“… They scare with plates, they say, vile, fly,
Now your dogs bark, then your ruins talk."
- V. S. Vysotsky
Sometimes, it is still useful to forget all the knowledge gained at school and institute, in order to look in a new way, at simple, long-known things. And then something new will certainly open up.
I propose to reflect on my collection of reproductions of paintings by painters of the eighteenth, early nineteenth century.
For a start, a little preface. So that the train of my thoughts was clear, and they themselves did not seem so incredible.
Everyone, morally and physically healthy, sooner or later comes to the realization that all life is a continuous run in a circle. Well, or a zebra, as you like. Nevertheless, the essence is the same: One day you wake up in the morning, and you realize that you have spent a lot of vitality on pouring from empty to empty. You start doing everything all over again, taking into account the previous experience, and as a result, another morning comes when you have to rethink everything once again.
And it turns out that very many people cannot admit that what they thought to be unshakable is in fact a delusion or a lie. We were taught resilience, right? We are convinced that there should be some truths that should remain the basis of everything, without the existence of which chaos will begin.
Promotional video:
Therefore, a person who renounces his beliefs does not cause anyone's respect. Respect for the "steadfast tin soldiers". And this is the main problem. It is very difficult to grasp that fine line between truth and error.
And time passes at the same time … And everything around is changing rapidly. You cannot stupidly follow outdated instructions. But at the same time, one must not deviate from the norms of morality, otherwise a "dumping into a tailspin" is inevitable, which leads to a catastrophe. The Bible describes the death of Sodom and Gomorrah, and this is precisely about those who decided that the norms of morality are outdated and not obligatory.
I hope to live until the times when the new, current Sodomite lands will receive what they deserve, to make sure that even though these truths are truly unshakable. Otherwise, we will have to admit that HELL exists, and we are exactly in it.
So, let's try to deviate from dogmas, but at the same time, do not cross the line, do not slide into mysticism. Here are some striking paintings by various artists that are less known than the work of Giovanni Battista Piranesi, but which are united not only by the era, but also by the content.
Unknown artist of the second half of the 18th century.
Pierre Patel the Elder.
Francesco Guardi.
Antonio Canaletto.
Dresden. Antonio Canaletto.
Alessandro Magnasco.
Jacob Van Ruisdael.
Nicholas Peters Berchem.
This master (Nicolaes Pieterszoon Berchem) painted quite a few landscapes in which the main characters are undoubtedly the ruins. I named him Nikolai Petrovich Medvedev, and this is not quite a joke, as many people understand.
The question is reasonable: - “Do they have that, in Europe in the 18-19 centuries. there are no undisturbed buildings left”? There is a reasonable explanation for this by historians and art historians. The explanation is actually simple and logical, and it's crazy to question it. At first glance, really, why "fence the garden", it's just a cultural trend, fashion, or as it is now fashionable to say among patriots: - "trend of the time."
Yes. Tastes and moods, thoughts and feelings of millions are subject to fashion and style. We all see this "monkeying" around everywhere. As soon as some famous idiot shows up on alpine skiing in the frame, hundreds of thousands of idiots begin to sweep ski equipment from store shelves, and confess in secret to each other that since childhood they only dreamed of skiing, like … Well, you know further. What? Have you succumbed to the epidemic yourself? And to fly weakly with Siberian Cranes?
Okay, back to our rams. And also to bulls, sheep and goats, against the background of "antique" ruins. This is also a "trend". The same as the shepherds and laundresses in the landscapes of those years. But did this "current" affect Russia? Do not doubt. Although the memory of the Russian ruins was carefully erased in the 19th and even in the 20th century, something still survived. I will show only two works that I have not shown before:
Kievsky Detinets. Unknown artist.
Tower-Ruin in the Catherine Park of Tsarskoe Selo.
