The most reliable historical document is the cookbook. Yes it is. It never occurred to anyone to fake cookbooks, therefore, by indirect facts about the true history, you can learn more from it than from multivolume treatises, recognized scientific luminaries. The same applies to other similar sources, such as stamps, coins, postcards, and picture albums.
Take, for example, "Historical description of clothing and weapons of the Russian troops from 1796 to 1801". This book is capable of causing a "short circuit". I suggest that you familiarize yourself with a few of its fragments.
A few suspicious, inconsistencies that do not fit into consciousness, which are customary to present in history textbooks, and what we see with our own eyes, cause bewilderment.
To me, a person who received a standard Soviet education, it seems a little strange to have a leopard-styled cape on the shoulder of a soldier who serves in the country of elks, bears, wild boars and hares with beavers and sables. Did someone in Russia know what leopards look like?
With great interest I began to study the details, since the topic is so closed that any document of that time, even with traces of falsification, is of great interest. Well, no real documentary evidence about our country has survived. All that we have today, catalogs, atlases, engravings, etc. have been published almost in full in one place … In France!
Probably everyone knows that "non-commissioned officer" means "junior", and "leib" means direct subordination to the head of state. It began with the guards (guards), the king's personal guard - the Life Guards. If there were tanks at that time, the Russians would also have armored regiments.
Promotional video:
But with the title "GUSAR" not everything is so smooth. All interpreters as they agreed, and are looking for the etymology of the word in the Hungarian language. Well, well … And only because someone "discovered" that the first hussars appeared in Hungary. But I've heard the interpretation of several, already modern philologists, who convincingly and reasonedly prove that this is a Russian word. And it is not surprising if you know who the Hungarians are. They themselves consider themselves the descendants of the Huns! But we know that the Huns are the people who previously inhabited the lower reaches of the Volga, and the modern Chuvash are the same descendants of the Huns, like the Hungarians!
Chuvash and Hungarians even understand each other without an interpreter. And since this people comes from Tartaria, it means that there should be a lot of language borrowings. So that's it. It is believed that GUSar comes from the Russian word "goose". And why not, considering the general essence of the hussar cavalry: - they quickly swooped down, pinched, flew away, made a circle, and another raid. I think the version is quite consistent!
Now let's remember how the letters "B" and "C" are often substituted for each other. Vulgaria turns into Bulgaria, Boldyr into Blister, Barbara into Varvara, etc. We read LEIB as LEIV and immediately come to mind associations with "left", "levy" LEVIT !!! Isn't this connected with the cute side-locks at Leiv-Gusar? AND!!! So you haven't noticed? !!! Look carefully at the faces of the hussars and what decorates them! Sideways !!! Or bouclie? Okay, whatever you name it, beech or sing, the object is the same … Again, this cap is from a private …
Hmmm? Isn't he at the fighting revolutionary red banner? And remember, what is the most common surname among the Don Cossacks? Abramov, right. This is the legacy of the Khazar Kaganate, as they say. Genetic gift to descendants from invaders punished by Prince Svyatoslav.
Okay … Let's look further …
What confused me here … The warrior, of course, is not very similar to those that correspond to our ideas about the appearance of a Russian soldier. Rather, its appearance is more in line with that of the Spanish conquistadors. But the hut behind is a typical Russian one, and it is from the St. Petersburg province. Look at traditional huts in the Gatchina or Luga districts of the Leningrad region! They differ from all other Russians in that the distance between the windows is not proportionally small. And it turns out that in the hut there are four or even six window openings on one wall at once! But what was especially confusing was the neighborhood with a typical northwestern hut, an atypical Dutch windmill! So not everything is as we were told about the bast shoes Russia. What else caught the eye on this album …
This is a military orphan house! In our opinion, the Suvorov School. That is, in such a house, the children of military personnel who died in public service were trained. Full state boarding school. INTERIOR! Have you seen this anywhere? At least one military university? Me not! I have in my mind parquet and dull walls with white lime on the ceiling, and walls painted with vigorous blue oil paint from the floor to the middle.
And I saw this only in the Kremlin and in the Hermitage! That means, in what palaces the orphans were brought up! Of course, the artist himself could depict the boys against the background of any scenery, but the rest of the engravings are quite real, nothing to lie and embellish! Indeed, it is known that the military were brought up so as to possess secular manners. They also taught them to play billiards and ballroom dancing. Probably, this is the hall where choreography was taught and balls were held.
And here's another riddle for you:
Well, how do you like this musketeer? Against the backdrop of a monumental unique architecture? How to explain the Maltese cross on his chest? Can you imagine now a Russian soldier with a Bundeswehr eagle patch on his camouflage?
And now, the hat … Along with the Masonic symbols - the Maltese cross and the double-headed eagle, the TEUTON cross appears! Moreover, the motto - "God is with us"!
Remember what was written on the belt buckles of the descendants of the Teutons - officers and soldiers of the Wehrmacht? Right!
So what connects the Russian army and the Teutonic one?
And here, almost everything is the same, only on the forehead is no longer the Teutonic cross, but the British one. This is the notorious "Union Jack"! Okay, let's leave a knot in memory of the fact that the Russian soldiers, as it were, accidentally wore the symbols of the armies, which we are used to considering as not entirely allied, and we will try not to forget about all this until the end of the article.
Have you forgotten about Lukomorye and Hyperborea? In the meantime, here's another, not reasonably explainable, fact:
Did you understand!? And this is the winter form! It is winter, sorry, for whom? For Negroes or Indians? We know that in Russia there are always frosty snowy winters lasting from autumn to summer. In accordance with the existing stereotypes, when using the phrase "Russian winter", the following picture is vividly presented: -
Bearded men are warming themselves with shaitan-water while sitting on the stove … And then with a balalaika, accordion, bells: - “Eh-eh-eh! For the Volga! To the gypsies ! And then what? Either these wars were wintering in latitudes not north of Persia, or the climate in Russia was not at all the same as it is now. Why not? Was Russia the main importer of pineapple and tea? Was! Peter I caught a cold in January while helping the sailors to remove the boat on the Neva from the aground? In January!
When did you see the unfrozen Neva and the ships on it in January? Never! And what is the version of the origin of the word "careless"? It is believed that they say this about someone who does not care about anything, i.e. not worried, not worried, frivolous, it means. But there is an in-depth version. According to it, it turns out that those who didn’t cook the oven for the winter were called bezpechny! So that means that stoves were not needed every winter? Then what happened to the climate in the 20th century?
We look further. I remember how smart scientists screamed like a flock of chainsaws on some TV program when they heard the version about the existence of the Lithuanian White Horde. Oh, and they tried to make fun of the person who used this definition.
How can we not recall the works of Andrei Stepanenko, in which he wrote to the Lipetsk and Lithuanian hordes? It seems that it is time for the skeptics to apologize to him and reconsider their views on the hordes (orders). It seems all the same that the Maltese and Teutonic orders are the same hordes as the Great, Golden, White, Lipetsk and Lithuanian!
I will not go into an explanation of what “ranked”, “comrade” and “governor” mean, I will only say that these military ranks existed exclusively in the Rus-Lithuanian Horde. But here comes the winter form again! Some information has been preserved about the combat path of the Lithuanian-Tatar Cavalry Regiment. The first written evidence of the regiment's locations says that it was quartered in Pinsk, Polotsk, and then in Simbirsk! In our opinion, in these cities in winter it is necessary to wear sheepskin coats, earflaps and felt boots.
And these dandies in patent leather boots, how could they fight? Napoleon's troops, according to the official version, were defeated not so much with a bayonet as with frost! Then how to understand the engravings of 1826, which depicts St. Petersburg in December and the soldiers are dressed in light uniforms and leggings? Researcher Alexei Kungurov, in one of his films, showed these engravings and has already expressed bewilderment about the inadequacy of the uniforms for the current season.
So I found exactly the same discrepancy. How to explain it? For now, let's remember this fact and move on:
I am sure that the majority have not heard anything about the Teptyars before. But experts are convinced that these are Mongoloids - Tatars. Well, first of all: - those who are now called Tatars are not Mongoloids at all. Those who have been to Tartary know that for the Volgars (Bulgars) almond-shaped eyes, dark skin and prominent cheekbones are not at all a mandatory attribute. Most Bulgars are fair-haired, blue-eyed, and only occasionally a Tatar can be recognized by the characteristic shape of the eye section.
In addition, in accordance with the latest genetic studies, it has been established that such peoples of Russia as Russians, Mari, Mordovians, Chuvashs, Tatars, Udmurts, Bashkirs, etc. have the same R1a1 genotype. By the way, this year the data of studies of geneticists of the University of Tartu were published, from which it is clear that the Estonians themselves have proved that the Estonians still have the same R1a1 gene. Those. We are one people, in whose veins NATURAL blood flows!
