Trump's impeachment - a Jewish conspiracy? Even asking such questions is dangerous. Christian news site TruNews has been branded as anti-Semitic and banned by the Jewish-dominated company YouTube for such claims. Jewish members of Congress want the White House to beware of news sources calling impeachment a Jewish conspiracy. Since then, PayPal has also banned TruNews for allegations that Jeffrey Epstein led a Mossad operation to lure leading US political figures into further blackmail.
But it cannot be denied that Jews played the most prominent and public roles in the impeachment process. The most prominent were the two congressmen who held the House hearings: Adam Schiff, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and Jerry Nadler, head of the House Justice Committee. They were both named prosecutors in Senate court hearings, with Schiff serving as the chief prosecutor.
Both Democratic lawyers at the House hearing were Jewish: Norm Eisen of the Justice Committee and Daniel Goldman of the Intelligence Committee. A number of the most prominent witnesses called by the Democrats were also Jews, among them Alexander Windman and Gordon Sondland.
Surprisingly, all three legal scholars summoned by the Nadler committee - Noah Feldman of Harvard, Michael Gerhard of the University of North Carolina, and Pamela Carlan of Stanford - were Jewish, and pronounced. Gerhard is a member of the scientific community of the Center for Advanced Study of Judaism. Herbert Katz and the University of Pennsylvanian, who lectured on law in Judaism. Karlan herself described herself as a "hot-tempered Jewish bisexual," and Feldman is the director of the Harvard Jewish and Israeli Law Studies Program.
As a result, it turns out that the impeachment was a project in which Jews of left-wing and democratic party affiliation were numerically predominant, Jewish lawyers of the Democrats interrogated Jewish witnesses in the committees of the House of Representatives, led by Jewish congressmen. All of this has been tirelessly and joyfully covered by Jewish-run media giants such as MSNBC, CNN, and the New York Times.
The only thing that may surprise in this situation is the publicity with which the Jews played their part. In the olden days, Jews used names that sounded like the names of the Anglo-Saxon Protestant population in order to distract the public's attention from their Jewish background, and non-Jews were often used by them as a veil on the surface of movements dominated by Jews, as was the case, for example, among radical left in the United States until the 1960s.
I am convinced that this brazen attempt is an indicator of Jewish power in America in 2020: Jews are now confident enough to take part in such actions calmly, knowing that their role will not be marked in public discourse.
Indeed, it is likely that the average white American will view the hearings of Jewish lawyers and government officials as ordinary white cases - for him there is not an ounce of Jewishness in them.
Promotional video:
This is not at all accidental, since the share of Americans who are convinced that television and cinema are run by Jews was only 22 percent in 2008, while in 1964 there were about 50 percent of them, despite the obviousness of such a situation for any who delves into the topic. Fear of looking at ethnic realities or brainwashing to such an extent that those realities cease to exist are key factors in the power of the new Jewish-dominated American elite.
Donald Trump has made the basis of his election campaign the awakening of hatred of this elite. His statements and comments on immigration ("Paris is no longer Paris", "Mexico is sending its worst people to us") and his defense of a peaceful foreign policy have been wake-up calls for an establishment seeking mass immigration and endless wars in the Middle East to protect Israel. His election victory was a violent invasion of the White House that challenged the entire political spectrum, from radical left to right-wing neoconservatives, including lobbyists for cheap labor like Paul Ryan.
Trump's campaign was populist to the core - its whole point was to avoid coinciding with the opinion of the elite. And Jewish American intellectuals have long shown their hostility to populism. I spoke about this in the fifth chapter of my book The Culture of Criticism.
But the Trump phenomenon went far beyond rational content. It was an unconscious white riot, driven by the fear of living as a white minority in America of the black and brown majority - a fear that was not unfounded.
However, Trump's positioning towards the white population has worked both ways, inspiring both support and resistance, especially among Jews.
In curious contrast to their American compatriots of similar socioeconomic status, about 70-80 American Jews vote Democratic. Even so, the way they gutted Trump during his 2016 campaign went beyond all limits.
That is why it is not unusual with what fury and malice the elections were received. The Washington Post ran with the headline "Trump Impeachment Campaign Started" on the day of the president's inauguration.
I believe that the current political crisis should be seen as a struggle between our new predominantly Jewish elite, which began during the first great wave of immigration of 1880-1920, with the traditional white Christian majority of America, rooted in colonial and pre-revolutionary times, and supplemented by the subsequent white Christian immigration. This new elite, although already influential before World War II, expanded its influence significantly in the 1950s. The 1950s are generally considered a serene and peaceful time of prosperity, but in reality it was a time of violent Kulturkampf (cultural strife) that raged behind the facade of prosperity and periodically burst out. The most striking episodes were associated with the scandalous activities of Senator Joseph McCarthy.
An emerging elite destroyed Senator McCarthy, despite later emerging evidence that he was, for the most part, right. Of course, it is a coincidence that most of those involved in McCarthy's indictment were Jews. McCarthy's crusade can be seen as the last gasp of traditional America. That is why the populist Trump's rebirth of conservative America was seen by our elite as a real disaster.
The new elite really came to power during the countercultural revolution of the 1960s. This decade saw the entry into force of the Immigration Act of 1965, launching immigration from around the world and a civil rights movement that has now morphed into what is virtually anti-white identity politics.
I was in the camp of the left in the 1960s. I often say that if someone asked me then what America would look like in half a century, I would answer that it is fairer, but I could not foresee the demographic transformation. I could not imagine that, like mushrooms after the rain, the sources of hatred towards whites in the media and academia would grow.
I said that this new elite is predominantly Jewish in the sense that Jews constitute its integral core. This core promoted certain views on immigration, multiculturalism, foreign policy (especially with respect to Israel), and color and gender identity politics, which now reached an undeniable consensus among both elites and the West in general. But these views prevailed in the Jewish community long before the 1960s, in which they were radically different from those of the rest of America at that time.
For example, the organized Jewish community has promoted Israel's interests since 1948, overcoming opposition from the previously dominant group of white Christians in the State Department who determined foreign policy.
More importantly, the Jewish community has been actively involved since the late 19th century in resisting immigration restrictions and in promoting America as a nation of immigrants open to all the peoples of the world.
This is how Professor Otis Graham commented on the John F. Kennedy Anti-Defamation League (ADL) being put on the cover of a book promoting mass immigration and written by one of the league's ghost writers.
Thus, despite the bombastic rhetoric, the increase in the flow of immigrants was only a means of ethnic protection through a demographic, political and cultural attack on Euro-Americans. This can be seen in the words of Jewish leaders up to the 1920s.
Jewish organizations today are deeply involved in punishing those who voice disagreeable opinions about immigration and other important issues. An example of TruNews is proof of this. This may sound like an abrupt change, but freedom of speech is by no means a traditional value in Jewish communities. And today, Jewish organizations (like the ADL) or organizations that receive Jewish funding and staffing (such as the SPLC) are unified in pushing for the introduction of the term "hate crime" into the laws of countries across the West. Jewish groups in Europe have long demanded penalties for “hate speech” and criticism of Israel. They have already done well in Britain, France, Germany, and many other countries.
In the United States, these organizations have taken a leading role in etching dissidents from social media and financial institutions. This has been possible thanks to close ties with Facebook, Google, Twitter and Microsoft in the name of combating cyber hacking, which includes pressure on YouTube to remove accounts associated with the alternative right. Also, these organizations have repeatedly engaged in persecution of dissidents, clarifying and publishing their data, which for dissidents often ended in the loss of housing and livelihood. Not long ago, ADL chief Jonathan Greenblatt spoke to Congress and argued that social media was not doing enough to combat hate speech and demanded that Congress intervene. This is a violation of the First Amendment.
