Have you ever been to Saudi Arabia? If so, then most likely - in one of the tourist resorts. But this country is known not only for excellent vacation spots, but also for its ancient artifacts.
Moreover, there are especially interesting ones, the origin of which researchers cannot explain until now. A few hundred kilometers from the city of Tabuk, there is the world famous El Naslaa stone.
And world fame was brought to him by the fact that this stone was sawn into two parts, and it is very much the same as if they were cut with a laser or some kind of diamond cutter.
For the first time they started talking about the stone at the end of the 19th century, when in 1883 it was discovered by the archaeologist Charles Hoover. Since that moment, scientific disputes around this stone have not subsided - it is very difficult to argue that such a cut has a natural origin - this is clearly not the work of rain and wind.
Nevertheless, mainstream science continues to insist on his natural formation. And do you know how she explains it?
And the whole point is that the stone, they say, stands on two small stones and over time this could make it crack. Don't you think this is complete nonsense? As for me, this version has several weaknesses:
Promotional video:
1) The cut of the stone is perfectly even, and in nature, as you know, there is rarely something even and symmetrical - she does not like straight lines.
2) In addition, this cut (or "split", as the representatives of official science call it). It goes not along the stone layers, but CROSSING. But in nature this is basically impossible.
3) In addition, after the cut, the two halves of the stone did not move relative to each other - it seems as if it was cut as if a red-hot knife had passed through the oil - most likely it did not even stagger.
Are water and wind capable of such miracles? And over time, the two parts of the stone did not collapse - it did not lose its stability. And his supports are quite fragile.
This suggests a logical conclusion - perhaps our past was not what the official history is trying to present it. It is possible that people of antiquity could possess very high technologies, much better than ours.
One gets the impression that someone walked on this stone with a laser. Petroglyphs were also found on the stone, but the researchers believe that they appeared here much later than the cut.
In addition, the edges of the stone are perfectly even, there are no serious chips - they certainly did not work with a saw. Have you ever tried sawing a block of wood with a saw? If done inaccurately, then at the end the chips will fly off to a loved one.
The same is with the jigsaw.
But what's interesting is that if you look closely at the stone, you will also not notice any melted areas that the laser can leave.
This means that the stone was not cut with a laser. But what then?