But a strange conspiracy of silence reigns around the disaster
Which of the atomic disasters is the most dangerous in the history of mankind? Most people will say "Chernobyl" and they will be wrong. In 2011, an earthquake believed to be an aftershock after another, the Chilean earthquake of 2010, triggered a tsunami that melted the reactors at the TEPCO nuclear power plant in Fukushima, Japan. Three reactors melted, and the subsequent release of radiation into the water was the largest in the history of mankind. Only three months after the disaster, radioactive chemicals were dumped into the Pacific Ocean in amounts exceeding the release during the Chernobyl disaster. However, in fact, the actual figures may be much higher, since, as several scientists have proven in recent years, the official Japanese estimates do not correspond to reality.
And, as if all this is still not enough, Fukushima continues to dump into the Pacific Ocean an astonishing amount - 300 tons! - radioactive waste every day! And Fukushima will do so indefinitely as the leak cannot be repaired. It is simply inaccessible to either humans or robots due to extremely high temperatures.
Therefore, one should not be surprised that Fukushima has already infected the entire Pacific Ocean with radiation in just five years.
Fukushima could easily turn out to be the worst environmental disaster in human history, but it is almost never spoken about by politicians, well-known scientists or news agencies. It is interesting to note that TEPCO is a subsidiary of General Electric (GE), one of the largest companies in the world, with very significant control over both numerous media and politicians. Could this explain the lack of coverage of the Fukushima disaster that we have seen over the past five years?
In addition, there is evidence that GE was aware for decades that the Fukushima reactors were in dire condition, but did nothing. These findings led to 1,400 Japanese citizens suing GE for its role in the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
And even if we cannot see radiation, parts of the west coast of North America have already felt its effects over the past few years. So, after a short time after Fukushima, fish in Canada began to bleed from gills, mouths and eyes. The government ignores this "disease"; meanwhile, it has reduced local fish fauna by 10 percent, including the North Pacific herring. In Western Canada, independent scientists have recorded a 300 percent rise in radiation levels. According to their data, this level in the Pacific Ocean is increasing every year. Why is this silenced by the mainstream media? Perhaps the reason is that the US and Canadian authorities have forbidden their citizens to talk about Fukushima so that "people do not panic"?
Promotional video:
Radioactive debris after Fukushima reaches the West Coast of North America
South of [Canada], in the US state of Oregon, starfish began to lose legs and then disintegrate completely when radiation reached the region in 2013. Sea stars are now dying in record numbers, putting the entire oceanic ecosystem of the region at risk. However, government officials say Fukushima is not to blame for this, although it was after Fukushima that the radiation level of Oregon tuna has tripled. In 2014, radiation on California's beaches increased 500 percent. In response, government officials said the radiation came from a mysterious "unknown" source and that there was nothing to worry about.
Radioactive debris after Fukushima reaches the West Coast of North America
But the Fukushima disaster had a huge impact not only on the West Coast of North America. Now scientists say that the entire Pacific Ocean is radioactive - it is 5-10 times more radioactive (apparently, depending on the distance from Hiroshima, Nagasaki and nuclear test sites of the United States and France - ed.) Than during World War II and immediately after that, when the US government dropped numerous atomic bombs in the region.
So, if there is no discussion about Fukushima, very unpleasant surprises await us.