The archaeological find of the late 80s in Arkaim (up to Magnitogorsk, then on the rebar. Basic information - dozens of sites, for example, [1]) confused the minds of many. It turned out that the civilization geographically positioned in the vastness of Russia is in no way less than 4000 years old; Stonehenge "can rest." That is, Russia began by no means from Nestor the Chronicler. The message that the grave of Spitama Zarathushtra was allegedly found in the same place, shocked everyone. From which the thesis "hatched" reasonably: the Aryans are proto-Slavs and in general …
In our difficult times, the promotion of this version of the history of Russia is capable of generating hot-headed actions that scorch the country's multinational composition, rock the boat. We will try to translate the ongoing discussions into some meaningful channel of common sense from our point of view. For this we will use the tool of L. Gumilyov's theory of passionarity and, in part, the legacy of V. Solovyov and D. Andreev.
According to a well-known anecdote, Perestroika was followed by a Shootout. It's time to carry out the roll call of the survivors. Any new movement forward must begin with an inventory of the existing one - only after this work can plans be made. But the Skirmish has been going on in Russia since the 10th century.
What happened. It was?
NB. In this article we will use some of the materials previously published on this site - do not send people for some of the arguments of this text somewhere every time.
* * *
It is not difficult to notice: in the final phase of the standard cycle of ethnogenesis and in the area where the passionary energy of the ethnos (PS in Fig. 1) has only a background value (at t> 1500 years), the most productive formation (re-registration) of national religious ideas takes place. So it was in Zoroastrianism: the colophons of significant primary sources date back to the 18th century AD. So it was in Buddhism: the "Second Buddha" (Vasubandhu) compiled his "Abhidharma Encyclopedia" in the 5th century. AD, "waiting" for more than a thousand-year pause from the time of the life of Buddha Shakyamuni. It was so, however, unsuccessfully, and in Judaism: Philo of Alexandria tried to switch the brains of the Pharisees after 1200 years from the time of Moses. Germany honors Martin Luther (16th century), and its intellectuals Jacob Boehme (17th century), respectively, a religious reformer and a "Teutonic philosopher"the lifetime of which, again, is at least 14 centuries from the events of the beginning of the New Era. Everything fundamental in the tenets of Islam was formalized in the Middle Ages by a whole constellation of philosophers and theologians (Umar, Uvays al-Karni, Ibrahim ben Adham, Ibn al-Arabi, Salman Farsi …). At the same time, one of the most ancient and most revered works is the "Elixir of Happiness" by al-Ghazali (XI century AD), who scrupulously described the rules of conduct for Muslims and the rite of service, again, not immediately after the death of the Seal of the Prophets, but much faster from the date of launching a religious idea than in other ethnic systems. At the same time, one of the most ancient and most revered works is the "Elixir of Happiness" by al-Ghazali (XI century AD), who scrupulously described the rules of conduct for Muslims and the rite of service, again, not immediately after the death of the Seal of the Prophets, but much faster from the date of launching a religious idea than in other ethnic systems. At the same time, one of the most ancient and most revered works is the "Elixir of Happiness" by al-Ghazali (XI century AD), who scrupulously described the rules of conduct for Muslims and the rite of service, again, not immediately after the death of the Seal of the Prophets, but much faster from the date of launching a religious idea than in other ethnic systems.
Promotional video:
Hardly anyone will argue that in the last two centuries there have been many cases of the birth of new pseudo- and quasi-religions on the planet (the same Bolshevism, new sects). And, thanks to the format of "instant" knowledge, the "puppeteers" managed (and still succeed!) In a very short time to sow this "knowledge" in the minds of their "flock", develop the "rank" and "dogmas" of their "beliefs".
The axioms emerge:
1) this or that religion arose and was cultivated precisely in that ethnos, the naming and geographical localization of the residence of the representatives of which is now (!) Combined with the ethnicity of this or that Messiah. The prophet and the ethnos that gave birth to him, and then professing the idea of the prophet, are of one nationality (according to the fifth point of the questionnaire), but with the exception of Christianity;
2) this or that religion is finally formalized in its dogmas and rank only in the final stages of the cycle of ethnogenesis after the passage of the “Breakdown” phase (our method of phase gradation according to the graph of the first partial derivative ∂PS / ∂τ with comments see [2], with In this case, the course of PS (τ) is assumed by us to be similar to the course of the Planck function curve)
3) with the development of earthly civilization, with the accumulation of experience of throwing new "food for conscience" on this or that "scenic earthly site", the time interval necessary for the development of dogmas and the rank of teaching decreases more and more;
4) the birth of a new ethnos is always and everywhere accompanied by the birth of a new religious idea (Gumilev's theorem. Proved by him. The list of works of the historian on this topic - in [2]).
The reasons for the "exclusivity" of the fate of the Savior's teachings are not discussed by anyone. But at the same time, if the traces of the prophet's activity in the fate of any nation are not found by historians at all, then the theologians automatically assign the religion of such an ethnos the title “Heresy” and at best it is proclaimed local. The Chukchi do not have their "Abraham", "Noah" and evidence of the life of their "Jesus" - that means pagans. And if we remove from the Russians all the evidence that would prove the emergence of a national Prophet in the rank of the Messiah on the territory where oral speech was conducted in Russian, then they and the Chukchi are also the essence of one - pagans! It is another matter that both future Greeks and future Persians and future Jews and future Russians communicated with each other in a certain proto-language ([3], [4]), but when was that!However, if we consider the Holy Scriptures of the world only as detailed scenarios with a list of actors, without getting hung up on the names of these persons / Persons and toponyms, then, for example, speaking about the religion of “even God's grandchildren” and the Aryans, we will not be able to clearly define their differences, as and identify many of the unique features of the life of adherents of these beliefs.
Adepts and shepherds of all religions claim that the Scriptures were dictated to them directly by their national God through their national prophet (Spitama, Moses, Gautama from the Shakya clan, Muhammad, …). It must be understood that this algorithm (dictation and recognition of the idea as sacred) operated even before the appearance of these prophets, at other time periods of the cyclical development of planetary communities of people. But the names of those prophets were different. If we admit the opposite, if we admit that neither before Spitama, nor before Moses, etc. there were no prophets-messengers of the word of God, then it turns out that the very institution of religion has not existed for centuries, and the history of any people begins from the date of the appearance of the prophet of the religion that exists now, and until his appearance it seemed to not exist, and they lived “without a king in the head. " But this is not so in fact: before Spitama among the Aryans (future adherents of Zoroastrianism and,partly, Buddhism) was Mithra, before Moses, the future Jewish and Muslim flock prayed in the lands of the Sumerians to El and his son Baal, while tenaciously keeping in memory the Triune Akkado-Sumerian college of the Supreme Gods (Eia, Anu and Ellil), later one-in- one including, for example, in his annals the history of the Sumerian Atrahasis (lit. - "Very wise").
In the text of the clay tablets "When the gods are like people …", scribbled by the younger scribe Ku-Ayya in 1646..1626. BC, the supreme God Eia instructs Atrahasis:
Then Atrahasis was successfully transformed into Noah (“noah” in translation means “tranquility”), and Nuh in Islam. In Zoroastrianism, this character is called Yima.
But what's interesting. In a series of tablets "About everything that has seen …" (Epic of Gilgamesh), the earliest mention of which belongs to scientists to 2500 BC, it is said:
Note: “priest” and “sorcerer” are different concepts in the text. That is, here "sorcerer" = "magician", i.e. Zoroastrian magicians were already behind the lands of the future Babylon in the XXV century BC!
Who then dictated to the Russians their national religious idea before the appearance of Christ? According to Nestor the Chronicler - NOBODY, but some idols were fantasized by the popular consciousness, that is, there was no history of Russia until 988, that is, the Russians entered Christianity directly from the "digging stick".
Moreover, they entered Christianity not directly and naturally, but "with their right hand over their left shoulder," lying for some time in their "religious swaddling clothes" in the lands of Mesopotamia - through Judaism. After all, it is argued that the cradle of Christianity is the content of the Tanakh (Old Testament). Well, so the history of the Jewish people [TaNaKh - an abbreviation: Torah, Neviim (Prophets), Ketuvim (Scriptures)] was prescribed for Russians to perceive (at the suggestion of whom and when?) As some kind of painfully dear and natural peace and morality; as a collection of books that develop their primitive and wild, - are accepted as such a priori (!) - ideas about these categories. Only the Bible allegedly opened the eyes of our grandfathers to what is actually Good and what is Evil. Well, the pagans did not know that to kill is a sin and to steal it is bad,that there is the Holy Spirit, and that God is three-hypostatic. It must be assumed that if they had not found out, then there would have been no one to understand the letters of this article.
Let's make a reservation right away. We have long had doubts that Judaism was the cradle of Christianity in Russia. We emphasize: well, we are not against Judaism! A Jew believes in Jehovah - for God's sake! We don't get sick with such a disgusting thing as Judophobia! We are only against the status of this religion as the cradle of Orthodoxy, as a world religion. And who is completely unbearable to digest this assumption - okay, even if it is truly planetary, but only without China, India, Japan, … and why not without Russia, a Eurasian country? Why would this Jewish Scattering to the East not move at all, but to the north and slightly to the east, and even more so to the west of Jerusalem - please?
The emerging Moscow Rus was faced with the task of satisfying the uncontrollable "illusory desires" (phrase of L. Gumilyov) of the first passionary rulers. Russia was then on the rise, in the XI century the akmatic phase of the cycle of its ethnogenesis began! And, as always and everywhere in such cases it happens, the nation needed a new religious idea (see “Gumilyov's Test”, for example, in [5: 404]). And how wonderfully this moment of history is described by F. Dostoevsky:
In our views, Russia in the 10th century (and maybe much earlier!) Was not born, but isolated. From whom? Essentially from some very powerful super-ethnic entity of which she was a part; perhaps from the one that on ancient maps is designated as Tartaria, and in Zoroastrian texts it is remembered as Arianam-Vaija (mythical (?) ancestral home of the Iranian-Aryans). Or maybe it would be more correct to call that country Ecumene? !!! And Russia really needed to generate in the consciousness of the cells of its system (the matrix of families) its God as "special" as possible. If we assume that the breakaway part also included the territories of Western Europe, then the first arrival of the Savior was just the right time (or rather the opposite: it was He who determined this time and place!). Indirectly, the fact of the spread of megaliths (dolmens, pyramids,other mega-constructions) practically over the entire surface of the planet (see [9] and [10]). But what is interesting: the quality of processing "stones" - tons, or even tens of tons each - exclusively and only on the territory of Russia (North Caucasus) is exemplary!
And now is the time to compare the basic premises of the Mazdayasnian (Zoroastrianism), Christian and Russian religions (which does not even have a name!). Then we will show the complete inconsistency of the norms of morality implanted in the Tanakh with those that were practiced in our ideas by the “even God's grandchildren”.
About the name of the founder of Mazdayasnism. It can be found in various spellings: Zarathushtra (Avestan), Zarathushtra (Middle Persian), Zardusht (late Farsi tradition), Zoroaster (Greek). "Zarathustra" is a laughing matter for orientalists! According to S. N. Sokolov, this is a common Iranian name-amulet - “possessing an old camel” [7: 8], but, according to the first translator of the Avesta, Anketil Duperron, Zarathushtra means “Golden Tishtr” (“Golden Sirius”). But we have a completely different opinion (see below).
When did the Iranian prophet appear? If we adhere to the official version of orientalists, then the lifetime of the son of Dugdav and cattle breeder Parushaspa should be taken as 660 - 583. BC.
All the various functions of the "pagan" pantheon were transferred to a kind of collegium of the so-called Amesha-Spenta. There are six of them: Vohu-Mana (Good Thought), Asha-Vakhishta (The Best Truth), Khshatra-Varya (The Chosen, Preferred Power), Spenta-Armayti (Holy, i.e. Beneficent Peace), Harvatat (Integrity, i.e.. Well-being), Amertat (Immortality). They are not independent deities, but abstract essences, they are endowed with flesh conditionally, only for the purpose of perception, but in the idea they represent only the functions of a single deity - or his hypostasis, which together with the seventh hypostasis, Ahura Mazda, constitute something analogous to the Christian Trinity [7: 11,12].
The first edition of the Avesta (the word “Avesta” itself means “knowledge”, “foundation” in the meaning of “establishment”, “law”, “religious establishment”) was written in a special alphabet in the so-called Avesta language (close to Sanskrit), invented specifically for records of sacred texts. Without a shadow of a doubt, we attribute this "know-how" to the process of the formation of an artificial Church Slavonic language: there was where to get the idea. All parts were mixed in a canonized order. Subsequently, the structure of the texts changed; The Avesta was divided into books (Nazca), chapters (fragardes, ghats, karde, ha) and stanzas, provided with commentaries, written not in the Avestan, but in the Pahlavian alphabet with the corresponding translation. The translation-commentary of the Avesta is called "Zend". Sometimes, therefore, its second edition is called "Zend-Avesta".
There is information that the original text included 2,000,000 verses, consisted of 1,200 fragards (chapters) and was written on gold plaques during the reign of King Vishtaspa (a version for which we have not found confirmation). One primary copy was translated into Greek, which enriched this country with new religious knowledge at least 400 years before the birth of Christ, the other was burned by Alexander the Great (the source of this data is unknown to us). E. West calculated that under the Sassanids, 348 chapters were left from the Avesta, combined into 21 books (nasc), which contained 345700 words. Then the Arab invasion followed, and from the Avesta only one Nazca remained entirely ("Wendidad") and plus about 83,000 words.
The first manuscripts came to England, but no one was able to decipher them. And only 17 years of the "business trip" of the Frenchman Anquetil Duperron allowed all the remaining parts of the Avesta to be removed from India and compiled with the help of the Parsis (that is, Indian Persians, of whom there are now about 30,000), a complete translation, which was first published in 1771.
For us, special attention is drawn to a special class of divine beings, defined as fravashi - something like souls ("guardian angels") that have existed for everyone from centuries, incl. and for Ahura-Mazda. Fravashi (Middle Persian - Fravarty or, in the translation of I. S. Braginsky, Fravashi) a person exists initially before his birth. It connects with a person at the moment of his birth, and after death flies away from the corpse and returns to the "spiritual world", but at the same time it has a direct impact on the life of the material body of a person during his life. All this is described in "Fravardin-yasht". And in "Bundahishna" ("Creation of the basis") it says:
Among the Fravashi in Zoroastrianism, one stands out - Daena - "Faith", "Religion" (avest.); average pers. - Dan. In the ghats, Vera is the personification of pious adherence to Zoroastrianism, sometimes appears as a female deity with anthropomorphic features; daughter of Ahura-Mazda, is sometimes identified with individual faith, i.e. morality and behavior - "thoughts, speeches and deeds." Time has no power over Vera. Any member of the College possessed his own “Holy Spirit,” including Ohrmazd himself.
Consequently, even from the standpoint of knowledge of the XXI century, it can be said that in Zoroastrianism any hypostasis of the Amesh-Spant collegium can be considered as an independent monad God-born by Him (“monad” is a synonym for “fravashi”; the concept was first seriously developed by Leibniz, and now by Daniil Andreev: see. the term "godborn monad" in [11] and in our country in [2]).
An exact system of correspondences was worked out: each deity was opposed by a certain deva. For example, Asha (or Arta) is Truth, and on the other hand, Druj (or Friend) is a Lie personified in the form of a female creature who is fertilized by sinners by committing a sin and gives rise to its own countless deities. The main force of Ahriman is the devas who previously had a human appearance, but were driven underground by Zarathushtra (25:15).
If you do not find fault with the terms in the primary sources, then you can compare the Hypostases of God in Christianity (according to Vladimir Soloviev) and in the religion of magicians By the way: sorcerer - magoz, sorcery - magia (Greek). The archmage was called mobed, which was, for example, Isadvastar - the third son of Zarathushtra (maybe his grave was found in Arkaim?). And then: who are the magi of Pharaoh in the Book of Exodus, who is the sorcerer Balaam, and what kind of people came to the Mother of God? That is, what comes first - Judaism or Zoroastrianism? We decided this question in favor of Zoroastrianism and the religion of even God's grandchildren, it seems, successfully both for ourselves and convincingly for the readers.
So - about the fundamental component of the Articles of Faith:
Christianity:
1. God the Father / En-sof (positive nothing)
2. Word / Logos
3. Holy Spirit
Zoroastrianism:
1. God the Father / Ahura-Mazda (Ohrmazd)
2. Word / Word (Light)
3. Holy Spirit / Fravashi
In our opinion, such a comparison is, of course, correct only with a certain degree of convention. Seemingly. But here's the bad luck: the fact is that the word "God" (Θεός) reminded the Greeks of running (Θέειν), contemplation (ΘεασΘαι) or fire (αίΘειν). And the craving of the Zoroastrians (and Russians) for the cult of fire is well known. As can be assumed, the Greeks, like many peoples, formed their conceptual apparatus not without external influence (after all, we remember that the Aryan cult of Mithra was known to them from the 4th century BC!), And generated practically identical concepts in their lexicon along the way of their transformations:
Fire → Contemplation → God
Regarding the Second Hypostasis, let us cite the text from "Ormazd-Yasht" with practically no comments:
That is, Ohrmazd, according to the vision of Spitama, delegated part of his functions to the Collegium of Amesh-Spenta (six Hypostases), delegated to each member of the Collegium at his own discretion the right to express His thought in the Word, but not in part of the Word.
Regarding the Third Hypostasis, one can recall St. Seraphim of Sarov, who later after the Greek hesychasts (for example, St. Gregory Palamas) defended his vision of the Holy Spirit as Divine Light.
But here, too, not everything is so simple. What kind of Holy Spirit? According to Zoroastrianism, it is female. And indeed: if a woman is barren (Sarah for Abraham, Rachel for Israel, Zorah for Manoah,….), Then what should be the beginning of the Holy Spirit?
But how everything turned upside down. For example, in the Gospel of Philip (Nag Hammadi Library) we read:
A very mysterious meaning of the text, which in fact confuses everything. But D. Andreev's synonym for the Holy Spirit is the "Great Feminine Monad" - a feminine substance. And this circumstance is proved by them in detail in "The Rose of the World". Thus, it is not at all a fact that our comparisons are incorrect.
By the way, in the same Gospel it is mentioned that “The Lord entered the dye-house of Levi. He took seventy-two paints, he threw them into the vat. He took them out all white and said: In like manner, in truth the Son of man came as a dyer. Note that among the Zoroastrians 72 names of Ormazm were revered in the same way as in the subsequent 99 Most Beautiful names of Allah among Muslims.
In our opinion, Zoroastrianism can be successfully called a "special case" of the Christian teaching about the Trinity of the Divine (or vice versa?). At the same time, this religion in its original format is fundamentally different in relation to Christianity: it promotes the idea of a symmetrical structure of the world with a long struggle between the forces of Good and Evil (four periods of 3000 conventional years) and their originality (this idea is developed in the Rose of the World more than), with the presence in the core of the dogma of proof of the inevitability of the end of the opposition of these forces with the victory of the forces of Good! And no Apocalypse, - an arrangement of the "Books of Enoch" for the conditions of the 1st century AD, the works of a not quite healthy apostle who became the main scarecrow of the Christian flock, as well as the ideological support and a desktop guide of more than a dozen tyrants, who reasoned very logically,that since Christ himself did not stop before the destruction of all mankind for the sake of the good idea of punishment for his sins and persistence in atheism, leaving only 120,000 of the most devoted Christians alive, that is, according to the Apostle John, virgin Jews! (see [Rev 9: 4; 14: 4]), then what does it mean for me, the chosen one, the anointed one, the pharaoh, the king, the duche … a guard devoted to me, for example, pure Aryans with a Nordic character ?!then what does it mean to me, the chosen one, the anointed one, the pharaoh-king-duche- … (further from fantasy) prevents me from destroying my own and other people's "cretins" and leaving at my disposal only the guards loyal to me, for example, pure Aryans with a Nordic character ?!then what does it mean to me, the chosen one, the anointed one, the pharaoh-king-duche- … (further from fantasy) prevents me from destroying my own and other people's "cretins" and leaving at my disposal only the guards loyal to me, for example, pure Aryans with a Nordic character ?!
It is time to note the origin of the term "Aryan".
In the "Judgments of the Spirit of Mind" it is said that Zarathushtra came from the northern regions, from Eranvezh: "… from the Avesta it is known that in Eranvezh there are ten months of winter, and two - summer. But even in those two summer months there is cold water, cold earth and cold plants, and winter is their enemy”[8: 111]. Where is Eranvezh (Middle Pers. - "Iranian expanse") or Arianam-Vaija (Avest. - "Avestan expanse") - the mythical ancestral home of the Aryans (once common to the primary life of the human community?), The place where the Zarathushtra ethnos could live.
Hitler, having warmed up a couple of Zoroastrian magicians in the Reich and having heard their stories about the first people, tried to prove that the Germans are the direct descendants of the inhabitants of Arians, a northern country. As a result, everyone got a familiar cliché: “A true Aryan. The character is Nordic. But where does Germany have to do with it? Indeed, to the North of Gava (Greek. Sogdiana) - the place of geographical localization by scientists of the missionary activity of Spitama - is Russia! And we really have enough territories where winter is 10 months. Where else? Not in Holland!
According to B. A. Rybakov, with the name of the Roda (clan - family, tribe, dynasty) is associated with a wide range of concepts and words, the root of which is the Slavic word: people, Motherland, nature, give birth (give birth), harvest. All these words in the popular mind were embodied in a single symbol. Considering the world of beliefs of pre-Christian Russia, one should, according to the academician, emphasize its moral rather than religious character. Which, in our opinion, is brilliantly confirmed by the Avesta. What did the ancients pray to? Five Ratu ("To the Lords" - avest.):
It is clear what our ancestors and ancestors prayed five times a day, perhaps of many and many other peoples inhabiting Russia now: to the family - first of all, to their kin, tribe, country, and to the prophet - last, and only at night. Sunni Muslims have embraced the practice of praying five times a day without a shadow of doubt. But the Shiites borrowed the second practice of praying three times a day, known from some of the followers of the Mazdayasni faith. Apparently, these "Zoroastrian separatists" had no idea of a tribe, a country, but only a clan and a tribe, and they represented some kind of old ethnic formation - a Gumilev convixia or some subethnos.
But how then everything changed!
And by the way: isn't the name of the prophet derived from the word Ratu? After all, it is obvious: Zarathushtra = Za - Ratu - shtra. But this thought did not occur to anyone. It's strange.
And now we will demonstrate the complete departure of thought. Let a certain traveler came to the lands of Sogdiana and asked the natives: "Who are you praying to, guys?" And they answered him: "But in the evening we pray for our Ratu." Our traveler returned home and tells his fellow countrymen that they are praying in Sogdiana Zarathushtra. Was there a boy? We agree that this is absolutely! But…
A fragment of the Creed of the ancient Iranian (proto-Slavic?) Religion looks like this:
And this Symbol of Faith is set forth in the "Yasna" Nazca, otherwise sometimes called "Fravarna", i.e. "I believe, I confess, I choose." Maybe, as orientalists assert, the word “is clear” and comes from the Avestan “yaz” (“to read”, “to worship”), but it’s so painfully Russian by ear (clear, sunny, fine, bright)! But scientists did not test this hypothesis, it did not happen.
In the Heavenly sphere in Russia "lived": Dazhbog - the deity of light, the Sun, the mythical ancestor of the Russian people - "dazhbog's grandchildren"; Perun - god of thunder and lightning, patron saint of warriors; Mokosh - "mother of the harvest", the mistress of the symbolic cornucopia - the first woman in labor; Lada is the second woman in labor, the patroness of spring spring vegetative strength and marriages; People - a round dance of men and women, placed at the foot of the deity. The underworld is reflected by Veles (Volos) - the benevolent god of the Earth, in which the ancestors rest. And since the Russians did not have Hell, then maybe there was no need to generate an idea about him, since there were no those who had to be sent there? Oh, and we love this idea!
In [12], the opinion of Acad. Rybakov about the tendency of the transition of the beliefs of our ancestors from their personification of evil and good principles to monotheism. His main attributes are Light and Good. The being closest to God is Light, symbolized by the Sun, which, according to ancient beliefs, appeared on earth and incarnated in the Russian people [12: 1013].
Analogs of the gods, whose names are derived from the word "sun":
- Khors ("round") - the deity of the Sun as a luminary (see the modern word "round dance");
- Kolaksay - the mythical king of the Skolotov - Proto-Slavs. It is interpreted as the Sun-king (from "kolo" - circle, ie the sun);
- Chipped - Pridneprovsky Proto-Slavs plowmen, named after their king Kolaksay, i.e. "Descendants of the Sun".
We can say that in the Skolot period, the entire life of the ancestors was inspired by the worship of one God in the image of the Sun, symbolizing light and good. In relation to God, all other deities were derivative, possibly, were his various incarnations (hypostases). The day of the Sun was Sunday, and the week began with it, Thursday - the day of Perun, Friday - Mokoshi, Saturday was given to Veles [12: 1014].
So there is considerable reason to believe that the ancient Slavs were very peculiar "idolaters". It seems that at the pre-Christian stage of religious development in Russia there was a cult, which in its dogmas is common to the hypothetical super-ethnosystem from which Russia broke away. And, naturally, closely resembling Zoroastrianism, with the existence of a collegium of gods-hypostases of the only Deity. The parallels with the model of the pantheon of the gods of ancient Iran - the colleges of Amesh-Spant suggest themselves, and they just hurt the eye.
But the Xth century has come. And it began
In order not to fall when reading the following into a state of "mocked national idea" and an obsessive desire to find and exterminate enemies (our fellow Jews are neither sleep nor spirit, but always extreme at the same time!), We emphasize two things. First, there are equal numbers of moral monsters in each nation, but judging by the events of the end of the last century in our country, it is not a fact that there are equal numbers. And second: the very term "passionarity" has no moral meaning! Passionarity as energy - an excess of biochemical energy of living matter, the opposite of the instinct vector and determining the ability to overstrain; the innate ability of the body to absorb energy from the external environment and give it out in the form of work. Passionarity as a characteristic of behavior is the effect of an excess of biochemical energy of living matter, which gives rise to sacrifice often for an illusory goal. The passionarity of an individual is associated with any abilities: high, small, medium; it does not depend on external influences, being a feature of the structure of a given person; it has nothing to do with ethical norms, equally easily giving rise to feats and crimes, creativity and destruction, good and evil, excluding only indifference; as a sign it is eliminated slowly, over 40-50 generations. Thus, all conversations about someone's malicious intrigues with the desire to humiliate the original Rus are meaningless for the reason that “he’s gruesome, but who’s giving him!”. This means that at a certain stage in the development of the Russian ethnosystem, people were born in it who were profitable to give themselves "zist", and they were Russians! And we have a proposal for naming them: homegrown “proto-oligarchs”. In our opinion,Nestor the Chronicler worked for them. As well as the current "Nestors" - show-turners, but already on TV.
Since Russia has to get out of the "passionary pit", then all unnecessary "baggage", everything superficial and in no way facilitating the ascent, but only burdening it, must be discarded. We, that is, Russians, that is, everyone who thinks, speaks Russian and shares all the hardships and joys together, regardless of nationality, are not strong enough to continue to carry on ourselves further ideas that are unusual for us (the term “Russians”, in our opinion is artificial). In Russia, this need was noticed earlier. But the young superethnos to drag on their shoulders that "ton", that two - then there was no difference at all. Now the country, which is in the Inertial phase of its ethnic cycle, will first have to make an inventory of all its resources, including the national religious idea. What we propose to doreferring to the starting point of our past.
Nestor the Chronicler claims that in 986 "Khazar Jews" came to Prince Vladimir, that is, representatives of the Caspian "Netherlands". The level of the Caspian was then about 10 meters lower than the existing one, and the Volga delta was indeed a heavenly place, the "Promised Land", where the Jewish Scattering left from Persia, and then the second part from Byzantium (see [16: 46 … 58]). The prince, on their alleged offer to accept Judaism as the leading religion in Russia, then replied: “How do you teach others, while you yourself are rejected by God and scattered? If God loved you and your law, then you would not have been scattered in foreign lands. Or do you wish us the same? " [17]. Note: Khazar rabbis came to the son of the one who killed all Khazar Jews only twenty-one years earlier (Prince Svyatoslav, 972 †)! But the Chronicler was also guilty of other oddities. Many of them have been analyzed by L. N. Gumilev and D. S. Likhachev. For example, if you follow the chronology of the Chronicle, it turns out: Svyatoslav was born to the 50-year-old princess Olga from the 65-year-old Igor (that is, from Helga Inger-Igor the Younger; "helgi" is a Swedish title, - "saint") [18: 246, 247].
Reading the "Chronicler", the conviction is created that the Russians had not heard of the existence of other religions until 986, they had no idea of the rank and dogmas of the main world beliefs. What is rubbish, if only because Princess Olga went to the Byzantine emperor Constantine VII (Porphyrogenitus), and not to the Muslim caliph al-Radi, and not to the German emperor Otto I, the existence of which could not be unknown in Russia at that time. If only because this harsh assessment has the right to exist, the embassy of Otto I-st did come to Kiev (as they say), and not only to Kiev, but also to Tsar-grad (Constantinople). And it is known that the arrival of the ambassador is always being prepared, and it is preceded by very long interpersonal relations between representatives of the two ethnic systems. The arrival of the ambassador only crowns this relationship! Thus,russians could not but have a complete understanding of world beliefs and the book. Vladimir never sent anyone to any lands for this knowledge. After all, if the embassy of Otto came to Tsar-Grad (fact!) And Prince Olga came there (fact!), Then why were there no direct and long-term ties between the lands of Otto and Prince Olga? Why a trip to Constantinople is no problem, but to Mesopotamia, India, China - no, no! Venerable Ephraim the Syrian in the IV century traveled safely along the route northerly Mesopotamia - Egypt - Cappadocia and back, covering more than 1000 km by sea alone; was well aware of the works of St. Basil the Great, and he read the works of St. Ephraim. They met and Saint Basil had no problems finding an interpreter. The Apostle Andrew reached the places where Balaam is now. One. But not a single Rusich, after 600 years (!) From the adventures of St. Sirina did not know about the life and the essence of the religions of other peoples; sat in the huts, poked their foreheads into the statues of idols and jammed the chatter? After all, this is exactly how it turns out according to Nestor! And this is the second forgery.
