The Film "Viking" Is A Russophobic Project Of The Russian Orthodox Church And The Russian Academy Of Sciences - Alternative View

Table of contents:

The Film "Viking" Is A Russophobic Project Of The Russian Orthodox Church And The Russian Academy Of Sciences - Alternative View
The Film "Viking" Is A Russophobic Project Of The Russian Orthodox Church And The Russian Academy Of Sciences - Alternative View

Video: The Film "Viking" Is A Russophobic Project Of The Russian Orthodox Church And The Russian Academy Of Sciences - Alternative View

Video: The Film
Video: Historical Origins of the Ukraine Crisis 2024, May
Anonim

For this parody of a historical film, 1.2 billion budget rubles were allocated. The money of Russian taxpayers was ineptly spent on the approval of Russophobic theories, that is, AGAINST the Russian people! And this is the main irony and tragedy of our time.

After the inglorious premiere of this "creation", almost 3 years have passed and there is no point in retelling, analyzing the plot. Suffice it to recall that the film entirely fits into the paradigms of the priests of the Russian Orthodox Church and academicians (not necessarily scientists) of the Russian Academy of Sciences: "the Slavs are dirty, stupid half-animals, civilized with the help of the Norman peoples and brought to a close to human condition by the Greek priests."

The amazing and revealing unanimity of priests and academics … where do "legs grow" from?

ROC

To make everything very clear, Patriarch Kirill (in the world of Gundyaev) expressed the GENERAL opinion of the church about the Slavs in the following way: … And who were the Slavs? These are barbarians, people speaking an incomprehensible language, these are people of the second class, they are almost animals. And so enlightened men went to them, brought them the light of Christ's truth and did something very important - they began to speak with these barbarians in their language, they created the Slavic alphabet, Slavic grammar and translated the Word of God into this language …”.

The false history of Russia, written by German academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences, has ALWAYS been supported by the church. Moreover, with the participation of hierarchs from the church, this story has been written since the time of the accession of the Romanovs, remember the Nikon (schismatic) reform of the 17th century? Bringing the primordially Russian Faith into the Teachings of Christ, "in accordance with the Greek canons", and in fact in its present Russophobic form.

The secular part of this historical lie, pulled up later - after several stages of destruction of old chronicles and texts that kept the true history of our ancestors (in more detail: How the true history of Russia was destroyed … (part 1) and How the true history of Russia was destroyed … (part 2)) …

Promotional video:

A creature with a tambourine (!) - apparently a sorcerer? pay attention to the condition of the SANCTUARY
A creature with a tambourine (!) - apparently a sorcerer? pay attention to the condition of the SANCTUARY

A creature with a tambourine (!) - apparently a sorcerer? pay attention to the condition of the SANCTUARY.

RAS

He decided to create a certain body in charge of all science, the same tsar who stole 5508 years of continuous history from the Slavs, who collected and destroyed all the archives that he could get to, who fiercely hated EVERYTHING Russian and idolized EVERYTHING Western - Peter the First (for more details: Riddles of Peter the Great.).

He himself did not have time to finish his idea and Catherine the First continued his work. Following the then fashionable trend, the Russian empress hired German pundits to write Russian history. The fact that some of them did not even know the Russian language did not in the least interfere with her understanding.

Image
Image

It was then that a lie about Rurik's Swedish origin appeared, which left everyone on edge, by the efforts of the Germans, who became the "first" Russian ruler. This is how the Norman theory was born.

Indicative is the list of all academicians of the Russian academy from to (open the link).

Professor A. A. Klesov in his interview quoted O. Balanovsky, head of the laboratory of genomic geography at the Institute of General Genetics of the Russian Academy of Sciences: “Studying the Slavs is like studying the fascists” - it was very clear, right?

Balanovsky OP is a very typical, I would say in a certain sense, * academic * person …
Balanovsky OP is a very typical, I would say in a certain sense, * academic * person …

Balanovsky OP is a very typical, I would say in a certain sense, * academic * person ….

But back to the parody of the historical film. The leading researcher of the Institute of Slavic Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences (member of a specialized council), member of the Archaeological Commission of Antiquities - Petrukhin V. Ya. Sounds logical, right? Who else can be consulted if not the MAIN "Slavist" of the RAS? But it looks logical if you don't know the details of his biography:

Since 1991 - professor at the JEWISH University in Moscow, lecture courses on the history of Russia in antiquity and the Middle Ages, the history of JEWS in Russia in antiquity and the Middle Ages, introduction to archeology, archaeological practice. Since 1995 - Member of the Academic Council of Scientists and Teachers of Jewish Studies at the universities of the Sefer Center, participated in the study of SLAVYANO-JUDAISTIC relations.

Petrukhin V. Ya. - Jewish coordinator of Slavic studies?
Petrukhin V. Ya. - Jewish coordinator of Slavic studies?

Petrukhin V. Ya. - Jewish coordinator of Slavic studies?

Since 1999 - COORDINATOR of the Khazar project at EUM, member of the organizing committees of the international symposia "Khazars" in Jerusalem (1999) and Moscow (2002). Ardent supporter of the Norman theory.

Can you imagine - a Jewish activist and researcher of Khazaria, in charge of the RAS - SLAVIC STUDIES and consults a film on the history of the Slavs! It’s hard to come up with more mockery …

The consultant is in such a day … one of ours
The consultant is in such a day … one of ours

The consultant is in such a day … one of ours.

From such a symbiosis of priests and academicians who hate the Slavs, a film was born - dishonoring our ancestors, and even with our money. This is truly an example of the resourcefulness of the nation, which has entered into proverbs among our people …

Recommended: