India deserves a separate discussion on the issue of megaliths melted, or rather melted in the rock. Many who have visited it say that the sensations in the temples are extremely strange - as if you are on the tip of an invisible iceberg.
Having looked at these photos, you will be convinced that the temples were not carved out of hard rock with stone hammers and copper chisels, but were made in it using completely different methods and for very interesting purposes.
Where and Verul (near Ellora):
We draw attention to the props, which were clearly set when the roof began to bend, but at the same time they form one whole with it:
The same story. either the stone flowed down to the supports, or they grew into it.
Promotional video:
There is something similar in Castello di Sperlinga, Italy.
Once again, we draw attention to the built-in props and the rock melted on top of them.
It was as if the breed was smeared like a paste, and brick structures were built on top, and at about the same time and not so long ago:
Here you can clearly see that the left supports, although they seem to be a remake, were inserted into the still molten rock, which then flowed down with a visor from above:
Inside and around:
Inside the fortress:
Can you imagine stone steps bowing like this?
Obviously, the stone was plasticine at the time of construction. The set floated away before it could really harden.
Back to India:
Badami:
Rajasthan:
We recently saw a similar technology for the synthesis of a monolith with a brick in Germany, Königstein Castle:
Another good example of fusing architecture with stone, Castle Caccamo:
Back to India:
Attention to the thin visor-layer of dark rock on top of the light one.
Undavalli:
Pandavleni Caves, Maharashtra.
Ellora:
An ancient mine next to Ellora, the mountain was well worked:
More mines nearby:
Ajanta:
"Caves" Ravana Phadi:
Again the mines:
Session excerpt:
Q: I have spoken with some who have been to India. They say that some temples have passages to the dungeons or hidden floors, and even deeper (tens if not hundreds of meters) there are more ancient layers, but the passages to them are either closed, or their presence is only felt, but in physics they are not. What can you say about this?
A: Yes, that's right. In fact, there are many layers visible to us and invisible. We can say that there are ancient layers and there is a multi-layer visible remake …
Q: Is it correct to understand that the visible temples were made in soft rock?
A: Not always and not everywhere. In many places, the rock was laid on top of the old complexes to hide them, and a remake was molded on top. Like, as the scenery was set to divert the eyes. As they covered with paste in physics, they put stone patches *. On the thin one, ancient temples stand intact, conserved in their dimension, somewhere even the owners still live. There are also temples above the ground, but that's a different story. And new temples - they serve as beacons, because they still concentrate energy, provide a reference point, it is easy to count them from orbit, if necessary.
* Stone patches (go to google and compare the height of the patch with a completely flat surface around):
Stone patch 33 km long:
And at least 500 m wide (~ 50 m high).
Q: How were these stone patches made?
A: Materialization, energy densification. There is the word “condensation” … matter condensed from the ether like water from steam. In general, a lot of places on earth were so covered with patches to hide what is under these mountains. Shows that in some places the temples work as checkpoints …
Q: Where are the checkpoints?
A: Into the layers that are now closed to people, including the ancient complexes
Q: How did you do the temples visible to us?
A: Basically, they just removed the excess matter. You direct the emitter to the block of the mountain and the rock dissolves. There is the word annihilation, primary matter. If a 3D printer creates matter, then an anti-3D printer worked here. He will create. Or, at first, a frame, a hologram of the temple was placed, and around it the rock was already materialized. The frame remained intact, empty, and the stone around was compacted. Many methods, architects also experimented with different technologies. There is the phrase "free masons" and the message is such as a smile with a wink;)
Q: And why are there decorations to divert the eyes?
A: To prevent people from climbing where they shouldn't be climbing.
Q: So these are not real structures?
A: Again, it depends on the case. But yes, many people make phonites like cardboard. Pacifiers. There are real temples under them or somewhere nearby, but these are placed just to divert the eyes, there is almost no energy in them.
Q: What is the point of doing this? People come there anyway, pray …
A: The point is that there are places of power that can harm people and vice versa - people can damage places, crystals that stand there, spirits. And not only people, in fact, you never know tourists arrive, everyone has their own motives and thoughts are not always pure. There are such strong currents from the Earth that it is better not to stay for a long time, the subtle bodies will burn. Well, pilgrims also bring dirt a lot. And so that these pilgrims did not run around anywhere, they made cardboard decorations, which are slightly offset in space from key points. A hologram, it is a hologram in India)
Q: So it turns out that the temples we see are just a cargo cult?
A: You could say that. They work more as a reminder so that the culture does not completely disintegrate, beacons again. Real ancient temples are hidden for the time being. There are too high technologies of protection, all kinds of portals for transitions, crystals, vimanas … it was impossible to leave this for a young crop, it is dangerous.
Q: Are the mines near some of the temples - are they mining or something else?
A: Somewhere mining, somewhere searching for what was hidden by layers of stone. If there are rock dumps nearby, then most likely a search. If there are no dumps, then production.
Q: Is the Hindus today the same genotype that built these temples?
A: Of course not. The builders left not so long ago by our standards. 250-300 years ago, if in linear time. They had cyclopean buildings there, much more than those that we see now. Here the passages were closed to them. There is an analogy with Isaac and the giants *, but cultures and races are different. Different parents, different children, but the principles are similar
Q: Is it related to branch merging?
O, sure. But here, rather, with separation …
Q: That is, ancient technologies were hidden by parents from their children for the time being?
A: It's time and time is still in question. Technologies are located in spaces that today's human genotype does not perceive. It's like a security measure. When the race has evolved enough and has discovered the possibilities of more multidimensional perception, these temples will manifest for those who have opened.
Q: Is it possible to connect the local manifestation of these temples with the unfolding of a new space?
A: Including. It's a matter of perception. Now we perceive only a small part of the frequencies, further there will be more … before, even on the thin one it was impossible to get there, but now it is possible.
***
* An excerpt from the session about Peter. Operator comments:
Buildings were immediately synthesized from energy. In the right place, a 3D drawing was opened as a frame, and then with the help of the magic of several (many) Atlanteans, the building was translated into physics, compacted, supplemented with new energies. Each of the builders brought something of their own. Like gifts of a fairy in fairy tales: they gave and put in features and feelings, emotions. In Isaac's, for example, pink marble contains a lot of love, feminine energy *, among other things. The city is very multidimensional and the architecture has many purposes. It also restrains the lower worlds, ensures the separation of dimensions, but at the same time nourishes and retains the spirits and the dead. Going back to Atlanta, these things fed and supported the dome over the city.
Continuation: "Temples-portals of India. A path to the underworld or to another dimension?"
