Already, many people, based on the work of independent researchers of the past, have learned that a few centuries ago, almost the entire planet existed a single architecture, indicating that civilization was also a single one. Later, the fragmentation of the once united world began. What caused this fragmentation into nation states? Such researchers of the real past as O. Pavlyuchenko A. Kadykchansky and some others believe that this happened as a result of global catastrophes and the post-catastrophic redistribution of the world by the surviving new elites. And the last such redistribution took place in the middle of the 19th century after a catastrophe that covered the first floors of these antique-style buildings all over the world with clay.
For example, what can you read about this in the book by A. Kadykchansky, published in 2018, "The Small Encyclopedia of Great Tartary":
There are many other signs confirming the fact that it was Britain that suffered the least in the catastrophe of the middle of the 19th century, and therefore carried out in the second half of the century with the help of the saved army, navy, factories and technologies, the seizure of world power and the redivision of the world. But all these buildings of a unified antique architecture, whose first floors were covered with a strange "red clay", were built even before this redivision of the world.
Promotional video:
By the way, it was the British who not only did not build them, but also during their colonial wars destroyed many such buildings in different parts of the Earth. For example, the Yuanmingyuan Palace in China was destroyed by the Anglo-French troops in 1860 during the so-called. "The second opium war". They also destroyed an ancient temple in Sevastopol during the "Crimean War", as well as many buildings during hostilities in India and the United States. And this is quite understandable, since the very existence of such buildings of a unified architecture in different parts of the planet contradicts the “official” version of history rewritten by falsifiers. And the fewer such artifacts are preserved, the fewer “uncomfortable questions” are asked to historians by those who have not yet lost their independent thinking.