Before proceeding to the topic of this work, I considered it necessary to briefly explain the main ideas of the previous ones. This is mainly due to some confusion arising among the readers, which is visible in the content of their letters to me on the topic of this work.
1. The main idea of “Ancient Egypt. X-files “is the emergence of the ancient Egyptian cult of the dead and the entire religion of this country with the belief in the afterlife, as a direct copy of the“divine”immersion in a state of prolonged biological inhibition (presumably for long space flights) with subsequent“resurrection”. At the same time, the development of such attributes of the cult as sarcophagi is traced, as a direct analogue of "sleep chambers" with the ensuing results.
2. At the same time, I could not resist the analogies of the Christian teaching with the ancient Egyptian religion. It is my deep conviction that Christianity not only copied the fundamental principles, resurrection after death, Osiris as the prototype of Christ, the presence of God, an all-present spirit, but also adopted many small "miracles" and procedures of service, while ungratefully denying the original source to everyone as less developed and incorrect in understanding the truth of divinity. The book by the famous Soviet Egyptologist Perepelkin about the history of Ancient Egypt, which I read after writing the work, once again strengthened me in the correctness of my conclusions. Perepelkin, passing on this topic in passing, gives brilliant examples of Christianity borrowing many ancient Egyptian "details" of the cult. To my delight, none of my examples coincide with his,they are all links of the same chain and only confirm the truth of each other.
3. Small article "Predynastic Egypt: Forced Unification or Voluntary Union?" completely devoted exclusively to the idea of the possibility of uniting the country on the basis of mutual interests, and not the forced occupation of one nome by another.
In many sources repeatedly cited in works devoted to ancient India, there are references to surfaces glazed from the enormous temperature with an area of hundreds of meters and even several kilometers on the territory of ancient cities. Moreover, the very nature of the destruction of these cities in conjunction with such surfaces on their territory leads the authors to the conclusion about the use of some kind of "super-weapon", similar in effect to a nuclear charge. However, the overwhelming majority of historical evidence and the absence of radiation unequivocally contradict at least some possibility of the presence of such weapons in people of those distant times. Attempts at a historical compromise in the form of works proving the existence of previously original rocket developments and their use in no way explain such a powerful impact on the environment that took place.
There are even descriptions of some "rocket launchers" based on crude oil or gunpowder, with which Princess Olga allegedly fired at rebellious cities in revenge for her husband's death.
I will not delve into these descriptions since I do not have enough material on this topic regarding the above-mentioned parts of the world, but I simply cannot ignore the ancient Egyptian texts describing a very similar use of some "super-weapon".
Earlier I wrote that the most interesting facts of ancient Egyptian history, in which one can see "outside" interference, must be sought in the era of the first dynasties and in pre-dynastic times, but it cannot be ruled out that some artifacts of the "gods" could be found at a later time. A striking example of such a find is the description of the use of a mysterious weapon by Ramses the second 1279-1213 BC. e.
Promotional video:
The work is called The Poem of Pentaura, after the scribe who wrote it down on papyrus. Also, the poem is carved on the walls of temples in Karnak, Luxor, Remesseum and Abu Simbel.
The abundance of copies, especially in the wall version, testifies to the grandeur of the event, and the point here is not only in the victory over the enemies - there were many similar victories in the entire history of ancient Egypt, but rather in how exactly this victory was won. The poem tells about the campaign of Ramses the second against the peoples of "Hittites, Pidas, Dardanians, Masa, Iruen, Luka, Artsava, Karkemish, Nukhash, Ugarit, Keda, Kizuant".
In fact, the whole story does not represent anything special for the one looking for a certain secret, but there is one detail, it is she who makes this trip - by the way, its exact date is unknown - more than remarkable.
This story also acquires a special halo because of some of the oddities of our time. For example, in the atlas "Egypt, Valley of the Kings" by Alberto Siliotti, published in 2001 and containing excellent and detailed descriptions with diagrams of all found rock tombs of the 18-20 dynasties, the tomb of Ramses the second is absent, it is simply skipped!
