- Part 1 - Part 2 - Part 3 - Part 4 - Part 5 - Part 6 - Part 7 - Part 8 - Part 9 - Part 10 - Part 11 - Part 12 - Part 13 - Part 14 - Part 15 - Part 16 - Part 17 - Part 18 - Part 19 - Part 20 - Part 21 - Part 22 -
Suzdal
Below is information on the subject of severe dust storms resulting in dust / soil deposition. This version is currently the main one for me. But it refers to examples (buildings) of the late 18th and early 19th centuries. More ancient structures covered with clay and soil such as Rome, ancient Greece, Turkey, etc. - here I do not exclude flood phenomena.
Link to dissertation
Excerpt from the work: At the same time, in the studied part of the core, five layers of dust (dust) are visually distinguished, falling on 1842, 1906, 1925, 1985 and 1986, of which the nine-centimeter layer dated 1842 is most clearly manifested [Eichler et al., 2001]. Chemical analysis of the dust layers showed that all five layers have a similar mineral ionic composition (water-soluble forms).
Comparison of dust layers in the core of Belukha with similar layers in ice cores taken in 1982 and 2003. on the Kohl Gnifetti Alps glacier, showed their significant difference. In the cores of the Kole Gnifetti glacier, 3 yellow layers, dated 1901/02, 1936/37 and 1977, were identified, the formation of which is associated with the transfer of sand from the Sahara Desert [Schwikowski et al., 1999]. Dust layers in the core of the Belukha glacier differ from the layers in the Alpine cores, both in composition and in the time of their occurrence.
Interpretation of the appearance of the layers related to 1842, 1906, 1925 presents significant difficulties, although for 1906 and 1925. In the archives, there are references to the fact that they were preceded by dry summers and low-water springs, which should have created conditions for the occurrence of dust storms in Altai. The layers of 1985 and 1986 seem to be more accessible for decoding, since for these periods a sufficient amount of diverse information has been preserved in the archives, including synoptic maps available in the archives of the Institute of Higher Economic Relations of the SB RAS [Synoptic maps, 1986; Synoptic Bulletins, 1987; Frolova et al., 2007].
Or maybe the mountain itself appeared in 1815, and it was not the climate that changed?
Another dissertation: Spatial-temporal dynamics of the main forest-forming species of woody plants of the state natural reserve "Stolby".
Promotional video:
The distribution of the forest area of the reserve by 20-year age classes cannot be considered normal either by the chi-square criterion or by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov criterion. Disturbed forests are observed both in the left and in the right parts of the polygon (there is a predominance of forest stands at the age of 70-130 years and a lack of old-growth in comparison with the normal distribution curve)."
The official version is deforestation. However, there is still a strange fact - why no one pays attention to the fact that there are no characteristic marks on the saw cuts of old trees (podsushin), which survived the 1800s. Perhaps they do not attach much importance - fire and fire. Or maybe there are no podsushin there? After all, there could have been something without a fire. That's the question…
***
Chairman (video author) well done! He tells with irony. And indeed, how could one manage to first build a city out of stupidity, knowing about the floods, and then catch up and fill the city with 6m clay? Where was it taken in such a volume as such a volume was transported? How long did it take? Where is the documentary mention of such a filling? Isn't it easier to fill the dam along the river? As they are doing now.
Why didn't they deepen the river bed in the area of the city? At least along the coast, when the water is low. It would surely save the city from flood peaks.
***
Some skeptics (clever people) will argue that this raised the level of the embankment in order to avoid flooding of houses during floods. But in the beginning, why were the houses built so low? Did you know about the floods? Again my opinion: it is not easier to deepen the bottom of a river, canal, fill up a dam, than fill up the whole city !?
***
Quicksand?
This effect is known for water. If it is saturated with gas bubbles, then even ships sink in it. This is one version of the disappearance of ships in the Bermuda Triangle and other places with a bad reputation. The density of water becomes less and it no longer pushes out the body. It's the same with sand.
If we continue the thought, then during the degassing of the Earth by gases coming from the depths of the Earth through such loose rocks, houses can drown in them. But will they sink evenly, without heel?
***
As you can see, this is not a listed building. Its foundation does not go 3-8 meters deep into the ground. The technology of building its foundation on a pile belt is clear.
RECONSTRUCTION OF THE COMPLEX OF STATE MANSION ON VOROBYEVY GORAY MOSCOW
Examples of destruction caused by deformation of the foundation for those who continue to claim that these old buildings have sagged, sunk into the ground:
***
Etruscan antiquities of Italy. Cerveteri
Excavations.
As you can see, this tomb was under layers of soil. Some would argue that under the cultural layers of the growing soil, accumulated over the centuries.
The street of the tombs. Archaeologists and historians always claim that they were deliberately buried at such a depth in order to avoid looting.
Tomb of Alcove. Inside, everything was also in clay. How did she get there, if you do not assume that the clay was liquid like in a mudflow?
If the tomb planters wanted to hide the burial sites, then why give these places away with masonry blocks? Something else had been built over the entrances.
The sarcophagi have long been plundered - pierced.
By the way, pay attention to the flow along the edge of the step. Apparently, these are cast masses. As well as overlap.
***
Excavations in Cyprus.
***
Osirion at Abydos, Egypt.
***
***
Observation from sergio_leone, which may be related to the houses brought in and to the topic of the lost heating technology:
In the center of Moscow time. houses from the 18th and early 19th centuries are divided into two types. Either the first floor is buried, or nothing is buried, but there are air ducts. For the sake of interest, look at the opened first floors of houses, they do not have these air ducts … Isn't this detail the key to the solution ???
But that is not all. For some reason, windows in houses with air ducts have been altered. The windows in them are not above the air ducts, but between the air ducts and the original windows are laid, and the new ones are cut …
Merzlyakovsky 10, the left wing of the house rebuilt at the beginning of the 20th century.
Walked around the center and recorded these two details. Match 100% There are no exceptions to the above.
***
Travel of an American on the Transsib 1894 -1896. Is the building filled up or sagging?
Source
***
Igna Lau1's comment:
Palace Square in St. Petersburg is ZAKOPANA at least 1.5 meters. And the palace is tied to the level of the old paving. Therefore, it did not sink. Also, if you are interested, the SECOND ALEXANDROVSKAYA COLUMN was found on the square during the reconstruction of the paving (back in 1977). She's cracked. And she was left to lie, buried again. As is known, there is no sound about her in the official version of Montferrand. BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT HER! And this one already says a lot about it.
Listen here from 28 minutes 40 seconds. One of the architects (Anatoly Chernov), the authors of the paving, PERSONALLY talks about the column.
***
For the objectivity of the picture, I propose to look at the criticism of alternative hypotheses by representatives from official science:
See from 1:01 the report of the author of the journal starcheolog with whom there were discussions on this topic on its pages.
For many, this is not criticism, but practically trolling alternative versions and stretching facts in an attempt to somehow explain the oddities.
Continued: Part 24
Author: sibved