The canons are one thing, but the apocryphal say that Jesus did not like carpentry, but always strove for the spiritual …
As confirmed by a number of facts, Jesus Christ was a real historical character (regardless of whether he was God, an avatar, an enlightened person or a genius - the main thing was that he was!), But there is very, very little information about his life and history … about his relatives. For example, we know that his father was a carpenter and his name was Joseph. However, scientists, examining the ancient archives, stumbled upon curious information that may force them to consider a different version …
In the ancient treatise of Celsus "The Truthful Word" (quoted by the famous Christian theologian Origen), data are given about a man who is called "the father of Jesus." And his name is by no means Joseph! In the source, he is referred to as "Panther". Agree, the name is rather strange, rather rare! This causes a certain skepticism in relation to information.
However, an Israeli archaeologist managed to find the grave of a man with that name! The inscription on his tombstone (Tiberius Iulius Abdes Pantera) testifies that he was an archer from Sidon and lived from 22 BC. before 40 AD However, this time is remarkably consistent with the time of Jesus! And Celsus just says that Jesus was the son of a (illegitimate) Panther, a Roman soldier who served in Palestine.
Moreover, in one of the apocryphal sources there is such a name for Christ: "Jesus ben Pandir". And this is the "son of the Panther"!
This could explain the softer attitude of Pontius Pilate towards Jesus and the attempts to save him, which were not crowned with success due to internal intrigues. In addition, if the son was born out of wedlock, the Panther could entrust him with the "upbringing" of the carpenter Joseph (for an additional fee, of course). This, in turn, would explain the phenomenon of the "immaculate conception" (Joseph was not a real father, but to somehow hide it - it took a "legend"), as well as the very cool attitude of Jesus towards Joseph, who did not perceive him as a father and a loved one (which is repeatedly said in the sacred text).
This is not a criticism of the divinity of Jesus, since the holy spirit could descend on any person, and in the words of Jesus, conveyed by the Bible, there is a lot of real, enlightened, unearthly … And it only refers to the purely material details of what happened.