The publication "ASTRAKHAN FARMER FOUND THE BURIAL OF A SARMAT KNOWLEDGE" was sent to me by Evgeny Tolbin, in which it is said that our archeologists carried out excavation works on an area of 750 square meters in 12 working days. What was it that those who were ordered by the curators from above to dig exclusively for the tree were looking for? After all, no wooden fence or red forest baths were found on this square. This question is answered by Evgeny Tolbin himself, who sent the article, with the words "skeleton size", trying to draw attention to the fact that this is a Giant:
I read the publication with pleasure and did not find any mention of the fact that our archaeologists have found the skeletons of the Giants. Although we can clearly see against the background of the archaeologist - the skeleton is not small. Yes, I understand that now some figures will come running with the words "my not to see anything." Needless to say, when after our film about the Giants, there were figures who objected, for example, "if a sword is for a giant, then why a handle is for an ordinary person." And this despite the fact that the photographs were - Dawmont's sword of the most colorful dimensions. A sword belonging to the Giant Pierre. Or about the Japanese sword "it was mainly used against horsemen":
Interestingly, those who adhere to the version from the category "I was told so", at least sometime think about what they write, how a small Japanese with more than a two-meter sword could fight against a rider? I am already silent about the handle clearly not intended for the dwarf brushes of the Japanese. Look at the photo, it's not that the Japanese's hand won't cover the grip, but this grip is so much larger than the body! For horsemen, as far as I know, there are spears - a very convenient thing. And then, imagine a little Japanese on his belt, how he drags him after him - a rider flies at him … how to get him out of the scabbard? Probably two more Japanese quickly run up and pulling him out must run off at least two meters! How to keep? After all, the handle is very thick! The armpit is probably the same on the rider, trying to somehow lift him. Those who write that the sword is for fighting horsemen, I do not know,Do they ever go into their thoughts. If yes, then there probably with a kerosene lamp wandering through the dark and damp dungeons shouting “um, where are you? I deigned to come down here for Your advice! " And correctly argue that the owner simply tells them not to see something beyond the generally accepted.
Promotional video:
But look not only at the doors, but also at the pictures on the sides:
The installation was given, to peck themes on the Giants, but the pictures themselves were mocking and marked with an indicator of how tall people should actually walk there! But back to finding the Giant. Excerpt from the article:
Now let's look at this very valuable photograph:
Where can you see from this clay that the body was buried? I personally see a body covered with clay; recent black earth has grown on the clay. Where is the cultural layer that geologists love to shout about? Our buildings, dating back a hundred or two hundred years, turned out to be under the ground for many floors, and here is a burial of the 6th century! How deep is the skeleton? Why were not accents highlighted that there is no cultural layer? We see young soil, which is clearly not 14 centuries old, and behind it clay. No cultural debris is visible nearby. We read further scientific and entertainment fantasy:
The burial was found by accident. A farmer, digging a hole near the house, discovered unusual utensils. He handed over the find to the museum and the researchers, together with archaeologists, organized an expedition to the village. After examining the object, they suggested that it may be one of the royal burial mounds - the place of ancient burials of nomads. For 12 days of work on an area of 750 square meters, three graves have already been found with funeral implements - numerous household items, weapons and gold jewelry, next to one of the coffins - a horse's head in a richly decorated harness, which gives reason to assume the high status of the buried.
So they dug 750 square meters, found a couple of skeletons and it immediately became clear that this was a burial, a mound and a cemetery! In our monasteries, where the burials of the nobility are, where on a smaller area you can find much more bodies! I’m already silent on the walking anecdote "next to one of the coffins - the head of a horse in a richly decorated harness." Do you see a noble coffin of a noble person in the photographs? And the horse was also buried, and even with jewelry? They, these archaeologists, suggested that it may be one of the royal burial mounds - the place of ancient burials of nomads. And why did the king roam, the princess drove out of the house or what? The article is summed up with these words:
"At present, the issue of including the research results in the federal target program" Culture of Russia ": security and rescue operations and scientific study of objects is being worked out."
That is, it is clear - the skeletons of the Giants will be recycled, and we will be flooded with stories about nomadic tribes, not saying a word about the fact that the Giant was found there. And the version will never sound there that this is not a burial place, but traces of a global catastrophe. For example, here's a boat dug up:
Was she also buried by the nomads? They won't tell us the truth. The federal target program "Culture of Russia" will take care of this. Did you think they care about culture and the past? Where did they dig at least one brick building to the foundation? Remember that, Zhenya found a stainless gear on the "Clues to History" channel and called the museum, offering it. The curators of the museum probably immediately went to sick leave, that they still haven't called back and now the guys in the comments are joking, “Why did you, Zhenya, stun people so head on? I should have said that I found a wooden gear that looks primitive. Then not only museum scholars would come, but also television”. Or here's an excerpt with a fair comment from the net:
"Thatched huts of Russia, you say?"
"Antique Gothic of Russia"
"Why did they destroy the mills? Third part. New buildings next to the old ones"
Author: Snowfall Bullets