The Russians were aware of the flawedness of their religion and were very tormented by this, they already “groaned”, wishing to shelter the Christian idea in themselves - yet another Russophobic delight! The ideas of Christ really fell on the consciousness of our ancestors in a more than natural way, but for a completely different reason! The Slavs converted to Orthodox Christianity consciously, we think that it was solely because of a passionate need. But the Catholic charisma of the priests of that time, and later of the monks "Do what I say, not what I do!", Got used to Russia not without the help of secular rulers, and oh, what a lot of blood!
And right there we ask ourselves the question: well, let it be “according to passionate needs,” but who was the leader? By whose passion was the people induced? This super-powerful wave of intellectual and religious charge did not come from the Red Sun - a ruler who kept a harem about more than one hundred concubines, and whose very existence was remembered for the first time only in the 19th century on the first nationwide celebration of the 900th anniversary of the Christianization of Russia, and fatherhood which for some reason were attributed to exactly 12 children-boys, born and named for some reason and again painfully exactly in accordance with 12 different signs of the Zodiac (or 12 “tribes of Vladimir-Israel” ?!)!
Let us note for ourselves: true Islam, in its original “format”, is very loyal to other religions: “Each nation has its own messenger; and when their messenger comes, it will be decided between us justly, and they will not be offended”[Quran 10:48]. Only in the XII century and after the ill-fated year 1054 was he and only "civilized" Europeans officially labeled "heresy". Russia, however, only much later than this date and through the efforts of Europe (including its people on our throne) was pitted against the Muslims! By the beginning of the 11th century, in Her eyes, the teachings of Muhammad were not heresy! This is indirectly confirmed by Nestor, not opposing Islam in essence, but only in the form of service. Which is alarming. Only a person who does not believe in God, in Good could speak like that;for whom, in the customs of other peoples, the main thing is only the outer side (rank) of the service, and for whom it is not the essence of which ideas about the Unknown are developed by the popular consciousness, which moral values are practiced by people.
After all, this “Nestor” had to write: “But this was what he disliked: circumcision and abstinence from pork meat, but about drinking, on the contrary, he said:“Russia is joy to drink: we cannot be without it”(translation D S. Likhacheva). Note here that there is no talk of circumcision in the Qur'an! Not! Not a single word! And if now Muslims are going through this rite, then it owes its appearance in the practice of Islam exclusively to Judaism, and to the initial desire of Muhammad to find a common language with all religions! His followers did not succeed in this, but the ritual borrowing from an alien religion was left alone - just in defiance of Western Christians. And pigs were not eaten for quite a banal reason. Idris Shah finds a logical explanation: “It is easy to understand why the Qur'an forbids the consumption of pork and meat from dead or unusually sacrificed animals:in the hot climate of Arabia, poisoning with trichina and spoiled meat was a common occurrence, which claimed many victims. " And in order to reduce the mortality rate of his fellow tribesmen, the Great native of the Quraysh clan simply forbade his flock to take risks. Part of the world realized that it was necessary to run away from "bukhalovo". In the rich Mecca, before the eyes of the Seal of the Prophets, apparently, more than one hundred drunks passed, which, in the end, simply got him. So he introduced the ban. But the Russian grand-ducal beau monde did not want to give up his bohemian life! Ordinary people were not up to these fun - in the zone of risky agriculture there is no time for "dancing along a sinusoid" with or without it! You have to survive. And in order to reduce the mortality rate of his fellow tribesmen, the Great native of the Quraysh clan simply forbade his flock to take risks. Part of the world realized that it was necessary to run away from "bukhalovo". In the rich Mecca, before the eyes of the Seal of the Prophets, apparently, more than one hundred drunks passed, which, in the end, simply got him. So he introduced the ban. But the Russian grand-ducal beau monde did not want to give up his bohemian life! Ordinary people were not up to these fun - in the zone of risky agriculture there is no time for "dancing along a sinusoid" with or without it! You have to survive. And in order to reduce the mortality rate of his fellow tribesmen, the Great native of the Quraysh clan simply forbade his flock to take risks. Part of the world realized that it was necessary to run away from "bukhalovo". In the rich Mecca, before the eyes of the Seal of the Prophets, apparently, more than one hundred drunks passed, which, in the end, simply got him. So he introduced the ban. But the Russian grand-ducal beau monde did not want to give up his bohemian life! Ordinary people were not up to these fun - in the zone of risky agriculture there is no time for "dancing along a sinusoid" with or without it! You have to survive. But the Russian grand-ducal beau monde did not want to give up his bohemian life! Ordinary people were not up to these fun - in the zone of risky agriculture there is no time for "dancing along a sinusoid" with or without it! You have to survive. But the Russian grand-ducal beau monde did not want to give up his bohemian life! Ordinary people were not up to these fun - in the zone of risky agriculture there is no time for "dancing along a sinusoid" with or without it! You have to survive.
Someone is trying to convince us, that is, at least the author of this article, to this day that the intellectual elite of Russia was all one - that God, that Satan, but if only the service was "prettier"! And how could a person say such a person who would have followed the people, the entire people, and not just the court crowd? Then "Nestor", in our opinion, could only be a human product, not of a devout and morally pure ethnosystem of the XI-th century, but of a new, pragmatic, sample from somewhere in the XVII-XVIII century.
Regarding the ratio of the piety of people at different stages of the development of civilization: let us confirm the fall of such in figures on the research data of P. Sorokin (USA). The scientist has collected an enormous amount of statistical material on how the masters of fine arts changed the theme of their paintings from the beginning of the Middle Ages up to the 30s of our century. We are talking about the dynamics of the percentage of the number of paintings, the plots of which are based on the religious perception of the world and, on the other hand, based on worldly ideals and values:
The Christian idea was close to the Russians in its spirit; in its essence it was an improved version of the already existing cult of Dazhbog and hypostases equal to Him. That is, the Christian Creed and its ideals were not only understood by the Russians (not the princes!), But, if you will, were more perfect and more universal than in the model of the Seven Hypostatic Deity - in our opinion, a complete analogue of the Amesh-Spentu collegium in Zoroastrianism. And that is precisely why, and not for some other reason, Christianity was established in Russia as a new national idea; an idea that ensures the isolation of Russia from the South and from the South-East.
Why was that necessary? In our opinion, at that moment in history (not necessarily in the 10th century!) There was a procession of ideas of Prince Gautama from the Shakya clan (the source was on the border of Pakistan and India, about the 5th century BC). At first, the ideas of the Tathagata were received with hostility by all those in power! After all, according to the teachings of the first Buddha, it turned out that a significant part of the population (and women as well. The doctrine of gender equality was laid down in the dogma!) To achieve nirvana must leave society for monasteries! And who will give birth, will feed, build, fight? All around, like mushrooms after rain, new states, nations, languages were formed; there was a global redistribution of the world. This very reason - the withdrawal of a part of society from fulfilling its civic duties - caused clashes among followers of Buddhism (including the Dalai Lama,leaders of Bon-po) and the Chinese administration already in our time and just like then, under Confucius! But this is in the East. And in the South, the script of the Seal of the Prophets was already developing "to the fullest," but adjusted by his followers for their personal, and, again, super-passionary needs! It was necessary to defend oneself, and, first of all, by modernizing the faith common then for all peoples, which was the main Russian national idea for our ancestors!
Note that “Nestor” (in quotation marks) does not say a word either about Zoroastrianism or Buddhism when discussing “candidate religions”! And why, if the belief in Dazhbog was already a "carbon copy" of Zoroastrianism (if not vice versa!), And, according to its primary idea, was older than the Buddhist? Another thing is without deep philosophical design. And why, in fact, "without"? There is the "Book of Veles". And those flying on this site have the opportunity to compare the letter in Sanskrit and the Veles book in Glagolitic (the picture was scanned by us from [9])
Written below the line, but read in reverse order. At least everyone can understand part of the first Russian phrase! We will quote without comment: “Impressions of a resident of India who came to Moscow. “When I was in Moscow, at the hotel they gave me the keys to room 234 and said“dwesti tridtsat chetire”. Perplexed, I could not understand whether I was standing in front of a nice girl in Moscow, or whether I was in Benares or Ujjain in our classical period 2000 years ago. In Sanskrit 234 will be: "dvishata tridasha chatvari" … "[9: 155]
But if the texts of the Avesta were 92% simply physically destroyed (burned), and this is known for certain, then is the absence of its Russian analogues known to the same extent for certain? After all, you can prove not only the presence of something, but also the absence. But, apparently, such works from academic circles cannot be expected!
Historians can cite repeated examples of the forced burning of monastery libraries in Russia during the reign of the Romanovs; and before their accession (or during?) the disappearance of the library of Ivan the Terrible in this regard is extremely symptomatic. It was only through the efforts of M. Lomonosov that all this fanaticism and plundering of national monuments was stopped (unfortunately, not completely). Has any of the professional Russian historians and theologians ever been admitted to the Vatican book depository? Have you tried? It seems to us that such an attempt will fail now! Until. But when Russian researchers have access to all sources, there is no doubt! - a lot of things will come to light!
And today, speaking about the differences between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox, it is necessary to remember, in our opinion, not more than 100 differences in rank and dogmas! The difference lies in the fact that for the first confession Judaism (that is, the ideas of the Tanakh) was really a “cradle-by-blood”, and for the second only a “cradle for passionate need”! The first Roman pontiff was a former Jew - the Apostle Peter, and the Russians immediately said “no” in this matter and began to develop Christ's ideas in their own format! Based on the already fully developed model of the Dazhbog Collegium (no quotes!). But our ancestors had no idea what they would have to face. Children of a wondrous nature did not even think of using faith for the purpose of gaining money and strengthening power.
How in this way less than 8% of the source texts of the Avesta have survived to this day; the primary records of Confucius, Buddhist texts of the 7th century. BC, and even the first text of the Koran is absent at all (it is known about five copies of the primary, previously written down by Ibn Sabbit, the text of the Koran. One copy is kept in Russia). A monument of Buddhist thought (The Teaching of Karma, 5th century AD) in Sanskrit was found only in 1935, and before that it had been known in Chinese translation from the 12th century (even earlier in Tibetan). Monuments of the Sumerian-Akkadian thought (clay tablets) have been found just about, and their general text volume with literary and religious themes in translation into Russian fits into a small booklet. But with all this, we have “authentic” versions of all the books of the Tanakh and the Gospels in the volume of 100%!The Bible was first translated into German only through the efforts of Martin Luther (16th century), into English in the 17th century; before that, the papal throne allowed her to walk only in Latin, Hebrew and Greek; reading Scripture on your own was persecuted! But the German emperor Frederick I (Barbarossa) was in the XII century with the viceroy of Christ "on you", his empire extended to the territory of the northern half of the Italian "boot", but the idea to make the text of the Gospels available to his citizens did not occur to him (?) … At the same time, The Mariinsky Four Gospels, written in Glagolitic, dates from the 11th century! Why was an exception made for Russia in the XI century, which was not done for Germany, France and England? They say that this is the merits of Cyril and Methodius - we do not dispute. True, what does Moravia have to do with it - the place of service of saints,- with its West Slavic dialect and Russia? Or were there no differences in their languages then? And if so, what was the state of Moravia? Isn't Russia-Tartaria a protectorate - since their citizens spoke the same language !? But let me ask you another question: why did they need the permission of the Pope to translate the Bible into the language of the people, whose Church “walked under Byzantium” and who was then in “the very juice”? How does the Bible come to us from Rome, and the first saints with its ideas, as it is said, come from Byzantium, if the first and the second by that time were already dogging in full? And second: can anyone imagine that a translation of Shakespeare into Russian can be successfully done by an Englishman? Not! But the Greeks (or Latins?) - yes. Either we have something with brains, roofing felts … from some representatives of our Church again bears Eurocentrism.
Each translator of the Avesta and Buddhist texts "only" of the 5th century AD still offers its own version of the interpretation of the set of graphemes, "drawn" initially in Avestan, Pahlavi, Arabic, different traditions of Farsi, Sanskrit (all belong to the group of Semitic languages) … As a result, there are a lot of Russian translations of the same texts; you can find at least three versions of the translation into Russian of the same Zoroastrian Nazca (see [7]). And this is understandable: in the 21st century it is very difficult to find modern analogues that are synchronous with the concepts of ancestors, to put them in mutual correspondence. And this is a daunting task for all Orientalists and, in general, for all historians and theologians who come into contact with ancient texts! We emphasize once again - the HARDEST!Over the past 100-200 years, scientists have done a titanic job of translating the Avestan texts brought by Anketil Duperron from the Indian Parsis, but even now the translators do not fully agree! Even N. Gumilev's translation of the Akado-Sumerian poem "The Epic of Gilgamesh" ("About everything that has seen …") after 50 years (only half a century!) Is recognized as unsuccessful, and now a fundamentally new version of the translation of the Sumerian epic text (in [nineteen]). But, at the same time, no one has any doubts about the adequacy of the translation of ancient texts from Hebrew (also a language from the Semitic family!) As well as doubts about their authenticity. Here are miracles! The same applies to the unique ancient Greek: those prehistoric Greeks wrote down the first line from left to right, the second from right to left, the third again from left to right (they lived at the crossroads of two traditions of recording technique. Therefore, they were "confused" - "both yours and ours"?). The Latins generally understood little of what exactly the Patriarch of Constantinople wrote to them, there were no concepts in their language that the brother-in-Christ used in his epistles, there was no efficient translator in their midst, the Byzantines' thoughtfulness and their erudition made Western Europe nervous. Including this circumstance prompted them to anathema Kellularia! On the streets of Constantinople, it was not uncommon then to meet a man with a bag on his chest - there was ink and a pen! Well, "Atu, this" rotten intelligentsia! "We want" bread and circuses! " How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?what exactly the patriarch of Constantinople wrote to them, there were no concepts in their language that the brother-in-Christ used in his epistles, there was no efficient translator among them, the thoughtfulness of the Byzantines and their erudition made Western Europe nervous. Including this circumstance prompted them to anathema Kellularia! On the streets of Constantinople, it was not uncommon then to meet a man with a bag on his chest - there was ink and a pen! Well, "Atu, this" rotten intelligentsia! "We want" bread and circuses! " How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?what exactly the patriarch of Constantinople wrote to them was not in their language the concepts that brother-in-Christ used in his epistles, there was no efficient translator in their midst, the thought of the Byzantines and their erudition made Western Europe nervous. Including this circumstance prompted them to anathema Kellularia! On the streets of Constantinople, it was not uncommon then to meet a man with a bag on his chest - there was ink and a pen! Well, "Atu, this" rotten intelligentsia! "We want" bread and circuses! " How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?Western Europe was irritated by the profundity of the Byzantines and their erudition. Including this circumstance prompted them to anathema Kellularia! On the streets of Constantinople, it was not uncommon then to meet a man with a bag on his chest - there was ink and a pen! Well, "Atu, this" rotten intelligentsia! "We want" bread and circuses! " How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?Western Europe was irritated by the profundity of the Byzantines and their erudition. Including this circumstance prompted them to anathema Kellularia! On the streets of Constantinople, it was not uncommon then to meet a man with a bag on his chest - there was ink and a pen! Well, "Atu, this" rotten intelligentsia! "We want" bread and circuses! " How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?"How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?"How familiar it is! Well, where is now everything they stole then? Have you been to museums in Europe, have you seen the private collections of representatives of the "outpost of civilization"? What money did you buy - such a question did not ask yourself?
If the Akkadian, Avestan and Buddhist texts are full of lacunae, then in the books of the Tanakh (allegedly the 6th and even the 9th century BC!) There are none at all! That is, someone wants to say (that is, personally me, the author of this article wants to convince - we speak only for ourselves!) That by the time the Torah was finalized (IV … V centuries AD), people had literally restored the phrases spoken by the prophets of the Exodus people at least 460,000 (Four hundred and sixty thousand) days after the date of their actual announcement? And it’s quite funny: the lives of all the characters in Scripture are described, if not by the minute, then almost by the hour, with an exact reference by historians to the Julian calendar! While the date of the Birth of Christ itself has at least three versions today with a discrepancy of 4 years. Let us note the date here: the third edition of the TaNaKh was carried out in the IV … V century AD. (Including one of his books, Isaiah,- Corresponded (added) three times. Nobody denies). What and under what fit? Didn't the works on interspersing the ideas of the Savior into the darkest book of mankind in its entire history (of the 613 commandments of the Pentateuch (Torah) - 365 prohibitions and 248 commandments) blossom with a magnificent color? Let us explain.
There were countless forgeries of documents in history. Even Pushkin got burnt on them. He tried and did a poetic translation of the songs of our Balkan companions, which were given by Prosper Mérimée in the book "La Guzla". The Russian public was delighted with the translation, "voraciously" reading "Songs of the Western Slavs" (1834). Adam Mickiewicz was the first to suspect forgery. Pushkin turned to Merima and the "prankster" confessed to the deception: the "songs" were his personal fantasies.
And here's an even wilder story. In 1999, the book by A. K. Guts “The True History of Russia. Notes of an amateur. Study guide”(Omsk). It examines the technology of counterfeiting the Radziwill Chronicle (LR), dating back to the 15th century. Further, we quote the essence of the work of A. K. Guts according to [20]: “LR sheets are paired, that is, make up one spread of a notebook - this is a single piece of paper. Several nested spreads make up a notebook. And a stack of notebooks makes up a book. The manuscript consists of 32 notebooks; 28 by 8 sheets, two by 6, one by 10 and one by 4 sheets. The difference in quantity from the average (8 sheets / notebook) is due to a stitching error. The sheets are numbered in Church Slavonic at the bottom of the sheet and in Arabic at the top. But there is an oddity in the first two notebooks (6-sheet and 8-sheet):
- the letters denoting the numbers 9,10 and 11 are forged into 10, 11 and 12;
- there is a semantic gap between the end of the text of sheet 12 and the beginning of the text of sheet 13
Apparently someone tore out sheet 12 entirely without replacement and made room for sheet 9, then pasted into the LR. Sheets were numbered with Arabic numerals later.
And for what? Outlined on this sheet N8 is neither more nor less, but the famous vocation of the Varangians to Russia. That is - the basis of the famous Norman theory! Without this sheet, this whole theory will simply crumble and Rurik becomes just the first Russian prince, nothing more. As MV Lomonosov insisted. The goal is clear - the Romanovs were from the Northwest.
On sheet 9, in the handwriting of either the 18th or 20th century, an entry was made on a pasted note "… A whole sheet is missing before this" and with a reference to the edition of the Republic of Lithuania in 1767, where … "Lost sheet" … with a statement of the GLOBAL CHRONOLOGY of RUSSIA! In her connection with Byzantine and Roman chronology. If you remove this sheet, then the ENTIRE chronology of the "Tale of Bygone Years" hangs in the air! Those. The LR was made not earlier than the 18th century !? " [20: 16 … 21]
Well, what does the Russian Academy of Sciences think about this? And what about our valiant journalists? Are the bells ringing? And they do nothing, because if you think about it and, God forbid, throw out the discussion among the "people" - oh, how many authorities will fly, the dissertation fund can be thrown out, and people with brains will automatically have a question: what kind of science is such a story? which you can only throw out one fact - everything else will crumble … and so on. etc. And who wants to have a pale look! And what our theologians will learn is hard to imagine! Judging by the fact that Deacon A. Kuraev believes that we and Muslims are united only by the first book of the Torah (see his book "Satanism for the Intelligentsia (On the Roerichs and Orthodoxy)"), he never held the Koran in his hands. And judging by the phrase “… the axiom of Buddhism in general is the belief that its founder lived for the last time,because he achieved final liberation, and therefore, in principle, there can be no later “incarnations of Buddha”, - the professor's knowledge of the essence of Buddhism is, to put it mildly, at a not very high level. Well, and absolutely apotheosis: from Biblical phrases like "… our war against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against the spirits of evil in high places" [Eph 6:12], the Orthodox deacon invites Satan, the devil of Hell, to live in Heaven, giving him the honorary title " Police God ". U … uuh! That's really, really arrived! We believe that a biblical phrase should excite someone, but more ufologists than an Orthodox and highly professional theologian in their circles!Well, and absolutely apotheosis: from Biblical phrases like "… our war against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against the spirits of evil in high places" [Eph 6:12], the Orthodox deacon invites Satan, the devil of Hell, to live in Heaven, giving him the honorary title " Police God ". U … uuh! That's really, really arrived! We believe that a biblical phrase should excite someone, but more ufologists than an Orthodox and highly professional theologian in their circles!Well, and absolutely apotheosis: from Biblical phrases like "… our war against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against the spirits of evil in high places" [Eph 6:12], the Orthodox deacon invites Satan, the devil of Hell, to live in Heaven, giving him the honorary title " Police God ". U … uuh! That's really, really arrived! We believe that a biblical phrase should excite someone, but more ufologists than an Orthodox and highly professional theologian in their circles!than an Orthodox and highly professional theologian in their circles!than an Orthodox and highly professional theologian in their circles!
