figure: 42. Map of the radiation background in Moscow.
The epicenter of the spot is located exactly in the place where the windows of the two officers mentioned in the memoirs of the Comte de Segur looked out. The very ones, in whose eyes graceful and noble palaces were first lit and then collapsed. Caught in the epicenter …
***
The official historical science still hasn't figured out who set Moscow on fire.
The French believed that the Muscovites themselves did it. And even four hundred “arsonists” were shot (Fig. 43). So that others are discouraged.
Figure: 43. Shooting of the Moscow "arsonists" (art director V. Verischagin)
The Russians believed that the Corsican monster was to blame for everything. Vindictive and vicious. From natural bloodlust, it destroyed a huge city and tens of thousands of people, including thirty thousand of its own soldiers and officers.
But is it? There was no need for the French to set fire to Moscow. Winter is ahead. And from Moscow to Paris - six hundred and sixty-six leagues. I mean, very far away! Among other things, Napoleon needed Moscow as a bargaining chip in the upcoming peace talks.
Muscovites also did not need to burn themselves. Winter is ahead. And we must somehow survive. Regardless of the occupation. In addition, thirty thousand wounded were left in Moscow. Almost all of them perished in the fire. Together with twenty thousand citizens who did not manage to leave the doomed city.
As for Emperor Alexander I, there are very serious doubts about his innocence in this crime!
On April 5, 1813, the emperor arrived to say goodbye to Kutuzov, who was dying. Behind the screens near the bed of the Most Serene Prince was the official Krupennikov, who was with him. He kept for posterity the last conversation between Kutuzov and Alexander I:
- Forgive me, Mikhail Illarionovich! - said the Sovereign and Autocrat of All Russia.
“I forgive, sir, but Russia will never forgive you for this,” the field marshal replied.
Why did the emperor ask for forgiveness from Kutuzov? Maybe for his top secret order to leave Moscow? Or what happened to her after she was abandoned?
Shortly before the invasion, Alexander I said to the Austrian ambassador: “I suppose that at the beginning of the war we will be defeated, but I am ready for that; retreating, I will leave a desert behind me. The bloody nightmare of the Austerlitz catastrophe forever instilled fear in the emperor's soul and assured Buonaparte of invincibility. I mean, in the impossibility of defeating the Corsican monster by conventional means. And he could have prompted the search for unusual …
Was Alexander I the author of the terrible trap prepared for Napoleon in Moscow? Or listened to someone's advice? Or obeyed someone's orders?
One way or another, at least the emperor should have known about her. Therefore, he ordered to surrender the capital to Napoleon. Dumping all the responsibility for this on Kutuzov.
The latter, by the way, is quite understandable. If the proposal to surrender Moscow had sounded from the lips of the tsar, he would not have long to reign. Even the enormous authority and fame of Kutuzov could hardly bear the weight of this decision. “The ruler is weak and crafty, / The bald-headed dandy, the enemy of labor, / Accidentally warmed by glory” would simply be crushed by this weight. In the literal sense of the word. I mean, an officer's scarf. How it happened with his father. Ten years ago.
So who, after all, organized such a terrible trap for Napoleon?
Cui prodest - look for who benefits - said the ancient Romans. Who would benefit from destroying the Corsican villain? Who was the usurper's most sworn enemy?
Modern historians laugh at the stupid Buonaparte, who, after the Battle of Borodino, sat on Poklonnaya Hill and waited for the boyars to bring him the keys to Moscow (Fig. 44).
Figure: 44. Napoleon near Moscow. Waiting for the deputation of the boyars. (artist V. Vereshchagin)
And, really, it's funny. After all, there have been no boyars in the Russian Empire for a hundred years!
In Russia, indeed, there were no boyars or governors. And in Great Tartary?
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. Therefore, it is not at all surprising that Napoleon sought an alliance with a power that had recently fought with Britain and Russia. Expecting with its help to defeat both the one and the other. And to fulfill his cherished dream - to take out her finest pearl from the British crown. I mean, India.
If a military alliance between France and Tartary took place, the ownership of the East India Company in India would very soon change owners.
The Prime Minister of England, Earl of Liverpool (Fig. 45) formed his cabinet in June 1812. And he steered for almost fifteen years. In the previous government, he was Minister of War and Minister of the Colonies. And before that he was the Minister of Internal Affairs. It was he who managed to solve the most important foreign policy problems of England - to weaken France and Russia as much as possible. And to destroy Great Tartary is the most terrible threat to the Indian colonies.
