Report at the VII ICPC "New Paradigm"
1. History of the Roman Empire
1. History of Tartary
1. Wars of the Roman Empire with Tartary
Based on this plan, we will try to substantiate our view of World History as the history of the wars between Rome and Tartary. I did not make a reservation: we are not talking about local military conflicts between two neighboring states, but about the centuries-old war of the two Kingdoms - the Kingdom of Truth and the Kingdom of Krivda throughout the World History, covering almost the entire Oycumene (part of the Earth inhabited by people).
Moreover, the school (or so-called "traditional") history knows neither the Roman Empire nor Tartaria within the framework of this report. The school Roman Empire accounts for approximately 15-20% of its true size, power and chronology, and nothing is known about Tartary. Therefore, one of the most important goals that I set for myself was to restore the history of the two largest states in the world. Moreover, these states remain today.
My approach is based almost exclusively on intuition, and because the mathematical approach of the founders of the New Chronology has already been brilliantly tested earlier, then the intuitive approach will expand the chronological and geographical framework of their research. Therefore, my research will not be based on hundreds of monographs, sources, etc. scientific paraphernalia, but on the rejected sacred texts, folk epic and "unscientific" theories. Such an approach will allow one to completely free oneself from the view of the world-historical processes imposed by school (scholastic) science. On the other hand, the search for evidence is extremely exciting, and there will be numerous history buffs who will do all the necessary research and obtain a critical mass of necessary and sufficient evidence of the validity of my Model of the World.
As for the outline of the report itself, then I have to admit that it is purely formal, since the first part of the report will occupy more than 80% of the total volume, while the second part is outlined only in dotted lines and needs further detailed elaboration. The complete absence of sources, deathly silence about the very fact of the existence of Tartary, etc. will not allow, in the same detail as the history of Rome was described, to restore the history of Tartary, which is highlighted only by the outbreaks of military conflicts between Rome and Tartary, which do not subside, but only flare up more and more every year. A new look at the essence of military clashes even within the Roman Empire itself will largely explain their strangeness and contradictions.
Promotional video:
The abundance of material will not allow me to dwell on each section in detail, so I will have to reduce time at the expense of detail, which will make the bird's eye view prevail over the usual sequential disclosure of the topic.
The last thing I would like to point out in the introduction to the report is my general approach to the whole Meaning of History. I completely reject the view imposed by materialism on the history of mankind as the history of the evolution of ape into man and, accordingly, the consideration of the Meaning of the whole History as a change in socio-political formations - from the primitive communal system through the slave-owning, feudal and capitalist - to socialist and communist ones. For the first time, a full refutation of the change in socio-political formations in full force sounded in the works of Fomenko, because of which the historians of the Soviet historical school attacked him, which prevented the productive cooperation of the two approaches to history.
My view of the Meaning of History is much more radically at odds with the so-called school or traditional (or concord) history and even with the view of Academician Fomenko, and consists in reconciling the Holy Scriptures not only with common sense, but also, most importantly, with the planned course of the World Historical Process. In other words, my second main task was to find traces of Holy Scripture in our today's culture and an attempt to link the entire World History with the fragments of this Ancient Holy Scripture of Great Tartary.
Section 1. History of the Eternal City of Rome
Introduction. Geographic and chronological scope of the study
The first part of the lecture is devoted to the history of the Eternal City of Rome, and therefore we will need to outline the geographical and chronological framework of the study of this history. The very name of Rome as the Eternal City illustrates for us the breadth of chronological boundaries, i.e. Rome is the single greatest City on Earth that was first built and will continue to exist throughout human history. As for the geographical scope of the study, here too they turn out to be much wider, because the history of the City of Rome can be called the history of all cities or, in other words, the history of all urban culture on Earth. In other words, the history of the Eternal City of Rome is the entire history of all mankind with an urban lifestyle. Therefore, the word "Civilization" from the word "sibyl = civilized" City (lat.) Denotes the urban culture of Rome, in contrast to the non-urban and non-civilized (i.e."Wild") culture of Tartary.
I will emphasize again: civilization and all the words derived from the main - civilization, civilization - I will call the urban culture and the urban way of life. In another way, civilization can be called a technocratic culture. Unlike urban, non-technogenic, non-civilized culture is usually called “wild”.
We see vivid examples of this in the history of Russia - Little Tartary (in the European part of Russia) was always called the "Wild Field", and wars with it continued until the 18th century, and the "Wild, Wild, Wild West" (the entire US territory west of the Great Lakes) as the American part of Great Tartary is not completely subdued even today. The "Cultural Revolution" in China and the war against "savagery" swept away the remnants of Tartary in East Asia at the end of the 20th century, and similar phenomena are observed in other countries of the world.
This is the historical and geographical framework for our exploration of the Eternal City of Rome. On the one hand, we see the imposition of Roman urban history as unique (i.e. the one and only) or as a component of 100% of the content of the World History of Humanity, but, on the other hand, without studying the history of Great Tartary in the World History of Humanity, we will not be able to correctly assess The meaning of history. It would be more correct, from my point of view, to talk about the opposition throughout the history of mankind of two cultures - urban and "wild", Roman and Tartar, "civilized" and divine.
Chapter 1. Location of the Eternal City of Rome
Location of Rome
The obvious and indisputable fact of Rome's location in the Center of the World indicates only one city - Alexandria. But this fact is so well classified that the linking of the entire Roman history to the town (Vyatka) of Rome-on-Tiber does not seem strange to anyone. Therefore, before proceeding with the presentation of Roman history, it would make sense to dwell in more detail on the substantiation of their point of view.
