I have already written quite a lot about the discrepancy between the usual idea of the appearance of Christian churches and crosses with those that we see in the drawings and engravings of travelers to Muscovy of the eighteenth century. And I still think it's important. If you have not read about the meaning of "poppies", "onions", tops of temples - please start with the article Tops of Slavic-Aryan Temples.
We are talking about such churches and crosses, as in the picture from Meyerberg's album:
Kolomna. Album Meyerberg * Types and everyday paintings of Russia in the 17th century *.
In the article Journey to Dorosiyaniya, the author Kadykchanskiy writes:
In the article Tops of the Slavic-Aryan Temples, many answers to these questions were found, but I forgot one thing - there is no need to look for ancient drawings - you can see such structures today with your own eyes. Both the shape of the dome and the crosses. Everything is the same!
Promotional video:
Over the mountains
The last of the four Transcarpathian committees is Maramorosh (or Maramuresh), “just around the corner” even relative to the rest of Transcarpathia.
Beyond Vinogradovo, the Volcanic Ridge turns to the south, separating from the main highland, and the basin behind it is Maramorosh. The only entrance there is the Tisza valley, along which in 1918 the committee was divided between Romania and Transcarpathia.
The Tisza, which flows into the Danube far, far to the south, is the main river of Transylvania, and its sources are in Maramoros. This is the real Transylvania, and even the first owner of the komitat was the knight Dragos Voda, the founder of the Moldavian principality, and according to the legend known here, the distant ancestor of Prince Dracula.
The capitals of Maramoros have historically been Siget-Maramursky (now in Romania) and Khust, standing just at the entrance to this valley, and becoming the center of its Czechoslovak-Soviet-Ukrainian part. The third largest city of Transcarpathia (35 thousand inhabitants), a major transport hub, a bazaar city with several monuments of the Transylvanian Middle Ages.
From Vinogradov to Khust - only 20 kilometers, but first you have to cross the ridge. The map clearly shows that the Tisza valley is a narrow "gate", which predetermined the history of the Maramorosh region.
Near Khust, in several villages, unique wooden churches have been preserved, which are called Maramorosh Gothic, or the wooden Gothic of Potisya.
Perhaps the most famous is the Intercession Church from Kanora.
Sorry, I did not find a description in Russian, but there is a lot about the church on Ukrainian sites.
And here's another one:
Church in Aleksandrovka, Ukraine.
There are a lot of them.
Transcarpathian region, metro Svalyava, Bystry village.
The village of Huklivy (Ugric Zugo), Volovets district, Transcarpathian region.
The village of Podobovets (Ugric Padoc), Mizhgirya district, Transcarpathian region.
The village of Izki (ug. Iszka), Mizhgirya district, Transcarpathian region.
Well, this is the Carpathians and western Ukraine - you say: “Okay. Impact of European Gothic Culture!"
Is it so?
Catholic occupation
Alexander Vladimirovich Pyzhikov - Doctor of Historical Sciences, served as Deputy Minister of Education of the Russian Federation - talks about geocentricity - the pivotal axis of Russian history, laid down in the second half of the seventeenth century. That the term "Kievan Rus" was introduced to please the Romanovs and, in fact, everything was exactly the opposite.
According to Pyzhikov's version, under the Tatar-Mongols, the inhabitants inhabiting the territory of northeastern Russia were hiding. He does not utter the words of Tartarus and Tartary, does not speak about moguls, well, let's leave this question aside for now. He tells how from the territories of Poland and supposedly "Kievan Rus" the unceasing expansion went to the east, inspired by the Catholic West. And it was these captured territories that, in response, experienced the brunt of the "Tatar-Mongol yoke".
Pyzhikov calls pro-Western forces invaders and occupiers and deduces that, gaining a foothold in the occupied Slavic territories, they built fortresses and outposts, in which they were actually in a state of siege, given the "great love" of the indigenous people for them. The colonialists were able to gain a foothold only in the upper Volga. Where they failed to gain a foothold, the peoples began to be called "nasty".
And these outposts were destroyed, burned along with the temples, which we call the Tatar-Mongol invasion, people were killed mercilessly because they were treated like colonialists.
But Alexander Pyzhnikov specifically clarifies that churches and monasteries were ALWAYS outside the walls of fortresses.
In total, the territory of Poland and western Ukraine was strongly influenced by "European culture and religion." And according to Pyzhnikov, they were occupied by the colonialists with the support of the Catholic Church.
Is it possible that the “Gothic of Maramaros” are traces of this influence?
Pyzhnikov, however, claims that the "occupation" did not reach the upper reaches of the Volga!
But then what about Kolomna and even Moscow, where at Mayerberg and in the drawings of other travelers we see exactly the same churches and the same pommels (the language does not dare to call it crosses)? The same thing that is now preserved in Ukraine (do not hiss, I am writing as they taught me at school "on". I do not want to offend anyone.)
Some more crosses
These are crosses, right?
And this is a cross?
Georg Adam Schleissing * Derer beyden Czaaren in Reussland Iwan und Peter Alexewiz *.
The same thing as here, in the distance on the spiers.
And here is the drawing of Princess Sophia.
The most interesting drawing, in itself. I would write an article about him, but still, let's talk about the crosses. There in the background! Maybe she's in Kiev?
Well, then how to explain this? This is Olearius. The Moscow Kremlin. What the red arrows point to - look. Well, the blue one is for the Russian watch.
Author's version
It would be dishonest to leave the reader without a version, to deal with this mishmash of oddities yourself, but it is not enough to voice it, you have to provide a ton of examples and proofs. Moreover, an inexperienced reader will not understand at all what it is about. Are there not many crosses on the temples now?
Anyway….
Once again, here we see nothing more than evidence of a clear discrepancy between the real past and the proposed official history. I don't know if these crosses were parts of some energy systems (such versions are often put forward). But it is hard to call these tops Christian crosses.
What's the matter?
There are many confirmations that Muscovy up to the 19th century, yes, up to the nineteenth, was part of Tartary, and not Russia or Russia. With its own statehood and religion, in which, apparently, other confessions (including Christianity) were also calmly treated, but it was not the main one.
The disintegration of Tartary ended with the war of 1812, Muscovy was captured, St. Petersburg became the capital of the state. History has been rewritten.
Many articles on our website are proof of this scenario.
Again, this study is just a piece of the puzzle; it would be ridiculous to make such loud statements based on it alone.
Euterpe, are you? Where did I go, huh?
And what's underneath me: water? grass?
sprout of lyre heather, bent by such a horseshoe, that happiness seems to be
such that maybe
how to amble from a gallop
so fast and breath is not knocked down, neither you nor Calliope know
Joseph Brodsky New Stanzas to Augusta.
P / S
Those who decide to speculate on the topic of the great ukrov and nasty Muscovites, I will note that at the time in question in this article there was a SINGLE STATE and this, not Kievan Rus, excuse me! But not Muscovy either! That's what Pyzhikov's video is for. This state included both the now Ukrainian lands and Muscovy and the Carpathians and many others. And even more than that, the word "state" implies the presence of a sovereign, which was not, or rather, the form of government and the names were different! So please download elsewhere. In addition to everything, this article was written to show the unity of peoples and "nations" - a concept, by the way, I repeat, which arose only in the 19th century! And yes, there are three bright fragments of the PR-language - Russian, Ukrainian and Belarusian, which should be considered as a whole. For they were all distorted, but in different ways. And by the common fragments,Perhaps it will still be possible to restore something, just without pushing as if on a delivery, figuring out who was behind whom and who was Aryan and who was not.
Author: Sil2