Stanislav Lem in one of his interviews expressed the following thought: “I am an opponent of these projects. I think that it is not worth spending efforts on space when there are so many unresolved problems on Earth. Take, for example, the problem of the Aral Sea. Or rumors that it is no longer possible to drink from Baikal. Recently, the US press asked: what can America oppose to Saddam Hussein? It turned out - practically nothing. An atomic bomb will harm yourself more, and other means to the Iraqi dictator are like a mosquito bite. Where are we with such luggage in space?
The contradictions between different states on Earth are real, and in orbit they will not disappear, but will turn into contradictions between people who are carriers of the culture and worldview of their native countries."
This opinion of the world famous Polish science fiction writer is shared by the Russian researcher of anomalous phenomena, Professor Yuri Fomin. But in his reasoning, he is not limited to considering the social and moral aspects of the problem. Yuri Alexandrovich believes that a person is simply not able to fly far from the Earth, since the very depths of space will not allow him to come to him.
Take, for example, the famous photograph in which Neil Armstrong takes his first steps on the surface of our night star. But where is the evidence that this is the Moon? And if you look from the other side, then there is no evidence that the Americans did not fly there. Where is the truth?
Russian cosmonaut Georgy Grechko provides evidence of flight falsification. Here are just a few of them. Television has repeatedly shown footage of the American flag waving from the lunar flagpole. But he could not sway there, since there is no wind on the moon due to the lack of atmosphere. Every schoolchild knows this in our country. But the graduates from NASA, as it turned out, do not know. They didn't go through this at school.
Another argument of our astronaut concerns the movement of American astronauts on the Moon. The photographs and footage clearly show that they walk in soft, air-filled spacesuits. But in a lunar vacuum, such a spacesuit would be like steel armor without articulated joints. It would be impossible to turn around in it, let alone perform difficult work. And the American cameramen did not come up with the idea of dressing astronauts in tough spacesuits.
Finally, the manner of walking on the surface of our satellite. Astronauts in motion pictures walk slowly, but in the same way as on Earth. But because of the weak lunar attraction, they would have to jump 2-2, 5 meters with each step.
Professor Fomin completely agrees with the astronaut Grechko that the American lunar project is a falsification. In this regard, he also recalls the Hollywood movie "Capricorn-1", filmed after NASA's "moon epic". He was filmed in the desert of Arizona, the landscapes of which are similar to those of Mars. It is known that the director of the film admitted that at first he intended to "send" people not to Mars, but to the Moon, but a representative of the "competent authorities" of the United States who visited him advised not to touch our natural satellite …
Promotional video:
But the main reason for Fomin's distrust of American lunar projects is not in these, as he calls them, particulars. According to his theory, a person simply could not be so far from the Earth. This is the key in his reasoning. Yuri Alexandrovich says: “Everyone knows that time and speed depend on gravity. They know something, but they are lazy to take and calculate what will happen at a distance from the Earth. Or they are afraid."
The professor was not lazy and was not afraid. He counted. And it turned out that on the surface of the Sun, time flows 28 times faster than on Earth. And on the same Mars, on the contrary, it is slower. For the inhabitants of the Earth, the flight to it will last about a year, and on the bio-clock of the cosmonauts, eighty years will fly by during this time. It follows from this that the Martian program, already adopted in the United States, is not feasible - there will not be enough human life for its implementation.
But that's not all. Let's admit such a way out. Men and women would fly, and after a century and a half passed for them, their grandchildren and great-grandchildren would return. Well, the problem is solved? Flight to Mars is also impossible for more serious reasons. The fact is that at a distance from the Earth the gravity vector is so small that it excludes the very existence of the human body. And, alas, we have to refute Tsiolkovsky, and we will not fly away from Earth on our rockets. After all, the usual and physiologically acceptable flow of time extends about a thousand kilometers from the planet. In this close space, the difference in the course of the biological clock does not harm a person yet. But beyond this thousand-kilometer limit, a living highly organized creature will have a hard time. After all, the moon is 384.386 kilometers, and not some thousand there. By the way, even on the near-earth, and therefore,In a relatively low orbit, according to Fomin's calculations, a month turns into a year, and the record-breaking astronauts who have spent, say, a year and a half in orbit, return one and a half decades older. True, the MCC does not admit this, but this is already politics.
So, it turns out that the professor essentially closes the era of the great dreamers Tsiolkovsky, Tsander, Korolyov? He himself does not agree with this statement. He only proves that, while remaining in the familiar three-dimensional world and following its laws, a person cannot get far from his home planet.
But the world is measured by not only three vectors. The outstanding German physicist Hermann Ludwig Helmholtz in the 19th century introduced the concept of "flat", which showed the difference in the perception of the world by beings of different dimensions. A ploskat is an imaginary creature that lives, say, in the plane of a Whatman sheet. The concepts of length and width are available to him, but height and depth are incomprehensible to him. Let's say it crawls on this sheet, and we take it and pierce a hole in it with an awl.
In the consciousness of a flat-wagoner, this is tantamount to a world catastrophe: suddenly a failure appears in such a familiar and cozy space! This is what a person perceives as the underworld or the Bermuda Triangle.
So, according to Professor Fomin, we, despite the three-dimensional perception of the world, are also akin to flatheads. And when someone from our native three dimensions, not perceived by us, pierces our familiar world with his four-dimensional awl, we begin to rant about otherworldly forces. Isn't it better to conclude that the world of a higher dimension is not yet available to our perception?
However, one should not draw a conclusion about the final impossibility of a person's transition to the fourth dimension. Take the same flatfish. If you draw two figures on his sheet of Whatman paper, then the flattened itself is so slow that even ten lives will not be enough for it to crawl from one of them to another, where, say, another flatat is inhabited. And we will fold the sheet so that these figures touch. Then the first plane will easily crawl to another figure and get acquainted with his brother, whose existence was not reported to him by either his fellow travelers or two-dimensional telescopes.
But if it is easy to bring two flat worlds closer together by folding the sheet in half or rolling it into a roll, then the idea becomes real that the entire Universe can be pulled together into one point.
At first glance, this seems to be a purely theoretical, speculative construction. Nevertheless, there are examples of transitions to a higher dimension in our life. Let's say a biological cell contains ten billion atomic nuclei. Moreover, both the sperm and the egg are the same number. The total number of cores is about 25 billion. But it was established that during sexual reproduction ten thousand sextillons of bits are transmitted - and this is a figure not with ten zeros, as it was in the original version, but with twenty-five. From the point of view of 3D mathematics, this is impossible. But the presence of the fourth dimension explains everything. Therefore, according to the laws of multidimensionality, not only an egg cell, but also one nucleus of an atom can contain information about the entire Universe, pulled into one point.
This means that deep space flights (it would be more accurate to call them "jumps", that is, a term that has long been mastered by science fiction writers) are possible. But not in the usual space orbits, but by moving from one dimension to another and back at the time of arrival at the destination. Therefore, we can explain the phenomenon of UFOs that suddenly appear on Earth and disappear from it - it turns out that they are wanderers from a multidimensional world. But in order to fly like them, it is necessary to seriously engage in multidimensional physics, which was already partially done by Lobachevsky and Einstein. And to begin with, give an answer to such a "simple" question.
The size of an atom is 100 thousand times the size of an atomic nucleus. If we imagine a nucleus in the form of a tennis ball, then the neighboring nucleus of this element will be at a distance of one or two kilometers from the first. On this scale, the electron appears to be just a speck of dust scurrying about half a kilometer from the nucleus. And what is in between? Emptiness? So it turns out that matter is mainly composed of emptiness? But how, then, are wave oscillations transmitted? On this score, various hypotheses have been invented: "ether theory", "vacuum theory", etc. But these tricky words, in fact, do not explain anything, since in the framework of three-dimensional physics this paradox cannot be explained at all. But in multidimensional physics, such problems are quite solvable.
But, returning to our, so to speak, "rams", let us remember that the Americans have planned a landing on Mars no later than 2025. A trillion dollars are allocated for this program. But even for such a huge amount of money in such a short period of time, it is impossible to develop multidimensional physics in such a way as to create fundamentally new aircraft such as UFOs. How about making a movie in the Arizona deserts again? Add to this an adventure with a meteorite allegedly found in Antarctica, which is a fragment of Mars, and with traces of life. According to Professor Fomin, they started it to knock out money for the Mars program. It's good if everything comes down to a promotion. If people are sent to Mars on the usual space technology, they will die.
Vladimir Guryev