I see 5 main proofs (not counting less important) of the validity of linking the entire Roman history, and, therefore, the entire history of mankind, to Rome = Alexandria:
1. Church history
2. Natural-Geographic
3. Heraldic-genealogical
4. Legal (Roman law)
5. Theocratic (institution of sacred kings)
Due to the brevity of my report, I will not dwell on each of them in detail, but simply mention well-known facts. 1. All early Christian church history prior to the establishment of the Inquisition in Europe is tied to northeast Africa. 2. The whole geography of the huge Roman Empire in Afrasia is compressed into Lilliput on the Apennine Peninsula. 3. All European heraldry uses the African fauna (lions, ostriches, etc.), and the genealogies of all the reigning houses are rooted in Prilian Africa. 4. The most paradoxical fact seems to be the complete absence of traces of Roman law in Italy and its complete presence in its entirety in Africa. 5. And, finally, the well-known custom of the deification of the persons of Roman emperors was never original in Europe, while the institution of the "holy kings-Alafin" continues today throughout the world,bearing on itself clearly African features.
Let us now consider this evidence in more detail.
1. Church history
An unconventional approach to the history of the Roman Empire completely destroys the official school history not only of the Christian Church, but also of all the major world religions - Buddhism, Judaism, Islam, Confucianism and, of course, Christianity itself.
The very fact of the preservation in Africa of the most ancient layers of the three most important world religions - Christianity, Islam and Judaism - without the Scriptures familiar to Europeans (the Bible for Christians, the Koran for Muslims and the Talmud for Jews) suggests an extraordinary youth as the religious movements in Europe themselves, and their Holy Books. The repeated change of religions in the Roman Empire led to the parallel coexistence of several variants of religions in one territory in one historical period, which is the reason for constant religious wars.
A comparison of two religious strata, including the three mentioned world religions (Christianity, Islam and Judaism), one of which is more ancient and therefore primary (African) in relation to the younger secondary (European) convinces us that the European stratum repeats African in mirror reflection.
What is the oldest African layer of three religious movements? First of all, he relies on a completely different Holy Scripture. It consists of two main parts: Biluyat (Old Testament) and Hadisat (New Testament), but at the same time, the Old Testament was compiled by seven pre-Flood Patriarchs from Adam to Enoch, and the New (more correctly Noah's) Covenant was compiled by the post-Flood Patriarchs from Noah before Abraham. Thus, in the true (African) Roman Empire, the most ancient tradition of the Holy Scriptures is still preserved. This tradition belongs to the Christian Church, which is the oldest and most primordial in relation to the other two.
The leader of the God-fighters (Israel), proclaimed by the Messiah or Musa, became a religious reformer, and because of this, his teaching began to be called Messianism = Islam. The African Messiah launched religious wars in Europe, spreading his teachings further north. In some readings, Musa-Messiah is read as Moses. He compiled an abridged summary of the entire Sacred History contained in Biluyat and Hadisat, and supplemented his synopsis with four books: Deuteronomy (pre-Flood Primordial Law is part of Biluyat), Exodus, Leviticus and Numbers. The common name for his new set of concise Scripture was "Torah" = "Law."
And, finally, the third and youngest is African Judaism, rooted in the traditional beliefs of the Negroid population of the African part of the Roman Empire. The bloody sacrifices characteristic of these beliefs brought to life their ritualization, which distinguishes this trend from all others. Excessive ritualization of not only the sacred, but in general all aspects of human life, the presence of an incredible number of prohibitions-taboos, etc. reveals the chthonic African roots of this religious movement. Today, this extremely interesting religious stratum is dying due to the policy of resettlement of the Falash Jews from Africa to Stony Arabia in the State of Israel under the pretext of reuniting all Jews. True, recently it has slowed down due to the close acquaintance of Falash with European (Ashkenazi) school Judaism,which has almost nothing to do with the primordial and protest on the part of the Falash to change the most fertile lands of Abyssinia for the dead deserts of the vicinity of the Dead Sea with an endlessly prolonged war-intifada.
Let me remind you that in the school European history of the three most important world religions it is customary not to remember their African roots, therefore it is quite natural to put the Messiah first in a row, i.e. Moses. His religion is declared the oldest in Europe (it really is), and the three newest European branches of world religions are based on it. The second founder of the world religion was appointed a certain "King of the Jews" - a religious reformer, for whom it is rather difficult to find a real historical justification, because the names given to him, the Anointed One and the Savior, do not agree with each other (Christ is taken from the Greek, and Jesus is from the Hebrew). In addition, there is a clear division of Christianity into two branches - early (African) and later (European) - with a complete mismatch up to the opposite of their beliefs. In particular,Europeans had to invent the Seven Ecumenical Councils to abolish the Apostolic Tradition and other innovations in order to close the African page in the history of Christianity. Thus, later European Christianity has almost nothing to do with its early African prototype, except for the name. The founder of the third world religion is considered Muhammad (in other traditions, Mahdi = Great). At the same time, for some reason, school European history calls the youngest religion Islam, and not Muhammadanism. The founder of the third world religion is considered Muhammad (in other traditions, Mahdi = Great). At the same time, for some reason, school European history calls the youngest religion Islam, and not Muhammadanism. The founder of the third world religion is considered Muhammad (in other traditions, Mahdi = Great). At the same time, for some reason, school European history calls the youngest religion Islam, and not Muhammadanism.
So, today two versions of Christianity coexist - European with the Vulgar Bible (which is usually divided into Catholicism, Protestantism and Orthodoxy) and Ancient (Africa and Asia - the so-called Nestorianism, non-Chalcedonian Churches, Siberian Old Believers, etc.); two Muslims - European (Muhameddanism with the Koran) and Ancient (non-Arab Africa and some Asian regions); and, finally, two Judaisms - which are much more obviously divided into European Ashkenazim with Talmud and African Sephardim and Karaites without Talmud. Below, in some cases, we still turn to the history of the African roots of the three most important world religions.
2. Natural-Geographic
First, let's try to abstract and draw the main geographical areas of the Roman Empire on a white sheet of paper. Abstracted? Here's what we got:
North-populated by barbarians
West-Gauls Rome East-Sabea
Now let's take a look at the map of Europe. If school history teaches us that Rome is in the center of the Apennine Peninsula, then it turns out that two of the three most important geographical areas fall out of common sense. Indeed, if the Germanic tribes are called barbarians, then the Alps reliably close Rome from any contact with them. As for the Sabeans, with whom the Romans have been fighting or trading for centuries, their situation is simply critical. Because to the east of the Apennines there is nowhere to move (further, the Adriatic Sea and the Balkans), it means that the mighty Sabeans must be sought in the Apennines and, therefore, this was the name of the numerous mighty people on the other side of the Apennine mountains along the sea, i.e. on a very narrow strip of land.
Now let's move these areas to another place - to northeastern Prilian Africa between the Golden Horn and the Mediterranean Sea. What picture do we see in this case? In the north, along the entire Mediterranean coast of Africa, there is a huge Barbary, inhabited by the Berber barbarians. Moreover, this situation and the large number of Berber tribes are quite consistent with the reports of the historians of the Roman Empire.
In the east of the huge World Empire is the region of Saba, from where the name of the peoples inhabiting it, the Sabeans, originated. The center of Saba is the southwestern part of the Arabian Peninsula, called Hadhramaut (today the state of Yemen). Saba is a very important part of the Empire because The Sabaean kings ruled Rome for centuries, and the most famous of them was the Queen of Sheba, who became the wife of King Solomon the Lawgiver-founder of the Solomonid dynasty in the Roman Empire.
In the west of the Roman Empire, there are numerous warlike tribes of the Gallas in the area named after them Gaul. These are African negroid tribes. Tall strong Gauls served in the Roman army and instilled fear in their enemies. But the same Gauls, led by their leaders, attacked the Roman cities and destroyed them, knowing no pity for the captives. The conquest and subjugation of Gaul became one of the most important events in early Roman history.
The first conclusions that suggest themselves: the African position of the Roman Empire is much preferable to the European one. First, what an open space! What wealth and multitude of peoples, what lively trade, etc. Secondly, many inconsistencies in school history disappear. So, Hannibal, at the head of a huge army with war elephants, no longer storms the alpine peaks, but, turning from the usual caravan routes, simply bypasses Rome-Alexandria in the desert and suddenly finds himself at its walls. Third, such a turn of events completely changes the entire "political coloring" of most of these events.
The second layer of conclusions is associated with purely geographical clarifications and other localities, peoples, names of rivers, mountains, etc. All these clarifications are given in great detail and in detail and, most importantly, with sufficient reasoning, in the book of the researcher Makarenko.
We now proceed to consider the second aspect of placing Rome at the center of the Ancient Coordinate System, which made it the Center of the World. All ancient geographical maps consider the meridian passing through Rome (present-day Alexandria) as the prime meridian, and this "binding" of all geographical maps to it created the effect of increasing inaccuracies with distance from the center. Today, as you know, the prime meridian passes through London-Greenwich. When and why did you change the coordinate system?..
In addition, it is important to note here that in ancient times, each country on the surface of the Earth was "under the auspices" of certain constellations, and all the great astronomers were at the same time great geographers, because astronomy and geography were inextricably linked with each other. And therefore, the description of certain events in Roman history with a mythical bias is easy to restore, proceeding from the transfer of celestial constellations to the earth's surface. For example, in the center of the Roman Empire is the constellation Orion (on the territory of modern Sudan).
The geographical aspect also includes the question of the commercial significance of Rome. The expression "all roads lead to Rome" extraordinarily eloquently reveals to us its position at the crossroads of practically all world routes - trade, pilgrimage, migration, etc. Rome-Alexandria before its destruction (now most of the city is flooded and is under water) was the largest city on Earth. All caravan routes from West Africa to the east to the Far East and from the south from the Transvaal and Zimbabwe to the north through the Levant (eastern Turkey) to Russia converged in it. Moreover, since Rome-Alexandria was the largest port, where goods were transshipped from ships to pack camels and vice versa. Thanks to this, trade was carried out between the countries of the Indian Ocean and Europe.
But, in addition to all the names associated with the school history of the Roman Empire, there are many other names that are all too well known, but, so to speak, unidentified. There are two extremely important names for the center of the Roman Empire in Africa: one of them is Judea. The second is India. As for the first, it obviously follows from the very history of the alien people from the Himalayas and Hindu-Kush and who sat in the most fertile places in Africa, in the "country of eternal spring" as the Abyssinian highlands are called. The rulers of Abyssinia have always called themselves nothing other than "Lion from the tribe of Judah."
The second name, India, is key for the perception of almost all of Ancient History. If you return India to its correct location, then the whole story simply turns upside down. The most notable shape-shifter will be the Indian Ocean and vice versa. All the famous travelers to India - Marco Polo, Afanasy Nikitin, Alexander the Great, Kosma the Indikoplavatel and many others - will find themselves not in Asia south of the Himalayas, but in Africa in the upper reaches of the Nile.
These two clarifications in naming the Roman Empire Judea and India will be extremely important in what follows.
3. Heraldic-genealogical
The question of heraldic symbols is extremely important from the point of view of reflecting the System of Government of the World Empire, which allowed proud Rome to subjugate peoples and maintain its power over them for centuries. Heraldry reflects the correlation of central power with the power of governors around the world, those dynastic, hierarchical, military, etc. connections that made the owners of some coats of arms powerful rulers, while others placed them in a subordinate vassal position to them.
And the central question here will be the question of the heraldic meaning of the African maned lion as a symbol of the central royal power. Immediately, we note that the African maned lion lives only in the central part of the African continent in the savanna belt in Sudan. Meanwhile, its distribution around the world is simply extraordinary: it is included in the coats of arms of Tibet, China, Burma, Sri Lanka, the southern provinces of India, Persia, Spain, England, Finland - the list goes on for a very long time. The fact that the coat of arms of the city of Vladimir is also the African maned lion, I will specifically dwell below.
Is it possible to establish approximately when the lion became the symbol of Rome? Oddly enough, yes! Based on the title of the Roman Ethiopian emperors Negussa Negussim (King of Kings): “The Lion from the tribe of Judah conquered” - it can be concluded that one of the 12 grandsons of Abraham, the founders of the 12 tribes of Israel, Judas was the first to make Leo a symbol of his own royal power. It was from him that the Roman Empire = Judea spread this symbol in all areas subject to it.
