Mysteries Of The Siege Of Leningrad - Alternative View

Table of contents:

Mysteries Of The Siege Of Leningrad - Alternative View
Mysteries Of The Siege Of Leningrad - Alternative View

Video: Mysteries Of The Siege Of Leningrad - Alternative View

Video: Mysteries Of The Siege Of Leningrad - Alternative View
Video: World War II - The Eastern Front 4/10 - The Siege of Leningrad 1/9 - The Secrets of the Blockaded Ci 2024, May
Anonim

In that terrible war, the Russian people showed unprecedented mass heroism and dedication in a deadly struggle against a parasitic scourge, which tried to once again conquer and destroy Great Russia. And today the descendants of those parasites are trying to cheekily lie to the Victory won by the Russians with the blood and lives of millions of their best sons and daughters.

Most likely, previously carefully hidden information has finally begun to filter out to people, which can reveal to us the real organizers of that terrible war, the real goals that they set for themselves, and the real events that took place at that terrible and cruel time.

It seems to us that we know almost everything about the Great Patriotic War, because thousands of books have been written about it, hundreds of documentaries and feature films have been created, and many paintings and poems have been written. But in reality, we only know what has long been emasculated and put on the public display. There may also be some part of the truth, but not all.

We will now be convinced that we know very little about even the most important, as we were led to believe, events of that War. I want to draw your attention to the article by Alexei Kungurov from Chelyabinsk entitled "On Mathematics and Historical Reality", which at one time was undeservedly ignored by all the world media.

In this short article, he cited several facts that shatter the existing legend about the blockade of Leningrad. No, he does not deny that there were protracted and heavy battles, and there were a huge number of civilian casualties.

But he claims that there was no blockade of Leningrad (complete encirclement of the city), and gives convincing evidence of this statement.

He draws his conclusions by analyzing publicly available, widely known information using logic and arithmetic. More details about this can be viewed and listened to in the recording of his Internet Conference "Management of History as a System of Knowledge" …

In Leningrad at that time, there were many oddities and incomprehensibility, which we will now voice, using many fragments from the named article by Alexei Kungurov.

Promotional video:

Unfortunately, no reasonable and well-founded explanations for what happened at that time in Leningrad have yet been found. Therefore, we have to hope that correctly formulated questions will help us find or calculate the correct answers.

In our additions to the materials of Alexei Kungurov, we will also use only publicly available and widely known information, repeatedly voiced and confirmed by photographic materials, maps and other documents.

So let's go in order.

THE FIRST RIDDLE

Where did this term come from?

There was no blockade of the city of Leningrad in reality. This sonorous term was most likely coined to transfer to the Germans the blame for the mass casualties among the urban population. But the encirclement of the city of Leningrad was not in that War!

In the summer of 1941, according to the available publicly available information, a certain rather large area of several thousand square kilometers, on which the city of Leningrad was and is now located, was cut off by German troops from the rest of the country. It happened at the end of August 1941:

“After stubborn battles, the 39th motorized corps of the enemy captured the large railway junction Mga on 30 August. The last railway linking Leningrad with the country was cut …"

Image
Image

RIDDLE TWO

Why were there so few shells?

A. Kungurov's article begins with an analysis of the written statement that 148,478 shells fell on the city during the blockade. Historians describe these events as follows:

“Leningraders lived in constant nervous tension, the shelling followed one after another. From September 4 to November 30, 1941, the city was shelled 272 times with a total duration of 430 hours. Sometimes the population remained in the bomb shelters for almost a day. On September 15, 1941, the shelling lasted 18 hours 32 meters, on September 17 - 18 hours 33 minutes. During the blockade, about 150 thousand shells were fired in Leningrad …"

Image
Image

Kungurov, through simple arithmetic calculations, shows that this figure is taken from the ceiling and may differ from reality by several orders of magnitude! One artillery battalion of 18 large-caliber guns is capable of firing 232,000 shots during the mentioned 430 hours of shelling!

But after all, the blockade, according to ingrained data, lasted much longer than three weeks, and the enemy had several hundred times more guns. Therefore, the number of falling shells, about which the newspapers of that time wrote, and then rewritten by everyone who wrote to us about the blockade, should have been several orders of magnitude greater if the blockade took place in the form to which we were all taught.

On the other hand, many photographs of besieged Leningrad show that the destruction in the central part of the city was minimal! This is possible only if the enemy was not allowed to attack the city with artillery and aircraft.

Image
Image

However, judging by the maps, the enemy was only a few kilometers away from the city, and the reasonable question of why the city and military factories were not completely turned into ruins in a couple of weeks remains open.

RIDDLE THREE

Why was there no order?

The Germans had no order to occupy Leningrad. Kungurov writes about it very clearly as follows:

“Von Leib, commander of Army North, was a competent and experienced commander. He had up to 40 divisions under his command (including tank divisions). The front in front of Leningrad was 70 km long. The density of troops reached the level of 2-5 km per division in the direction of the main attack. In this situation, it is only historians who do not understand anything about military affairs to say that under these conditions he could not take the city.

We have repeatedly seen in feature films about the defense of Leningrad how German tankers drive into the suburbs, crush and shoot trams. The front had been broken through and there was no one ahead of them. In their memoirs, von Leib and many other commanders of the German army claimed that they were forbidden to take the city, were given an order to withdraw from advantageous positions …"

Isn't it true, the German troops behaved very strangely: instead of easily seizing the city and advancing further (we understand that the militias, whom we were shown in the movies, are not capable of providing serious resistance to regular troops in principle), the invaders for almost 3 years stand near Leningrad, allegedly blocking all land approaches to it.

And given the fact that counterattacks from the defenders, most likely, were not or were very few, then for the advancing German troops this was not a war, but a real sanatorium! It would be interesting to know the true reaction of the German command to this legend of the blockade.

RIDDLE FOUR

Why did the Kirovsky plant work?

“It is known that the Kirovsky plant worked all the time of the blockade. The fact is also well known - he was 3 (three !!!) kilometers from the front line. For people who did not serve in the army, I will say that a bullet from a Mosin rifle can fly at such a distance if you shoot in the right direction (I just keep silent about artillery guns of a larger caliber).

Image
Image

Residents were evacuated from the area of the Kirov plant, but the plant continued to work under the very nose of the German command, and it was never destroyed (although, one lieutenant-artilleryman with a battery of not the largest caliber could cope with this task, given the correct task and sufficient the amount of ammunition) …"

Do you understand what is written here? It says here that the fierce enemy, who for 3 years continuously fired cannons and bombed the encircled city of Leningrad, did not bother to destroy the Kirov plant, which produced military equipment, during this time, although this could be done in one day!

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

How can this be explained? Either because the Germans did not know how to shoot at all, or because they did not have an order to destroy the enemy's plant, which is no less fantastic than the first assumption; or the German troops, which were stationed near Leningrad, performed another function, so far unknown to us …

To understand what a city looks like when it is really processed by artillery and aviation, find military photos of Stalingrad, which was shelled not for 3 years, but much less time …

Image
Image

And this is how Dresden looked after the bombing of the Anglo-American aircraft in February 1945. The number of bombs dropped on the city in 2 days was about 650 thousand! At that time, 1,478 tons of high-explosive bombs and 1,182 tons of incendiary bombs were dropped on a peaceful city overcrowded with refugees.

Image
Image

RIDDLE FIVE

How was the Kirov plant supplied?

“The Kirov plant produced various products: KV-1 tanks, SAU-152 self-propelled guns, by 1943 they mastered the production of IS-1, IS-2 and SAU-152 tanks. From the photos posted on the Internet, we can imagine the scale of tank production (this is a large and mass production). In addition to the Kirov plant, other plants in Leningrad also worked, producing shells and other military products. Since the spring of 1942, tram traffic has resumed in Leningrad … This is just a small piece of reality, very different from the historical myths written by professional historians …"

In order for a large machine-building enterprise, such as the Kirovsky Zavod, to operate and produce products, a very serious, constant supply is needed. And this should not only be electricity in the necessary and very large volumes, but also raw materials (metal of the required grades in thousands of tons), components of thousands of items, tools of thousands of items, food and water for workers and a lot of everything else.

In addition, it was necessary to put the finished product somewhere! These are not fountain pens! These are large items that could only be transported on their own, by sea or rail. And the fact that the products were manufactured is confirmed by written evidence:

“Due to the shutdown of almost all power plants, some of the machines had to be set in motion by hand, which increased the working day. Quite often, some of the workers stayed overnight in the shop, saving time on urgent front-line orders. As a result of such selfless labor activity, in the second half of 1941, the active army received from Leningrad 3 million shells and mines, more than 3 thousand regimental and anti-tank guns, 713 tanks, 480 armored vehicles, 58 armored trains and armored platforms.

2. Helped the working people of Leningrad and other sectors of the Soviet-German front. In the fall of 1941, during the fierce battles for Moscow, the city on the Neva sent over a thousand artillery pieces and mortars to the troops of the Western Front, as well as a significant number of other types of weapons. In the difficult situation in the autumn of 1941, the main task of the workers of the besieged city was to supply the front with weapons, ammunition, equipment and uniforms. Despite the evacuation of a number of enterprises, the capacity of the Leningrad industry remained significant. In September 1941, the city's enterprises produced over a thousand 76-millimeter guns, over two thousand mortars, hundreds of anti-tank guns and machine guns …"

A strange blockade turns out: on August 30, 1941, the railway communication with the "mainland" was interrupted, and in the fall of 1941, "over a thousand artillery pieces and mortars, as well as a significant number of other types of weapons …" were sent to the Western Front.

How could such a colossal amount of weapons be taken out of the "besieged" Leningrad to the Western Front if there was no longer a railway connection? On rafts and boats across Lake Ladoga under continuous fire from German artillery and aircraft dominating the air at that time?

In theory this is possible, but in practice it is very unlikely …

Image
Image

RIDDLE SIX

Where did the products of the Kirov plant go?

“The fact remains: the amount of manufactured products has been calculated and announced, you cannot argue with the fact. Now let's think a little about what the historians actually wrote.

The first question is about the method of delivering 713 tanks, 3,000 guns, a million shells and, most importantly, 58 armored trains from the besieged city to the active army, and mostly near Moscow, all this can be taken out only on rails, and at least 100 echelons are required. For tanks and armored trains, even more so, do not carry on boats (such boats (ferries) did not exist yet).

The second question is that mass production was announced (and this is in conditions of a siege). Tales about the fact that you can release something without having raw materials, materials and, moreover, tools, can only be told to illiterate people!

All this points to the constant supply of necessary materials and raw materials. Indeed, in the blockaded city of Leningrad, there were no coal mines, iron ore and other deposits to provide the industry with coal, steel, coke, fluxes and other materials!

"Historians" argue that the machines were rotated by hand - this is just a conjecture of people who are illiterate in technology: try a machine with a 3-10 kW drive (these are the drives used by industrial drilling and lathes) to turn it by hand and turn a metal blank. You will immediately realize that this is the most common invention, with your hands it is not something to ensure the required rotation speed, it is simply impossible to turn such a machine!..

Image
Image

RIDDLE SEVEN

Didn't you have enough shells?

Historians also argue that the main reason for the increase in working hours was not a heroic impulse to give everything for a common victory, but a lack of electricity. From the works of "historians":

"In the autumn and winter of 1941/42, Soviet artillery fought this struggle in extremely difficult conditions: there was not enough ammunition, artillery instrumental reconnaissance means, there was no corrective aviation, the firing range of Soviet guns was at first inferior to German ones, therefore, until the spring of 1942, opposition to enemy artillery was defensive in nature, although the retaliatory strikes of the Soviet artillery weakened the enemy's combat power …"

Still, it is interesting - they themselves did not have enough shells or they ferried 3 million shells to the army ?! Why? Did they have any problems in the blockade? How did they increase the firing range of the guns? Probably, the guns rolled closer ?! This is another example of not just an illiterate presentation and misunderstanding of information, but complete falsification!

The firing range of the gun itself does not increase or decrease, and is initially set by design parameters! Historians had to point out that new weapons with an increased firing range were designed, manufactured, tested and adopted. It seems that historians wrote like this, hoping that no one would read or analyze it …

RIDDLE EIGHT

Where did the electricity come from?

“There were five thermal power plants on the territory of Leningrad; they were part of the Energy System of the Leningrad Region. Power engineers write about this time like this:

Energy blockade

After the ring of the blockade was closed around Leningrad on September 8, 1941, the city was cut off from all suburban power plants that supplied it with energy. Many substations and power lines were destroyed. In Leningrad itself, only five thermal power plants operated.

However, due to a lack of fuel, the production of energy on them was sharply reduced, which was only enough for hospitals, bakeries and government buildings related to the front. The transmission of electricity from the Volkhovskaya HPP was interrupted, the main equipment of which was dismantled in October 1941 and taken to the Urals and Central Asia.

At the station, two auxiliary hydraulic units of 1000 kW each, which worked for the Volkhovstroy railway junction and military units, remained in operation. The work of defense plants was paralyzed, trams and trolleybuses stopped working, the water supply system stopped working.

Many power engineers went to the front, and the rest continued to work in severe conditions of hunger and cold, ensuring the generation of the possible amount of electricity. The energy blockade of Leningrad began. The most difficult day for the power industry in Leningrad was January 25, 1942. In the entire power system, only one station was operating, carrying a load of only 3000 kW …

Let's comment on the article a little: since September 1941, the production of electricity has decreased due to the extreme economy regime. By January 1942, the city ran out of coal, thermal power plants practically stopped, and only 3000 kW were produced. At the same time, the Volkhovskaya HPP produced 2,000 kW (2 MW), and this was enough only for the railway. node and military units (that is, pay attention to the figure - 2 megawatts is very small on a city scale).

During the Great Patriotic War, when most of the power plants of besieged Leningrad could not work due to lack of fuel. In the winter of 1941-1942, boiler No. 3 of the Krasny Oktyabr power plant was converted to burn milled peat, which was available at the peat enterprises of the Vsevolozhsk region. The start-up of this unit made it possible to increase the load of the power plant to 21-22 thousand kW out of 23-24 thousand kW generated by the system. (Wikipedia)

That is, the final figure has been announced: the entire system (more precisely, one thermal power plant on peat plus the Volzhskaya HPP) produced 24 thousand kilowatts until the end of the war. The figure only seems large, but, for example, I will cite that this energy is not enough for one city (for example, Grodno, 338 thousand people) to boil electric kettles at the same time.

Since the spring of 1942, 6 tram routes have operated in Leningrad. To ensure this energy consumption, 3.6 thousand kW of electricity (3.6 MW) is required. So that 20 trams with a total of 120 (total) with an estimated engine power of 30 (!) KW run on each route (for example, modern trams have a capacity of up to 200 kW) …

It remains to draw up the electricity balance

The electricity remaining from the movement of trams (20 MW) needs to power the production of factories, and this is:

- tens of thousands of machine tools of 3-10 kW each (millions of shells, bolts, bushings, dowels, shafts, etc.), - 30-100 MW (if there are 10 thousand machine tools at all factories);

- dozens of machine tools for the production of cannon barrels (large-size screw-cutting lathes), - rolling mills (there are no armor plates without this), - a lot of industrial welding units (after all, they produced 713 tanks in six months, 5 tanks a day), the tank is scalded for more than one day. If we assume that the tank is scalded with one welding unit for three days, then 15 welding units with a total capacity of 600 kW are required …

And as a result of elementary calculations, we find that we are greatly lacking the remaining energy (20 MW), and we need to provide electricity to the regional committee and city committee of the party, the regional council and the city council, the NKVD administration, hospitals, etc."

RIDDLE NINE

Where did the food come from?

“The need for food in the city was (2 million 544 thousand residents of the city - excluding military groupings, the fleet and residents of the region within the siege), 1.5 kg of food per day (500 grams of crackers and 1 kg of vegetables and cereals - this is a combined-arms ration) - 3800 tons of food daily (63 modern wagons). Let me remind you that this is without taking into account the number of troops and the fleet, and the inhabitants of the region.

The secondary accounting of foodstuffs conducted on September 10 and 11 showed that to provide the troops and the population in Leningrad there were reserves of grain, flour and rusks for 35 days, cereals and pasta - for 30 days, meat and meat products - for 33 days, fat - for 45 days. days, sugar and confectionery - for 60 days (by November everything should have been over, and this is taking into account the reduction in consumption by half).

To alleviate the food situation in Leningrad, transport aircraft were allocated for the transfer of goods. The delivery of food together with the Special Air Group, created at the end of June 1941 to serve the Northern Front, was handled by the Moscow Special Purpose Aviation Group, formed from 30 Moscow civil aviation crews.

From September to December 1941, through the heroic efforts of Soviet pilots, more than 6 thousand tons of cargo were delivered to the besieged city, including 4325 tons of high-calorie food and 1660 tons of ammunition and weapons.

(For 3 months they brought food for 2 days. It is not clear why they brought ammunition, if in Leningrad they themselves released and transported to the mainland).

Image
Image

In total, by the end of the navigation of 1941, 60 thousand tons of various cargoes were delivered to the besieged city by water, including 45 thousand tons of food (Wikipedia) (for another 20 days of food).

In total, during the first blockade winter, the ice road worked until April 24 (152 days). During this time, 361 109 tons of various cargoes were transported, including 262 419 tons of food (wikipedia) (that is, less than 2000 tons of food was transported per day - this is less than the daily requirement of the city) …"

Let's do some calculations with you. In order to transport 360,000 tons of cargo by one and a half, it is necessary to make 360,000 / 1.5 = 240,000 trips, which were completed in 152 days (round up to 150 days, we do not need high accuracy here). One day accounts for 240,000 / 150 = 1,600 trips. We have 60 x 24 = 1440 minutes in a day.

It follows from this that, in order to provide 1600 trips per day on the "road of life", it was necessary that cars move day and night with an interval of slightly less than 1 minute!

But the “dear of life” was the ice of Lake Ladoga, cleared of snow (ordinary cars cannot drive through deep snow). For driving on ice, such an interval is quite acceptable, because ice is not asphalt, and exceeding the load immediately leads to a disaster and a long stop of the entire column.

If everything was as historians and propagandists of those times tell us, then the enemy had a very simple task: periodically fire cannons on the lake and ruin the road.

After all, it is very easy to spoil the icy road, but it is impossible to “repair” it quickly! It is necessary to clear a detour, and this takes several hours, because the tractor cannot be sent there - it is too heavy.

Therefore, the statement that 360 thousand tons of cargo were transported along the "road of life" in 152 days does not seem plausible, if only by virtue of the above calculations! And yet it was still necessary to provide round-the-clock, rhythmic unloading, loading and refueling of cars, and this conveyor did not have to stop for a minute!

It was also necessary to have enough transport and fuel to deliver what needed to be sent to the "mainland" and to take out what was brought to the surrounding area.

And how many cars were involved in this operation? This can be roughly calculated.

It is easy to determine from the map that the distance that had to be covered on Lake Ladoga is about 30 km. If we assume that the cars were moving at a speed of about 30 km per hour; add 1 hour for loading and 1 hour for unloading; we get that each car made 8 trips per day.

Therefore, in order to make 1600 flights a day, it was necessary to have 200 cars.

Of course, this is the perfect alignment. In fact, the travel time could have been more than 1 hour, and the cars were out of order for various reasons. Therefore, to ensure the specified volume of traffic, the number of cars can be safely increased by 2 times.

And all these 400 and a half had to be constantly refueled with gasoline. Their fuel consumption was about 20 liters per 100 km. During the day, every car that traveled 480 km consumed at least 100 liters of gasoline. The entire fleet of cars had to be delivered at least 40 tons of gasoline every day …

This work, which is quite feasible in peacetime with constant and sufficient funding, in wartime with constant, targeted opposition from the enemy, becomes an impossible, almost impossible task.

No, I have no doubt that an attempt to organize the supply of the city and region in this way could take place. But I am absolutely sure that the results of this work were very different.

RIDDLE TEN

Does it all seem like the truth?

“By November, not only coal, but also all supplies of raw materials and materials, food should have run out (which happened). Through austerity, these stocks were stretched until January. The transportation of life along the road by cars with a carrying capacity of 1.5 tons provided only food needs (and even then not completely).

It was not revealed by the "historians" what were 100,000 tons of other cargo brought in the first winter, but this did not cover the needs of the industry (these are thousands and thousands of tons). The industry had to stop. But the factories all worked and worked (this is a fact).

Where the additional energy came from is unknown (probably the Germans supplied). Where the resources came from, and how the finished product was shipped, is also unclear.

At the same time, the German command, in order to completely paralyze all the activities of the city, was enough to destroy only 5 power plants (at the initial stage of the war, and one after January 1942), which were clearly visible to spotters of artillery fire from the smoke from the pipes. Is this another accidental carelessness?

It is completely incomprehensible why 713 KV tanks did not solve the issue of lifting the blockade of Leningrad, because at the beginning of the war we had only 636 KV tanks, and these tanks were not penetrated by German cannons.

The simultaneous and massive use of these tanks was supposed to push through any defense with the support of 3000 guns fired (and at the beginning of the war we had only 1928 guns) and in the absence of ammunition savings. This number of tanks and artillery should have been enough to throw the Germans even to the border …"

The available maps really clearly show that the troops of the Leningrad and Volkhov fronts were divided in the Shlisselburg area by a narrow strip, only 12 km wide!

And it is simply impossible to believe that the troops of these fronts, with a huge amount of powerful military equipment and ammunition produced in Leningrad, did not have the opportunity to push the Germans back from Lake Ladoga at least 20-30 km!

Moreover, it turns out that in March 1942 the following landmark event took place:

“On March 29, 1942, a partisan train with food for the residents of the city arrived in Leningrad from the Pskov and Novgorod regions. The event was of great propaganda significance and demonstrated both the enemy's inability to control the rear of his troops, and the possibility of unblocking the city by the regular Red Army, since the partisans managed to do this …"

Image
Image

Nevertheless, the encirclement was not broken, and we do not yet know the reasons for this …

CONCLUSIONS

1. The city of Leningrad was not blockaded during the war; there has never been a blockade of the city as such.

2. It is alleged that 1.5 million people had been evacuated from Leningrad by October 1942. It is alleged that during the blockade in Leningrad, about 1.5 million people died. But before the war, only 2.5 million inhabitants lived in Leningrad. Where could the additional 0.5 million have come from to perish, and who worked for 3 years in military factories that monthly produced hundreds of tanks, thousands of guns and millions of shells? The generally accepted statistics on these issues do not stand up to even elementary analysis.

3. If, allegedly, 1.5 million people were evacuated from Leningrad in 1.5 years, then supplying food to the 1 million remaining people was no longer a very difficult task. If everything went as we are told with the supply, there would not be 1.5 million people who died of hunger !!!

