It Became Known How Puppeteers From "democracy" Control NATO Members - Alternative View

It Became Known How Puppeteers From "democracy" Control NATO Members - Alternative View
It Became Known How Puppeteers From "democracy" Control NATO Members - Alternative View

Video: It Became Known How Puppeteers From "democracy" Control NATO Members - Alternative View

Video: It Became Known How Puppeteers From
Video: What If The USSR Abandoned Communism? | Alternate History 2024, May
Anonim

Continuing the American-English theme, let us turn to extremely curious documents recently published on the Voice of Sevastopol website. The papers shed light on the proprietary technology that Americans and British people use to push their solutions to international organizations. It does not always work out, but they try their best, appealing directly to military discipline, using the NATO bloc as an instrument of openly forceful coercion of the member countries of the North Atlantic Alliance.

It works like this. Before an important vote anywhere, be it in the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons or even at the UN General Assembly, US and British officials in NATO write a confidential letter to NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg. For Stoltenberg, this is an order. The Secretary General already through internal NATO channels informs the member states how to vote correctly in the interests of the Alliance. That is, nothing is left to chance, nothing is left to the discretion of the "democracies", because America and Great Britain know better as it should.

And here is one of these letters of orders was published in Sevastopol. Probably, somehow miraculously ended up at the disposal of our Navy. What? After all, sailors are also interested.

His Excellency Mr. Jens Stoltenberg

To the Secretary General

NATO headquarters

June 14, 2017

Dear Mr. Secretary General, next week, within the framework of the UN General Assembly, an important vote will take place on issues related to the Chagos Archipelago, which is administered by the UK as the British Indian Ocean Territory (BTIO). For the reasons stated in the attached note, this issue is of great importance to the United Kingdom and the United States.

Promotional video:

Mr Paul Johnston, Chargé d'Affaires, Permanent Mission of the United Kingdom to NATO

Mr. Lee Litzenberger, Chargé d'Affaires, Permanent Mission of the United States to NATO."

The essence of the order is already in the attached note. This is a strategically important island for the Americans and the British, exactly in the middle of the Indian Ocean, the largest in the Chagos archipelago. There is a powerful joint Anglo-American naval and air force base. It can receive and service warships of any class and military aircraft of any class, be it transport or strategic bombers. In addition to the military base, a secret CIA prison similar to Guantanamo was also located on the island.

Geographically, the point turned out to be so valuable that in the 60s the British did not hesitate to forcibly deport thousands of local residents. Every single one. International crime! Got away with it.

Sovereignty over the archipelago is contested by the state of Mauritius, a former British colony that gained independence in 1968. According to UN Declaration No. 1514, free Mauritius must preserve its territorial integrity. Everything would be so if the Americans and British did not consider that they themselves needed the island more.

Mauritius - to the International Court of Justice. On the same topic - a new vote at the UN in June last year. And just before that vote, NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg receives an order to direct the vote.

Returning to the accompanying Anglo-American Confidential Note dated June 14, 2017.

“British Indian Ocean Territory: Basic Provisions for NATO Members.

The United Kingdom and the United States are asking for your support if this issue is put to a vote.

Now we need public expressions of support, we need our allies to state unequivocally that they will vote against the resolution."

By the way, the United States and England then remained in the minority at the UN General Assembly, their line on the annexation of the island was too impudent and impudent. But what difference does it make to them? This base, regardless of who and how will vote on it, the "sweet couple" will never give to anyone.

But today we are not so much talking about the base as about the mechanisms for controlling the position of the allies through NATO on a variety of issues and regions, even in the Indian Ocean, even in chemical attacks somewhere. A strict vertical of power has been built in NATO. At the very top are the States and Great Britain. Other countries that are vertically lower are only service personnel. Their job is to follow orders. To the public, this is called "solidarity." It should manifest itself in everything - from the Chagos archipelago to the expulsion of Russian diplomats. The discipline is military.

Recommended: