I am not the first to say that Peter the Great was an alien impostor. Even during the life of Peter the Great, rumors were constantly circulating among the people that Tsar Peter I had been replaced in the non-farm. These memories have been preserved by our Old Believers, who suffered especially severely from him when all believers could come to peace and harmony. It was to suppress these rumors that the Secret Peter's Decree was created, the first institution of this kind in Russia, the main task of which was to suppress rumors and conspiracies that threaten the power of the ruler.
No country has been so dominated by impostors as ours. It will take a long time to list them. Therefore, I will focus on the most typical aliens for our case, those whose appearance may be the first clue to unraveling the revealed secret.
There is another dark spot in Russian history that was biasedly explored by tsarist historians and reluctant modern scholars. This is the story of the False Dmitry. Only after the overthrow of the ruling kings were they called False Dmitrys, and before that they were solemnly greeted by the boyars, nobility and even the people. They did not even have to gather a large army to conquer Russia. False Dmitry I came to Russia with a detachment of less than a thousand Polish criminals and robbers, who did not even know how to fight. It was only later that the Russians fought against the Russians, which created the exaggerated dimensions of the Polish invasion. The nobles themselves gave power into his hands, just remove the Godunovs, who do not allow them to live in peace, take away power and subordinate them to state interests. False Dmitry I was very popular with Muscovites, somewhat reminiscent of a modern democrat and his boyfriend's shirt. The people did not overthrow him, but on the contrary ran to the Kremlin to save him. But they were late. He was overthrown by those who set him up when he wanted to get rid of them and prepared a large massacre for the boyars and nobility. But they got ahead of him.
The first one was gone, they quickly found another False Dmitry II, False Dmitry I who had "miraculously" escaped. Now, taking into account the sad experience of the autocracy of the previous ruler, they organized something like a government to help govern, or rather control over the new autocrat. By the way, the father of the future tsar, Metropolitan Filaret of Rostov, was also a part of this government and according to another "seven-boyarism". Again, like the previous one, the new False Dmitry turned out to be objectionable neither to the boyars, nor to Poland. Then an open intervention began to annex Russia to Poland. They overthrew Tsar Vasily Shuisky and False Dmitry II. And again the boyars supported the Poles and were ready to summon the Polish prince to the throne. Here the people intervened in history. With difficulty, the people's militia, led by Kuzma Minin and Prince Dmitry Pozharsky, expelled the Poles from Moscow in 1612. The fourteen-year-old Mikhail Romanov, the son of Metropolitan Filaret, was elected to the Moscow throne in 1613. When electing a young tsar, boyars and nobles, they hoped that they could influence him and thus ensure their well-being. But their plan failed. Six years later, in 1619, Filaret (originally a negotiator on the succession to the throne) returned to Moscow from Polish captivity. Now secular and ecclesiastical power in Russia began to fully belong to the Romanovs. Russia received peace, the times of the prosperity of Russia came almost half a century before the Church reform of 1666, which took place during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich and foreshadowed the great reforms and upheavals of moral foundations that were begun by his great-grandson, Tsar Peter I, and realized, to our common misfortune, a false king - an impostor …that they will be able to influence him and thereby ensure their well-being. But their plan failed. Six years later, in 1619, Filaret (originally a negotiator on the succession to the throne) returned to Moscow from Polish captivity. Now secular and ecclesiastical power in Russia began to fully belong to the Romanovs. Russia received peace, the times of the prosperity of Russia came almost half a century before the Church reform of 1666, which took place during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich and foreshadowed the great reforms and upheavals of moral foundations, which were begun by his great-grandson, Tsar Peter I, and realized, to our common misfortune, a false king - an impostor …that they will be able to influence him and thereby ensure their well-being. But their plan failed. Six years later, in 1619, Filaret (originally a negotiator on the succession to the throne) returned to Moscow from Polish captivity. Now secular and ecclesiastical power in Russia began to fully belong to the Romanovs. Russia received peace, the times of the prosperity of Russia came almost half a century before the Church reform of 1666, which took place during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich and foreshadowed the great reforms and upheavals of moral foundations, which were begun by his great-grandson, Tsar Peter I, and realized, to our common misfortune, a false king - an impostor …Now secular and ecclesiastical power in Russia began to fully belong to the Romanovs. Russia received peace, the times of the prosperity of Russia came almost half a century before the Church reform of 1666, which took place during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich and foreshadowed the great reforms and upheavals of moral foundations, which were begun by his great-grandson, Tsar Peter I, and realized, to our common misfortune, a false king - an impostor …Now secular and ecclesiastical power in Russia began to fully belong to the Romanovs. Russia received peace, the times of the prosperity of Russia came almost half a century before the Church reform of 1666, which took place during the reign of Alexei Mikhailovich and foreshadowed the great reforms and upheavals of moral foundations that were begun by his great-grandson, Tsar Peter I, and realized, to our common misfortune, a false king - an impostor …
In general, I must say that when trying to figure out who summoned the impostors to Muscovy, all traces lead precisely to Fyodor Nikitich Romanov, who was forcibly tonsured a monk by Boris Godunov. And he was forcibly tonsured because he claimed the royal throne along with Godunov. A. S. Pushkin tried to investigate this, but did not bring his research to the end, and does not say directly, but hints at it. Metropolitan Filaret was elected under False Dmitry I, and False Dmitry II himself was named “Patriarch” in the Tushino camp in 1608, because at that time there was Patriarch Germogen in the Kremlin, and he needed his own patriarch. In fact, Filaret was held captive by the impostor and did not take this “title” seriously, but as a metropolitan he fulfilled his duties in managing the dioceses captured by the impostor. It should be noted herethat all False Dmitrys were not indifferent to the Romanovs, since they were their relatives and therefore tried in every possible way to bring them closer to themselves. After the overthrow of Tsar Vasily Shuisky, Metropolitan Filaret strove for the son of the Polish Tsar Sigismund, Vladislav, to sit on the Moscow throne, but on condition that he accepted the Orthodox faith. In 1610-1611, Metropolitan Filaret, on the instructions of Patriarch Hermogenes, headed the first "great embassy" in negotiations with Poland on succession to the throne, but since in 1612 Moscow was freed from the Poles, these negotiations lost their meaning, especially since the Poles did not accept the conditions of Moscow. Metropolitan Filaret ended up in Polish captivity (conditionally) and remained there until 1619. The last Polish military campaign, led by King Vladislav, is the one Filaret wanted to see on the Moscow throne, took place in 1616-1618.and was also successfully recaptured by Prince Dmitry Pozharsky. According to the agreement between the Poles and the Russians on the exchange of prisoners in 1619, Metropolitan Philaret returned to Moscow, where his son Mikhail was sitting on the throne. In Moscow, since the death of Patriarch Hermogenes, there is no patriarch, and Metropolitan Filaret has the glory of having suffered for the Orthodox faith. Just a few days after arriving in Moscow, he is proclaimed patriarch and actually co-operates with his son until his death in 1633. He quickly curbed the willfulness of the boyars and became a support for the tsar, an experienced advisor and a wise leader in everything, strengthened and exalted the tsarist power, and, having streamlined unbearable taxes, makes life easier for ordinary people. Metropolitan Filaret returns to Moscow, where his son Mikhail is sitting on the throne. In Moscow, since the death of Patriarch Hermogenes, there is no patriarch, and Metropolitan Filaret has the glory of having suffered for the Orthodox faith. Just a few days after arriving in Moscow, he is proclaimed patriarch and actually co-operates with his son until his death in 1633. He quickly curbed the willfulness of the boyars and became a support for the tsar, an experienced advisor and a wise leader in everything, strengthened and exalted the tsarist power, and, having streamlined unbearable taxes, makes life easier for ordinary people. Metropolitan Filaret returns to Moscow, where his son Mikhail is sitting on the throne. In Moscow, since the death of Patriarch Hermogenes, there is no patriarch, and Metropolitan Filaret has the glory of having suffered for the Orthodox faith. Just a few days after arriving in Moscow, he is proclaimed patriarch and actually co-operates with his son until his death in 1633. He quickly curbed the willfulness of the boyars and became a support for the tsar, an experienced advisor and a wise leader in everything, strengthened and exalted the tsarist power, and, having streamlined unbearable taxes, makes life easier for ordinary people.he is proclaimed patriarch and actually reigns with his son until his death in 1633. He quickly curbed the willfulness of the boyars and became a support for the king, an experienced adviser and a wise leader in everything, strengthened and exalted the royal power, and by streamlining unbearable taxes, makes life easier people.he is proclaimed patriarch and actually reigns with his son until his death in 1633. He quickly curbed the willfulness of the boyars and became a support for the king, an experienced adviser and a wise leader in everything, strengthened and exalted the royal power, and by streamlining unbearable taxes, makes life easier people.
So try to understand from this, who was Patriarch Filaret for Russia?
It was necessary to dwell in such detail on this period because to show what customs reigned among the boyars and the court nobility of that time and also because these customs have not changed to this day.
Already under Catherine II there was an impostor "Peter III" named Emelka Pugachev. It is curious that before calling himself the "tsar" who had escaped the assassination attempt, he spent more than a year in Poland. And Poland would very much like Russia to be in turmoil and unrest. But Pugachev did not have support among the palace nobility, so his "liberation" campaign failed.
Promotional video:
And here is a very recent historical example. In the mid-90s of the last century on the Russian reforming television, when it was still sometimes possible to show everything, the program "The Fifth Wheel" was broadcast. One of the programs of the "Fifth Wheel" was devoted to the documentary showing of unknown pages from the life of V. Ulyanov's family. For seventy years of Soviet power, we have been accustomed to a virtual idealized artistic and historical image of Lenin, and here is some kind of vulgar opposite. And this is what the authors of the program found. Here I will not mention the moral climate that "reigned" in this deeply unhappy family and the reason for which was V. Ulyanov's mother, but I will go straight to the essence. As the authors of the program found out, not quite the same V. Ulyanov, who was born in Simbirsk, returned to Russia from Switzerland. Why did such a substitution take place and why was this secret kept by many people and even his family and is the main party secret? - one can only guess, but one can assume.
In all likelihood, V. Ulyanov died under the wheels of a car in Switzerland in 1910. It was an accident or an attempt to establish it is no longer possible if some documents are not revealed. As a result of this accident, the party was left without money, which was already in the bank in his name and which should have come yet. It was impossible to re-register them as heirs or to another name, taking into account their specific sources. V. Ulyanov was urgently "revived", which was beneficial to everyone, and first of all to the perpetrator of the incident. There was a court that ruled to reimburse the cost of a completely mangled bicycle to V. Ulyanov, who got off with only minor bruises. Somewhere since then V. Ulyanov (Lenin) appeared. But it seems that misfortune followed anyone who adopted these names. In 1918, as a result of an internal party showdown, the second was also killed. The image of the "liberator" of Russia from the tsarist oppression and the bourgeoisie was so "promoted" among the people and in the world that his death could have irreversible consequences for the power of the Bolsheviks. They found a third, either a drug addict or a mentally ill person, a bit like the first two. It is his lifetime photographs taken in Gorki that can frighten people. Who is in the mausoleum on Red Square is also unknown. Publicist Yuri Vorobyevsky in the book “The Path to the Apocalypse. The omega point”tells that the“Bolshevik”magicians performed some Egyptian satanic ritual on the still living“leader”, specially selected according to the signs known to them - a sacrifice that turned the corpse of a tortured person into a mummy for popular worship. And here's another note. Under Soviet rule, the following order was always in force:“All photographs or documents related to V. Ulyanov (Lenin) during his lifetime” were to be handed over to the Soviet authorities. Secret storage of such materials was punishable by execution."
For now, I will dwell on this and I think that some of you will add to these stories.