4. Elementary calculations convincingly show that it was impossible to provide the military industry with raw materials, materials, tools and components either by motor transport, or by boats or aircraft.

5. There is no information on the provision of the city and industry with sufficient power capacity. For the operation of military factories, which actually worked, energy was needed several times more than was available according to official information.

6. It is completely incomprehensible where most of the produced military equipment, especially heavy ones, went. If in Leningrad in 3 months more than 700 heavy tanks were produced, then in 30 months of the blockade so many of them could be made that would be enough to roll the whole of Europe into dust!

7. So far there are no guesses about the reasons why the Germans did not destroy the Kirovsky plant that was working under their noses (3 kilometers away), which produced military equipment throughout the "blockade".

8. It is also unclear why the Germans did not destroy Leningrad with artillery and aircraft, although at first they had a great advantage in these types of weapons.

9. There is no intelligible explanation for the fact that the encirclement of the area was not broken through by Soviet troops. The Leningrad and Volkhov fronts in the Shlisselburg area were divided by a strip only 12 km wide! The partisans brought food in carts, but the regular troops could do nothing. Absurd!

10. It is very likely that the variations on the "blockade" of Leningrad are intended to mask something much more serious than what we know from publicly available information. It is quite possible that at that time completely different events took place, for which they did not stop before the millions of victims, and which are carefully hidden to this day …

P. S

We still have to deal with the history of the Great Patriotic War.

There are many incomprehensible moments in it. It is not clear what type of weapon the German troops destroyed by the winter of 1941 about 20,000 (twenty thousand) of our tanks, while they themselves had only 4171 tanks and self-propelled guns.

It is not clear how we lost an even greater part of the 104,840 tanks and self-propelled guns produced during the war, while most of the tanks were repaired and returned to battle several times.

Such losses are recorded in real history only once - during the six-day Arab-Israeli war, when Israeli troops destroyed almost two thousand tanks (but then there were ATGMs and a different level of jet aircraft) …

Along with this, elementary calculations show that a lot of information is simply hidden from us, and because of this, the rest cannot be explained. One gets the impression of a global betrayal, that this whole blockade was specially organized so as to kill as many people as possible.

based on the article by D. Baida

RIDDLE ELEVEN

The 2015 events in Syria have added another mystery, though not as obvious as the previous ones. In May 2015, a mass execution of captured Syrian soldiers took place in the ancient amphitheater of Palmyra, captured by Islamic State militants. At the same time, they were shot by adolescents, the young younger generation.

Image
Image
Image
Image

Behind each of the 25 soldiers were teenagers in desert camouflage uniforms and brown bandanas in the back. They look no more than 12-13 years old. The terrorist in black makes a speech, after which the teenagers shoot in the head all the Syrian soldiers standing on the stage.

Image
Image

You can ask a reasonable question: what is the connection between Leningrad and Palmyra? And none, according to the modern understanding of history, except for the esoteric and occult. But it can become more obvious if we add the city of Baalbek (Heliopolis) in Lebanon to this list and look at events through the time when Leningrad was named Yarograd. Or maybe the one who ordered to rebuild it, forbade and blow up, bringing a sacred sacrifice of 1.5 million people?

So. These events are separated by a time circle of 72 years and the city of Leningrad is often called the Northern Palmyra due to the similarity of architecture. In addition, Vanga's prediction says: "if Syria falls, a world war will begin." Remember our military assistance to Syria. Moreover, according to karmic astrogeography, 72 is a full cycle of development of something, 5 is the manifestation of subtle and spiritual influences, 15 is a predisposition to unleashing certain karmic knots, 25 is the sacrament of healing, etc.

All these events have figurative-sensory and not logical-structural connections. Therefore, they must be viewed from this point of view. You can understand them only by realizing the essence of figurative thinking.

Thus, the reasons for the mystery of the blockade of Leningrad may be worth looking in a slightly different plane than we are used to doing?