It looks all the more strange because there are descriptions of the tombs of his father, Seti the first and his son Merinptah. Moreover, about the tomb of Merinptah it is written: "It is located in a small side valley, opening on the right side of the main channel, not far from the huge tomb of his father!" Thus, the second Rameses who ruled for about 70 years (and this is longer than the reign of any pharaoh of 18-20 dynasties) and, of course, who built himself, for sure, the largest tomb of this period, is simply missed! Could this be accidental ?! I am deeply convinced that it cannot. Each description of the tomb in this edition is accompanied by a huge number of high-quality photographs. And if on the walls of the tomb of Ramesses II there is a history of this campaign of his, and it simply cannot be there, because this was his most grandiose victory, the reason why these images hide,becomes clear - it is too fantastic and inconvenient for the theory of copper-stone Egypt.
The most "great warrior" was found in 1881 in the so-called cache "el-Bahri", where the priests of the 21st dynasty (978-959 BC) hid the mummies of the most prominent pharaohs of the new kingdom from the desecration that inevitably threatened them in the case of being in their own tombs.
Ramses lay in a strange wooden sarcophagus, equipped with a corresponding inscription about his "afterlife" journey. The current location of the mummy is not exactly known to me, but for sure it is in the Cairo Museum of Antiquities. There is a slight suspicion that the mummy attributed to Rameses the second may actually not belong to him due to the fact that the hiding place before the archaeologists had already been visited by robbers, on whose tracks they came there, but still there are a lot of chances that it is him …
Having reached the territory of (tentatively) modern Syria, Ramses crossed the Orontes River and set up camp. Part of his troops were two days away from him. Part of it was ferried to the south, and another part was somewhere nearby. Apparently, only his guard and part of the convoy were with Ramses. The following quotes: Translation by M. A. Korostovtsev on the "Tale of Peteis ///" 1978. pp. 122-138.
Apparently by accident, or maybe on a tip from scouts, the combined enemy army went directly to the camp of Ramses.
"Countless like locusts, they covered mountains and valleys." Quite naturally, a small detachment of soldiers, without reinforcements and caught unawares, rushed to flee, leaving the pharaoh alone. Pierre Monte's version of "Egypt of the Ramses", that this part of the troops fled, and the Pharaoh was saved by his guards, does not stand up to criticism, if only because the enemies then personally begged Ramses not to exterminate them all completely, and because the whole battle took place immediately!
In the event of a retreat, it would take time to collect part of the troops and the subsequent battle, which was clearly not the case. Ramses remains only with the chariot Mena and several courtiers, apparently servants. And what? Ramses is acting so strange that there are only two reasons for his behavior.
1. He went mad with fear, but then he would have been quickly sobered over the head with an ax.
2. He knew what he was doing, and not only saved his life, but also had no other choice.
“And he appeared in radiance like Father Montu, with military weapons and clothed in a PANTSIR, like Baal in his hour of greatness. And with him is his main horse "Victory in Thebes", may he be healthy and unharmed."
"And then his majesty let the horses gallop, and crashed into the midst of the enemies, AND HE WAS ONE, NOBODY WAS WITH HIM, and he began to look around and saw that he was cut off from the road by 2500 chariots of enemies"
I deliberately began to highlight in large letters those places that, in my opinion, deserve special attention. The Egyptians never lied, especially they did not lie with such descriptions. If Ramses had barely gotten away from this campaign, the chroniclers would have simply “hushed up” this embarrassment by focusing on something else in his glorification. But they would not persist so much in details and, repeating the same thing over and over again, attribute the victory to their ruler. There is a logical explanation for this. They described it so often and persistently because they wanted their descendants not to doubt their story, and also from an excess of impressions. However, those will appear among the readers as soon as we move on to the quotes further.