And again I will not bore the reader with the information gathered together about other heraldic animals and symbols, the most important of which is, of course, the patron saint of the Northern Kingdom-Israel-eagle. And the symbol of the single undivided Empire of the Northern and Southern Kingdoms was a griffin, a fantastic animal with the body of a lion and the upper part of an eagle.
To finish this part of the study, I will draw the reader's attention to the coat of arms of the Roman King of Kings: a lion in a royal crown holds a sword against the background of the rising sun. It is this coat of arms, only without the crown, that we see in Sri Lanka, southern India, Persia and Myanmar. From this, only one obvious conclusion can be drawn - these areas constituted the Roman Empire itself, while the Roman provinces could place a lion without a crown and without a sword, and then only on a part of the field (Spain, England, Saxony, Vladimir-Suzdal Russia and etc.).
In general, if I may say so, the African approach to the entire heraldry of Afrasia, i.e. not only in Africa itself, but also in Europe and Southeast Asia, makes it unusually fascinating to search for semantic connections.
4. Legal (Roman law)
There are two main systems of law - the right for slaves (Roman law) and the right for the free (Truth). Because both systems of law continue to coexist in our days, this convinces us that the first part has not yet managed to absorb the second. In its purest form, Roman law continues to be preserved in the so-called "insular" or "precedent" law in Europe (USA, Great Britain), and the so-called "continental" or "legal" law adopted in the rest of Europe is based on Magdeburg law, based on The truth.
The very fact that Europe, and especially Italy, never knew Roman law is staggering. The preservation of Roman law in all its classical pronounced form in Africa and southwestern Asia is even more striking. If you want to get acquainted with all the procedures and traditions of Roman law with your own eyes, to meet great connoisseurs of this law, who know to the smallest detail and understand the intricacies, go to Sudan, Ethiopia and other states, choose the most remote villages, in your opinion, and you will be shocked seen:
"LEGAL LEGALITY"
It has already been said that Abyssinians enjoy legal disputes on their own … They pride themselves on their good knowledge of judicial procedure, persuasive in court petitions and eloquent in speeches. Local courts gather in an almost completely informal atmosphere, somewhere in an open place, very often these sessions take place on Sundays or on holidays, being the center of attraction or even entertainment for the entire village population, not busy with other affairs.
Apart from the church and the large weekly market, the courts represent the third major area of public activity, especially in village life. But the very procedure for considering cases is very surprising to the uninitiated.
Over the past 300 years, Fethi Nagast (Laws of the Kings) has been adopted in Ethiopia by the legislative code; in fact, it is still frequently cited. These laws are almost entirely based on Roman law modified and “vulgarized” in the Eastern Roman Empire in the centuries after Justinian, but the Ethiopian translation was probably not made until the 17th century.
Nevertheless, some of the judicial procedures known among the Abyssinians should have had their predecessors much like earlier times. For example, the traditional civil procedure procedure carries some features from the ancient Roman system of the 2nd century BC. e. Their most obvious common feature is that the plaintiff in any case gives a certain "stake" in money or something else, which will be left to the court if it loses the case. Also, both systems imply the cooperation of the parties involved in the case, and the procedure prescribes them the ability to ask questions and give answers in the prescribed manner. Common to both systems is also the provision of seizure of the defendant - especially the debtor, who, under the old Ethiopian legal system, could literally be physically tied to the creditor.
The overwhelming majority of cases are disputes over land, loans and debts. In a crowded court, the accuser takes his seat to the right of the judge, and the accused to the left. The parties prepare their own witnesses and jurors, but the judge must ensure that they are acceptable to both parties. The accuser addresses each juror and witness with the words: "You know me!" He may also add, “I trust you! If you are for him, be lost! And if for God, prosper! " The accused says the exact opposite: "You don't know anything against me!" etc. But litigants unfamiliar with the "language" (that is, legal procedure and phraseology) may be represented by a professional male or female lawyer. An experienced accuser often tries to scare the accused and impress the judge,making a large deposit. "I give a whole mule pacer for you to do this and that!" (The mule pacer is the most valuable bet for the court.) The accused can agree and join: "Come on, come on, make your bet!" But he may feel that he is not capable of accepting the challenge, and exclaim: “No, no, I cannot do that! Lower the rate for me. " And the rate can be lowered to "fast horse" or "honey".
The judge listens to the arguments of the accuser and the witnesses. But the court's particular attention is drawn to secondary issues - disputes within disputes. One side accuses the other of using offensive language or incorrect procedure. The jury can settle this minor issue before the judge sums up the main case. Or the accused may become the accuser in the middle of the trial. The debtor may shout: "I will bet honey on what I gave you dollars!" - believing that his testimony will win, since the creditor has no honey. And they change places, and the accuser stands on the right, until the accused shouts: “There are more of my witnesses! Go away! I will be the winner! " And so the accuser can step away in fear and become the accused, or he can refuse and shout: "This will not make me leave!" And then the accused will say: “I will put honey onthat this is what makes you leave! " - and the accuser will answer: "The fact that the judges tell me to stand here in this place and defeat and beat you, I put a double measure of honey!"
Many disputes that cannot be resolved by a "small" local judge are directed to a "large" judge, or a wambar, and it is this or an even higher court that should consider especially important civil and criminal cases. The punishments imposed by these courts range from small fines, flogging (often carried out on the spot) to various terms of imprisonment, but death sentences (carried out by hanging) require confirmation from Addis Ababa in recent times. Above the wambara court is the chilot court, or provincial assembly, presided over by the governor with the wambaras and other chiefs serving as jurors. There are also special courts in important centers for cases falling under the jurisdiction of the Nagadr, market chiefs and customs officials. But nonetheless,the entire structure of the courts has been greatly changed since the return of the emperor in 1941. The right to appeal to the higher courts or directly to Affa Negus - the imperial chief legal dignitary - is a long-established privilege of subjects. Vambars and governors were always available to criticism, whether on the road or at home: they could be stopped by angry petitioners or the family or friends of the wrongfully convicted; even the emperor himself was considered, according to tradition, equally accessible.they could have been stopped by embittered petitioners or the family or friends of the wrongly convicted; even the emperor himself was considered, according to tradition, equally accessible.they could have been stopped by embittered petitioners or the family or friends of the wrongly convicted; even the emperor himself was considered, according to tradition, equally accessible.
If a person was offended by a wambar, he could stock up on stones or a tree laid on his head and wait on the road or at the gate of the governor's passage. At his approach, he lifted his burden and shouted: "Abiet, Abiet!" - and the governor, asking for a name, gave him a baldarab, or protector, so that he would remind him of him at the right time, while he added: "Come on the day of the meeting of the chilot" - and let him go."
5. Theocratic (institution of sacred kings)
By the institution of sacred kings, we mean three features of royal power in the Roman Empire, namely:
1.environment of those in power with a mystical halo
2.deification of deceased rulers
3.ritualization of the ruler's entire life
In addition to these three main features, there is also another very important detail - the Roman emperors were elected, i.e. they did not inherit each other, and they were elected by ordinary soldiers, which is why they were called "soldier emperors." Let us now try to deal with this phenomenon in more detail.
Africa has always sacralized the supreme power, and the mighty Negussa Negussim, the King of Kings or the leader of a small tribe, were the sacred kings-alafin-for their subjects. First of all, it is necessary to understand that the sacralization of the royal power did not come from the carriers of this power themselves, but from the priests who made the sacred rulers an obedient instrument of their will. For this purpose, the priests first chose several of the most beautiful, healthy, strong and tall young men and tested them for the subordination of future rulers to the will of the priests. Then the candidates underwent rites of initiation (dedication), sometimes very painful. The choice of the future alafin was made by only a few chief priests at a secret meeting, after which they performed the inauguration ceremony over him, i.e. "Elections". It is about the fact that several candidates were circled around the statue of the god,and the hand of a stone statue touched the necessary candidate, which was perceived by the uninitiated as a miracle, and on this basis the people immediately chose him and began to worship him as a living god.
From that moment on, marked with the seal of the chosenness, the alafin became the owner of wonderful supernatural qualities. His biography was immediately rewritten, deriving his lineage from the Sun or the Morning Star (Astarte), and therefore the comparison of the sacred kings with the Sun or Star is not a flattering poetic image - Vladimir Krasno Solnyshko, Louis XVI, the Sun King, Persian shahs, etc. - but a vivid proof of the existence of the institution of holy kings in many countries of the world.
The enthronement of the new ruler begins with the kindling of the Sacred Fire. Lighting a sacred fire at the Olympics is nothing more than a desacralized custom rooted in the institution of sacred kings. After the death of Alafin, the Sacred Fire was extinguished, and the whole country plunged into sacred chaos. It is interesting that the ancient Russian princes, once captured, were likened to “the sun that had set in red,” but, until reliable news of the death of the prince was received, the new alafin was not enthroned. This was more vividly manifested in the most "African" state of Europe, pre-revolutionary England. The death of Alafin on the English throne paralyzed the entire court life for a long time.
Due to the remoteness of the African metropolis from its European colonies for many thousands of kilometers, inauguration issues, i.e. the election of a new alafin by the mob or soldiers were increasingly decided by the transfer of power from father to son. But in this case, the relationship between the main candidate for the throne and the side ones, i.e. his brothers and other relatives. Ascending the throne and becoming a sacred person, the European Alafin dealt with everyone. Therefore, the extraordinary bloodthirstiness of the European Alafins was dictated by the rules of the game, and not by the properties of their characters. And Ivan the Terrible does not stand out from the rest of the Alafins.
An important feature of the Alafins was the prohibition to look them directly in the eyes, because it was believed that they have incredible gaze power, so the prefix "Terrible eyes" to the alafin is also characteristic. The institution of sacred kings implies the prohibition not only to look into the eyes of the Alafin, but even just to look at him. When the king approached, everyone had to look away from him and prostrate themselves, pronouncing magic formulas that averted the power of the royal gaze. This, as it is believed, an oriental custom, existed in Europe.
The holy king was never supposed to touch the ground, so he was always carried in a palanquin or rode on horseback. In many ancient Russian images, we can see the transfer of Russian princes or tsars on special stretchers. Similarly, the Alafins were transferred to France, England, up to Tibet and Burma.
It was the institution of sacred kings that gave rise to such court positions as bedding, bedding, etc. By virtue of the sacredness of the royal personage, when serving food to the king, he had to not only first taste them, but, turning away from the king, so as not to see how he was eating, ring the bell. Hearing this bell, all the courtiers fell down, because the moment of eating alafin was also sacred. And again, the title of "supplier of the Court of His Imperial Majesty" is associated with the institution of sacred kings - that is. this title was the most honorable in all states dependent on Rome, from London to Tokyo. The supplier to the Court was required to supply only ritually clean food, clothing, etc., worthy of an alafin approved by the high priests.
From this little description, it can be seen that the life of the Alafins has been ritualized to the limit, and the image of the little dauphin (crown prince) in The Prince and the Pauper evokes extreme compassion. And again the right of the first night grows out of the institution of sacred kings, tk. the divine power of the Alafin put an equal sign between him and God, why the child conceived from the Alafin was revered as God-born.
The male power of the Alafin was confirmed not only by the right of the first night, but also by the so-called polyud, when the sacred king traveled around the lands under his control with a retinue, collected tribute from them, carried out judgment and thereby strengthened his power. In addition to the purely practical in the custom of polyudya, there was also a sacred-sacred king who transmitted his divine male power to the earth and thereby increased its fertility.
But the life of the Alafins was short. Long before the appearance of gray hair, before the withering of male power, any illness, a lost tooth or a minor injury could lead to the need for new elections, because Alafin could not have any physical disability. Alafin, slightly wounded in battle, was finished off by bodyguards. Even the elimination of the old Alafin and its replacement with a new one was ritualized. It is believed that the murder of Nicholas II was ritual, one cannot but agree with this, as well as with the murders of other sacred royal persons. After all, it is believed that the kingdom will perish if at least one Alafin dies a natural, not ritual, death.