Now she looks as it should. Good expensive Tajik renovation, gloss and glamor. But more recently, it looked in line with the European "trend" of the 18th century. A pebble with a European date, but depicted in Russian numbers, is noteworthy.
& quot; Turned up & quot; mean the number 1762.
To be honest, the reliability of this plate seems to me very doubtful. In many ways. See for yourself.
But not surprising. The scale of the "cleansing" of the true history of Russia is such that it does not fit in my head how it was possible to pull off all this. After all, everything that we could learn about the pre-Roman empire was drawn from sources that were outside the “cleansing” zone, namely, in Western universities and libraries.
This fact leaves no doubt about who exactly "cleaned up" the story. Of course a winner. And this winner is clearly not one of our ancestors, otherwise we would write the history of the Anglo-Saxons, and not they to us. Although … This is not our method. We are not against the great past of the ancient European civilization, which was certainly one hundred thousand milen guilders better than our savage one.
Of course, I do not assume that the hordes of Germans walked through the forests and fields, and bulldozed all the ancient buildings on the territory of Tartary. No. It was enough to spit on all this "junk", and not worry about preserving, that's all. And written sources were destroyed in a similar way. And not only so, but also deliberately, purposefully.
Both under Peter and under Catherine, books, under the pretext of preserving, were taken away from the peasants, and whole carts were taken to Moscow and St. Petersburg, after which their trace is lost in the darkness. It is clear that the "Old Believer heresy" was simply burned.
In the twenties, the Bolsheviks did exactly the same with the archives of the Romanovs themselves. No wonder they say: - "Do not spit in someone else's well …"
Well, God be their judge. Let's look at the paintings of another outstanding representative of the "ruinistic" trend in European painting - Giovanni Paolo Pannini, or, as I call him, Ivan Pavlovich Panov.
As you can see, the main character of the creations is the ancient ruins. Nothing new, only on the ruins there were no cattle, but "normal Europeans". Middle class and know. But this does not change the essence. Some ruins still exist in the form of restored structures, or outright remakes. But most of what surrounded people until very recently was irretrievably plundered, pilfered for urgent economic needs.
These plots are also united by the fact that the artist photographically captured reality, without thinking about the subsequent interpretation of their creations by descendants. And the descendants turned out to be ungrateful, they considered their great-great-great-grandfathers half-witted, dark, uneducated dreamers, inclined to exaggerate, embellish, and generally suck it out.
Here is what all modern encyclopedias and reference books write about - "ruinistic" painting: - "_ SUBSTITUTE IN THIS PLACE THE NAME OF ANY OF THE ABOVE ARTISTS _ - is known for pictorial fantasies, whose main motive is parks and real, and more often imaginary" in the words of Diderot), many sketches for which he made during his stay in Italy.
And should we believe this? Because the authority has spoken? And if I don't want to take their word for it, and seeing all this splendor, I cannot believe that the artist reproduced those buildings that have survived to this day with photographic accuracy, and those that are no longer there, he simply took out of his head! Why is this all of a sudden !?
The truth is that the artists did not invent anything, they documented the world around them, and we see that in the 18th century, by historical standards - YESTERDAY - the civilization of European peasant pastoralists, ruled by a handful of those who had more expensive rags on their bodies, existed on the ruins of gigantic megalithic structures, which they themselves clearly did not build.
And the seniors' explanation that, in fact, it was their ancestors who built it, but then the “era of medieval obscurantism” began, which lasted a whole thousand years, and everyone forgot how to build such a miracle … And they also forgot what the pyramids are for. And since it is not clear what to do with them, then you need to demolish them to the devil, so that your eyes do not become callous. And then to go on a tour of Egypt, and re-"open" the pyramids, only Egyptian.
So it turns out that the Colosseum is just a theater, so you can still see it today, but it was not possible to invent the purpose of the pyramid, therefore it was dismantled into sheds for sheep and goats.
It is not clear what the stele is made from Egypt in the picture, which, according to the official version, was brought only in the 19th century.