Figure: 45. Robert Banks Jenkinson, Earl of Liverpool, Prime Minister of Great Britain 1812-1827
Observance of British interests in Russia was monitored by the envoy, Count Cathcart (Fig. 46). Which became famous for the outstanding in its cruelty and senselessness of the bombing of Copenhagen in September 1807. When, in just three nights, fifty English ships of the line made fourteen thousand side salvos and razed a third of the Danish capital to the ground. Prior to this, Cathcart managed to distinguish himself in the war with the British colonies in North America, fought in Spain and Flanders and dealt with anti-British demonstrations in Ireland, for which he was promoted to full general and knighted of the Order of the Thistle.
Figure: 46. William Shaw, Earl of Cathcart, Baron Greenock.
During Napoleon's invasion, Lord Cathcart was in the retinue of Alexander I and in September 1813 (on the first anniversary of the Moscow fire) he was awarded the St. Andrew's ribbon by the highest decree.
Field Marshal Rumyantsev was awarded the Order of St. Andrew the First-Called for the capture of Kolberg during the Seven Years War. Prince Potemkin - for the victory in the Russian-Turkish war and the Kuchuk-Kainardzhi peace treaty. Suvorov - for the defense of Kinburn and for Focsani.
I wonder what such feats of the highest order of the Russian Empire was the English envoy awarded?
Apparently, for the advice given on time. About the trap. And also for organizing the procedure. More precisely, for mediating in its organization.
Because other forces played the main role in the Moscow tragedy …
Apart from Britain, Napoleon had another powerful enemy. Much more vindictive and dangerous.
The Rothschild brothers (Fig. 47) were not awarded with Russian orders. And they were not mentioned anywhere in connection with Napoleon's campaign against Moscow. But his defeat could not do (and did not do!) Without their participation.
Figure: 47. The Rothschild family.
Given the sneakiness of this family. And the number of spies it contained. And also the authority of the Rothschilds in the Jewish diaspora and proximity to the ruling circles of Europe. And also to those who stood behind these circles. And pulled them by the strings.
It is possible that the Rothschild family had contact with the very top of the pyramid. I mean, with those who are above and watching what is happening.
What did Napoleon annoy the Rothschild family with?
Yes, actually nothing. Except for his appeal to the French Council of State in 1806 in connection with complaints about the usury of Jews: “They are the main troublemakers in the modern world … They are the vultures of humanity … The evil in them does not come from individuals, but from the indigenous nature of this people … Jewish activities nation since the time of Moses, due to all its predisposition, consisted of usury and extortion … The French government cannot indifferently watch how a low, degraded nation capable of all sorts of crimes seizes both beautiful provinces of old Alsace into its exclusive possession … Whole villages have been robbed Jews, they reintroduced slavery; these are real flocks of ravens. The harm done by the Jews does not come from individuals, but from the whole nation as a whole. These are worms and locusts,devastating France … I do my best to prove my contempt for this vilest nation in the world. Jews are a nation capable of the most terrible crimes … You cannot change the philosophical teachings of a Jewish character, they need exceptional special laws … Jews are treated with disgust, but I must admit that they are really disgusting; they are also despised, but they are also worthy of contempt."
Prior to this appeal, Buonaparte had shown nothing of his vile anti-Semitic nature. On the contrary! For the first time, he met representatives of the most persecuted nation in the world only during the Italian campaign. When he was already twenty-eight years old. And he immediately took them under protection. And since then he supported him in every possible way wherever his army turned out to be. And he even promised to restore the Sanhedrin and the Jewish state in Palestine. But it didn't last long.
After the Alsatian appeal, the fate of the presumptuous Corsican upstart, who had lost his scent after countless victories in Europe, was decided.
The victories ended abruptly. Glory went downhill. Less than three years later, his empire was shaken by a severe economic crisis. The population was dissatisfied. Attempts followed one after another. The Russian tsar, who had sworn eternal love in Tilsit just recently, suddenly became insolent. And he refused to marry his sister to him. First one, then the second. Obviously running into a scandal. And yet he managed to achieve his goal - Buonaparte gathered troops, moved to Moscow and himself climbed into a trap prepared for him.
Hasidic tzaddik Yisroel from Kozenitsy, having learned about Napoleon's invasion of Russia, answered the question about the prospects of his campaign: "Napol tipol". Literally translated, this means "inevitably will fall." It is curious that at the same time the aforementioned Israel used a play on the words "napol" and "napol", consonant with the name Napoleon.
The rest was a matter of technique.
In the literal sense of the word…
***
During the Napoleonic invasion and the overseas campaign, the irrecoverable losses of the Russian army amounted to about three hundred thousand people.
