Purely psychologically, sailors have long been ready to meet sea monsters in the oceans and even engage in combat with them. Which, in fact, happened more than once - if you believe the records in the ship's logs.
But at the same time the sailors were not at all ready to meet underwater technical devices in the depths of the sea, surpassing those known to them in the same proportion as the mythical sea serpent - the earthworm! Least of all admirals expected to meet unidentified "flying" objects under water!
But since the unidentified objects were still in the path of the warships, then, most likely, the war admirals should have expected orders to open fire. In January 1960, according to the information received by the Polish professor-ufologist Andrzej Mostovich, patrol ships of the Argentine Navy discovered two submarines of an unusual shape using ultrasonic sonar locators. One of them was lying on the ground, the second made some complex movements around it.
A group of anti-submarine ships approached the area where the submarines were located, and after the usual means of communication and warnings did not succeed in making the boats surface, depth charges were used. Many of them were blown up (the bombs were received from the United States free of charge: the remnants of the Second World War), and it seemed that those under water did not have the slightest chance of surviving. The more was the amazement of the sailors when both "submarines" surfaced and began to leave. Huge spherical wheelhouses towered over the water, boat hulls were also of unprecedented shape. The Argentines rushed in pursuit, but could not keep up with them and opened fire from guns. The “Submarines” sank again, and miracles began to happen on the sonar screens: first there were two, then four, and finally six. All this submarine fleet, having developed incredible speed, disappeared into 'the depths of the Atlantic.
However, this "submarine" (or similar) appeared two weeks later in the Caribbean, and two months later - in the Mediterranean. And at the end of 1960, ships of the US Pacific Fleet were already chasing her in the Seattle area - with the same result.
In 1964, in the Atlantic off the coast of Puerto Rico, according to researcher N. Posysaev, there was an incident with a UFO during an exercise of anti-submarine ships of the 9th aircraft carrier formation of the US Navy. In a report by American analyst Professor Anderson, it was noted that the compound was unexpectedly attacked by a powerful submarine. This happened off the coast of Puerto Rico, when the leader of the group, the aircraft carrier Wasp, surrounded by escort ships, was just preparing to repel the attack. But not from a depth of five kilometers! The officers were alarmed: there was not at that time, as there is not now, a submarine capable of diving to a depth of more than one and a half kilometers. The unknown submarine, according to reports, raced at a speed of 280 km / h (150 knots, modern submarines develop a speed no higher than 45 knots). She walked under the escort ships and rushed into the vastness of the ocean, dropping 2 km in a few minutes. Such a drop, according to the laws of hydrodynamics, would inevitably cause the destruction of the most durable case, since it is accompanied by a huge increase in pressure. But the fantastic ship ignored these laws. The latter fact embarrassed the admirals, and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably sensibly judging that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there were dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logs and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …dropping 2 km in a few minutes. Such a drop, according to the laws of hydrodynamics, would inevitably cause the destruction of the most durable case, since it is accompanied by a huge increase in pressure. But the fantastic ship ignored these laws. The latter fact embarrassed the admirals, and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably sensibly judging that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there were dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logs and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …dropping 2 km in a few minutes. Such a drop, according to the laws of hydrodynamics, would inevitably cause the destruction of the most durable case, since it is accompanied by a huge increase in pressure. But the fantastic ship ignored these laws. The latter fact embarrassed the admirals, and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably having reasoned that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there are dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logbooks and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …would inevitably cause the rupture of the strongest case, since it is accompanied by a huge increase in pressure. But the fantastic ship ignored these laws. The latter fact embarrassed the admirals, and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably sensibly judging that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there are dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logbooks and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …would inevitably cause the rupture of the strongest case, since it is accompanied by a huge increase in pressure. But the fantastic ship ignored these laws. The latter fact embarrassed the admirals, and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably sensibly judging that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there were dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logs and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably sensibly judging that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there were dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logs and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …and they ordered the abolition of bombing and the use of homing torpedoes, probably sensibly judging that it was impossible to fight against such "submarines" using conventional means. For history, after this incident, there were dozens of eyewitness testimonies, reports and reports from the commander of the Atlantic Fleet of the US Navy in Norfolk, as well as entries in 13 submarine logs and aircraft logs about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …as well as entries in 13 submarine logbooks and aircraft logbooks about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …as well as entries in 13 submarine logbooks and aircraft logbooks about an "ultra-fast submarine with one propeller or a similar device" …
In 1972, the Deep Freeze naval maneuvers were conducted in the polar regions of the Atlantic. The exercises took place among pack ice and were supported by icebreakers. On board one of them was the famous polar explorer Rubene J. Villela. Suddenly, breaking through an almost three-meter thickness of ice, a spherical silvery body emerged from the depths and disappeared into the sky at great speed. “The object was at least 12 yards in diameter, but the hole it punched was much larger. He carried huge blocks of ice with him to a height of 20-30 yards, and the chilly water in the ice hole was covered with clouds of steam, apparently from the hot casing of this ball … only Villela, the helmsman and officer of the watch, were watching.