The priests invented a huge variety of ways to eliminate the old (not in the sense of age) alafin, from ritual suicide to extremely painful procedures for burning alive, immuring, burying, strangling, etc. Numerous ritual murders of royal persons in the past are seen in a completely different way when the procedures associated with the existence of the institution of sacred kings are applied to them. The explanation for the uninitiated was the fact that the personality of the Alafin left the divine supernatural power that filled him and which elevated him to the throne. So that this very power would not leave the whole kingdom of the Alafin, he was eliminated and a new Alafin was chosen, who possessed divine power.
Over time, the sacred kings began to oppose the system of their elimination, which was developed in detail by the priests. Their counterparts appeared, who were ritually killed instead of the kings themselves. Even the described "whipping boy" is nothing but an echo of this opposition. And if in ancient times the priests could send a lace or any other symbol of suicide to the Alafin, then in recent times the elimination of the Alafins has become more and more troublesome.
Massive popular unrest, revolutions, etc. have become increasingly popular. movement. Spontaneous unrest, ending with the strictly ritualized murder of the holy king - these are the first impressions from acquaintance with the descriptions of eyewitnesses in English, French, Russian, etc. revolutions.
Chapter 2. History of the Eternal City of Rome
The history of the Eternal City of Rome must begin from the very beginning - from the very beginning when the first city was built on Earth. The founding of the City was laid by the murder, when the elder brother killed the younger one and founded the city at the scene of the murder. According to legend, Romulus killed Remus and named the City by his name. He also became the first king of Roma. In the Sacred History there is a direct parallel to the legend of the two brothers. This is the story of the first fratricide on Earth, when Cain rebelled against his younger brother Abel and killed him, after which, at the scene of his crime, he founded the first city on Earth and named it after his son: “And he built a city; And he called the city after the name of his son: Enoch”(Gen. 4:17). In this case, the name of Rome "The Eternal City" becomes quite justified: Rome is not only the first city on Earth, but also preserved at all times from the day of its foundation until the End of the Age.
The first seven kings of Rome
But let's continue our study of the history of the Eternal City. After Romulus, six more kings ruled the City. This is a direct parallel to the Sacred History, where Cain was succeeded by six of his sons. Here are the names of the first Roman kings and their counterparts in the Holy Scriptures:
1. Romulus Quirin = armed Cain
2. Numa Pompilius = rude Enoch
III. Tullus Hostilius = Hostile Gaidad
1. Ankh Marcius = boundary, middle of Maleleil
2. Tarquinium Ancient Methuselah
3. Tullius Servius = servant of Lamech (first bigamist)
Vii. Tarquinius the Proud Jubal (Copper and Iron Kovac)
Let's look at the left side of the table first.
“First of all, the names of these kings attract attention. The second part of each name presents no difficulties, being an understandable Latin adjective (…) On the contrary, the first part of each name has no meaning in Latin. Morozov (see [5] pp. 318-319) derives these names from Arab-Jewish roots:
Romulus from RM rhino
Numa from NAUM, comforter
Tull from TL, height (hence Tullius)
Ankh from KNUK, consecrated (hence the name Enoch comes from)
Tarquinius from TOR, instruct, and CIN, labor … (Postnikov, vol. 2, pp. 124-125)
The first part of the name of the first seven Roman kings has Semitic roots (Morozov even uses the word "Maghreb", that is, North African), from which he draws the most natural conclusion: the source of the late medieval writer for writing early Roman history was a Maghreb manuscript written on one of the Maghreb dialects. M. M. Postnikov goes even further, classifying this manuscript unknown to "science" as one of the books of Holy Scripture:
"Was this manuscript one of the lost parts of the Bible?" (v.2, p.125).
So, the first question facing the student of early Roman history is how did North African Semitic names get on Latin soil? The second is the number of the first Roman kings - seven. It is this number, and no other, and it also corresponds to the number of the seven Roman kings of the Holy History (Cain and his sons).
Now let's turn to the right column. This family tree of the Cain family is borrowed from the Slavic Bible. Obviously, in the Vulgate, the lineage of Cain is not indicated at all. Thus, the "interruption" of the era of the first seven Roman kings according to Holy Scripture was caused by the greatest ecological catastrophe - the Flood. According to the school textbook, the era of the kings suddenly ended and the Roman Republic began.
Periodization of school Roman history
The history of the City of Rome (in Italy) in school textbooks is clearly divided into five periods:
1. The era of the 7 kings - semi-legendary (753-510 BC)
2. The era of the Republic (510 BC-27 BC)
3. Age of Empire (27 BC - 476)
4. Age of Ruins (the Eternal City in the ruins of the 5th-15th centuries)
5. The era of Roma-Vatican (XV-XX centuries)
It is immediately striking that this whole story fits into a very short period of time of about 2.5 thousand years, and almost half of all this time the City lay in ruins! I will say more, there is no archeology on the territory of Rome. Lovers of antiquities do not delve into city dumps - they have nothing to do there. All the "ties" of early Roman history to the area are the fruit of the imaginations of scientists around the world.
Therefore, the whole history of Italian Roma is as follows:
Semi-legendary era 243
Greatest era of the Republic and Empire around 1000 years
The real (non-legendary) era of the City's non-existence for 1000 years
Growth of Roma around Vyatka (Vaticano) in the last 500 years
There is no evidence of the existence of the greatest city of Antiquity and the capital of the world empire on the territory of Roma-on-Tiber. Therefore, it is not possible to tie the entire early Roman history to this town. From this follows only one conclusion - the real history of Roma with Vyatka is less than 500 years old!
Periodization of the history of the Roman Empire
Founding of the Eternal City of Rome-276 from the Creation of the World
The Age of Seven Kings from Cain to Jubal 276-1308 from CM
Kingdom of Nimrod - 600 years after the Flood (c. 2000 C. M)
Resettlement of Abraham to Rome (?)
