After reading the title, you probably decided that the author is either crazy or joking.., but I am serious, in my right mind and I assure you that the existence of such creatures has been proven by official historical "science" long ago. And I will definitely tell you about this in this article, but first, have a little patience and let me not be distracted for a long time by our, so often and stubbornly forgotten by Russian historians, and tell about how the names of ancient peoples are given …
So - Russians, this is the most impersonal people in history, there are dozens, if not hundreds of names of various peoples who were actually Russians - but today we call them differently and no one even thinks to associate them with the Holiness of Russia … After all, a person is designed in such a way that he draws all analogies and associations based mainly on names …
Let's imagine that a certain archaeologist Vasya found evidence of a previously unknown settlement of ancient people during excavations. Moreover, he was lucky and he discovered the graves of those who once lived in this settlement … it is logical that it would be necessary to restore the national identity of those who lived here.
How do I see further developments? It is necessary to conduct an anthropological analysis and, if it is possible to isolate DNA, a genetic analysis (NOT ONLY HAPLOGROUPS !!!). Next, you need to correlate the obtained data with objects of culture and everyday life, ornaments, letters - and make a verdict - which of the peoples living today are closest to the inhabitants of this settlement and name them as close as possible to what they called themselves - and as they still call them …
What is the archaeologist Vasya doing? Let's say anthropology says that the remains belong to the Caucasian type, geneticists say that the results are closest to the representatives of the regions of Russia, Belarus and Eastern Europe. Looks at the ornaments - ornaments are typical for the Russian north. And then he begins to remember what he was taught at the institute - and understands that according to the official version - only Turks, Mongoloids, or, for example, Martians lived here - it doesn't matter. And something his find knocks out of the general logical order.., then he has a dilemma: to declare to the whole world about the "sensational" discovery of a Russian settlement and become an outcast in the community of historians, undergo tremendous response pressure from criticism, ridicule, possibly lose his job.., or describe your find within the framework of the concept of official history, write a dissertation on this topic,receive an award, honor, respect and memory of descendants who will study his surname, painting on a mustache for his portrait on the pages of a school history textbook … What will Vasya choose … because he has a wife, children, whose work he even loves (besides his wife) … And now imagine that this is not Vasya, but some kind of Karl or John, and from childhood he was taught that the Russians are enemies who want to enslave him … or maybe it is Mysore or Fatih, who from adolescence considered himself a descendant of Genghis Khan and therefore gave in archeology to exalt the story of the adventures of their ancestors to Russia? And here such a thing … All his illusions collapse … This is not something to prove to the whole world - here he himself does not want to believe in what he sees … Will someone defend the truth?painting on a mustache to his portrait on the pages of a school history textbook … What will Vasya choose … because he has a wife, children, and he even loves work (besides his wife) … Now imagine that this is not Vasya, but some kind of Karl or John, and he was taught from childhood that the Russians are enemies who want to enslave him.., or maybe it is Mysore or Fatih, who since adolescence considered himself a descendant of Genghis Khan and therefore went into archeology to exalt the story of the adventures of his ancestors to Russia? And here such a thing … All his illusions collapse … This is not something to prove to the whole world - here he himself does not want to believe in what he sees … Will someone defend the truth?painting on a mustache to his portrait on the pages of a school history textbook … What will Vasya choose … because he has a wife, children, and he even loves work (besides his wife) … Now imagine that this is not Vasya, but some kind of Karl or John, and he was taught from childhood that the Russians are enemies who want to enslave him.., or maybe it is Mysore or Fatih, who since adolescence considered himself a descendant of Genghis Khan and therefore went into archeology to exalt the story of the adventures of his ancestors to Russia? And here such a thing … All his illusions collapse … This is not something to prove to the whole world - here he himself does not want to believe in what he sees … Will someone defend the truth?that the Russians are enemies who want to enslave him.. or maybe it is Mysore or Fatih, who since adolescence considered himself a descendant of Genghis Khan and therefore went into archeology to exalt the story of the adventures of his ancestors to Russia? And here such a thing … All his illusions collapse … This is not something to prove to the whole world - here he himself does not want to believe in what he sees … Will someone defend the truth?that the Russians are enemies who want to enslave him.. or maybe it is Mysore or Fatih, who since adolescence considered himself a descendant of Genghis Khan and therefore went into archeology to exalt the story of the adventures of his ancestors to Russia? And here such a thing … All his illusions collapse … This is not something to prove to the whole world - here he himself does not want to believe in what he sees … Will someone defend the truth?
In short, everything can be solved very simply. Genetic analysis - into the furnace, well, they could not isolate DNA, ancient remains are … anthropological data? Well, you can either not mention them, or mention them only in passing, for example: "There are similarities between the found remains with a Caucasian type of person." No one will pay attention to these similarities - remember the "Ukok princess" …, people do not associate her with the Russians. All major associations - ONLY BY THE NAME OF THE PEOPLE. And even easier - to bury the remains back … Well, also keep in mind - all the main discoveries of the peoples whose names you studied according to the school curriculum were generally made and described at a time when there could be no question of any genetic research. The only thing left is to come up with a name for a non-existent, but newly discovered people. And there is no difficulty here. If it is in China, it means “Chinese”, don't give a damn about anthropology … if in Egypt it’s “Egyptians”, but who else is that! In addition, you can attach the name to a nearby settlement, or correlate the find with the names of the official history and descriptions of the peoples who lived in this area, you can generally give the people your surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about some meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …if in Egypt - "Egyptians", but who else is that! In addition, you can attach the name to a nearby settlement, or correlate the find with the names of the official history and descriptions of the peoples who lived in this area, you can generally give the people your surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about some meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …if in Egypt - "Egyptians", but who else is that! In addition, you can attach the name to a nearby settlement, or correlate the find with the names of the official history and descriptions of the peoples who lived in this area, you can generally give the people your surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about any meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …In addition, you can attach the name to a nearby settlement, or correlate the find with the names of the official history and descriptions of the peoples who lived in this area, you can generally give the people your surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about some meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …In addition, you can attach the name to a nearby settlement, or correlate the find with the names of the official history and descriptions of the peoples who lived in this area, you can generally give the people your surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about some meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …you can even give the people their surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about some meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …you can even give the people their surname! And more often, it happened even more interesting - any ancient text is taken, for example Greek - we look at the names that the Greeks could call someone, and do not care about the meanings of these words, who cares about some meanings - and we stamp these peoples, not even leaving the offices, did the Greeks call someone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …did the Greeks call anyone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …did the Greeks call anyone shepherds? - The people will be Shepherds. Did the Greeks call anyone carpenters? There will be the people of Plotnikov …, and then everything just pulls up to the official version of the history of the emergence of peoples by the ears, or the horns …
Quite possibly an ancient historian.
And now the pages of history are already full of the diversity of the peoples of the ancient world - dozens, hundreds of names of various proud tribes of the past. And only these harmful Russians suddenly materialized out of nowhere in the "6th century AD", and created the largest country in the world in such an amazingly short time, and at the same time they beat, conquered, taxed their entire short life on this planet … well just all and sundry.. and these Russians …, anyway, to the evil of the "ancient" peoples grabbed the most tasty piece of land for themselves … An amazing historical paradox..
Promotional video:
In general, what am I doing. The practice of inventing new names for peoples led to the fact that Russians who lived all over the world acquired many dozens of names that they never called themselves. Imagine that the Russians living in Brighton Beach will be called representatives of the Negroid race or Indians in 5000 years, just because they lived in America, and the historians of the future will have a clear opinion that only Negroes and Indians lived on this continent, well, that's the concept they will have something to do … Well, or even easier - by the Brightonians, and what, a suitable name, it remains only to draw it to the ancient Chinese texts …
Varangians, Veneds, Vans, Vikings, Celts, Etruscans, Franks, Saxons, Scots, Goths, Huns, Huns, Sarmatians, Scythians, Alans, ancient Greeks, ancient Egyptians, Ases, Taurus, Bulgars, Ugrians, Tatar-Mongols, Prouralians, Rigvedists and dozens, if not hundreds of other names - ALL THESE RUSSIAN !!! And no one will convince me otherwise - all these peoples left the territories of the north and central zone of Russia, they were all Caucasian type, they all professed the Vedic culture of worshiping the sun, they all spoke ancient Russian. And to this day, their descendants, even those that mixed with other peoples have changed their appearance and acquired new cultural customs - they speak dialects of that primitive language of most languages of the world - Old Russian.
All the names of peoples given by me above are deciphered only from the point of view of the Russian language, and I will analyze many of them in subsequent articles.
But now let's get back to the "Horse-Men" I promised, and I will tell you about what prompted me to write this very boring and long text.
So, one of the readers of my articles left the following comment:
So, out of habit, I immediately read the word Kulundaytsy from the point of view of the etymology of the ancient Russian root bases. We get the following: HA-LAN-DAY-Tse (the last syllable tse - possibly added by those who gave the name, but I will take it into account anyway) = MOVING ON THE PLAIN GIVES IT = HORSE. And what else could they use to move quickly then? And then it dawned on me - and so they are centaurs then dear !!! A whole nation of HORSES !!! And how skillfully historians have encrypted their existence in such an ornate word, ah, cunning …
Let's see what Wiki has to say about this name:
At first glance, everything converges …, here it is - a horse.., but still - not everything is as simple as it seems … Of course, the name of this "people" was given by the locality, without drawing any parallels with the living peoples - and they immediately deprived those who lived there for a long time … This is the name of a nearby village in the Altai Territory - Kulunda, but attention.., there is Lake Kulunda and the Kulunda River flowing into it !!! So it's not a horse after all … what a disappointment.. centaurs evaporate before our eyes !!! The river and the lake, allow you to move directly by rafting on boats or rafts, hence the word formation! Well, it's easier with a Kazakh horse - KULAN = GA + LAN = Walks on the plain.
R. Kulunda.
There are a couple more names that certainly disguise these legendary creatures!
I present to you these wonderful CENTAURS: Huns and Huns:
This phrase amuses me especially:
As, in principle, the history of Russians until the 6th century AD … I tried to find the meaning of the "Latin" word Hunni - and did not find it. Well, they just write that it's Latin, but nobody knows its meaning. I will reveal to you the greatest secret, over which historians are struggling in vain in their attempts to unravel who this mysterious people was.
Hunni they are also Huns, they are also Huns - this is nothing else but the RUSSIAN WORD "HORSE" !!! So the secret is revealed, PEOPLE - HORSES existed! And the official history openly declares this !!!
And I'm not kidding - that's a fact. Etymologically, the word KONI is disassembled into two ancient Russian roots - GA + NA = MOVE ON = UP. Hence the word RUN, HUNTER, etc … So, of course, when the Greeks wrote about the "Huns", they meant not the horses themselves, but the RIDERS. NOT A PEOPLE, NOT A NATIONALITY, BUT RIDERS !!!
Hence, by the way, the word Gypsy = TSE + GA + NA = THIS IS RIDERS. Remember how the gypsies loved horses, and of course the gypsies are also not originally a nationality, the origins of their pedigree must be sought in India, and the word gypsies stuck, because of the nomadic lifestyle on horses.
So, ANYONE WHO RIDES ON A HORSE NOW - TURNS INTO AN ANCIENT HUNN !!! It also includes cyclists, motorcyclists, and even public transport passengers !!! In the subway in the morning there are whole crowds of HUNS, and historians do not even notice it !!!
The naivety of people simply goes off scale - some bad people write stupid books, others are naive - they read and blindly believe … And when you start getting into all this, the level and scale of insanity is simply amazing. HISTORY IS JUST SOME SECTION !!! I don’t even have any other definition, they invented fairy tales for themselves and they sit and believe in them from morning till night … Theses are written on the themes of these fairy tales and, with a pompous look, broadcast from everywhere about what never happened !!!
So, a few words about the Huns - let the representatives of the Turkic tribes breathe a sigh of relief - they can really be the descendants of the so-called "Huns". But there is only one small snag - WHILE THE HUNNS WERE STILL RUSSIAN! This is the usual Russian cavalry - they are COSSACKS. Professional, hereditary horse army of the Russian Tsar! The fact that natural processes took place - the migration of other peoples to the outskirts of Russia, the mixing of Russians living on the outskirts of the country with other peoples - this is quite normal and this must be understood and recognized. Well, people like each other - they do not look at race and nationality … But in this way ethnogenesis changed, the culture of Russians was deformed under the influence of the culture of other peoples - and many new nationalities were formed. But the Russian language, although it was distorted, still holds on,and the Turkic languages are simply filled with Russian words, and the peoples who use them do not even fully realize their meaning and the origins of these words. So you ask the Kazakhs - why do they have a horse called Kulan ??? Anyone who considers himself a "descendant of Genghis Khan" - I propose to do a DNA test on the paternal and at the same time on the maternal line for the presence of a Caucasian ancestor - the results will most likely surprise you … (Moreover, no "Genghis Khan" never existed! It's easy to understand - just by reading his name in ancient Russian.., but I'll tell you about this in the following articles …) In fact, there is nothing wrong with the ancestors belonging to different races, and maybe even this, and vice versa, is good, it's not for me to judge this - the mixing of peoples has always happened,but not realizing these processes and inventing historical tales is not quite the right approach … The fact that we have common ancestors with the Turkic peoples and our common past should unite our peoples, because this understanding alone can remove a huge variety of interethnic issues and frictions. So, I think these things should be voiced directly and the truth should be conveyed to people. Otherwise, someone has decided to celebrate the 750th anniversary of the "Golden Horde" … And people do not even understand that they are honoring the RUSSIAN ARMY! I kind of have nothing against such holidays and even FOR.., but you at least explain to people what they are celebrating … Otherwise, I have a vague suspicion that this holiday was invented specifically "against the Russians" … and God forbid that if it were not so - the Tatars are our closest brothers and we have a common great past that must be remembered and honored.