The departure of such objects from under the water was recorded earlier, as evidenced by the entries in the ship's logs. At 3.30 a.m. on August 12, 1825, sailors twice saw round glowing red balls fly up. On June 18, 1845, south of Sicily, the crew of the vessel "Victoria" observed the slow rise of three dazzling discs, linked by thin glowing rods. On the afternoon of July 20, 1967, the crew of the Argentine ship Naviero off the Brazilian coast recorded a brightly glowing "cigar" 105-110 feet (35-37 m) in length near and below them. At 16:00 on November 15, 1975, not far from Marseille, 17 people witnessed the departure of a ten-meter silvery disc from under the water. Relatively recently, in 1990, three UFOs flew out of the water of the Bering Strait to the south of its narrowest point (according to some information, there,near the Cape of St. Lawrence, there is an anomalous zone) observed visually and through binoculars Academician R. F. Avramenko with colleagues.
Promotional video:
In the 70s, the Soviet scientific vessel "Vladimir Vorobyov" recorded some unknown body in the Arabian Sea. The echo sounder showed a depth of 170 m at this point at the same time confirming the presence of some mass under the keel at a depth of 20 m. Simultaneously, the team observed a bright white spot for half an hour, rotating counterclockwise and breaking up into eight parts.
On February 28, 1977 the newspaper "Vechernyaya Odessa" published an interview with the captain of the motor ship "Anton Makarenko" Yevgeny Lysenko, who said that one day at two o'clock in the morning, five members of the team witnessed an even greater glow. The luminous spoked wheel had a center of rotation behind the vessel and a rotation radius of over 12 miles!
Indirect evidence that the source of energy for the rotating circles on the water surface is precisely UFOs, are the cases of observation in the air and under water of brightly luminous objects with diverging circles around. For example, from the book by J. Piccard and R. Dietz "Depth of 7 miles", published in 1963, one can learn that submariners at a depth of 700 fathoms observed a large disk with numerous luminous points.
UFO dives, ascent and takeoffs were repeatedly recorded by the Soviet military. Such phenomena, for example, were repeatedly detected by the devices of the satellite tracking base of the anti-space defense forces. The base was located at some distance from the Pamir Lake Sarez, which has a depth of up to 500 m, and its servicemen did not know whether anyone else had observed these phenomena near the lake or from its surface. Occasionally there were incidents between the Navy and UFOs in those moments when their interests were contrary. Fortunately, this did not lead to any serious consequences, and besides, the number of military clashes between naval ships and alien ships is much less than the number of combat engagements of aircraft with UFOs.
In late December 1989, a triangular UFO came under fire from naval artillery over Tikhaya Bay near Vladivostok. Not responding to the "rudeness", the object quickly moved towards the city.
