Nature in the modern world seems to have rebelled: abnormal tornadoes and hurricanes, showers and snowfalls, droughts and frosts suggest that this is not a natural process, but the result of the use of climate weapons.
Controlled climate
The military of the leading world powers have long been in search of perfect weapons capable not so much of destroying people as of causing colossal destruction. They know very well in which direction to work: we are talking about geophysical weapons, which, when influenced by the environment, can provoke various natural disasters: from tsunamis and earthquakes to floods and droughts.
In the subordination of natural elements to his will, a person takes the first, but confident steps. This primarily applies to experiments in weather control. People have already learned to artificially provoke the formation of clouds and fog, cause rain in one place and disperse clouds in another.
At first, such experiments set one goal: not to allow the hail to destroy crops or prevent the sun from destroying the harvest, but when the military became interested in climate weapons, the development of such programs ceased to be peaceful. It is not known for certain what success the developers have achieved in this area, since, for obvious reasons, their activities are kept in the strictest confidence.
There is a hypothesis that one of the confirmations of the use of climate weapons was the heat wave that swept the European part of Russia in the summer of 2010. This was allegedly caused by the action of the HAARP complex, located in Alaska, 250 km northeast of Anchorage.
The US authorities assure that the HAARP station is intended exclusively for studying the aurora, although Georgy Vasiliev, a researcher at the Physics Department of Moscow State University, casts doubt on the words of officials. In his words, the fact that the complex belongs to the US Department of Defense speaks volumes. Other data are also alarming: the construction of HAARP took 20 years and more than 250 million dollars, and the power of its emitters is 3,600 kilowatts, which makes them the most powerful devices in the world to influence the ionosphere.
Many experts are suspicious of the connection between the completion of the construction of HAARP in 1997 and the beginning of a whole series of cataclysms that swept across the planet in subsequent years. The most devastating of these was the 2004 9-point earthquake off the coast of Sumatra, which caused a giant tsunami. Then over 300 thousand people became victims of the disaster.
Another complex that is suspected of participating in climate experiments is Sura, located at the test site of the Vasilsursk Radiophysical Research Institute near Nizhny Novgorod. The main task of the Sura project, created back in the USSR, is to find ways to protect our planet from large corona emissions into its atmosphere, which often lead to malfunctions of electrical equipment and communications.
However, as in the case of HAARP, there is no evidence that the Sura was used for military purposes. Moreover, according to the statements of Russian and American specialists, they are in constant contact and conduct joint research.
Promotional video:
The strength of the rain
The only confirmed use of climate weapons to date is Operation Popeye (Spinach), carried out by the US military during the Vietnam War. The importance of this operation is evidenced by the fact that it was led by the authorized adviser to the President of the United States for science and technology, Dr. Horgins.
In order to increase the amount and duration of precipitation in the skies over North Vietnam, American pilots were instructed to spray silver iodide, which they did regularly from early 1967 to mid-1975. "Do dirt, not war" - this was the unofficial motto of this program.
The essence of the method is simple: falling into a rain cloud particles of silver iodide, concentrating moisture in themselves, cause heavy rainfall. The US Department of Defense hoped that prolonged torrential rains would significantly raise the water level in the rivers, which would lead to both disruption of supply of the Viet Cong and to massive famine. And they did not lose: in addition to making it difficult to travel along the Ho Chi Minh trail, unprecedented downpours destroyed fields with cultivated plants in North Vietnam.
However, Operation Spinach cost a pretty penny to the American budget: over 5 years of the program, about $ 15 million was spent. During this time, American pilots managed to make over 2 thousand flights and spray about 5.4 thousand tons of silver iodide into the Vietnamese sky.
US meteorological writer James Roger Fleming reports that the public does not know the exact results of Operation Spinach from a military point of view, but according to some reports, the annual rainfall in the region during the Vietnam War increased by about 7 times. It is believed that the same methods were used by the American military in Cuba, which led to the destruction of the sugarcane crop.
In the 60s and 70s, Americans experimented not only with rain clouds, but also tried to subdue hurricanes. For some American states (Texas, Missouri, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kansas, Tennessee), annual tornadoes are turning into a real disaster. Scientists racked their brains not only over how to prevent the destructive effect of a tornado, but also how to find ways to use the element for military purposes. For its experiments, the Ministry of Defense attracted the famous mathematician John von Neumann.
Although the Nixon administration strongly denied allegations of the use of climate weapons, in particular, in Operation Spinach, Jack Anderson's journalistic investigation for The Washington Post in 1971 rocked the public and had a wide political resonance.
In 1972, the Pentagon was forced to curtail all programs to test climate weapons, and 6 years later the UN adopted a resolution on the inadmissibility of the use of climate weapons in military conflicts. True, skeptics are confident that the resolution, due to the large number of legal loopholes, cannot prevent the desire of individual powers to use the climate for their own purposes.
Another part of the public is skeptical about the very possibility of the emergence of a real climate weapon capable of changing the weather over a large area in a short period of time. From their point of view, this most complex scientific and technical problem cannot be solved in the coming years.
Taras Repin
