The UN Officially Recommends To Ban The Words "husband" And "wife" - Alternative View

The UN Officially Recommends To Ban The Words "husband" And "wife" - Alternative View
The UN Officially Recommends To Ban The Words "husband" And "wife" - Alternative View

Video: The UN Officially Recommends To Ban The Words "husband" And "wife" - Alternative View

Video: The UN Officially Recommends To Ban The Words
Video: Wife Gives Husband Birthday Gift, Husband's Reaction Is So Sad | Dhar Mann 2024, July
Anonim

Building a "happy world society" continues without a break for coronavirus. As it turned out, numerous complaints about the blocking of Google services, primarily YouTube and Facebook, of posts and videos criticizing homosexuals, and most importantly, mentioning the words “groom” and “bride” (boyfriend and girlfriend), as well as “husband "And" wife "became" toxic "to the UN and were recommended for elimination in the media. On the basis of the organization, even courses were organized to retrain journalists.

In the world, the economic crisis is gaining momentum, African countries are on the verge of starvation, pogroms have not abated in the United States for the second week, Trump is pulling military units to Washington, the conflict between Israel and Palestine has escalated again, in the end, the pandemic has not yet officially ended, and a third of the world sits in full quarantine. Meanwhile, the United Nations is making the most "fateful" decisions - to prohibit journalists from using "gender-incorrect words." Moreover, this was done one-on-one, as we adopted the law on the Single Register - without any discussions, meetings and other things, under the pretext of coronavirus and with the involvement of just one group of American feminists to develop.

We are talking about this tweet, which appeared on the official page of the United Nations.

Image
Image

Thus, the bride and groom are now required to be named as partners, and the husband and wife - exclusively as spouses. Even a policeman is now banned - now only a police officer. It remains to be seen who made such a decision? Was there a resolution or at least a discussion? No, it was not. As Robert Bridge aptly noted, the UN officials did the whole thing on their own and, moreover, opened a "gender-tolerant language school for diplomats and journalists."

Image
Image

To clearly drive new information into the heads of Russian, Chinese, Indian and other diplomats, whose homes have not yet introduced totalitarian tolerance, they even opened courses in "gender correct language" with teachers and tutors. And then he will blurt out a compliment to the lady at the reception, and she will be offended.

Now, however, it is not clear how our President to communicate, if there the partners have tightly tied the word to the bedroom. It's just that “our foreign partners”, although it sounds politically correct, means, sorry, “our foreign bride and groom”. But the construction of the satanic "society of universal happiness", about which Katyusha wrote last time, has now reached a new level

Promotional video:

Unfortunately, now it has, at least while there is no one there to say: "Are you generally healthy there?" With what fright a bunch of American morons in the very medical sense of this term decides how to call their beloved in Russia, Zambezia, Sri Lanka or Ecuador? I would like to understand, gentlemen, officials, you are there in general, why were they gathered after the most terrible war? In order to prevent a new world Reich, and not for another dictatorship of pederasts with feminists. Banning brides, grooms, wives and husbands - how is that? Maybe the UN next time will officially approve the pogroms and arson - purely for the sake of the next minorities or the oligarchs behind them. In general, Trump is right: this UN is broken, like the WHO - it's time to disperse and reassemble.

Recommended: