The Well-known Algorithm Of Human Thinking And Ignorance Of Their Sources Of Thought, Allow Them To Control - Alternative View

The Well-known Algorithm Of Human Thinking And Ignorance Of Their Sources Of Thought, Allow Them To Control - Alternative View
The Well-known Algorithm Of Human Thinking And Ignorance Of Their Sources Of Thought, Allow Them To Control - Alternative View

Video: The Well-known Algorithm Of Human Thinking And Ignorance Of Their Sources Of Thought, Allow Them To Control - Alternative View

Video: The Well-known Algorithm Of Human Thinking And Ignorance Of Their Sources Of Thought, Allow Them To Control - Alternative View
Video: ⚠❗ It's all an illusion. It's all fairy tales. Wake up now ❗⚠ 2024, May
Anonim

Maybe this information will be interesting and instructive for some people.

First, let's talk about the algorithm of human thinking.

It's not for us to teach you and tell you something, you already understand and know so well how in our time there is an influence on the way of thinking of a person. There is a comprehensive impact on the "stereotyped" thinking. And gradually people get used to thinking in exactly this way, in "templates".

And what can be done from "templates"? You can build an algorithm that will be known to "others"

Now imagine knowing the pre-set tasks and knowing the options for answers, solutions to a specific task, a proposal. It is possible to identify very accurately the thinking algorithm of a single person.

And now, in order to get the desired result, it is enough just to put or puzzle a pre-selected proposal. A person without realizing it becomes easily manageable. The person considers and is convinced. That he thought of this himself. I did so. And not otherwise, because he himself wanted it.

Now about the sources of thought of the person himself. Are you still convinced that in yourself there is only one source of thought? And, of course, you think that you yourself do the internal decision to make or make a specific choice, figuratively speaking, "put the seal accepted"?

This is not true.

Promotional video:

It is enough to understand what a person "consists" of. You definitely have a body, you will agree with this confidently. The body wants a lot of things, in fact, for most people, this is a greater source of thinking.

But, no matter how science puffs up about the "materiality" of the world, a person still cannot control the blood flow, the heart with his own desire, clearly control his organs like hands and feet, a lot of things cannot. For this, there is that very bodily mind, maybe it will be clearer for someone, the brain. And he wants to, drink, eat, bask, be lazy, etc.

There is also consciousness. Do you remember this expression “everyday life determines consciousness”?

In order not to rassosolit for a long time, you yourself can think well and understand how a person's consciousness is formed. Education, rules, then you can not, then you can. It's impossible. And this is possible, laws. "Templates" written above and many other influences from outside.

Do you think your consciousness can be another source of thought?

Let's say your body is impatient, but you can't do it here and now according to the rules in which the consciousness is convinced. Who decides whether to do it here and now or later? You? And what state should you have for the choice to change?

Now let's take, say, a person's passion for dancing, creativity, just love a person, sacrificing oneself for someone else. Does a person do this because this is how they teach the rules "stitched" into consciousness? Or because the body itself wants it? Think about it.

Image
Image

And since the majority cannot even guess about their "different" sources of thought, they can easily slip a completely different thought from someone else's source. A person will consider "other people's" thoughts as his own.

And if he decides to “put the stamp accepted”, it is enough to create physical conditions and “flash” the consciousness.

We hope you understand the information we are delivering to you, for further reflection.

Recommended: