Phobos Is Hollow Inside And Artificial - Alternative View

Phobos Is Hollow Inside And Artificial - Alternative View
Phobos Is Hollow Inside And Artificial - Alternative View

Video: Phobos Is Hollow Inside And Artificial - Alternative View

Video: Phobos Is Hollow Inside And Artificial - Alternative View
Video: Science Bulletins: Phobos—A Groovy Moon 2024, May
Anonim

The prestigious European space agency has stated that Phobos, the mysterious Martian moon, is artificial. At least one third of it is hollow, and the origin of the satellite is not natural, alien in nature.

ESA is analogous to NASA in Europe. Could this revelation motivate NASA to remove the veil of secrecy from its secrets? Don't count on it.

Famous astrophysicists considered Phobos to be artificial. Astrophysicist Dr. Iosif Samuilovich Shklovsky first calculated the orbital motion of Phobos, the Martian satellite. He came to the inevitable conclusion that the Moon is artificial and hollow, in principle, a huge ship.

The Russian astronomer, Dr. Herman Struve, spent months calculating the orbits of the two Martian moons with extreme accuracy in the early 20th century. After examining the astronomer's report, Shklovsky realized over time that the orbital speed and position of Phobos in space did not match Struve's mathematically predictions.

After a long study of tides, gravitational and magnetic forces, Shklovsky came to the firm conviction that there are no natural reasons that could explain the origin of two odd moons or their strange behavior, in particular, what Phobos demonstrates.

During an interview about the mysterious Martian moon, Shklovsky explained: “There is only one explanation in which the characteristics are consistent, the constancy of the shape of Phobos and its extremely low average density can be reconciled. We must assume that Phobos is a hollow, empty body, reminiscent of an empty tin can."

For decades, most mainstream scientists ignored Shklovsky's breakthrough, until ESA began to look closely at the strange little moon.

An abstract ESA study that appeared in the peer-reviewed journal Geophysical Research Letters shows that Phobos is not what astrophysicists and astronomers for generations thought it was: a captured asteroid.

Promotional video:

»We are reporting the independent results of two sub-teams of the Mars Express Radio Science (MaRS) team that independently analyzed and tracked data to determine the consistent gravitational pull of Phobos' moon on the MEX spacecraft, and hence the mass of Phobos. New values of the gravitational parameter (GM = 0.7127 ± 0.0021 x 10 - km ³ ³ / s ²) and density of Phobos (1876 ± 20 kg / m ³) provide significant new restrictions on the corresponding range of body porosity (30% ± 5 %) provide a basis for improving the interpretation of the internal structure. We concluded that Phobos' interior probably contains large voids. When considering various hypotheses about the origin of Phobos, these results are inconsistent with the assumption that Phobos is a captured asteroid."

Image
Image

Photo: greenword.ru

Casey Kazani writes in ESA: The Moon of Mars Phobos is “Artificial” that “… the official ESA website Phobos contained specific scientific data, from different points of view, which fundamentally“supports the idea that radar signals look like they are returning from inside a “huge geometrically …… hollow ship ". The overlap of all of these three independent Mars Express experiments - 'imaging', 'internal mass distribution', '(tracking) and' internal radar survey 'now lead to the conclusion that' Phobos is partially hollow inside, with an internal geometric void that Phobos is artificial."

In other words, Phobos is not a natural satellite, it is not a "captured asteroid", and the object is hollow. This is exactly what Dr. Shklovsky identified back in the 1960s.

Phobos was artificially built and launched into Martian orbit … how, by whom?

Data show Phobos is not natural. There is currently not enough information to discover what exactly the Martian moons are, but there are some intriguing speculations.

1. This giant spaceship could have been built as an orbital station or space observatory.

2. This is a generated spacecraft that arrived from another star system and was placed in a parking orbit around Mars.

3. The moon was built in Mars orbit by interstellar travelers, but was never completed.

The fourth possibility is more ominous and alarming.

4. This is a functional (or non-functional) giant planet - a killer, a space bomb, possibly left over from some interplanetary conflicts in the surrounding space millions of years ago. (Some researchers actually offer this hypothesis.)

An alien ship, a superbomb, or a work in progress? Regardless of the state of modern Phobos, its origin and purpose are completely unknown.

Recommended: