The period from 1989 to 2000 is analogous to the period from 1905 to 1917 - the most inflection, completing the transition from the second and third spirals to the next. The locomotive of the country is rolling downhill, downhill - towards the new system of social structure and the new government, a rather painful and lengthy process.
Nothing can stop the country from falling into the abyss. The power itself remains in place for now, both in 1905 and in 1989, there is no radical change in the ruling elite. These revolutions only forestall the coming catastrophe. As under Nikolai Romanov, so under Gorbachev and Yeltsin, the same bureaucracy rules. The period 1905-1917 is similar to the period 1989-2000, which can be characterized as the low points of the spiral. The country is going downhill, downhill - towards the new system of government.
The difficult years 1915-1916 are similar to 1999-2000 years (analogous to the cycle of Uranus, which is equal to 84 years). In the textbooks, he is characterized by "ministerial leapfrog", the complete loss of authority of Nicholas II, criticism of his actions as the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the country. During this period, there is a collapse of the entire national economy, a sharp impoverishment of the entire population. Even the employees and officers of the tsarist army turn into beggars, humiliated and insulted outcasts. Unfortunately, Nikolai has an addiction to alcohol, which largely prevents him from coping with his duties. In full measure, all this can be attributed to the rule of Yeltsin. Nothing can stop the country from falling into the abyss. It is foolish, unreasonable to carry out reforms aimed at recovery in such periods. They are simply doomedbecause one should dream and yearn only for the most painless and smooth fall with the aim of the least losses for the country and the people. After all, you also need to be able to fall, and sometimes it is much harder to fall than to rise! "Ministerial leapfrog of 1916" was only transformed in 1999-2000 into a prime minister's.
The cyclical nature of historical processes is due to their spiral nature and the cycles of the planets: for example, the initial period of the third spiral from 1917 to 1928 is similar to the same period in the fourth from 2000 to 2010.
The period from 1917 to 1921 is similar to the period from 2000 to 2003, during which the old system was broken down, a new system of power was born and the first internal crisis emerged. The analogy of the beginning of the third revolutionary and fourth spirals leads in 1918-1920 and in 2002-2004 to the same scenario - the land issue, judicial reform (the old courts were destroyed) and the reform of the army are gaining the greatest importance. In contrast to the central regions, where the Bolsheviks took power peacefully, the greatest difficulties in 1918 were experienced by the population of the southern outskirts of Russia, especially the population of the Don, Kuban and the Southern Urals. The 2002 flood also brought a lot of suffering to the people of the south.
Let us also recall the slogan of the revolution "Russia is on fire!" This time, during the next cycle of Uranus, the fire turned out to be not revolutionary, but the most natural - in the form of spontaneous forest fires, which were not so easy to extinguish. Only the outward manifestation of the same planet has changed. The unpredictability of Uranus, the original image of which was in the form of a destructive lightning, is very strongly manifested in Russia. And therefore, it is no coincidence, no coincidence, in recent years, dry lightning of the heavens lit the forests of Siberia and the Far East.
Let us continue the analogy of the spirals and the direction of the country's movement in 1918-1920 and 2002-2004. As for the party struggle, in 1918, the Bolsheviks first of all aimed it against the most numerous party of the Social Revolutionaries. Recall that the Bolsheviks did everything to achieve the dissolution in January 1918 of the legally elected representative body - the Constituent Assembly, in which the majority belonged to the Social Revolutionaries.
And the struggle of the Bolsheviks with the Socialist-Revolutionaries at the V Congress of Soviets in July 1918, which took place at the Bolshoi Theater? The prominent Socialist Revolutionary Party leader Maria Spiridonova had to withstand not only strong political pressure. She was then closed in the buffet of the Bolshoi, where she had to spend the night. A connection with Svetlana Goryacheva involuntarily arises, for whom 2002 was not the most calm year. Latvian riflemen surrounded the Bolshoi Theater and then saved the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks took their own people out of the theater, the rest were arrested. The capture was carried out within a few hours. A detachment of Red Army soldiers led by Mikhail Frunze defeated the Left Social Revolutionaries who had seized the post office.
Promotional video:
And many are perplexed about the struggle that is constantly happening in the Duma ?! But despite the positive tendencies associated with the growth and strengthening of the new spiral of power, the country continues to follow the same well-worn track that developed earlier. After all, this is what it should be, therefore the struggle of parties in our time is also no less intense. Unlike earlier times, this struggle is now largely determined and directed by the Kremlin and the president himself. This is the fate of Russia. Only this way, and not otherwise! This is the determinism of the historical course of Russia.
84 years and 3 months will pass before another theater center, the Center on Dubrovka, will be seized again, which will also be seized within a few hours at night. And again, attention is focused on the means of communication, although this time attention was paid not to the post office, but to the media. Of course, the circumstances are different, but in the new river of time, besides Uranus, there are other cycles. Events so different at first glance led to the same consequences for the authorities. In both the first and second cases, there was no need to negotiate with the opposite side, the issues of military development arose again, and again attention was drawn to the issues of communication and information transfer.
In this regard, it is interesting to compare 2010 with its counterpart in the third spiral, it will be 1927-1928.
There is a semblance of behavior by the authorities, new lawsuits, the second - on Yukos in 2010. A year later, in 2011, there was a sharp increase in tension in society, the growth of rallies and demonstrations against the repressive power apparatus, for fair elections. Of course, in 1928-1929 the Kremlin decided to discard the old schemes of interaction with agriculture, now in the new river of time, in 2010-2011, economic issues, unemployment and schemes of interaction with business are on the agenda.
So, the initial period of the country's development naturally presupposes an increase in tension in society. That's why they are laws, to act independently of the will and desire of the masses. This reveals their objective nature of action. Remember the Old Testament: "Let there be lights in the firmament of heaven to separate day from night, and for signs." Heaven dictates its cycles, its script to us.
Of course, time makes its own adjustments and methods of resolving the situation. In the 21st century, time is of paramount importance not to bread and its producer, but to oil and oil production. As for the methods, then, unlike Stalin, in the spiral of the Romanovs during this period, along with the growth of tension in society, there was an increase in conciliarity. Councils are convened on almost all significant issues, at which problems of the development of society are discussed in a democratic way.