Israel's exodus from Egypt, messianism = Islam from Moses
Incarnation of God-Word 5500 From CM
Alexander the Great (circa 5700)
The reign of Solomon = Suleiman the Magnificent 1520-1566 (c. 6000 from the Creation of the World)
Reign of the Solomon dynasty in Ethiopia 1574-1974 (6000-6400 A. D.)
1974 - Assassination of the last Roman emperor Haile Selassiu
Moving from the East …
Rome as a World Empire once existed on Earth. This is the pre-Flood history of mankind. Due to the complete unreliability of the sources, they cannot be classified as scientific, so I will skip this part.
But then my story becomes more scientific. After all, we are talking about the ancestral home of all mankind and about the directions of the settlement of peoples throughout the face of the Earth. According to the Scriptures, Noah and his family were saved from the waters of the Flood in the Ark. After a hundred days of sailing on the waters that flooded the entire surface of the Earth, the Ark stopped at the highest mountains in the Himalayas. These mountains got their name from his father Lamech who escaped with Noah. In reverse reading they will give Hemal = Himalayas.
At first, there were very few people, and they all lived together. Then they became more and more, and then Noah settled in the Tibetan plateau, his eldest son Sim, in the north of Tibet, in Altai. Noah's middle son Ham settled on the southern side in the spurs of the Hindu-Kush, and the youngest son Japheth, between them in the Tien Shan. And so, when the sons of men became too many, they moved. But first they cast lots, and the youngest son got Europe from Spain and Norway to the Urals. Ham went to modern Africa, Arabia and Western Asia. And the eldest and beloved son of Noah, Sim, got the most favorable places - almost the entire northeastern Asia-Tartaria.
And so, moving from the East, two waves of immigrants began to develop new lands. The northern wave of the migration of the sons of Japheth went from the Tien Shan to Europe, carrying with it the most ancient culture, from which today almost nothing remains - we are talking about the culture of the Druids, Celts, etc.
But within the framework of our report, we are more interested in the second, southern wave of resettlement. From the most fertile places of the spurs of the Hindu Kush through the south of the Arabian Peninsula, this wave reached Africa and spread across the entire black continent. In addition to the main wave, other waves rolled into Africa - through Western Asia and the north of the Arabian Peninsula, another wave populated the entire north of Africa.
The settlers distributed the land among themselves, and they retained these rights for centuries: to this day, the land is passed on by seniority, and the descendant of the first settlers is called the "Master of the Earth." The memory of this Southern Migration is still preserved in Africa. The settlers drove their livestock in front of them, and therefore livestock in Africa almost completely coincides with the Central Asian breeds of livestock. The sacred cows are an Asian echo in Africa. In general, all sacred animals in Africa are of Asian origin.
Too many conclusions follow from the theory of two waves of migration - North and South, so it needs more detailed elaboration, but this is beyond the scope of the report. So, moving from the East, the settlers found the Shinar Valley and began the construction of the Tower of Babel in it. But we will skip millennia to stay within the framework of scientific research.
Great Tartary
The Eternal City of Rome became the most important city of the Empire, and after a relatively short time the Hamites became crowded in Africa and Asia. But Sim's richest lot remained inaccessible for the Hamites because of the insurmountable mountain ranges. For a long time, Rome possessed vast territories and numerous peoples, but the Great Tartary until the 18th century remained practically inaccessible to Rome. It was Peter who became that key figure in the history of the two greatest empires in the world, from which the wars of Rome and Great Tartary became a reality.
Section 2. History of Great Tartary
The history of Great Tartary is practically unknown to us, because the history of Rome has completely supplanted everything else. One can only define its culture - it is the culture of Harmony with Nature, it is the culture of the Druids in Europe and the Rakhmanns in Asia. Due to the fact that there is too much controversial and unscientific in this story, I will completely omit this topic.
Section 3. Wars of the Eternal City of Rome with Great Tartary
Once again, I repeat, the wars between Rome and Tartary began relatively recently, only about 300 years ago, and the conquest of Europe lasted for about 300 years. I will not describe in detail the pictures of direct military clashes between white and black soldiers, i.e. "Invasion of the Moors". After the complete conquest of Western Europe and the destruction of its original culture of the Celtic tribes, Africa no longer sent its troops to Europe. Now soldiers began to be recruited locally. But men with black skin continued to command the troops.
One of the commanders was the Moor Othello, known to everyone from Shakespeare's tragedy. Another very famous black military leader was George the Victorious. The well-known commander-in-chief of all the troops of the Russian Empire was Hannibal, an associate of Peter the Great. And there are a lot of such examples. Under the command of a black commander, Lithuanian troops rushed to the conquest of the European part of Tartaria on the Kulikovo Field.
Castle cities-fortifications
The conquerors acted according to one plan, well-proven in the past. This plan can be called "scorched earth tactics." The conquerors came to the lands that they wanted to conquer, and built fortified fortresses on them. Forests were gradually reduced around these fortified cities and all crops were burned out. Thus, the city was protected from Nature and the local population. Provisions were also stocked up on very simple-quick sorties-raids. The advantages of the conquerors over the local population were obvious - impregnable walls, experience in constant wars, excellent weapons, etc. - allowed the invaders to conquer more and more territories and peoples.
The calling of the Varangians to Russia
Spain, Holland and England were the first to fall on European territories. They were the first to raise the Roman lion on their battle standards. They were followed by Lusatian Saxony, Venice, Lithuania, until finally, among the forests, a city was built, which became the first city in Little Tartary. It was the only Russian city that made a lion its coat of arms.
The traditional school story tells of this event in a romantic and sublime way. Say, there was no order in Little Tartary. And then, after consulting, the people decided to invite the Varangian princes, known for their order, to rule over themselves. So foreign princes-rulers appeared in Russia.
But if a lot of attention was paid to the question of the complete lack of order, then not a word was given to the question of the origin of the summoned princes. Oddly enough, the question of the origin of the Rurikovichs lies on the surface - this is Holstein. In the entire centuries-old history of the conquest of Tartary Minor by the Negroids, it was ruled by only one dynasty - the Holstein dynasty. And there were no changes of dynasties. Who was the last ruling Tsar Nicholas II married to? On the Holstein! To whom were all (I will underline everything!) Russian princes from Rurik to Nicholas II consistently married? Exclusively at Holstein!