A similar incident on October 7, 1977 also ended without consequences. This time due to the fact that the radio operators of the floating base of the Northern Fleet "Volga" for 18 minutes could not call the aviation for help. All this time, the base was blocked by nine UFOs, as soon as they finished their round dance over the ship, communication was restored, and the called reconnaissance aircraft, of course, did not record anything unusual in the sky …
Apart from sightings of “just UFOs” above and under water, there are also sightings of strange humanoid creatures. However, this is not surprising - if humanoids are sometimes seen and photographed on the ground near the landing sites of UFOs, then why cannot they be seen under water near the landing sites (on the water or on the bottom) of the same objects? It's true, but with one "but". No one and nowhere saw how "underwater humanoids" came out (swam) out of UFOs, that is, the involvement of one in the other has not yet been established.
In the summer of 1982, the head of the diving service of the USSR Ministry of Defense, Major General V. Demyanenko, at the district gathering, examined the actions of his colleagues. Not long before that, on the western shore of Lake Baikal, scout divers during training and combat dives in the icy water of the lake repeatedly met unknown divers in tight-fitting silver overalls, in everything similar to people, but huge, almost three meters in height. At depths of about 50 m, they did not have scuba gear or any other apparatus - only a spherical helmet that hid their head. We moved at high speed, observing the area of the slopes. The alarmed command decided to detain the "unidentified divers"for which seven divers, led by an officer, tried to throw a net on one of them. The result of the operation was disastrous - all the attackers were thrown to the surface of the water by some powerful impulse. Due to a sharp drop in pressure and decompression sickness, the entire group was seriously affected: four became disabled, three died. Soon after this incident, a corresponding order was issued by the Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, which criticized the "initiative" of submariners of the Siberian and Trans-Baikal districts and where, among other things, deep-water lakes were listed in which submariners should be careful, since in these lakes there were descents and ascent of disks and balls, underwater luminescence and other abnormal phenomena. The described case is the only known contact of the Navy with anomalous phenomena that resulted in human casualties. Due to a sharp drop in pressure and decompression sickness, the entire group was seriously affected: four became disabled, three died. Soon after this incident, a corresponding order was issued by the Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, which criticized the "initiative" of submariners of the Siberian and Trans-Baikal districts and where, among other things, deep-water lakes were listed, in which submariners should be careful, since in these lakes there were descents and ascent of disks and balls, underwater luminescence and other abnormal phenomena. The described case is the only known contact of the Navy with anomalous phenomena that resulted in human casualties. Due to a sharp drop in pressure and decompression sickness, the entire group was seriously affected: four became disabled, three died. Soon after this incident, a corresponding order was issued by the Commander-in-Chief of the Ground Forces, which criticized the "initiative" of submariners of the Siberian and Trans-Baikal districts and where, among other things, deep-water lakes were listed, in which submariners should be careful, since in these lakes there were descents and ascent of disks and balls, underwater luminescence and other abnormal phenomena. The described case is the only known contact of the Navy with anomalous phenomena that resulted in human casualties.where the “amateurism” of submariners of the Siberian and Trans-Baikal districts was criticized and where, among other things, deep-water lakes were listed, in which submariners should be careful, since in these lakes there were descents and ascent of discs and balls, underwater glow and other anomalous phenomena. The described case is the only known contact of the Navy with anomalous phenomena that resulted in human casualties.where the “amateurism” of submariners of the Siberian and Trans-Baikal districts was criticized and where, among other things, deep-water lakes were listed, in which submariners should be careful, since in these lakes there were descents and ascent of discs and balls, underwater glow and other anomalous phenomena. The described case is the only known contact of the Navy with anomalous phenomena that resulted in human casualties.
In the hypotheses interpreting such UFO activity on the water areas of the Earth, there is a whole range of explanations: from the fact that aliens are simply hiding under water from air defense detection systems, and at the same time mining minerals from the bottom, to the version of the existence of an independent underwater humanoid civilization at the bottom of the ocean. There is no generally accepted hypothesis, and this is understandable if only because the ocean depths have not yet been studied well enough, much worse than the space of the nearby Cosmos.
V. A. Chernobrov