Interest in the inexplicable tragedy associated with the Dyatlov group, which died in early February 1959, is gaining momentum again. Again, people begin to show themselves, convincingly proving that they know exactly the cause of the death of these guys. At the same time, they with such an effort pull the facts onto their theories that one wonders. And they deliberately do not pay attention to those moments, the explanation of which should have helped to understand the cause of death. I drew attention to these facts in the article "Inexplicable moments of the death of the Dyatlov group."
And first of all, we must pay attention to the simply frank suicidal decision in the late afternoon in bad weather conditions to leave the forest, where they built a storage shed on the slope open to all winds, in order to put up a tent there and spend the night.
It is believed that the last photo was taken at about 5 pm at the place where they decided to be located.
It is alleged that the air temperature then dropped to minus thirty degrees. At the same time, even in the photo you can see that a fairly strong wind is blowing. So you can safely lower the temperature to minus forty. As you know, the frost is felt much stronger in the wind, since the heat is simply blown out from under the clothes.
You can spend the night in a tent in such conditions, but you must either heat the stove or have warm sleeping bags. There were no sleeping bags. The stove was dismantled, but not heated. And with what to drown it?
To use the stove, one had to stay in the forest.
A couple of days ago I heard one explanation for this act. It turns out Dyatlov decided to arrange a so-called "cold night". That is, I decided to try to spend the night without a furnace. Therefore, they deliberately left the forest on the mountainside. He allegedly wrote about it in his diary.
Promotional video:
Let's take a look at the diary.
On January 30, 1959, you can read the following lines:
That is, Woodpeckers under a cold overnight stay ALWAYS means the use of a stove!
I am generally surprised that no one pays attention to the fact that the guys took off their warm clothes in such a frost. A tent is not a place where you can spend a long time without warm shoes and clothes in a thirty-degree frost. They could only undress if the stove was HEATING!
Here is another entry from Dyatlov's diary made on January 28:
Although it should be noted that there is no mention here that they undressed even when "the stove is full of heat."
I had to spend the night in a poorly insulated garden house, equipped only with a stove - "stove", which the Dyatlovites apparently used. So that's it. Then the temperature outside was about minus fifteen degrees. I sat all night near the stove, constantly heating it up, because as soon as the wood burned out (and they burned out very quickly) it immediately became cold.
I am quite accustomed to the cold, I was specially tempered, but I had no desire to take off my warm pants and shoes.
Why am I dwelling in such detail on the fact of a very strange decision for the second time to put up a tent on a bare slope and then take off my warm clothes in it?
Because this action is the main cause of death for these guys. Because it turns out that they themselves created ALL the conditions in order to perish. Little of. It seemed a little to them, and they left the tent naked, leaving everything that could keep them alive.
I cannot imagine that out of nine people, no one had any doubts that they were doing deadly. Otherwise, it can only be explained by a sudden loss of reason and a sense of self-preservation. But if you look at their further actions, it is very difficult to say that they have gone crazy. It looks like they still tried to fight for their lives, although initially they did everything to die.
In the future, I want to consider the version of the "snowboard". This theory supposedly explains their behavior, but I have serious doubts.
Finally, let me remind you once again that I do not even consider versions with the participation of aliens and high-ranking poachers. Not because I disagree, but because there is simply nothing to consider. They explain everything easily)