Accident? Hardly! So, the Varangians-enemies from Schleswig-Holstein at first mastered the coast of the Baltic Sea, creating there a network of trade fortifications-cities of the Hansa. Then the African maned lion began to prepare for the jump - Lithuania made the lion its coat of arms. The local population of Tartary was outlawed in the face of the Negroid conquerors. To fight the Tatar-Mongol yoke, young men began to be recruited under the lion's banners.
Construction of Roman cities in Little Tartary
Little Tartary began to be "assimilated": at first it was covered with a network of cities, which were obviously built according to one plan and according to a certain principle. Cities were built on important river arteries and highways.
This is how the epic about Nightingale the Robber appeared, because of which the road became impassable. A lot of epics about Nightingale the robber Budimirovich, a wealthy merchant guest from the city of Ledenets (Venice), whose coat of arms is an African maned lion, ends with a story about the miserable fate of Nightingale from the hand of the mighty tartarin Ilyushenka.
At first, cities were built in dense forests, but then the forests were gradually reduced, the crops were burned out, and the main population of Tartaria was squeezed out into the Wild Steppe and to the North. In the forests, cuttings were made, which had to be constantly maintained in "working condition". So Tartary gradually learned urban culture = civilization.
A map of the first cities and serif lines shows who this centuries-old grueling war was fought against. It is quite obvious that not the mythical nomad Mongols who lived in tents in the Kalmyk steppes were the main enemies of the Russians - the cities were fortified areas in the midst of the hostile local population of Tartaria.
Solovey Budimirovich at the head of the Roman fleet goes to Russia
Folk legends have preserved the memory of the military-trade expeditions of the Romans, one of which was the expedition of Nightingale Budimirovich. This Russian Livingstone, apparently, was distinguished by remarkable intelligence and courage, which is why he became one of the most frequent characters in Russian epics. There is only one question - when?
When did the epic events take place in reality? When did Russia undergo a massive invasion of Negroid culture and fell under the blows of Negro warriors? Moreover, today she is already at war with might and main with Great Tartary - and no longer black, but white warriors are falling from both sides. The answer to this question will be unexpected - epic events took place no more than 500 years ago. Rather, the epics of the Ancient cycle can be dated to about 500 years, and Solovey Budimirovich and others are clearly younger. The pre-Petrine history is distorted too much.
Battles of Rome with the Tartars
Very interesting propaganda pictures of the wars of the Romans with the Tartars have come down to us in Western European chronicles. In them, the inhabitants of the forests are portrayed as ugly half-humans, half-animals, werewolves, monsters. Romans, fearful of Nature, is the content of most American films about sharks, spiders, werewolves, etc.
And the black George, conquering Nature in the form of the Serpent, became a symbol of many European cities. But it is correct to portray him as a negroid. But this detail changes a lot in the perception of the coat of arms of Moscow. Why exactly George-Gyurgiy-Yuri became the founding father of the future capital of Lithuania, and then Muscovy? How are the warrior from the Roman Empire and the founder of Moscow related? But the question of Negroid roots arises not only in the study of the Moscow-Holstein connections. It is much sharper when studying the genealogy of the Moscow princes starting with Yuri Dolgoruky. And therefore the Abyssinian roots of the winner of the Tartar militia, whom Russian history renamed Dimitri Donskoy, are no longer something shocking.
Battle of Kulikovo
I will end my report with a description of the usual military tactics of the Romans, which the Abyssinians have preserved to this day. This description was compiled at the beginning of the twentieth century by a Russian officer who was in Abyssinia as part of the Russian mission Bulatovich.
First, he noted that during the battle the commander-in-chief is always on the sidelines, and the warrior dressed in his clothes is called "lycamakos". Further, the tactics of the Romans always consisted of withdrawal and coverage. Thus, the horse warriors arriving on the battlefield drove the local militia ahead of themselves. Further, part of the mounted soldiers stood on the left, and the other part on the right side of the local militia. In the center, the rather numerous local militia took the brunt of the attack. Few of the militia warriors survived, but in the event of a victory, their chances of survival remained even less. mounted warriors finished off the remnants of their allies. The shooting of foot militias by their own horsemen is a very frequent plot in the history of England, France, etc. But the main forces were always located behind the militia in the so-called "ambush regiment", and Kulikovo Pole was no exception. The commander of the army of the Ras, known from Russian chronicles as Vladimir Staritsky (this is obviously his Russian pseudonym) was personally and commanded the Ambush Regiment.
So, let's take a quick look at the course of the battle on Kulikovo Field. Likamakos Andrey (Oslyabya) led the Smolensk militia, doomed to certain death, if not from the hands of his brothers, then from the arrows of the cavalry detachments under the command of two fitaurari. Andrei fell along with all the other militias.
Two cavalry detachments of the Left and Right hand, with a quick maneuver, had to go into the rear of the Tartar army, while the Tartarians crushed and pressed the Forward Regiment of the Smolyans. The main forces of the Romans hit the flank of the Tartarians - the heavily armed horsemen of Ras Staritsky himself - and overthrew them. So the army of Tartars, who defended their native lands from the invasion of Negroids, turned out to be surrounded, and with arrows, spears and, most importantly, guns (cannons were used for the first time), the Romans pulled out more and more soldiers from their ranks. While the wheelhouse between the Smolensk militia and the squads of volunteers under the command of Tsar Mamai was exhausting their forces, the Roman horsemen = Chevaliers killed both, being at a considerable distance from them and easily maneuvering between them. This is how this historical battle is seen today.
As for the figure of St. Sergius of Radonezh, we must not forget that at the end of the 18th century, the lives of all Russian saints were rewritten. The Monk Sergius is no exception, and Empress Catherine the Great herself compiled his Life! So the participation of St. Sergius in those historical events is still hidden …
A. P. Stamboli