“And there were three of them (enemies) per chariot, that is, 7,500, and there was no charioteer, no shield-bearer, no commander with him, for all of them and ALL THE ARMY fled.
And then His Majesty called, “What happened, my father Amon? Has the father forgotten his son? Have I transgressed your plans? What does the ruler of Egypt mean if a foreigner dares to block his path ?!
What is to your heart these Asians who DO NOT LEAD GOD!
The army left me. I shouted, but none of them (the soldiers and the entourage) heard when I called out. AND I GOT THAT IS MORE CHARITABLE FOR ME AMON MILLION WARRIORS, HUNDREDS OF THOUSAND CHARIOTS. Obviously something is meant, but not God himself as a concept, in such a capacity of a "substitute" for God himself, no one ever names throughout Egyptian history!
Apparently Ramses still managed to get together and sit on a horse or chariot, but the phrase that he had comprehended the beneficialness of Amun in this situation sounds strange. This is most naturally understood if the pharaoh had SOMETHING in store, and in a difficult moment he realized that his entire cowardly army was nothing compared to THIS. That is, observing the flight of his soldiers and getting ready for battle, Ramses was a little nervous, as evidenced by his appeals to Amon, but he was confident in the power of "Amun", and then his phrases sound about the same as, for example, the phrase "with God" at the machine gunner pulling the trigger.
Then something very strange happened.
“And he stretched out HIS HIS HAND to me, and I rejoiced.
And he was, as it were, FOR ME and BEFORE me AT THE SAME TIME.
And my heart was strengthened and my chest rejoiced. AND EVERYTHING HAPPENED BY MY DESIGN, I was like Mont, in the moment of his greatness. I fired with my right hand and took prisoners with my left."
Leaving aside the statement that Ramses could shoot from a bow with one hand, while capturing prisoners (which is interesting), let's pay attention to the fact that something protected him both in front and behind! At the same time, the pharaoh suddenly speaks of some kind of accomplished plan, which means that he planned something like that, although not in small things.
"Two thousand and five hundred chariots that surrounded me are stretched out before my horses." It is now clear that Ramses was in a chariot.
“None of them raised their hands to me, their hands weakened, they could not pull the string, they didn’t have the strength to take hold of the spears. I knocked them down and killed many of them.
None of the defeated looked back, who fell, did not rise!"
Without a doubt, it is clear that they all fell before Ramses began killing them. From what!? It is unlikely that the outnumbered, well-trained warriors only weakened the formidable appearance of the pharaoh. The point here is, as they say, not clean at all. Some parts of the poem can be safely attributed to this fragment, so that it would become clearer what really happened.
“As a WALL he (Pharaoh) protects his army, he SHIELDS him on the day of battle! He is brave and valiant in the face of the enemy, and in the hour of battle he is like a FLAME EATING! Thousands of husbands cannot resist him, LOWER STRENGTH AT THE SEE OF HIM! He instills terror with his formidable ROCK!"
Let's summarize preliminary results. It can, of course, be argued, and many will do so, that these are all mythopoetic exaggerations. But excuse me, what does it have to do with such details !? Glorification by glorification, but we are dealing with a natural picture of the influence on the enemy soldiers of something mysterious and unknown. The striking power of this something spread over a vast territory, about one hundred or two hundred meters in circumference and paralyzed the human body. At the same time, Ramses himself, being at the epicenter of the radiation, was not subjected to this effect. A formidable roar may well be the sound of something similar to an energy generator, and God's hand is nothing more than a force field. Running a little ahead, we can assume that Ramses used an installation installed on his chariot, which has unique, even from our point of view, capabilities.
First, it generated a protective force field. Secondly, it produced paralyzing radiation outward, and thirdly, something else.
“I overtook many of them, for although they fled, THEIR LEGS WERE WEAK.
Every arrow shot at my majesty, approaching me, DEFINED AND FLYED BY ME !!!!!!!"
