For many researchers and those simply interested in ancient history, the expansion of the Earth is no longer a hypothesis, but an almost logical model, and to some extent a theory. This model explains a lot. In confirmation of this, there is a consequence of Larin's theory about the degassing of the Earth (expansion of metals during the transformation from hydrides, during degassing of hydrogen) or the hypothesis of the absorption of ether by the Earth's core and the gain of mass and volume. The latter in official circles is pseudoscience. But it exists in the minds as a version of the real structure of the Earth.
Video with animation of this process, where all continents like puzzles are added to a common mosaic. There were no oceans initially. And so much water, too. Wegener's hypothesis about the collision of lithospheric plates does not explain many questions. Rather, he explains, but through subduction: the diving of the oceanic plates under the continental ones as they move.
And in principle, this can be discussed and argued for a long time. These ancient maps add oil to the fire:
Orontius Finey. 1531 g.
North America, together with Asia, are so closely connected that they are one continent. There is no Bering Strait. Although Dezhnev passed here in 1648 (the date is strange, since Peter I introduced the chronology of R. H. in 1700). And officially in 1728. this strait was discovered by Bering. Perhaps the navigators and discoverers of the 18th-19th centuries. - these are researchers of the geography, which was already very different from the previous outlines of the continents.
The map also shows that the Caspian Sea is of a different form, Greenland is adjacent to North America. And the islands of Hyperborea are visible. Research: article "Torn Hyperborea".
Next card:
Promotional video:
Gastaldi. World map from the Geography of Ptolemy 1548
Also North America is a single continent with Asia.
There is a hypothesis that tries to explain the large-scale migration of the Eskimos from Asia to America at the time when the glacier existed. That the future residents of Alaska went along it to develop new territories. They live from Greenland to Chukotka, but there are only about 170 thousand of them. If the Bering Strait did not exist then, they simply lived on one large continent in the Arctic zones.
1565 Lafrerie. The same map was redrawn by Forlani-Dechetti in 1570. Shown is the huge southern continent and no Australia. Perhaps Australia is connected to Antarctica (as in the map above).
Let's dwell on this map in more detail, because I found it in good resolution. I increased some places.
But first the question: how over a period of about 50 years. after the discovery of America by Columbus, were such sufficiently detailed maps compiled? Even on later maps, the entire west coast of North America is a blank spot. It turns out that these maps are drawn from more ancient sources? After all, they show Antarctica without ice and the mythical Hyperborea. And Columbus was already floating around to make an audit and establish contacts with those who could survive! And there are grounds for this statement. We look at the enlarged areas in more detail:
I highlighted the city on the map. As in the North. America and on the side of Asia. Officially, there were no cities in North America at this time. Only on the territory of modern Mexico and to the south are the cities of the Mayans, Incas and other Indians. But, as you can see, in the interior of the mainland there are also many cities. Here are some of their names (which I could read): Modana, Lacruz, Callaotor, Coca, Sipola, Tamaka, Tiguar, Aksa.
From Asia: Amagog, Kairam, Pirri, Gaziaf, Rezbi, Sragva. These are not all cities. Could the cartographers of that time be so freethinkers, dreamers, that they inflicted these cities and united the two continents into one? It is because of these inconsistencies with modern geography that the maps of that time are not recognized. There are not only maps of this kind, but also globes:
Globe Behaim, Martin. 1492 year.
Hyperborea, another Caspian and Asia, connected to North America. By the way, on this globe, the Red Sea is shown in red. Those. this name is not just beautiful. And from the fact that either red algae grew here, or some springs with red dissolved compounds were beating from the bottom (black smokers in geology). And the water was brown.
Animation made from one of the old globes. Here the Bering Strait has already formed. But the Pacific Ocean is disproportionately small. Yes, and the continents are also too large for the area of the planet.
Author of the painting: Donato Bramante, Rome, 1477
Pay attention to the globe. Light is water. Africa is connected to some kind of mainland, possibly Antarctica
Another observation on this topic. At one time, alexandrafl from livejournal noticed one interesting fact in old maps:
This picture can only be explained by the fact that the Earth has increased in size and the angular distances between points on the mainland on the map have become different. The continents did not expand - the land expanded through the increase in the area of the oceans.
To this place in the Pacific Ocean, where the Earth is expanding relative to the mid-ocean ridge, I always had questions. This place looks very strange even from the point of view of the hypothesis of subduction. It is very strange how the continents move like a fan from the point of view of the hypothesis of the Earth's expansion. But in the model of the Earth's expansion, this place is understandable. The vertical red line is the mid-ocean ridge, relative to which the ocean floor is increasing. The map is flat, but on the globe everything looks logical. Here, apparently, the Pacific Ocean has grown very quickly.
The area of the ocean in the southern hemisphere in the Antarctic region has also greatly increased. Australia remained in place, while Antarctica moved to the South Pole.
With the expansion, the continents also suffered a lot. There was a large-scale catastrophic mountain building: with volcanism, the release of water, oil to the surface from the depths (formation of coal), combustion of silanes and hydrocarbons. In general, the entire civilization that lived in this place has been erased by the processes of the Earth.
And what could have been the start or the reason for such processes? Because All this happened quickly, catastrophically with consequences for the entire civilization of the Earth, then the mechanism could be triggered due to the fall of a large body in the Taklamakan desert area.
It is possible that a giant comet fell here. Because there are no tektites or a high content of metals in this place, then the version with an asteroid disappears. The comet melted to form sand erosion.
This led to large-scale formations of the Himalayas (inertial crustal shear) and the rupture of the oceanic crust in the Pacific Ocean (as the least thin). The Himalayas are young mountains - sharp peaks, erosion has not yet flattened them. It is not excluded that an imbalance in the Earth's rotation occurred. Probably, the Earth was doing somersaults and the poles were reversed. Some peoples have mentions that the Sun has risen several times in the wrong place. This also provoked floods in the coastal regions of the continents. After this event, our planet has changed beyond recognition.
I do not exclude that such leaps and bounds occur regularly. The earth is expanding constantly, but slowly. But some reasons make her do it in leaps and bounds. Possibly, the pressure in the subsoil rises or the accumulated hydrocarbons or silicas start to burn when the fluid escapes in the form of an oxygen-containing substance. There can be a lot of reasons. We do not know anything about the true structure of the Earth and about its past, even in the period of a thousand or even several hundred years ago.
Author: sibved