Secondly. Our scientists "irrefutably proved" that Teptyari are not a nationality, but an estate. These, allegedly, were alien Tatars who fled from Kazan to the Bashkirs, and there they rented land for a fee. And the name "Teptyari" is from the Turkic word "notebook". In which the rent collectors wrote down the names of those who paid the tribute. Why do I find this version unlikely? Because not a single carpenter or miller gave a name to the people. Only the Bashkir debtors assumed the official name "Notebook". No, well, how do you like it: - "nation of blacksmiths", or "miners' nation". AND! Remembered! We have such a nationality - a lawyer!
This is not correct. I am also convinced of this because the very principle of the formation of the Russian (Russian?) Army was strictly on the basis of ethnicity. More precisely, not by nationality, but by the name of the territories where they were formed. We still have it like that - the Pskov division, the Ryazan division, etc. Nobody says that the people of Ryazan are such a nation, or an estate! The following illustrations will prove my point. A regiment of shepherds or merchants cannot stand apart from the ranks of the Poles, Lithuanians, Germans, French. He immediately falls out of the logical chain.
And the Teptyar regiment, among others, gives an answer to the question of who they really are. Of course, this is not an estate. This is a small people, but it is a people, which is confirmed by their characteristic exotic appearance. For a long time I was looking for similarities with the peoples known today and did not find anything more similar than….
Well, yes … As crazy as it sounds, but these are American Indians! Now we remember that until 1841 Alaska and the east coast of America belonged to Russia up to Mexico. And let's ask ourselves why there are so many Russians left in America, while Native Americans for some reason have not left a trace on our territory? Maybe this is just the case? When did immigrants from America live in Russia compactly and even recruits were given to military units, recruited on the basis of community?
So it is still so. Almost only Pskov guys serve on the nuclear missile carrier "Pskov". There are whole brigades in which fellow countrymen serve, and which supervise the administrations of cities and regions, from where they were called up. It all fits! Nothing changes over the centuries. Nothing is new under the Sun and nothing is eternal under the Moon.
And this is a kind of elite! Personal one hundred desperate thugs, in the service of protecting the royal person. Like porters in the Vatican or Latvian riflemen at Lenin's, and Chinese soldiers at Tukhachevsky (by the way, there were always exactly 100 of them too. The quirk of the "innocently repressed" army commander. Round-the-clock personal security from the Chinese. And exactly 100, no less. If anyone- then he died, or for some other reason dropped out, his place on the same day was taken by a Chinese from the reserve, and there were always 100 of them). I like their shoes. It looks absolutely modern. Classic cowboy boots, which in America are called - KOSSAK. National American shoes are like that. Interesting, but why no one argues about who the Urals are? Is it a nation, or an estate?
With the Poles, everything is clear! The nation is from the territory that is called Poland. And what is he doing in the Russian army? It's very simple. At this time, no Poland, as a state, existed at all. The Principality of Warsaw appeared only in 1807, but it was also part of the Russian Empire.
And what about the Greeks? Well, it's clear with them. Greeks are a people who lived in compact communities in the Crimea and the Caucasus. Even in today's Greece, there were many of them. They gave the name to the country, which appeared in 1821. Melitopol and Balaklava are also the places of their original residence, so the regiment, staffed mainly by Greeks from Balaklava, was called Greek.
And then what does the German regiment do in the collection “Historical description of clothing and weapons of the Russian troops from 1796 to 1801”? From the name it is clear - "Russian troops"?
Everything becomes clear when you realize that in 1800 there were no states, countries or nationalities. There were provinces of a single global power. And the Bavarian-Swabian principalities of Hohenlohe were the same areas of it as Poland and France, and even England.
I quote: - “November 27, 1797-accepted into the Russian service of the Corps of the Prince of Condé, which consisted of the following five regiments: 1) French Noble Prince of Condé; 2) French Grenadier of the Duke of Bourbon; 3) German Duke of Hohenlo; 4) Noble Dragoon of Duke De Berry, and 5) Dragoon of Duke d'Angien (, 142). The regiment of Prince Condé consisted of two, five-company, Musketeer battalions; regiment of the Duke of Bourbon - from two, five-company, Grenadier battalions; the Hohenlo regiment - from two, five-company, Musketeer battalions and from two Grenadier companies, and the other two regiments were five-squadron (143).