History should teach, but it seems to do it selectively. We represent the storm of indignation that our next guess will cause. But what if it seems that this was the case? At least the idea itself, in our opinion, is good for discussion.
At the dawn of the New Era, the ministers of the synagogues realized in time that if the enemy cannot be defeated, then they need to join him. They justly noted that in the Gospels there is a clear vacuum - the epistemological component (the doctrine of being). Having "licked" the history of the creation of the world from the Akkado-Sumerian tablets, supplementing it with a national flavor and, of course (!!!), a national religious idea, it was not at all difficult to pick up the powerful "Locomotive" and "four wagons" (actually the Gospels - about 5000!) something, so that this something should fill this vacuum, giving it solidity, the idea of the existence of a teaching right from the creation of man as such. It was in this case that the problem of constant demand for the carriers of the "basic" religious idea could be and was successfully solved, always and where the ideas of Christ were affirmed, and then, but not so successfully,and Muhammad (repetition of names in the main book of Islam: Moses (Musa) - 128 times, Abraham (Ibrahim) - 63 times, Jesus Christ (Isa) - 49 times. [21: 202, 203]). But again they, like the main body of Scripture, had a double standard. Yes, indeed, the TaNaKh supplements the Gospels with that very epistemology ("And there was evening, and there was morning …"), very transparently hints that oh, how the Jews were waiting for Christ (Isaiah simply proceeds in the text with the expectation of the Messiah!). Yes, and by blood He is a Jew, for the proof of which His family was brought out from Judas - the son of Israel, the great-great-grandson of Adam! But this is for external use. For the internal one - the Talmud, a series of books, the translation of which from Hebrew into other languages first began only at the end of the 20th century. And for good reason. From the Talmud (in the version of the text of the 5th century AD!), You can learn, for example, that Jesus Christ was born from the extramarital affair of the hairdresser Mary with a certain Ben Stada, i.e.the son of a certain herd …
Since we are not in the habit of leaving our judgments without arguments, then:
regarding epistemology from the Sumerians, we quote from a series of their tablets, written not earlier than the XIV century BC. "When at the top …" (the content of only one of the many fragments-tablets in this book):
about, for example, the exploits of Joshua: a fragment of the tablet "I am Sinacherib, the great king …" (entry about 691 BC)
Noticing here that this Third campaign of the Akkadian king was also described by Herodotus [see. See comments on page 427, ibid.].
Regarding the story of Moses: It was written about 690 BC. in “I am Sharruken, the mighty king …” [19: 297..298]. This story is known in a single fragment, since scientists have not been able to find the full text of this work (the characters and names sound in it, of course, differently than in the Tanakh).
But then, having said "A", we must also ask question "B". How, trying to distance itself from the beliefs of the Sharruken kingdom, while in search of its own national religious idea, was Russia swaddled with the ideas of this kingdom, concentrated in the Tanakh?
And there is nothing surprising in the fact that the indicated assumptions have never been voiced at all before. These Sumerian tests appeared in Russian translation for the first time only in 2000 [19], but not everyone has this book on their desk today.
And the Jewish Scattering never moved to the East, it is clear why: and who needs the image of a corporate God with the name Jehovah there, if, for example, Buddhism does not put any gods above Buddha at all (the abode of their pantheon is immeasurable, is in the layers universe below Buddhas and Pratyekabuddhas)? Moreover, Buddhism recognizes the mortality of the gods in the eternal cycle of samsara, and only the wild ratios of the duration of their life and human create the illusion of the eternity of their existence. Indeed, in the Buddhist picture of the world, as such, the concept of the Supreme God is absent. The state of nirvana of the best human beings is recognized and, accordingly, the cessation of their rebirth due to the victory over suffering and the causes of suffering (who managed to weed out the flow of negative dharmas - negative psychoquantas-informos) and who became Buddhas. Moreover, this circumstance, according to the teachings of the Tathagata, does not contradict the cosmogonic process, which is considered inexhaustible in time, subject to thinking. In the East, the national religious idea was generated much earlier than in the lands of Jerusalem, before the appearance of Christ! And if you already have a Mercedes, why do you need a Zhiguli? And vice versa in Europe: if you have a Zhiguli body and you are offered a motor from Renault, why not?if you have a Zhiguli building and are offered a motor from Renault, then why not?if you have a Zhiguli building and are offered a motor from Renault, then why not?
There are double standards and absurdities in the Tanakh - the number is wild, at every step, and the Russians could not fail to notice them if they really started modernizing their national accumulations of conscience with the Tanakh, and not with the Gospels. Its authors each wrote clearly not knowing what ideas the other had. Their, - these authors, - after numerous debates back in the 19th century, four were recognized, conventionally named "I" (Yahvist), "E" (Elohist), "S" (Priest) and, in relation to the era of Moses, these sources are added "B" (Historian of Deuteronomy). In other words, the “Books of Moses” are not the fruit of his personal creativity, but are composed of materials emanating from the sources “I”, “E”, “S” and “B” [22: 109 ff.].
Let us determine, for example, according to a simple scheme (described in [2]) on the data of the Old Testament text, the dates of birth and death of the patriarchs. As a reference point, we take the date of arrival of Joseph, the great-grandson of Abraham, in Egypt. M. Grant (and he is not the only one) dates the arrival of Joseph in the possession of Pharaoh Seti I (XIX dynasty) 1300 BC. [22: 306,307]. But the fact is that this pharaoh died in 1290 BC. and Joseph could not appear before his eyes in 1287 (according to the text of the Bible). We found that Joseph died in 1207 BC, while the same modern author identifies the time of the Exodus between 1224 and 1211 BC. (reign of Pharaoh Merenptah?) [22: 307]. It turns out that Joseph was a participant in the Exodus !? But from the Torah it clearly follows that by the time of the Exodus, the patriarch had long been lying on the churchyard. The biblical Abraham was born in 1568,and not somewhere between the XVI-XVIII centuries, as usual and somewhat embarrassed themselves, theologians date the emergence of Judaism. In our opinion, the time interval from Abraham to Christ is overstated by at least 50 percent! And we have a remarkable ally in this judgment.
In the 18th century, a certain English lord, in his old age, decided to study the history of Egypt. Having calculated the average duration of the reign of the pharaohs according to the data of traditional history, he got the figure of 33-35 years, which is clearly nonsense! But he did not stop, and, as a true scientist, began to collect statistics from primary documents, having collected which he concluded that the average duration of the reign of monarchs always and everywhere did not exceed and does not exceed 18-20 years. Which gave him full grounds for the proposal "to shorten all dates older than the formation of the Persian Empire in the ratio 20:35, or 4: 7". But scientists and theologians had a hard time with mathematics, and they attributed his efforts and conclusions to senile insanity. That lord's name was Isaac Newton. [23:37]
But here's the bad luck. If we analyze the genealogy of Jesus Christ according to the data of the apostles (both apostles, - [Luke 3: 28..38] and [Matthew 1: 1..18], - trace the genealogy of I. H. through Judas - one of the 12 sons of Israel), and if we take as a parameter the age of paternity of 20 years, and the dates of birth of the patriarchs based on our calculations for reference points, then simple calculations will show that Jesus was born from a 500-year-old (!) married couple Joseph and Mary. That is, the history of Egypt and, as a consequence, of the people of the Exodus is stretched just about twice. As proved, but in a different way Isaac Newton!
And how much moral filth is there in the behavior of even the first-patriarchs in the Tanakh! Just two examples.
Abraham's unconditional and demonstrative devotion to the Lord somehow does not really fit in our ideas about honor and morality with his efforts to prepare a family burial place. The fact is that the Lord promised to transfer the lands of the Hittites to the first patriarch as personal property [Gen. 15: 18..20]. But, in fact, Abraham did not believe these promises! He redeems the cave located in the Hittite lands ahead of time, on the lands that did not belong to him at the time of Sarah's death: "… and Abraham said to the Hittite sons … that he (Hittite Ephron - our comment) … give it (the Machpel cave - approx. ours) to me in the midst of you, a property for burial”[Genesis 23: 3,8,9]. Wow: one thing is obsequious to the eyes of the Almighty, but another is obsequious behind the eyes: they say I have no time to wait for the fulfillment of Your promises, I need to bury my wife, and I better know where!In this cave Abraham buries his wife Sarah, and then he is there himself. The last one to receive the same shelter in the direct text of Scripture was Israel with his wife Rebekah. A little earlier, his first wife Leah was also buried there [Gen 49: 30,31; 50: 12,13]. So where is this cave?
It is known that in the most severe time for himself, Abraham hid in the family of the Amorites [Gen. 14:13]. But the Jewish God clearly showed how to pay for good: “And he said: I will lead you out of the oppression of Egypt into the land of the Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites, …, into a land where milk and honey flow” [Ex 3:17]. And Joshua (great-great-grandson of Abraham) began to chop the heads of the Amorites, one must understand in gratitude for the grandfather by hanging their five kings [Josh. 10: 1-27]!
Note also that at the time of the formation of the Semitic "alphabet" no one even thought of coming up with graphemes corresponding to short vowel sounds. Were they, these sounds among the southern peoples then? - the question is not idle, and we know for sure about the existence of serious scientific research with a negative answer to it! But why are we interested in this problem?