I want to ask a simple question and get a simple and clear answer to it. ABYPTOLOGISTS AND ARTISTICIANS, tell me, how could a man (Giovanni Paolo Pannini) depict an "imaginary" pyramid and a stele in Rome if he died seven years before the "discovery" of the Egyptian pyramids and this stele? !!!
The pyramids are sometimes depicted as unusual, now they are not being built. The proportions are unusual, the ratio of the length of the base of the pyramid to its height is completely different than that of all the currently known pyramids, even Egyptian, even American, even Chinese, even the same European ones (Visoko, in Bosnia). What kind of "stone cypresses" are they? Why did they break it? And it is clearly not "tombs" of any kind. I doubt that inside they generally had any cavities that can be used during operation. Then what is it? Well, not for the sake of the need for aesthetics, right? And some sort of "Khrushchev" sizes …
Caspar David Friedrich.
What else attracts attention. Sizes of ceilings and openings. For a normal, modern hobbit, as we all (no offense) are with you, these dimensions seem indecent.
From the point of view of construction, it is not rational, too costly, too time consuming. From the user's point of view, it is meaningless and wasteful. A dwelling with such "ventilation" is not relevant even in a Mediterranean climate. It cannot be warmed in winter, and in summer there is no escape from the scorching rays of the sun.
And if the explanation for a radical climate change looks convincing, then all the other questions remain unanswered.
There are two versions, either the builders were giants, or for them to build such gigantic structures was like two fingers on the asphalt.
If they were giants, where did their remains go? All reports of the finds of giant skeletons, and even fingers or teeth, turned out to be falsifications. There were no humanoids of unusual size on earth, except for some unique ones. If they did, how did they manage to evacuate each and every one, and no one forgot their slippers or bra?
Further there will be reproductions of paintings by the great Hubert Robert (Hubert_Robert), in my opinion - Yuri Robertovich, who is considered a student of the great Piranesi.
Huber Robert. Ancient temple, 1787.
Yes, we love to build something significant, bulky, influencing the psyche of a little person, like the building of the Moscow State University in Moscow, or the Fisht Arena in Sochi. But basically, we build ordinary cheburek houses and dormitories, which are called, by a misunderstanding, "houses".
But we have:
- schools and institutes for training, - uniform standards (and this is a whole network of scientific institutions), without which large-scale construction is impossible, - mining, raw materials and energy industries, - industrial production of building materials, tools, fixtures, machinery, and equipment, - a developed system of transport and communications, - communication system, - centralized financial and budgetary spheres, - a unified management system (centralized power).
In the absence of at least one of the listed conditions, large-scale construction is impossible. But even their existence requires a system of collection, analysis, and accumulation of scientific knowledge.
All over it turns out that we are faced with the impossible. With advanced knowledge. And this pushes you to fall into mysticism. Aliens flew in, shared technologies, or gods flew in, taught people … Etc.
I don't like both versions. I am not against the existence of other races, such as Atlanteans, Hyperboreans and Lemurians, but I am not entirely sure that they existed in the same world, or dimension with us. More precisely, I have doubts that we could interact with them in the physical plane. We already coexist with millions of life forms that really surround us, but we do not intersect in any way, we do not see, do not hear, do not talk with them, i.e. generally "no hello." (* - until we tune in to their frequency. Note)
Therefore, without discarding all other versions, we will leave the only real one: - Everything that is depicted in the paintings was built by our ancestors, only the level of their development was incommensurable even with our present one. We are wild monkeys for them. Capable, quick-learning, but still common pets, like cats or dogs for us. Only much more useful. We know how to support ourselves, and even feed the owners. Cats do not feed us or dress us, on the contrary, we are slaves to them, we feed them.
I would venture to make a statement that someone would consider xenophobic, but these are his problems. Just imagine the situation: - tomorrow they will decide to punish Erdagan for betraying the ideals of Western democracy and buying cheap Russian gas. Immediately, the color revolution in Turkey, the uprising of the Kurds, the invasion of ISIS, and a fire of war blazes in southern Europe, in comparison with which the events in Donbass will seem like the struggle of the Nanai boys.
A real "hot" world war begins, as a result of which the world turns into ruins. The remaining hobbits, deprived of electricity, computers, telephones, and flash drives with encyclopedias and manuals such as "How to grow wheat", or "How to get iron, and forge a knife out of it, with which you can stab yourself so as not to suffer", begin to reinvent ways hunting without firearms. And everything starts from scratch.
But at the same time, a tribe continues to live in Chukotka, which does not learn anything about this war. They will continue to raise and eat reindeer. And that's all … do you seriously believe that someday this tribe will develop to the point where planes, ships, computers are required? Yes, that's a fig there! They have eaten reindeer for thousands of years and will continue to eat, because they do not need anything! Not because they are dumb, they are just "aliens". They are SO good. They have other life values, and they know that such happiness is not from stupid books and films, but from God the creator! They are one in this world with this world, but we are not. We need to build something, but we do not understand that by building one, we are killing another.
I wonder what is there on the right, on the mountain? Could it be the pedestal of the statue of the Colossus himself, after which the COLOSSIUM is named - the Colosseum?
Now again I suggest playing with words. This time - KOL AXIS. “UM” does not count. This ending is artificial, added to Latin when borrowing an incomprehensible foreign word. There was KOLOS, and in the Latin manner - KOLOSI (UM). What does the word KOL / KOLO mean in Russian, we know, this is the center of rotation (WHEEL, BELL, KOLOROROT, etc.), but the same means AXIS!
Only if KOLO is a broader concept meaning a circle, a circle, then OS / AXIS is a specific pin. It turns out that the rye, or wheat WHEEL was of paramount importance, it is understandable, "Bread is the head of everything." This means that the Colossus, whose statue was located next to the Colosseum, in the city that is now called Rome, was clearly not a spirit of water or fire.
And … This … Do not send me to the library so that I read smart books there. Everything has been re-read many times and many years ago. If you don't understand, read the Preface.
In general, "Colossus" is not just "big" or "giant". This is a specific hero who was assigned a special role related to harvest, well-being, prosperity and prosperity. And let the skeptics laugh, but everything in this "foreign European antiquity" is simply permeated with the common roots of a single proto-language, to which the Slavic languages are closest to all others.
What is happening with the monuments in Ukraine now? Aha … This is exactly what happened with the statues, which were displeasing to the "enlightened victors". Any item, though somehow connected with a single history that unites Europeans with "quilted jackets", is destroyed in the bud. Nothing changes … There were at least five statues of Colossus (Athenian, Rhodes, Thebes, and two in Rome, one of which is the main one, stood next to the Colosseum), where is there at least one?
Logically, next to the pedestal on which the Colossus stood, there was more than one such lighthouse (far to the left). There must have been four, or at least two. The scale is colossal indeed. This can be created either by a technomagic culture or by a powerful centralized state.
The first version is closer to me, because a powerful centralized state cannot but leave in its memory a lot of trash, garbage, waste, and remnants of infrastructure. After all, hundreds of thousands of builders in our time would require whole cities for housing, and supply with everything necessary. Workshops, shops, shops, farms, fields, and all this entails the need to have a developed network of roads.
Therefore, I am closer to the version that the builders, who could well have been our creators, possessed knowledge that seems to us magic, mysticism, but in fact, these are quite rational technologies.
Here's a simple example. When in the "Taiga deadlock" in the eighties of the last century they discovered a family of hermits - Old Believers who had no connection with the outside world for more than fifty years continuously, then some things, simple for us, seemed to people like witchcraft. An ordinary plastic bag caused a real sensation. Glass, but wrinkles!