(From here:
Dealt with Conde. But Hohenlot is not called a duke, but a prince! Moreover, there is not a lot of information and everything is from the pen of Marshal Saint-Cyr. Well, I don't trust these Frenchmen. Everything there was completely rewritten in the 19th century. Well … Let's say yes, which part of the Russian army was really from the French. But the motive of this event is not clear. From the point of view of the French, everything is clear. The one who pays the money is the girl who dances. And what was it for the Russians to feed the frogs?
Trying to find reasonable answers to the questions that arose, I buried myself in a heap of information from various sources so that I began to fear that I was completely confused. The greatest number of absurdities was revealed when studying hundreds of geographical maps of the 16-19 centuries. Here are the main contradictions that I managed to find out:
1. All maps of the Russian Empire of the 18th century are not credible for the following reasons: - High quality of cartographic art, which does not correspond to the level of knowledge of that time. It's as if Voroshilov had a mobile phone. Compare at least with the cards of Remezov or Mercator. The level of European cartography at the end of the 18th century is almost the same as that of Mercator. Why, then, on the maps published in Russia, we see practically modern knowledge of geography? Clear traces of forgery, rude and shameless. So blatantly lie only to those who are considered stupider than themselves.
- On the maps of the allegedly Russian Empire, there are clear boundaries of states, which is not on European maps. For maps of that time, only inscriptions are characteristic, such as "Ceremissi" in the place where the Cheremis lived, but the boundaries were never marked. Again we see a clear indication that the maps were in fact drawn up much later than they claimed.
- The maps also lack Russian lands in America. Why is this modesty? Isn't it more logical on the contrary? This indicates that the maps, the date of creation of which, according to the official version, is the end of the 18th century, in fact, were drawn not earlier than 1841, but most likely it is generally the end of the 19th century.
2. There were no hints of state borders on the maps until the end of the 19th century, however, this is clear from point 1. In addition, not a single hint of the existence of a state with a name even consonant with the word "Russia". There is a territory from Britain to the Aleuts, in which the names of peoples are in their places of residence. The Russian empire seems to exist in textbooks alone. The geographic concept is completely absent!
3. An obviously contrived glorious story of the "mother of Russian cities" - Kiev! It is not on most maps at all, or it is indicated by a tiny village in Little Russia, although the word "Ukraina" came across a couple of times. But Kazan, Arkhangelsk, Vladimir, Yaroslavl, Nizhny Novgorod, Tyumen, Tobolsk, etc. were the real megalopolises throughout the continent. So who annexed whom to Muscovy? Moscow - Kazan, or Kazan acquired the province of Muscovy ???
Another very funny discovery:
Simple as that! The territory washed by the Volga from Tver to the confluence of the Oka into it is HYPERBOREA! And there is no need to fence a garden, look for it somewhere in the Arctic. Hyperborea, this is Moscow Tartary, or Muscovy. And pay attention to Novgorod. At a time when another Novgorod had not yet been built, BELOW downstream, Novgorod was alone, and now it is called Yaroslavl. There is also a surprise at the age of the card. Second century. Whoever is in the subject will understand me, and whoever is not in the know let him look at the date more closely.
Compare the first two digits. The ones are not alike because the first character is not a digit at all. This is the Latin letter "I". So at first the dates from the birth of Christ were recorded. I - Jesus. I 152 - means 152 from the birth of Christ. There was another system for recording dates: J152. More precisely, not a system, another symbol meant Jesus. This is in the countries where Jesus or Jesus spoke. But only you should understand that the whole story with Jesus happened not in the zero century, but in 12. This is confirmed by the research of Fomenko, Newton, Morozov, modern astronomical data, the results of radio-carbon analysis and a lot of facts.
And here is another "geographical discovery":
Wherever they are not looking for Lukomorye! And in Pskov, and Samarskaya Luka, in Vologda, Arkhangelsk, Astrakhan, only in China and Lesotho they did not look. And here it is! A little north of Tyumen! Right behind Yugoria! For the Lukomortians, the Ugra hills were the southern mountains! And again the question of climate and vegetation. Oaks don't grow there! And the cat walked on a golden chain, on what tree then?
So what we have:
Until the 19th century, there were no state borders.
There were no states at all. I understand how nonsense this statement seems. You say: - "And what to do with Grotsky, Locke, Hobbes, Machiavelli"? My answer: - "Fftopku" !!! Finally, you need to stop trying to try on your caftan for a giraffe. It is absolutely stupid to try on modern knowledge to the everyday life of the past.
The Russian Empire did not exist until the second half of the 19th century! As there was no Rus in general, including Kiev. There was a whole continent on which different peoples lived peacefully. In addition to farmers and pastoralists, the first parasitic organizations in history appeared - orders and hordes. Where does the saying "An unexpected guest are worse than a Tatar"? It's simple. Orders, including Cossack - Tatar, constantly demanded to share with them what was produced.
And also, it was required to replenish with recruits, horses, weapons, food, in general everything. Hence the legend about the Tatar yoke. In fact, the orders are just brothers who protect the peasants and especially the townspeople when they needed to deal with their neighbors, for example, because of disputes about whose haymaking it was in this glade. Gangs grew into orders, which in turn grew into the army. We constantly entered into conflicts with each other over spheres of influence, and everything was robbed, rake, robbed …
All wars were of an exclusively criminal nature, they had nothing to do with wars between states, because there were no countries or states. And it was only when the parasites realized how to make management effective that they found a simple but ingenious control lever - "DIVIDE AND RATE!" As soon as you realize this, everything begins to clear up and unfold on the shelves.
Not only the kinship of uniforms and the symbols of "enemy armies" becomes clear, but at least some reasonable explanations for many events, to put it mildly, strange, appear. For example, what were the troops of the Prince of the Holy Roman Empire Alexander Vasilyevich Suvorov doing in the Alps?
Here is Surikov's picture, everyone knows. And how did Suvorov get to Italy, and most importantly why ?! Nobody can explain. Such a question did not even arise! What was Napoleon doing in Russia? Has anyone provided an answer to this question? If there was a war with Russia, then what was he looking for in Moscow? It was a simple provincial town at that time … And if there was a war between countries, why then did all of Russia speak French? By the way, since I had to talk about Suvorov …
Suvorov, Voltaire, Bush Sr. … An immortal quote from the film "The Dog of the Baskervilles" comes to mind: - "Looking at family portraits, it is difficult not to believe in the transmigration of souls."
Quote for memory, do not judge strictly for inaccuracy. But the similarity is not accidental, oh, not accidental! All these characters have common ancestors in the person of King John VI. And they are not only relatives, but also Masons, and not ordinary ones. And then you involuntarily come to the conclusion that it was precisely the managers, the assistants of the progressors, who cut the whole world into pieces, wrote their own story to each, and are now sitting laughing, reading opuses like the one you are reading now.
I think this: In the 19th century, the last great fight took place between the orders. So strong that it claimed almost half of the lives on the continent. Not. Not on the same continent. In North America, everything happened in the same way as in Eurasia, only there it was first called the "war of independence." And then the "War of the North against the South".
One group won, remained the only mistress of the planet and, dividing the world into countries, depicts confrontations, wars, conflicts, crises. Keeps the townspeople in constant ignorance, deafening with false theories, mass media, GMOs, chemtrails, and a lot of things that we guess about, and those that only the progressors themselves know about, and their god. It would be nice if I was wrong, but you can't say to your brains: - "Stop!" It's not like turning off the tap with water.
Only one question remains to be clarified: - Where was Russia?
Answer: - ANYWHERE. There was no such state, in contrast to those that are considered to be fabulous, or mythical. Lukomorye and Hyperborea actually existed as lands, as part of a larger confederation. And the land "Rus" is not and was not on the maps. There was Russia, and it was located on the site of the present Vologda and Arkhangelsk regions:
Here it is: - "RVSSIAE". On the same map as Lukomorye. So why is now the Lukomorye considered fictitious, and about Russia is written in all textbooks, and even assign it the role that it has never played? Russia was the same province of global peace as Cheremission, and Obdoria, and Yugoria. Only once the world was divided into Great Tartary, and the rest of the world. And then states began to appear, which, like jackals, pounced to this day, trying to tear apart the remnants of the former empire. For one, torn off part of this empire, they invented the history of Germany, for the other - France, for the third - the Russian Empire (which did not want to break away), etc.
How did it happen that this process became possible at all? Maybe there was some event after which the climate changed dramatically, and it weakened the global empire? And served as a trigger for the impudent princelings to rush to share property and fight for power and territory?
Look closely at the map. Is it oriented north? Not. It is, as it were, overturned on its side by 22-25 degrees. This means that when this map was drawn up, the northern poleus was on the site of what is now Greenland. This may be the answer to the question of how the collapse of the empire could have happened. But this is already in another series …
The original version of this article was published on December 14, 2012.
Author: kadykchanskiy
