The theory that man did not descend from an ape, but appeared on Earth as a result of some mysterious events or processes, has long been quite widespread. The most popular hypothesis is that either our ancestors are representatives of another highly developed civilization, or mankind was generally bred artificially … In this case, where is the evidence, even if only indirect? Oddly enough, they are.
"Unscientific" finds
Supporters of the theory of paleocontacts find a lot of evidence for this. So, if we consider the most ancient artifacts, it turns out that people began to make bronze weapons at the same time in different parts of the globe. At the same time, the Bronze Age was not at all preceded by the Copper Age, as would follow from the logic of the development of civilization. There are also remains of ancient huts made of rounded logs - according to paleoufologists, they simply could not be built by people with a low level of development.
But that is not all! In the middle of the 19th century, researchers W. Bullos and C. Gilmore stumbled across the state of Kentucky, in the thickness of the frozen volcanic
lava, on the footprints of an unknown creature: it walked on two legs, and its foot was very reminiscent of a human: a separate arch and five fingers … However, traces were left more than 300 million years ago, when only the simplest organisms lived on Earth! To whom could these prints belong? And in the mines of California during the gold rush, human skeletons and arrowheads aged about 50 million years were repeatedly found.
Who created the woman?
Promotional video:
About 80 years ago, American anthropologists Lin and Berger examined the skeletons of cavemen and ancient primates for comparative analysis. They were surprised that the female skeletons looked more like monkeys. It seems that initially women tended to walk on four limbs. Whereas men were undoubtedly upright from the very beginning.
The researchers put forward an interesting hypothesis: about 59 thousand years ago, an alien ship arrived on Earth, on board of which there were only men. Because they needed women, they "humanized" the female monkeys. This explains the significant differences in the structure of male and female organisms.
Why weren't there women among the aliens? There can be several explanations. For example, these were criminals who were exiled to our planet. Or the landing on Earth was forced - say, a riot occurred on the ship, or the spaceship suffered an accident … Or maybe it was a scientific expedition that for some reason could not return to its home planet.
In all likelihood, humanoids possessed genetic technology, so they managed to raise local female primates from all fours and turn them into humans. However, in subsequent generations, primitive people probably degraded and lost most of the knowledge they received from their ancestors. Therefore, true information about the history of human origin has not reached us.
A slave civilization?
American researcher Zechariah Sitchin also claims that man was created by genetic engineering by representatives of the civilization that lived on the planet Nibiru. About 300 thousand years ago, they landed on Earth, apparently with the aim of using its natural resources. But to work in the mines and in the mines, labor was required. And then the aliens began to breed "lulu" - slaves, destined for hard labor in the extraction of minerals. For this, genetic engineering and cloning were probably used. And as "raw materials" they took local aborigines or the most highly developed primates.
Although the aliens could clone their own DNA … One way or another, for some reason they were able to create only men. To allow slaves to reproduce their own kind, alien geneticists modified one of the pairs of male chromosomes. So women appeared, and the human race began to spread across the planet.
By the way, myths about the "gods" who descended to Earth are found among the Sumerians and many other peoples. And the wall frescoes in ancient Egyptian temples and tombs depict some kind of manipulation of giants over stunted creatures. It looks like the first are injecting the second with some kind of solution using a pipette …
Is Earth a prison for humanity?
An interesting hypothesis of the cosmic origin of mankind was recently put forward by the American ecologist Ellis Silver. He believes that we are simply not adapted for life on this planet.
So, according to Silver, the fact that many people suffer from back pain, flat feet and other problems with the musculoskeletal system, indicates that our ancestors lived on a planet where there was a lower gravity than on the globe. In addition, the heads of human babies are too large, which complicates the process of childbirth. In other living things, childbirth is much easier - this may indicate that only people have moved here from another world.
Let us recall the biblical myth about Adam and Eve, expelled by God from Paradise for the Fall - eating the forbidden fruit from the tree of knowledge. At the same time, God said to Eve: "In agony you will bear your children." It is difficult for a woman to give birth on her own, and in the absence of medical care, the child has few chances to survive and stay healthy. And childbirth is a significant danger for the life of the mother herself …
That's not all. So, if we spend a lot of time in the sun, we get burns, and this can even lead to cancer. Therefore, ultraviolet light is harmful to us. Whereas other species - say, lizards - are able to stay in the sun for a long time without any harm to health.
In humans, there are many more different ailments, including chronic ones, than in animals. Many also suffer from sleep disorders. According to the scientist, this can be explained by the fact that our biological clock is set to a 25-hour rhythm, as previously proven by other researchers. But on Earth, as you know, there are only 24 hours a day. There is only one conclusion: the Earth is not our homeland!
Where did we come from? Most likely, writes Ellis Silver, we were thrown here about 60-200 thousand years ago. Who! Perhaps aliens. Another option is the artificial interbreeding of the indigenous population with the inhabitants of another planet, say, from the nearest star system Alpha Centauri, which is so often featured in science fiction … From the latter we are separated by a distance of 4.36 light years.
If we really are descendants of aliens, then we can assume that this is a planet with a low level of gravity, farther from its parent star than the Earth from the Sun, and a day on it lasts 25 hours.
As follows from biblical mythology, the first "settlers" could indeed have been "exiled" to Earth for some sins or crimes, which, incidentally, is consistent with the hypothesis of Lin and Berger. It is possible that we are paying with various sores for the long-standing sins of our ancestors.
What crimes could we talk about? Well, for example, about violence and cruelty towards other living beings. After all, according to the Bible, before the Fall, people could not make a choice between good and evil …
Guests on an alien planet?
By far, humanity is the most advanced species on the planet in terms of intelligence. But at the same time, physically we are far from perfect. Consequently, before the appearance of man on Earth, other living species could have existed. If all species evolved in the same way, then there could be more intelligent individuals. But so far only the rationality of man has been proven. Most likely, we were originally reasonable, and did not become so as a result of the evolutionary process … Why, say, cats and dogs, which for centuries lived next to people, have not yet learned to speak and write like we do, or at least do something similar, and generally have changed little compared to their distant ancestors? Perhaps evolution is not going at all the way we imagine. And we are deeply mistaken, believing that we became the same as now, precisely in the course of evolution.