Despite the presence of a huge number of archival documents, memoirs and scientific works on the history of the Patriotic War of 1812, the total losses incurred by Russia during the invasion are unknown. They can only be assessed indirectly. Based on the results of audits carried out in 1811 and 1816. The decline in the population of Russia during this period amounted to more than three million people !!! With a total population of thirty-six million. In other words, almost ten percent of the population died. The same number as during the Great Patriotic War.
How can we explain such a huge number of people who died and died from disease, cold and hunger? The Corsican monster, for all its bloodthirstiness, did not touch the local population. The retreating Russian troops, who set up a scorched desert along the old Smolensk road on the orders of Alexander I, the "Blessed, magnanimous restorer of the powers", burned hundreds of towns and villages. But the residents were not shot. In any case, until the complete expulsion of Napoleon.
The official historical science somehow vaguely expounds the reasons for the end of the partisan war. Say, they drove out the foe and everything ended immediately. The clubs were used for kindling, and swords for plowshares. As unnecessary.
Why did the peasants, who had just defended their land with weapons in their hands (Fig. 48), again surrendered to the mercy of the serf-beasts?
This is in Russia! She has not yet forgotten Razin and Pugachev, and is always ready for the "last and decisive"! I mean, to "senseless and merciless." Even in the most peaceful time! As it has happened more than once. Both before and after 1812.
Figure: 48. Do not hide, let me come! (artist V. Vereshchagin)
Historians attribute the losses of the civilian population of Russia to the harsh winter of 1812-1813. Or maybe the people's war did not calm down by itself? And ten percent of the population did not die of cold and hunger? I mean, not just from them?
"Eight Hundred and Frozen to Death" claimed tens of thousands of lives in Europe and North America. In Russia, the bill went to the millions!
But this year claimed even more lives in Tartary …
Academician Fomenko in his works expressed the hypothesis that the Great Tartary was defeated and divided between Russia and the United States immediately after the defeat of the "Pugachev rebellion". Assuming that this is so, a number of questions arise:
Why, after the death of Great Tartary, several smaller states did not appear on its territory, as is usually the case after the collapse of empires (Roman, Ottoman, Austro-Hungarian, German, Russian, British) or with the collapse of large countries (Soviet Union, Yugoslavia)?
Why, having suffered a military defeat, the proud and freedom-loving Tartars submitted to the cruel conquerors, and did not raise the cudgel of the people's war, as the Slavs-Aryans always do in such situations?
Why did the real development of new lands in Russia and the United States begin only half a century later?
And finally, the most important:
Why endless spaces from the Urals to Alaska were deserted? Where did the hundred-odd million of the smashed tartars go?
In addition, Fomenko's hypothesis ignores a number of important facts already mentioned by us earlier: “A year without summer”, two-hundred-year-old forests and “karst” lakes, as well as an outbreak of cancer.
Even after half a century, the development of new lands was only cartographic in nature. Both in Russia and in the USA. Because neither the US nor Russia simply had the resources to occupy them. Neither human nor material.
Not to mention the constant threat of popular unrest in the occupied territories. If in these territories not only small-numbered peoples of the North survived, but at least some Slavs-Aryans.
By the way, why did the northern peoples become so small in number? In North America, the invaders ruthlessly massacred the local population west of the Appalachians. However, the Russian Empire was not caught in the genocide. Nevertheless, all the northern peoples of Asia, which survived after 1816, have since been on the verge of extinction …
And now let's suppose that Great Tartary was not divided either in 1775 or later. Lost another war and suffered territorial losses. But it remained a single state. As before, the largest in the world. Still posing a great danger to both the Russian Empire and the British (the Romanovs were afraid of losing the usurped throne, and the Hanoverian dynasty trembled for their Indian colonies).
And here the chimera of the French Revolution gives rise to the Corsican monster. Who dreams of only one thing - to take away from Britain everything acquired by back-breaking labor! I mean, take the best pearl out of her crown.
soon Napoleon agreed with Paul I (Fig. 49) on a joint Indian campaign. Which breaks down only because of the murder of the Russian emperor. As a result of a conspiracy organized and paid for by Britain.
Figure: 49. Paul I, Emperor and Autocrat of All Russia, Moscow, Kiev, Vladimir, Novgorod, Tsar of Kazan, Tsar of Astrakhan, Tsar of Siberia, Tsar of Tavrichesky Chersonis, Sovereign of Pskov and Grand Duke of Smolensk, Lithuanian, Volyn and Podolsk, Prince of Estonia, Courland and Semigalsky, Samogitsky, Korelsky, Tversky, Yugorsky, Perm, Vyatsky, Bulgarian and others, Sovereign and Grand Duke of Novgorod Nizovsky lands, Chernigov, Ryazan, Polotsky, Rostov, Yaroslavsky, Beloozersky, Udora, Obdorsky, Kondiysky, Northern countries Lord and Sovereign of Iveron lands, Kartalin and Georgian Kings and Kabardian lands, Cherkasy and Mountain Princes and other hereditary Sovereign and Possessor, Heir to Norwegian, Duke of Schleswig-Golstinsky, Stormarnsky,Dietmarsen and Oldenburgsky and the Sovereign of Eversky, Grand Master of the Order of St. John of Jerusalem, and so forth, and so forth, and so forth.
But failure does not deter the stubborn Corsican. Disappointed in the new Russian tsar, Buonaparte is ready to conclude an alliance with Great Tartary. And he undertakes a campaign against Moscow. After the capture of which, a direct road to India opens up for his legions.
Was it because Napoleon's Great Army was so large that it had to defeat not only Russia? And go almost half the world!
It is difficult to imagine a more terrible nightmare of the unfortunate Hanoverian dynasty! A huge French-Tartar army under the general command of the most brilliant commander of all times and peoples, whose rears are provided with all the military-economic potential of Great Tartaria and its dominions, Free and Chinese Tartaria! And unhindered progress towards the Indian Ocean - their diplomatic support.
Is it from this nightmare that King George III finally went crazy (Fig. 50)?
Figure: 50. George III, King of Great Britain, King of Hanover, Duke of Braunschweig-Luneburg.
However, this was not the main reason for what happened in 1816. The people of Great Tartary withstood the vicious onslaught of the new world religions (Judaism, Christianity and Islam), preserved the moral purity and faith of their Ancestors and would never allow "worms and locusts" to engage in usury and extortion, rob villages and introduce slavery on their land. In a country that was the largest in the world …
By 1812, it had become abundantly clear that it was impossible to defeat Buonaparte on land. The Emperor of the French, King of Italy, Protector of the Rhineland and Mediator of the Swiss Confederation brought the whole of Europe to its knees (with the exception of Britain). Someone annexed to France, someone imposed their relatives as rulers, someone forced to join the continental blockade.
Cui prodest - look for who benefits. Who, in the end, won as a result of the victory over Napoleon and the destruction of Great Tartary, along with its entire population?
Britain, no doubt.
Or the Rothschild family?
However, to paraphrase the classic, we can say: “I say - Britain, I mean - the Rothschilds. I say - Rothschilds, I mean - Britain! Because by 1816 (after the famous stock exchange scam of Nathan Rothschild, associated with the Battle of Waterloo), the aforementioned family took possession of Britain.
From that moment on, for almost a hundred years, Britain ruled the seas (Fig. 51, 52). And Britain was ruled by the Rothschilds. And no one was a decree to them! Great Tartary was wiped off the face of the earth. France is defeated. Russia until the end of the nineteenth century could not recover from the invasion provoked by Alexander I. And when it recovered, the Rothschilds gave it new, no less destructive problems.
Figure: 51. Expansion of the British Empire after the destruction of Great Tartary.
Figure: 52. British Empire.
As for Napoleon, after the Moscow fire he lived another nine years. And he died, barely crossing the half-century line (Fig. 53). In the last years of his life, his health deteriorated greatly. Although he had not complained about it before this fire. Official science has never established the cause of the untimely death of the Emperor of the French. Someone thinks that the jailers poisoned him with arsenic. Someone thinks he died of cancer. Someone thinks that from both.
Figure: 53. Death of Napoleon.
However, it may very well be that Napoleon suffered the fate of the Hibakusha.
As mentioned above, seventy thousand people died in the atomic explosion in Hiroshima, and sixty in Nagasaki. But the list of victims of a nuclear strike does not end there. The total number of hibakusha (people exposed to the explosion) who died over the next five years from radiation sickness and other long-term effects of atomic bombings amounted to more than two hundred and fifty thousand people.
***
The total power of nuclear charges used in the winter of 1816 across the territory of Great Tartary, which burned out all Russian forests and caused a three-year “nuclear winter” in the Northern Hemisphere, was estimated by climatologists to be about eight hundred megatons. In other words, forty thousand Hiroshima. Some of the craters that remained after the explosions and turned into "karst" lakes indicate the use of not only nuclear, but also thermonuclear ammunition. With a capacity from one to ten megatons. But even in this case, the mentioned number of bombs should have been enough to guarantee the destruction of all settlements of Great Tartary. Both large cities and small sketes. And large villages, and individual farms. And noble kremlins, and small border fortresses.