To the chariot's lamentations that the army had abandoned them - apparently, the charioteer was somewhere nearby - the pharaoh calmly retorts:
"What are these women to your heart, we will defeat the enemy even without them!"
What self-confidence! Something not very much he was bold before the introduction of his "Amon". Further, Rameses the second, apparently, was so filled with courage that the scribe even noted:
"You are not worried about the abundance of countries opposing you!"
With such and such a weapon, of course, it doesn't bother.
In order not to forget, it should be noted that the pharaoh harnessed specific horses to the chariot, "Victory in Thebes" and "Mut Blagaya", although it is said that there were more of them. Why? Probably, not every horse would not bear from the "divine roar", they harnessed the trained ones. This means that Ramses had already tested this weapon and knew its action. At least he did it once before the battle.
“With uraeus on my forehead, crushing enemies, SPIRITING FIRE AND FLAME into their faces! I was like Ra, rising in the early morning, AND MY RAYS BURNED THE ENEMIES. One of them shouted: “Careful, beware, do not approach him. OVERFLOWS HIS DEITY, IT IS WITH HIM IN HIS CHARIOT! EVERYONE WHO GETS CLOSE TO IT WILL BE BURNED BY FIRE AND FLAME!"
There are also eyewitness comments.
“THIS IS NOT A MAN AMONG US! THIS IS GOD THE GREAT POWER, THIS IS BAAL ITSELF! THE ACTIONS UNAUTHORIZED TO PEOPLE DOES HE DO THIS, ONLY THE ONE CAN DO THIS! I CAN'T NEITHER RAISE MY HANDS OR TENSION WHEN I LOOK AT HIM!"
The third quality of the mysterious weapon used by Ramses second, as we see, was something similar to a flamethrower. However, with its previous properties, it is impossible to assume that the principle of flame and its effect on people was similar to modern flamethrowers. It looks more like a laser. Moreover, he burned not only the flesh of enemies.
"His Majesty BURNED THE ENTIRE VALLEY"
What was that !? And how could a king who ruled a society at an early level of development get such a thing? The fact of the real appearance of God and his help I, excuse me, completely exclude.
Concluding the quotes, I will cite only brief excerpts that after this massacre the united armies of the enemies immediately asked for mercy and admitted defeat. That is why Ramses did not take the nearby Kadash, probably having received huge compensation, and went home to Egypt.
“Is it good that you kill your servants? You have not left us heirs today! Do not be cruel in your deeds, O king! Peace is more beneficial than battle, let us breathe!
And my majesty refrained from exterminating (complete) the conquered and did not establish his dominion over them, for I was like Mont in the moment of his greatness."
Pharaoh was so satisfied with mass murder and so shocked and thrilled his enemies that he had no reason to advance further, he got everything he came for, and it is not worth trying on modern meaning and tactics for his then interests.
And yet, what was it? Without a doubt, Rameses the second somehow took possession of an outstanding artifact left over from the days of "divine rule". The closed castes of the priesthood could well have kept something for a thousand years, abandoned, or perhaps forgotten by the "gods" on earth. They also knew how to use it, which meant there were instructions. Considering the fact that Rameses very favorably and generously financed many castes and temples, it is possible that one of the high priests supplied his majesty with a deadly weapon of victory on the campaign. Who, if not beneficent priests, was even more interested in his victory and in considerable riches that the pharaoh was supposed to obtain in an obviously predatory campaign. And they had no doubts that Rameses the second, returning from the campaign, would begin to build and give even more than ever before.
Judging by the description, using this setup - let's call it that for now - was not very difficult. The dimensions did not exceed a box that could fit on the floor of the chariot. But remembering about the burning functions, we can assume that there were more than one artifacts. It is impossible not to notice that the pharaoh put on some kind of armor, and immediately became like a god !!!
