You are on the train and you are talking to a friend across from you and your friend is smoking a marijuana cigarette. Suddenly you see a fight on the platform outside the window: the police are trying to detain a man and they are fighting there.
Then everything ends, the intruder is caught and removed from the scene, and the police question you and your friend as witnesses of the incident. And at the end of the interview, the police cannot clarify a strange detail: your friend says that there was a police and a police dog in the observed scene, and you claim that you have not seen any dog. And the question arises: which of you is right?
A new study, published Monday, found that people who took just one small joint doubled the number of false memories compared to those who smoked a placebo. The study was authored by Johannes Ramakers, professor of psychopharmacology at the University of Maastricht in the Netherlands.
In an interview, Professor Johannes Ramakers says:
The main objective of this study is to help the police filter the testimony of witnesses to certain incidents. Since the case took place in Holland, where marijuana is not prohibited by law, many witnesses to the incidents of interest to the police are not quite sober and, as a result, this may give a difference in testimony.
And, as it has been experimentally established, when observing an event and simultaneously smoking marijuana, people tend to attribute to this event certain details that were not there. For example, the presence in the scene of the arrest of a police dog, about which FOX40 writes.
And although this study had concrete practical interest, in fact, its conclusions can have very distant and very wide consequences, in particular, it is good to explain the so-called “Mandela effect”, when a huge number of people store memories that contradict, as it were, real facts.
Since every person at least once in his life either used alcohol, or, like Clinton, smoked some weed or took some pills with effects on the nervous system (for example, diphenhydramine, which people with allergies drink in handfuls), then you need to think, that each technique endowed him with one or another false memory. And when the number of these false memories in society became critical, the very Mandela effect appeared.
Promotional video:
In general, in the light of these latest scientific data, the topic of Mandela can be closed, and if a person says that he personally read about the murder of this great African hero in a Soviet newspaper, then he can object that he read it high. Or read it - and took 200 grams, after which he dreamed all this. Good explanation, however …
Somewhere in the 1930s, maybe a little later, when people still had no idea about 3D and, moreover, about the Matrix, they also encountered the Mandela effect, but only named it differently. And within the framework of explaining this effect, one wonderful fantastic story was born, the author of which we do not remember for a long time - maybe one of our readers will remember the author and enlighten everyone.
The action there begins in a small private wine cellar, the owner of which took too much the day before and fell where he stood. And so, when he came upstairs suffering from a wild headache, he began to catch wild déjà vu. He was especially stressed by the truck of an advertising company, which rolled down the street and shouted advertising slogans into a megaphone.
In general, the day went badly and the dude, in order to dissolve the unpleasant sediment of the day, again went to the cellar, rolled again and again fell where he was standing.
In the morning he woke up again with a wild headache, went upstairs again and there his wife began to strain him again with her rumble. Moreover, what infuriated the peasant most of all was that she rattled the same thing, word for word, as the day before. And in addition, the calendar, like yesterday, was the day before yesterday. The only thing that has changed is advertising on the street: before that, the megaphone was praising one rubbish, but here it was already something else.
Realizing this, the dude realized that he was in a normal mind and therefore went to a friend, told him about all the cases and they decided to go to that basement and have a joint test binge. And to their great surprise, everything was exactly the same - the next day after the binge was spinning like a gramophone record and the only thing that changed there was advertising: every day a little car with a megaphone was praising something different.
Then, in order to clarify the circumstances, two reality researchers, suffering from headaches, plunged into the car, filled the tanks to capacity and shook them into the prairie, breaking even some kind of barrier along the way. And in the end, a canyon blocked their way, which on closer examination turned out to be the edge of a huge laboratory table. And there were some gigantic types in overalls with logos advertising a company that drove their toy trucks around the city.
This was the essence of the experiment. That is, a small toy city was built, along which units ran, imagining themselves to be people. They tested new slogans of the advertising company on them in the morning, followed their purchases during the day, and formatted their brains in the evening. The wine cellar accidentally turned out to be a white spot for the emitter, and the drink only added the effect, therefore, after spending the night there, the heroes of the story could not fit into the current model of reality.
This is, in fact, the whole explanation of the Mandela effect of the 1930s, and without involving the most advanced theories of the Matrix and Flat Earth. Therefore, it is very possible that in the world everything is somehow the same somewhere somewhere. That is, people are constantly formatting their brains and writing something there without their knowledge, but smoking marijuana, alcohol and other drugs somehow inhibits this effect and the recording goes badly. Perhaps it is for this reason that all psychotropic substances are prohibited by the owners of the “laboratory table”.