That is why, after the death of Great Tartary, several smaller states did not appear on its territory, as usually happens after the collapse of empires or during the collapse of large countries!
That is why the Tartars did not raise the club of the people's war, as the Slavs-Aryans always do in the event of a military defeat!
That is why the endless spaces from the Urals to Alaska in the middle of the nineteenth century, when their development began, turned out to be practically deserted (Fig. 54)!
Figure: 54. Valkyrie over the defeated warrior (artist K. Vasiliev)
The overwhelming majority of the population of Great Tartary burned down in the fire of atomic explosions. This explains the absence of the remains of millions of dead. The survivors suffocated in the smoke of the fires or died of cold and hunger. And also from radiation sickness and cancer. And they were betrayed to the cleansing flame by their comrades. For the completion of Kroda (departure to the Rod with the help of a funeral pyre) is a sacred duty and a sacred duty of every Slav-Aryan in relation to his dead or deceased brothers!
At the same time, the very last of the survivors, realizing that there would be no one to arrange for Krod, could commit self-immolation …
The huge blooming country was turned into radioactive ashes overnight. And it remained for many years. But the years passed. Taiga has risen in place of the burnt forests. The funnels turned into lakes. And most of the radioactive isotopes have decayed.
The radioactive background at the epicenter of a nuclear explosion does not remain high for long, because the main isotopes decay rather quickly. The activity of Cesium-137 falls by half in thirty years, Strontium-90 in twenty-nine, Cobalt-60 in five years, Iodine-131 in eight days.
That is why the development of endless spaces from the Urals to Alaska began only in the middle of the nineteenth century. When the radioactive background has finally dropped to a safe level. But even half a century later, the settlers did not risk approaching the strange round lakes, for some unknown reason formed in the most convenient places for settlement. And they gave these lakes completely meaningless names - Hell's Lake, Shaitan Lake, Devil's Lake, Dead Lake, etc.
Having initiated the use of the atomic bomb against Napoleon, and having made sure of the extraordinary effectiveness of this weapon, the initiators of its use were able to convince those who possessed it to use it again. Against his main enemy - the Great Slavic-Aryan state. Because there was no other way to crush it …
***
So. Let's put the disparate facts together.
In 1816, a "nuclear winter" began in the Northern Hemisphere, which lasted three years. Not long before this, the largest state in the world disappeared from the face of the Earth, along with its entire population. At the same time, all Russian forests burned down. And there were many strange round depressions and "karst" lakes. Re-settlement of the deserted lands began only half a century later. And any mention of Great Tartary and Tartars was prohibited.
What happened?
If we discard all impossible hypotheses, then the remaining, no matter how small its probability, is the truth.
The lands of Tarkh and Tara were subjected to massive atomic bombardment.
But in the nineteenth century, neither Russia nor Britain had nuclear weapons yet. And they could not apply it. So who applied it?
No strangers.
Annuit coeptis - the enterprises agreed - as the ancient Romans would say (Fig. 55).
Figure: 55. Annuit coeptis.
At the request of those who have contact with the uppermost part of the pyramid, the Great Slavic-Aryan Power was destroyed by those who are above and watching what is happening …
As for the year 1812, a silver medal was instituted in his memory. The same for everyone. And for the militias, and for the soldiers, and for the generals. At first, they wanted to place the profile of the reigning Sovereign and Autocrat on the obverse, as was always done in such cases earlier, but Alexander I the Blessed ordered to make another image (Fig. 56). And knock out the words from the psalm of David: "Not for us, not for us, but for your name" …
Figure: 56. Commemorative medal "1812".
PS A skeptical reader might think that the author has outlined in this article the plot of his next novel in the genre of alternative history. I have to disappoint him. Alternative history is now taught in schools and universities. And broadcast on zomboyaschik. And we are just beginning to learn about what was really going on in the world.
Sources:
Alexey Artemyev "Who Burned Moscow in 1812?"
Alexey Artemiev "I understand your age-old sadness …"
Alexey Artemiev "I had a dream … Not everything in him was a dream"
Alexey Artemiev "A nuclear strike has already taken place on us"
Alexey Kulagin "The Split of Rus"
Klepov A. "Alexander I and the fire of Moscow in 1812"
G. V. Nosovskiy, A. T. Fomenko “Pugachev and Suvorov. The Secret of Siberian-American History.