The mention of military armor in the Egyptian army is very sparse, and even more so, the Egyptians did not have anything like medieval European armor. In hot climates, it didn't make any sense. One can, of course, assume that Ramses put on some kind of copper pads on his chest and back, etc. But, together with the subsequent event, it is more reasonable to assume that the version of the "gods" battle suit has no less chance of existence than the version of the "installation". And by the way, it was in the case of a spacesuit that the pharaoh could calmly "captivate" - immobilize with one hand and strike, "shoot" with the other, if the corresponding devices were located on the sleeves. In this case, it should be noted that this spacesuit is more than worthy of attention. Not only did he lie for more than a thousand years from the era of the "gods", he remained efficient, he also possessed simply fantasticeven for modern times, parameters. He created a huge force protective field, and the devices included in the equipment had such damaging functions as "paralyzing" radiation and something similar in action to a very powerful combat laser.
Several questions arise in parallel.
1. It seems that the nature of the "gods" was at least humanoid - the presence of a form suitable for a person, unless the spacesuit or "installation" was specially made for you and me.
2. The source of energy that feeds this entire economy is so powerful that it is difficult to even guess what kind of principle it is. After so many centuries and working, that's really divine.
Of course, one can disregard rather accurate ancient Egyptian descriptions of these events and consider that this whole poem is nothing more than a high syllable about an event in the biography of Ramses II. But let this be the lot of those who, even after reading "their star ship has landed on our land," say that this is the fantasy of the ancient author.
In his work “Ancient Egypt. X-files”I already wrote that for some time now the study of monuments, tombs and many places on the territory of the former ancient Egypt began to be suspiciously secretive. Much in this poem could be explained by the drawings on the walls of the huge tomb of Ramses II. But I could not find them, moreover, I did not even find its description, and even more so I could not figure out what, when and who exactly found it there. However, according to indirect sources, for example, the expedition of which country and which institution and when, was there, one can try to draw a conclusion about what they could find and what is the further fate of the find.
And if it seems too fantastic to you that, for example, the modern developments of the army of a particular country (we will not say which one) are based on the finds of their archaeologists in Egypt, then do not rush to conclusions - the realities of life sometimes surpass even the most daring fantasies.
There is also a phrase in the poem that until recently I simply could not understand.
"He is great, his heart is like a COPPER MOUNTAIN!"
It would seem, what does his heart and the mountain of copper have to do with it, which also shines? Or imperishable? If he were completely likened to this very grief, it would be understandable, great, radiant, etc. But the heart and copper, a very strange combination.
However, there is also a very interesting theory on this score:
See: A. Sklyarov "What are you, the homeland of the gods?.."
In 1936, in the northern part of Sakkara, south of the pyramids of Giza, in the tomb of Crown Prince Sabu, son of King Ajib of the First Dynasty, a bowl-shaped vessel made of slate was discovered. The burial dates back to 3100 BC. No satisfactory explanation has been put forward for this subject. Scientists drew attention to the fact that slate itself is very fragile, and the mysterious object could only serve as a model for such a product, imitating the shape originally made of metal. And in 1976, exactly the same design, but already as a revolutionary engineering development associated with the American space program, was published in one technical journal. It was a flywheel with a lightweight rim.
As a result of a two-week search on the Internet, I still managed to get some photographs of the tomb of Ramses II. What he saw at the beginning was confusing, but there is also a logical explanation. Almost all images and inscriptions have been destroyed. I'm not sure, but judging by some of the photos, there is a collapse of rocks inside the tomb. However, such a massive "disappearance" of all inscriptions and drawings is difficult to explain only by the shift of rocks. If this happened because of them, then it would not be uniform and in some places of the tombs the images would be intact. But upon closer examination of some photos, it is quite possible to come to the conclusion about intentional destruction, knocking down the layer. In many places, the nature of the damage is clearly artificial. Now it's hard to say exactly who did it,but the first suspects may well be considered the same priests who wished not only to keep the mummy of the pharaoh intact, but also his secret.
DMITRY NECHAY