Jewish lobbyists even urged President Trump (who, despite their fears, pursues a policy of appeasement, for example, recognizing Jerusalem as the capital of Israel) to sign an emergency presidential decree banning and having jurisdiction over criticism of Israel in universities. The Foundation for the Protection of Personal Rights in Education commented:
Of course, the leadership of the institution already has a lot of experience in the suppression of freedom, even traditional conservatives are giving in, under the pressure of critics and threats from the left radicals from the campus.
In fact, Trump's emergency decree includes language that could be interpreted to put pressure on an article like this because it could be tailored to fit the criteria for the content of “stereotypical judgments about Jews in particular, or about the power of Jewish communities, such as Jewish control of the media., economy, government and other social institutions”- this is how anti-Semitism is defined by the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
As always, truth cannot be a defense against such actions.
The new elite was on the verge of an all-out victory in 2016. If Hillary had won, things would have gone decently on all fronts - from foreign policy towards the Middle East and Russia to an increase in immigration (which was already tried during the Obama presidency), amnesty for illegal immigrants, lifting fines for illegal border crossing and promoting multiculturalism to weaken the white majority.
These conditions would increase the likelihood of imposing European-style harsh penalties for speaking out about immigration and racial diversity, which would be approved by the Supreme Court, which Hillary would expand by judges like Elena Kagan, who have repeatedly expressed a desire to limit the application of the First Amendment to any speech. about racial diversity.
As Angelo Codevilla wrote (out of touch with the Jewish context):
Of course, Trump's election did not translate into the implementation of his promised program. The wars in the Middle East have continued, revealing the priorities of Trump's donors Sheldon Adelson, Bernard Marcus and Paul Singer, who jointly invested a quarter of a billion dollars in Trump's re-election. As for immigration, there have been a number of improvements on the southern border, but promises to lower the threshold of legal immigration (which should have been done when Republicans had control of both houses of Congress) and to revoke the right to American citizenship by birth (yes, an emergency decree will immediately overturn the court, so what?) were not met. The US is still heading into the future of the white minority.
Given Trump's unsuccessful efforts to influence fundamental change, why would Schiff and company put such enormous energy into a doomed impeachment scenario?
Because they cannot do otherwise. I believe the very “gut intolerance” I noted above is motivated by parallels between Trump's electoral base - the white working class - and the National Socialist white workers in Germany in the 1930s. This phenomenon deeply traumatized Jewish intellectuals, who at the time were deeply immersed in the ideas of the classical Marxist class struggle. This was of great importance in the reasons for the shift indicated by the Frankfurt School - a shift towards the formulation of Jewish racial interests. White ethnocentrism became a serious problem in the way of this, and the solution to this problem was propaganda aimed at demonizing any white racial identity (which soon became the leading idea in academic impulses,distributed by members of the Jewish community) and the importation of colored populations to destroy white political identity.
As always, this Jewish attempt to stifle Trump populism in the bud was carried out with the great psychological zeal that has always been a hallmark of Jewish activism. My observation is that there is a critical mass of Jews among the Jews who are extremely committed to any cause of fundamental importance to the Jewish community. Constant, non-stop and immediate activism, the desire to work for the good of the cause tirelessly. This commitment goes hand in hand with a slippery slope style of argumentation - any tiny hint of dislike for Jews is immediately presented as the first step towards the massacre of Jews.
This is how Peter Novick describes this behavior in The Holocaust in American Life:
In the event of impeachment, psychological zeal is motivated by the fear of Trump's re-election and becoming him in a position much more suitable for global change. During the Senate hearing, Adam Schiff said just that.
So is Trump's impeachment a Jewish conspiracy? Of course, such statements require qualifications. The Democrats may have "skewed" demographically, but the party still has a lot of white non-Jews. At the same time, there are Jews defending Trump, like Jay Sekulow, one of the president's lawyers, or Stephen Miller, trying to push the administration's line on immigration. Plus, there are the above-mentioned Jewish sponsors of Trump, albeit thereby creating bipartisan support for Israel and tilting Republicans to the left on immigration issues.
But yes, this is a Jewish conspiracy. More broadly, the entire post-1965 American regime should be viewed as a Jewish conspiracy driven by fear and hatred of the white people who inhabited America before 1965.