So it is in this case. We have not the slightest reason to consider everything incomprehensible as mysticism. Technomagic is a simple process, just like taking a fish out of the refrigerator to feed your beloved cat. After all, the cat does not know that you are storing fish in the refrigerator, and do not materialize it through magical manipulations. And how to explain to him where the fish comes from. And even more so, what is a refrigerator.
In general, the builders of these structures can be conditionally considered Gods, because the level of their development was so much higher than the level of pastoralists, how different the level of a modern person, who was born in a developed country, and the level of a savage living in the wilds of the Amazon. For him, even a can of lemonade seems like magic, not to mention a smartphone, a laser show, an airplane or a submarine.
If we disappear, the savage will use the inherited objects for a while. He, of course, will use a knife in the same way as we do, but at best he will adapt a microwave oven for storing dishes or other useful household items. When all this is gone, the savage will most likely start tying sharp pieces of obsidian to a stick again out of habit.
But it may be the other way around, this advanced knowledge, in the form of objects that its people did not create, will give an impetus to development, and two hundred years later, hovercraft will start to rush in the jungle of the Amazon.
Most likely, the second scenario happened to us.
We inherited from the Gods accurate knowledge of the planets, stars, and the calendar. In addition, we got a solid baggage of tools that allows us to develop our own production. True, part of the knowledge was lost irretrievably. We don't seem to have even figured out how to use the bronze cannons. They began to shove gunpowder and cannonballs into them, set fire to gunpowder in order to fire a shot, and how these "copper pipes" were used before us, no one knows.
We got fragmentary memories of some technological processes, the essence of which was not clear to us, but the outer side of which we copied thoughtlessly, although reliably. These are religious rites.
Prayer in front of the icon is very similar to communication on Skype, right? And I understand the nature of this phenomenon. When I start sharpening a knife in the kitchen, all the animals, both cats and dogs, come running. They are sure that if “God shuffles with a magic wand on a magic crystal”, then soon scraps of meat, chicken, or even sausage will materialize out of thin air! And maybe, when the animals become even more intelligent, they will try to repeat the "rite with a rod and a crystal." They will start rubbing against each other, with the conviction that if it is sacred to believe, then food will appear in the same way as it appeared in the "god" - the owner.
So our "masters" have gone somewhere, left us, and we are all looking into the sky with hope, muttering all sorts of nonsense in churches, and believe that it is about to happen. And don't believe, you need to know. Faith should be a personal category, let the wife believe her husband that he was on a fishing trip, and not in a bath with girls. We need to discard all religious rubbish, which is not much different from scientific. And change the criteria for scientific character. Let's not forget that quite recently it was unscientific to assert that you can build a ship out of iron, an aircraft heavier than air, an automatic firing machine underwater, and much more.
What was considered anti-scientific yesterday is in the pocket of every person today. Actually, the pockets themselves are also anti-scientific. What would you be told two hundred years ago if you began to assert in a decent society that clothes would be made from liquid (oil)?
In general, everything is relative, and if the “Matryoshka law” has been learned from childhood, then there is nothing complicated here. For example, for my then-future wife, I seemed like a god when I was in the seat of the flight mechanic of the Mi-8 helicopter. She was horrified by what she saw in the cockpit while starting the engines. And to me, in turn, it seems to me, to this day, my commander Nikolay Bezvesilny, who flew even better than God. I cannot understand how you can land a heavy car blindly, in dense fog, on a site where there are only two to three meters from the tips of the blades to trees and wires on concrete poles. But he did it, and not only that.
And now we can speculate about the state of the ruins. We do not see any traces of the bombing, this is a fact. The destruction that exists is more like natural destruction that has occurred due to natural causes. The main thing is age. This happens if the housing department ceases to function, everything quickly falls into decay, in the absence of proper repairs, and taking measures to extend the life of the operation.
Something has suffered from earthquakes, something stronger, something not very good, but active fountains and pools are adjacent to structures with traces of colossal erosion, which indicates the old age of the buildings. How old is it? This is one of the main questions.
Here, our historians are strikingly divided. When to confirm the official chronology. They shout together about “one hundred thousand milion years BC”, and when it is necessary to break the dough, which lends itself to easy sawing, they howl all over the world about the need to urgently save the heritage of the world heritage protected by UNESCO. Humanly understandable, their salaries are small. But you must have a conscience! How so, 12 centuries stood, did not fall, but here, if you do not allocate 6,122 rubles 79 kopecks, then by the spring the world will lose its precious heritage!
In fact, the truth is in the middle. Thank God there is an opportunity to track the changes that have occurred over a hundred years with the same natural objects. The advent of photography made it possible. And it turned out that the level of wear from natural impact on rocks is ten times overestimated. What is dated for five to seven centuries turns out to be 80-100 years old. It only seems that cities made of granite and basalt can stand brand new for a thousand years, exposed to rain, wind and temperature extremes. In fact, what was recorded by painters in the late 18th - early 19th centuries could have been only 300-500 years old.
But in my opinion, this may not be true either. You need to understand what these structures were built from before turning into ruins. And this is a very important question. So, this stone is not quite a stone. This is travertine, which is essentially a local variety of simple limestone. The Izborsk fortress was built of a similar material in terms of properties, and for three hundred years without repair it turned into ruins, into irregular-shaped hills!
Therefore, everything suggests that this beauty was built about a hundred years before it was “photographed”. And it is not surprising why it so happened that livestock breeders took away most of the ruins to sheds and barns. The catastrophe took place around 1700 according to traditional chronology. This is not "poking" your finger into the sky. The year 1700 is very mysterious. Not one year, of course, but it was at the turn of the 17th and 18th centuries that something clearly global happened on Earth, affecting all spheres of life. Suddenly, a technological leap took place.
Almost all spheres of human activity received an impetus to develop. Including painting, thanks to which we are now discussing this issue. After all, it was the appearance of the camera obscura that led to the appearance of photographically accurate fixation of images.
And the modern calendar was imposed on us by the Caucasians in 7208 from the sm., Which, by a strange coincidence, is the very 1700.
Many will rightly object, they say, what difference does it make at all, let Italians console themselves with the thought that it was their great ancestors who built all this splendor. Moreover, the version of traditional history does not generate so many contradictions. The only question that needs to be corrected is a thousand years from nowhere, which obviously did not exist in reality. This is practically beyond doubt.
But remember, even ten years ago, even the mention of a non-existent, invented thousand years of "dark Middle Ages" could put an end to the career of a scientist. Now the shock stage has passed, and quite recognized doctors and academicians are calmly arguing that yes, it is quite acceptable. Well, what to do, Petavius and Scaliger were deceived. It happens…
Yes, you can argue at your leisure about whether Chapaev was a man from a plow, or he was a refined technocrat, this dispute cannot change anything. But it is quite another matter if we have before our eyes evidence that can provide answers to the most important, most important questions for humanity. The most important for the entire existence of planet Earth:
- Who are we?
- Where are we from?
- Who created us?
- What is our goal?
- How will it end, when, and how?
Why did I decide that such answers can be obtained thanks to some kind of pictures? Because it may not be "some kind of pictures". We have very few reasons not to trust the veracity of a whole galaxy of artists, and if so, then this is exactly the case when the whole world should grasp this chance, presented to us by our great-great-great grandfathers, and try to learn the true history humanity.
The most important argument is unconditional, one hundred percent proof that a person has advanced knowledge. This is a sign of the artificiality of the whole world that surrounds us. This is a sign that we ourselves are all artificial creations, biorobots. Assembled on a single platform from various parts.
In fact, it is really not so important, in 1700 were built "antique" structures, or in 700. The main contradiction here is different. I will formulate the most important question as follows: If all objects on Earth, which we cannot, for one reason or another, recognize as the creation of the hands of our civilization, were built by a previous civilization, then where are the traces of the vital activity of these hypothetical previous civilizations?
An advanced civilization always leaves many smaller footprints than airfields and skyscrapers. It:
- burial, - garbage dumps, - roads, - places of mining and construction materials, - tools and equipment, - places of production of renewable resources necessary for the vital activity of a huge mass of people, these are water, food, clothing and shoes.
And that's at least. From all of the above, we can hardly scrape together several quarries, quarries and mines, the age of which is impossible to establish reliably. A striking example is the granite quarry in Aswan, which eyptologists "designated" as a place of extraction of building material for the construction of the great pyramids at Giza, which is located almost a thousand kilometers from the quarry. And the fact that the quarry was already being developed during the construction of the Aswan hydroelectric station is not considered at all.
And even a "defective" stele in the quarry is considered a "hello" from the ancient Egyptians, although in fact, by order of the USSR government, Russian engineers tried to cut it out, using a then secret plasma torch.
The stele was planned to be installed on the square in front of the Bolshoi Theater in Moscow, but after it cracked and became unusable, it became clear that it was impossible to repeat what had been done BEFORE US using this method. And the City Planning Council of Moscow immediately recognized the stela as not corresponding to the uniform architectural style of the Teatralnaya Square ensemble.
It turns out that man appeared on the planet at the same time with ready-made megalithic structures, knowledge, and tools for the further development of technologies.
After all, whatever one may say, in order to extract iron ore, you need a pick and a shovel, in order to forge a knife from primitive blast iron, you need a hammer and an anvil, which, as you know, cannot be made without other hammers and anvils. It turns out a vicious circle, a fairy tale about a white bull, or a dispute about what appeared first, a chicken or an egg.
And this paradox cannot be resolved by known methods. To find a solution, you will have to put forward a wild, anti-scientific version again. There she is:
Our world was created immediately as it is. Someone created a person, but immediately realized that in this form he would practically not exist at all. Unlike animals, humans have no means of survival in this world. Without clothes, shoes, housing, tools and weapons. He's just a naked warm lump of minced meat on the bones. Ideal animal feed. Therefore, it is obvious that by settling this gentle, unadapted creature in the midst of rocks, forests and rivers, the creator was obliged to teach a person to survive, and to provide him with a minimum set of knowledge and skills.
In addition, he, like any normal God, had to provide a person with housing! Even a careless owner, before bringing a puppy into the yard, will build a kennel for him.
When you buy a hamster or a squirrel, you simultaneously buy a whole plastic town for your pets, and then watch with emotion how the hamster runs between the houses, drinks from the fountain, climbs up the ladders to different floors of the houses … Does it look like anything? Isn't that how the breeders behave on the ruins from the paintings of Yuri Robertovich?
I understand that the comparison is crude, even cynical, but this is only to make it easier to understand the main idea of the proposed version. And the version was born, thanks to the works of artists - ruinists, including. These pictures clearly demonstrate the likelihood that I am right about something.
The ruins are really capable of speaking, you just need to learn to understand their language. And one of the translation options, I suggested:
The Creator created us at the same time as housing. As we ordered it, the tenth thing. This is a feature of Homo sapiens that distinguishes it from other species - crush, break, and kill. The following conclusion follows from this. We were created the same way we create dog breeds. Some for hunting, others for guards, others for dog fights, and others for decorating a home.
This means that we are only an "application", a mechanism for protecting something very important. We were created to protect the territory on which … It is not at all necessary that something material is stored. Perhaps we are guarding something that is impossible to touch, but which is certainly very valuable. And it may very well be that this is the very "Russian spirit".
This is what the ruins whispered about. I don’t pretend to be accurate, I don’t say anything for sure, but thoughts cannot be forbidden to be born. They can only be stated. And for worse or for good, time will tell.
Author: Andrey Golubev
