Antediluvian Boats Were Found In A Coal Mine, And Earlier - - Mammoth Skeleton - Alternative View

Antediluvian Boats Were Found In A Coal Mine, And Earlier - - Mammoth Skeleton - Alternative View
Antediluvian Boats Were Found In A Coal Mine, And Earlier - - Mammoth Skeleton - Alternative View

Video: Antediluvian Boats Were Found In A Coal Mine, And Earlier - - Mammoth Skeleton - Alternative View

Video: Antediluvian Boats Were Found In A Coal Mine, And Earlier - - Mammoth Skeleton - Alternative View
Video: Baffling Ancient Artefacts Found In Coal...Incredible, They Are Far Older Than We Thought 2024, May
Anonim

Archaeologists cannot explain this.

In early March 2020, news appeared on the Internet: Serbian archaeologists dug up a boat (not one, but a whole fleet) of an era unknown to historians.

Rather, the authors of this find are not archaeologists, but workers of a coal mine, a bucket wheel excavator. The archaeological site and the archaeological museum Viminacium is located next to the quarry. Neighboring specialists were called.

Image
Image

The quarry is located 2 km from the Danube. And the finding of a boat located so far from the riverbed, at such a depth, is extremely strange and inexplicable for modern archeology. There are no official conclusions yet, the boat's wood was transferred for radiocarbon analysis. Although, I would not strongly trust this dating method, since literally several hundred years ago, the content of CO2 in the atmosphere and in trees, respectively, could have been different.

Image
Image
Image
Image

In short: stripping work was carried out in the quarry and the bucket wheel excavator came across some kind of wooden remains. Archaeologists were summoned. In the process of studying and excavating, it turned out that there was not one large boat (measuring 15x2.65 m), but also many smaller vessels. Both made from planks and hollowed out from a tree trunk.

Promotional video:

Image
Image
Image
Image

The first thing that catches your eye is that the wood is very well preserved. At that depth of 7 meters, the age of the finds should be, according to the calculations of archaeologists, 70 thousand years. This cannot be, because in this place, the deepest finds were found 2-3 m below the surface and they are attributed to the Roman period.

These boats are not burial, but buried by some kind of cataclysm. Either a huge flood on the Danube, which is not described in history, or a flood, which destroyed the Roman cities here too.

Image
Image

This photo is very interesting. It shows metal nails with a wide head. Or is it studs for tightening the boards. In general, when the boat was made, people already knew how to smelt metal. The boat is in dark silt layers. It can be both river sediments and volcanic ash. An analysis of trace elements is needed to determine what these layers are and how they were formed.

Remember the Serbian archaeologist in this video. His name is Miomir Korach. Below I will show another video with him, which he will most likely try to keep silent about, because this fact of finding boats and a find made earlier in the same quarry, at the same depth, do not fit chronologically.

This video is more informative, it better shows the details of the wooden structure of a large boat, the scale of the quarry, in which layers the boats are located. View both from below and from above - I recommend looking at and evaluating this picture. After reviewing the questions, I have no questions left.

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Forged iron nail in the boat. And there is not one of them. Those. the boat belongs to the Iron Age, not even the Bronze Age. And this cannot be at all. On the second and third slides, I circled the metal staples that held the boards together. Judging by the rust, this is iron.

For me it is clear that boats to such a depth under layers of clay or sandy loam could only be brought in by a large-scale flow of water, silt and mud. Boats do not sink so heap just like that and in such quantity. Those. we can say that the Danube bed was once a huge stream. These boats were buried in it.

This information is not all sensation. In the same quarry, bones and a skeleton of a mammoth were previously found:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

This skeleton was found at about the same depth as the boats. I wonder if Serbian archaeologists will compare this? Or would they prefer to remain silent?

In this video, made in 2009, the same Miomir Korach says that a mammoth was found millions of years old. Now we can see it: the bones are at the same depth as the boats.

The bones of the mammoth, or rather the mammoths, were transferred to the newly built pavilion of the museum
The bones of the mammoth, or rather the mammoths, were transferred to the newly built pavilion of the museum

The bones of the mammoth, or rather the mammoths, were transferred to the newly built pavilion of the museum.

The fact that the Roman city Viminacium was located here - modern Kostolac, on the basis of the excavations of which the archaeological museum was made - adds fuel to the fire. And this city is completely destroyed to the foundations. According to the official history, the city was finally destroyed by the Huns (almost all destruction in Eastern and Central Europe is attributed to them). And around the city (and inside it), 14,000 graves (supposedly graves) were found.

But the fact that these are not graves, but the place where people died in the mudflows of the flood, can be judged by the video from these excavations:

Scattered skeletons. Their huge number around the city suggests that people tried to flee. But the element was large-scale and sudden. Did not make it. The boats did not help either. The mammoths were not saved either. The conclusion from these finds is that mammoths still lived during the days of the existing Roman Empire.

Viminacium is also called the Balkan Pompeii. And there is a reason. It was a big city, and now it is many meters deep. People in this particular place did not live after the destruction:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Its walls are depicted on many ceramic tablets. There were also many finds of utensils and jewelry (including gold ones).

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

Almost only the foundations of the buildings remained from the city. At what depth are the foundations of buildings, you can judge from this photo:

Image
Image

Depth: 3-4 m. There is not a single wall on the surface. Those. we conclude that the flow was rapid and simply erased the city. And the Huns have nothing to do with it. Where could so much water come from..

Author: sibved