Here's an example of inserting vowels into completely identical Arabic phrases (now, short vowels are displayed in Arabic with dots):
And where, then, are the guarantees of the sacredness of each letter of Scripture after its translation? If the Arabs themselves can understand the phrase differently!
The division into lowercase and uppercase letters did not exist by the accepted time of writing the books of the Tanakh. Ancient books also lacked titles: catalogs, for example, in Akkadian book depositories, were kept according to the first words of the text (in a period synchronous with the events of the TaNaKh both geographically and in time). Colophons are practically not found on these tablets, therefore, it is impossible to determine the authorship of the texts. But with the Jews, please: this book was written by Moses himself, this one - Isaiah, this one - Joel, this one -..! And there are names and dates. However, al-Ghazali also did not subscribe to his writings (the general style of the 11th century AD, but not of the times BC). But at least he was referring to himself, and his contemporaries referred to him, which later made it possible to identify the authorship of the "Argument of Islam" (as the Muslims themselves called him).
The names of the first "gray cardinals" of Russia at the beginning of the second millennium, whose efforts perverted the transition, natural for the Slavs, from the worship of the Dazhbog collegium to the Holy Trinity, seems to have not been sought by anyone. And it would be very interesting to find out: what, for example, ended in 1370, initiated by Pope Gregory XI, the mission to Russia of the inquisitor of the Dominican Order, John Gallus ("Oriental Inquisitor"), together with his brother Elijah. After all, he did not come to Russia with an empty wallet and not an observer! At least a similar mission of Bartolomeo Ponco to Armenia in the same year ended with the entry of King Gadget into the Franciscan Order under the name of John. And already in 1378, Pope Urban VI ordered the Dominican general to appoint three inquisitors: to Armenia and Georgia, to Greece and, finally, to Russia with Wallachia. And we have a question:Was this practice just beginning, continued, or was it the last on the indicated date?
We observe the entire historical period of the struggle for the alleged ideas of Christ (late 15th century - early 16th century) against the background of the debates between Nil Sorsky and Joseph Volotsky: the former defended the strict asceticism of the clergy and the absence of the Church's claims to any property (non-acquisitiveness); the second argued the necessity of paying the very "tithe" to the monastic treasury from the laity, defended the church-monastic land tenure. In our opinion, the result of this dispute - the victory of the first "oligarchs" - determined all further events in the history of the country. It was not popular in Russia to appropriate the fruits of someone else's labor without giving back. But as soon as the first import delivery of Western "achievements" to siphon money from the population, including for religious requirements, took place, many wavered.
And now, in tolerant Russia, there is a "showdown" with the heretics. In 1470, the ideas of a certain Rabbi Skhariya and his comrades (Joseph Shmoylo-Skaryavey and Moses Khanush), who came to Novgorod from Kiev, greatly "inspired" the courtiers. In particular, the noble clerk (i.e., the minister in the present) Theodore Kuritsyn and Archpriest Alexei. “Heresy” then took root not only in Novgorod, but also in Moscow. And not for one year [13: 370… 384]! At the same time, the clerk's propaganda activities took place with the connivance of the Grand Duke Ivan III Vasilyevich, who … ordered Maxim the Greek to translate the Bible into Russian.
And where did the Mariinsky Four Gospel go and all the fruits of the activities of Cyril and Methodius? (It's not even hee-hee!). The successor of Theodore, Ivan Volk Kuritsyn, and his associates, who were “kindled” by the idea of monotheism, were burned at the stake on December 27, 1504. Where does this atrocity come from in Russia? A rope or an ax around the neck is understandable, the rack is difficult, but also understandable. But what does the fire of the Inquisition have to do with it? Is this form of execution the result of the mission to Russia of the General of the Dominican Order? Note that at about the same time (15th century), the death penalty was abolished in Pskov altogether. Apparently, even then, among the “leadership” there was a more numerous group of “Eurocentrists” than “Eurasians”. And the winners, in the end, were those for whom European ideas were a very materially beneficial “wind of change”. To hell with all this democracy and all this "lyrics" with the commandments of Christ,when it is possible to use this "lyrics" for their completely material power demands, for illusory expansion in any area! Including in the area of "privatization of conscience" of each and every one. How did these priests get Peter I out of their idea of "and share?"
… Less than two hundred years have passed and the Western "experience" has become completely established: "In the summer of 7160 (1652), the day of June, by God's permission, Patriarchal priest Nikita Minich ascended to the throne, Nikon Tako in the blacks, my father and my brothers, Bishop Paul of Kolomenskoy, tormenting, and in the Novgorod border with fire burned Elder Abraham, my spiritual son, Isaiah Saltykov in a fire in Moscow. Elder Jonah of Kazan was cut into five in Kola. On Kolmogory, Ivan the Holy Fool was burned. In Borovsk Polyekta a priest and 14 people with him were burned. In Nizhny, a man was burned. There are 30 people in Kazan. In Kiev, the archer Hilarion was burned "[14]
And how much time did it take for Russia to establish Christianity? Apparently the starting point for Nestor is the demolition of idols in Kiev. But these images of Russian gods (Dazhbog, Perun, Mokoshi, …) were Prince. Vladimir scolded after 8, only eight (!) Years, as he was in Kiev and updated with an emphasis on the worship of Perun! Never before, nowhere and not a single ruler could afford to outrage the national religious feelings of his people without fatal consequences (see the example of Pharaoh Akhenaten - and did not live to be 19). And if the desecration of the Russian gods did happen, then it can testify only to one thing: the people themselves were already ready for this step of their ruler, people did not see for themselves a spiritual tragedy in changing the name of the Honored One! And such a situation can arise only when two circumstances coincide:the entry of the ethnos in the period of its rise and the natural need in this situation for the modernization of national religious ideas (including them!).
Not a bad comparison, however.
The Britons also abandoned their paganism. Nobody knows the essence of their beliefs now! And, most importantly, he is not looking for it - the British, apparently, don't give a damn - and it's so good! According to Bede Venerabilis (lat.), The history of England began with the baptism of the inhabitants of the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms in suspiciously the same way as ours. Their priest Koyfi, the local "Prince Vladimir", after listening to the arguments of Christian missionaries (we have a "certain philosopher"), personally crushed his idols [15]. And by the middle of the 7th century, Christianity had finally won the Isles, for which it took about 65 years from the day the first missionaries landed on Foggy Albion. That is, several hundred thousand (?) "Barbarians" - Britts, Scots, Angles, Picts, Utes, Saxons (etc.), who came in large numbers from God knows where, came to an agreement on matters of faith 8 times faster,than 5 million Russians? Moreover, you, flying through this site, will now laugh for a very long time: before this baptism, the history of Britain did not exist! Mentioned by the local "Nestor" only the first king of Kent Hengist and Ida. The entire "dark" period of 450-596. in "History" only a short chapter is devoted, and even then copied from Guilds "[15: 332]. But at the same time, the British have preserved about 160 written monuments "The Ecclesiastical History of the Angles People" by the Venerable Bede, synchronous to that era: "Moore's Manuscript" is dated 737, and the surviving "Book of the Times" by his (Bede) authorship - about 703 (by the way, a very entertaining book, especially for astronomers.)! But for some reason, all the "primary sources" are written in Latin … therefore, apparently, they were not destroyed by civilized Christian Catholics. Strange:before the 470-year-old "Roman yoke" the Britons did not have a written language? We're sure there was - we respect the British, it seems, more than they do themselves! And their culture was not lower than the Roman one and their writing. But it is too similar in its graphemes to Sanskrit and Verb. Well, who recognizes this now, even if it finds evidence ?! What then to do with all this dregs of A. Toynbee with his "Comprehension of History"? Reading the entertaining books of a kind uncle from Foggy Albion, you need to remember this, and not be touched by his intellect, but cry from the primitive ideas of a pensioner in spirit! But no! Our historians have turned it into almost a fetish! Well, miracles!But it is too similar in its graphemes to Sanskrit and Verb. Well, who recognizes this now, even if it finds evidence ?! What then to do with all this dregs of A. Toynbee with his "Comprehension of History"? Reading the entertaining books of a kind uncle from Foggy Albion, you need to remember this, and not be touched by his intellect, but cry from the primitive ideas of a pensioner in spirit! But no! Our historians have turned it into almost a fetish! Well, miracles!But it is too similar in its graphemes to Sanskrit and Verb. Well, who recognizes this now, even if it finds evidence ?! What then to do with all this dregs of A. Toynbee with his "Comprehension of History"? Reading the entertaining books of a kind uncle from Foggy Albion, you need to remember this, and not be touched by his intellect, but cry from the primitive ideas of a pensioner in spirit! But no! Our historians have turned it into almost a fetish! Well, miracles!wonders!wonders!
With all this, we cannot independently answer the questions: how is Prince Vladimir's refusal to the Jewish rabbis (according to Nestor) to accept Judaism consistent with his recognition of the post-Jewish version of Christianity in its full format as the "Old + New Testament"? That is, how was the mutual ethnic non-complementarity of the Khazar Jews and Russians broken through? How could it happen that the Slavs, who had just regained their national pride and still clearly remembering the name of the Jewish commander Pesach (only the other day cut off the heads of their fathers and grandfathers) and being, as an ethnos, in the stage of an energetic rise of passionarity, suddenly fell in love with the Jewish national religious idea ? What so penetrated our ancestors? Did they have no sense of national dignity at all? And if they supposedly accepted the ideas of Tanakh,why did they not restore the status of Jews - carriers of the "lullaby" idea - on their territory? After all, the elderly and their ideas about the world order in Russia were respected! Consequently, the ideas of Jehovah's adherents, the “fathers of Christianity,” had to be respected. The former Jew (the Apostle Peter) became the first Roman pontiff, but where are the names of those rabbis who became "the angels of the Russian churches"? Reference: the angels of the churches were called BC. synagogue primates.synagogue primates.synagogue primates.
Successfully preaching the Christian idea could only be that prophet who was complimentary to the local population, by his very nature went into the roots of the Russian ethnos, who could “infect” a huge mass of people with a new religious idea in a very short time! And, maybe, really only for 8 years, as described by "Nestor"?
Strange, but the Seal of the Prophets was only enough and 8 years from the beginning of the Era of Hijra (from 622 to 630) for Islam to gain a foothold on the Arabian Peninsula. Exactly after 8 years from the moment of his flight from Mecca to Medinat al-Nabi (literally - the City of the Prophet), Muhammad threw out all idols from the Kaaba (images of Abraham, the Mother of God with the baby Jesus Christ in her arms, and about three hundred images of all the gods) then known to the Arabs of religions), leaving in the temple only the sacred stone Eswad (a large black stone, as they say, of cosmic origin). But how many Arabs were there in the Arabian Peninsula in the 7th century and how many Russians were there in the 10th century? Who compiled whose script: "Nestor the Chronicler" of the writer of the text of the Koran Zeid ibn Sabbit, or vice versa?
How long can we allow the engravers of our conscience to draw in our brains a portrait of a Russian of the 11th century from the birth of Christ, who is an order of magnitude inferior to the fugitive citizen of Babylon of the 16th century BC under the phantom name Abraham? Note: the city-state of Mari arose on the ruins of Ebla not earlier than the 19th century. BC. More than 25,000 cuneiform tables have been found in the excavations. They do mention the names of the progenitors of the Israelites: Abram-ram, Jacob-el, Levi, Israel (Jezreel - in Russian translation), Isau (Esau), Ishmael (Ishmael), David (ancient Canaanite, ie Palestinian name [22: 230]), Saul … but without any connection with biblical themes [22:20].
Why, for ONE MILLION days and nights (XI AD minus XVI century BC) the growth of human intelligence and its ideas about God did not happen at all, but only a "smooth" succession of ideas occurred?
We don't believe!
What is
Russia has gone about 60% of its passionately saturated path, before the "passionary churchyard" she still has 700 years "toil". The Arab world will have to calm down its "agility" for another century and a half. Europe is already "retired", which was predetermined by Oswald Spengler independently of L. Gumilyov at the beginning of the 20th century. Our cutie America will soon enter the bloodiest stage of its development - the Breakdown phase (this was the case for everyone and always at about the 300th … 400th year of life. But for some reason the Europeans called this period the Renaissance). Our "deep" knowledge of the history of these countries and continents does not allow us to say what is happening in China, India, South America, Australia.
In general, the ratio of the leading imperatives of behavior of residents of Europe, Russia and the United States can be reflected in the table:
These imperatives are natural and exactly correspond to the age of ethnic systems. But do the legislation and the propagandized methods of achieving well-being in Russia correspond to the imperatives (stereotypes) of behavior and traditions of the country's population? - the first question. And here is the second: how did the simulators of intelligence manage to change the middle position of the country to a basement? However, this condition is temporary, because each ethnosystem is a self-adjusting mechanism, very, very inertial. And even if the “experiment” on a sharp decrease in the value of the integral pass-vector of the ethnosystem succeeded, then this is a temporary “success”!
For the purposes of this article, we are still interested in something else: how is the state of the religious idea consistent with the solution of the national problem of getting out of the "passionary pit" into which Russia was driven by the "Belovezhskie pozideltsy"?
Moving our attention to Arkaim, let us notice an interesting detail. On one of the clay tablets of the Akkadians ("I want to glorify the Queen of Nations …", XIV century BC), the story of the campaign of the messenger Anu (Anu is one of the three supreme gods of the Akkado-Sumerian pantheon) to the Land without Return, to visit to Ereshkigal - the sister of God:
That is, in the ideas of the Sumerians, the ideal city was built in rings in the same way as…. Arkaim.
But then Belarusian archaeologists arrived in Arkaim in the early 90s, climbed a hill by the fire to sit, and, having nothing to do, laid out a spiral of stones from the top of the hill to its base - a purely Russian joke. Now the local "guide", "specialist" in Slavic proto-religion will tell you that this is not just a spiral - but as much a tradition from ancient magicians: if you take off your shoes and walk all the way barefoot along this stone spiral, then at the top of the hill, standing on stone, you can get access almost to nirvana! Well, new pillars! The "bicycle" has been invented again! They certainly hadn't heard anything about Seraphim of Sarov!
But we think that another source of enthusiasm is here, as in the Beatles song "The Fool On The Hill". One eccentric climbed the hill and shouts from above: “People! What are you doing down there! Come to me! Here you can see how the Earth is spinning! And how beautiful everything around! " (our free translation). How our people yearned for the sane religious paradigm, pure, of the earth! So they fantasize. Like, fuck you all! Here it is mine, Russian; and I am in nature, at least, mentally comfortable; no pictures of terrible ships on the ceiling (I have every day today - what a last judgment!). To-to-eat! Dos-ta-li … and!
Our Orthodox priests would not have to get up in a pose, they say they are unreasonable, but on the contrary: revise Christ's ideas in their brains and finally dissociate themselves from everything superficial and unnatural for Russia! But then the churches in some parishes can simply turn into museums with pictures of Jewish idols on the walls and deacons-extras (but not the Church of the Intercession-on-Nerl, and not many, many, many other masterpieces of Slavic architecture!) Do we want this?
The ratio of ministers with and without higher education has long remained in Russia at the level of 1:10 (data from Deacon Kuraev). But if a semi-doctor is a threat to life, then a semi-priest is a threat to faith! And if we are not able to sort out our Orthodoxy, then what can we say about successful borrowing of the fruits of conscience of other peoples - we live in a glass house!
But now Deacon Kuraev is performing at a rock concert. And what? Yes, "MK" simply "smeared him on the asphalt" after that: well, they don't like the deacon in MK (do you see a lot of his fellow students at Moscow State University?). However, it was necessary not to drown, perhaps, the only intellectual in a cassock, but to SUPPORT! And if in this article we also spoke unflatteringly about him, then in a good way: we are sure that the professor has enough brains not to get angry and, perhaps, draw conclusions! And if not enough, then … a lot of efficient men in Russia!
Yes, Arkaim is the starting point. But for what? To return? For what? The train left a long time ago! But the Russian "national-patriots" have already roused themselves, and part of the Bashkir society has "cheered up": they say, we are Aryans! Should you describe their next step?
Before you break something, you need to clearly imagine the project of a new building! And any construction starts from the foundation. We are categorically against indiscriminate attacks on Christianity! Categorically! If only because they lived their last history with Christ in their heads, formed a super-ethnos; and they don't change horses at the crossing. But with the foundation of Orthodoxy is worth understanding! It must be strengthened, not undermined! Strengthen everyone together, take out all the trash from the basements of the national Russian religion, clean, wash. And not to show constantly gloomy faces with a pseudo-inspired look on the “TV”, as soon as the conversation turns to religious topics!
It says in the Avesta:
We made it clear enough in this article: no, and there can not be any one nationality now, which could insist on its more ancient origin than some other nationality! And on this basis, "download the rights." We are confident that all the people, not so long ago, were the inhabitants of a single Oycumene. And it doesn't matter how to call their language: Proto-Slavic, Sanskrit, Sumerian, … That was the ONE and planetary language at first. Now EVERY people can refer themselves to the primary sources! And the apostle's phrase - “In the beginning was the Word …” - in our ideas we need to understand simply head-on: in the beginning there was a Common word for all. And this thought perfectly correlates with the new presentation of some aspects of L. Gumilyov's theory of passionarity, which we will submit to the general judgment in [2]:Well, the humanitarian genius has confused the peculiarity of the standard course of the passionary energy curve in the final phase of the development of the ethnosystem, it does not take the value "zero", but only asymptotically tends to it! That radically changes our ideas about the possibilities of mutual penetration of ethno-specific features from one ethnosystem into another, even if it is distant in its energetic life cycle from the first for many thousands of years!
And in order to fully imbued with this idea, read (who has not read) IA Efremov, for example, on the website of the "noospheric communists" noogen.newmail.ru, which provides a link to the electronic archive of Ivan Antonovich (andromede.newmail.ru).
In vain E. Muldashev got hung up on Kailash, Egypt. He would have to look at S. Valganov's megalithic portal [megalith.ru] - a lot of interesting things. Sergey writes: “While accidentally looking through a small edition on the mountainous regions of Dagestan, I came across a fantastically beautiful peak. A real snowy pyramid! After a short doubt, I had to start collecting … I did not have any data except a bad photo and an extremely laconic description of the summer tourist expeditions of the Dagestanis. As well as descriptions of the way to the Mountain. So, the summit of Babaku, Babaku-dag, Shilo-Gora, height 3997 m, is located in the spurs of the Samur ridge among the endless mess of the ridges of mountainous Dagestan. " Look at the photo: why not "Kailash"? (photo borrowed by us from the specified site).
It seems that the riddles of dolmens are a task of the same order as the subject of research of a Russian ophthalmologist. But it would not hurt to add a national flavor to his research. At the same time, we will repeat again: Russophilia is a disease, just like Russophobia. If today, under the Moscow asphalt, I find a shard of antiquity about 20,000 years old and it will be recognized by all as the "oldest" on the planet, then it does not follow that the entire planet owes its existence to Muscovites. And what if tomorrow the Dagestanis poke their fingers into their mountain Babak and say: “Russians! What are you drinking there? When you were still walking under the table, we were already building pyramids! " So what?
It's the same in religion. Well, one shouldn't be like Hegel, who classified Christianity as "Absolute Religion", having driven Buddhists into the framework of almost primitive beings, and "forgot" about Muslims at all! Well this is necessary! One billion inhabitants of the planet, according to Hegel, does not have the right to a national religious idea, because only Judaism and Christianity have compiled Muslims "in one bottle"! Who is Hegel compared to a billion people?
WHAT WILL HAPPEN
We did not find anything better than to invite readers to comprehend the formula for the stability of the world, which we have derived, including on the basis of an analysis of Zoroastrian and Buddhist dogmas:
where C is a constant just for the bramfatura of the physical layer of the Earth - Enrof (the terminology of the Rose of the World).
Thus, our future is in our hands: the more good you do, the more - with the constancy of Evil - the suffering of people decreases! But Evil does not sleep! And since the future is nothing more than a memory of the past, for the clarity of the future, the past must be made transparent.
A sure sign that it has become such for the inhabitants of the country, in our opinion, will be the event of the appointment of a graduate of the Theological Academy to the post of Minister of Culture of the Russian Federation. But not the one that is Orthodox today only.
A. K. GOGOLEV