The war in Syria, which is expected from day to day, could end with World War III, as both experts and ancient prophecies say. Moreover, it is already clear that 20 countries can be drawn into the operation declared as a three-day bombardment in order to prevent the use of chemical weapons against civilians.
“If the Americans go for a ground operation, Russia may well get involved in the war. Then it will definitely be the Third World War, - said the Russian military expert Viktor Baranets. - Of course, Iran will side with Syria, ready to deploy several million bayonets, and then Israel can get involved. In general, everything will be very serious."
Several prophecies at once say that the end of the world will be provoked by the war in Syria. So, the famous clairvoyant Vanga repeatedly spoke about the upcoming global change in the world, however, without naming the exact date. “Is this time coming soon? No, not soon. Syria has not yet fallen! Syria will collapse at the feet of the winner, but the winner will not be the same! Russia alone will be saved. There is an ancient Indian (Aryan) teaching. It will spread throughout the world. New books will be published about him, and they will be read everywhere on earth. This will be the Fire Bible. The day will come and all religions will disappear! New teaching will come from Russia. She will be the first to cleanse herself."
The Revelation of Ivan the Theologian "Apocalypse" describes the events preceding the end of the world and the second coming of Jesus Christ: "The sixth Angel sounded the trumpet, and I heard one voice from the four horns of the golden altar standing before God, saying to the sixth Angel, who had a trumpet: release the four Angels connected by the great river Euphrates ". The four angels set free at the Euphrates River are Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran, through which this river flows.
According to the scriptures of another prophet Isaiah, Damascus will turn into a heap of ruins: “Damascus is excluded from the number of cities and will be a heap of ruins. The cities of Aroer will be abandoned - they will remain for the herds that will rest there, and there will be no one to frighten them. The stronghold of Ephraim and the kingdom of Damascus with the rest of Syria will not become; with them will be the same as with the glory of the children of Israel, says the Lord of hosts."
Now the issue of bombing is slipping in the US Congress. But it is possible that the Americans will return to this topic in a few weeks or months.
“Obama has repeatedly made it clear that he does not trust Assad. The Americans may demand the export and destruction of Syria's chemical reserves, but Damascus will not agree to that. An escalation of the conflict may occur again,”said Russian political analyst Sergei Markov.
Promotional video:
There is a way out of the crisis
There was a chance to avoid the bombing of Syria and, accordingly, a possible Third World War. Barack Obama agreed with Russia's proposal not to attack Syria if Damascus transfers chemical weapons under international control. Damascus doesn't seem to mind.
“This proposal was agreed in advance and it is very beneficial to the Syrian side, since the threat of an attack on the chemical depots of the militants was very real,” said Russian orientalist Said Gafurov, who met with the Syrian Foreign Minister on Monday. - Chemical reserves will remain in Syria, but will be under the control of international experts. It is even advantageous for Syria to declassify these warehouses, since they exist not so much for the use of these weapons as for intimidation of a potential adversary, Israel. At the same time, such a way out of the crisis is beneficial for Obama - Congress will not give him permission to bomb and somehow the president will have to abandon his military plans."
World War III - US strategy
In 1938, England and France pushed Hitler into war with their own hands, allowing him to occupy Czechoslovakia and authorizing the Anschluss of Austria. But then the onset of the brown plague could have been stopped. Had London and Paris been more determined, Europe would not lie in ruins in 7 years and there would not have been 70 million dead. A new global empire, the United States, has grown on the European ashes. North America received huge financial income from both World War II and Europe's post-war reconstruction, and was able to fully recover from the effects of the Great Depression.
Now we are in the initial phase of a global crisis that may last for ten years, and similar, and possibly even stronger than the depression that befell the world in the 20-30s of the last century. But the US is already preparing to overcome the crisis.
At the same time, the United States creates conditions both for the process of reindustrialization, the restoration of North American industry in the full technological cycle, and for the appearance of an enemy with whom, after the end of the crisis, a new world war could be unleashed that could give the United States more than 100 years of progressive economic development.
Over the past 10 years, the Americans have made a significant step in the development of their fuel and energy complex, which influenced the change in US policy in the Middle East. If 10 years ago the White House, conducting military interventions, pursued the goal of controlling a comfortable level of oil prices, now the United States is interested in only one thing - to increase the difference in quotations between the exchange grades of Brent oil traded in Europe and WTI, quoted on North American market. The USA benefits from the growth of Brent quotations, since it allows to lower production costs in America relative to Europe and Asia without reducing the cost of labor.
With the change in goals, so did politics. America does not seek to create controlled regimes in the Arab world, whose task would be to ensure uninterrupted supplies of oil and gas. Now the US is leaving behind civil war chaos, death and destruction.
The United States set fire to the entire Middle East and North Africa - Brent crude oil quotes remain above $ 110 per barrel, in Europe and China there is a reduction in production. However, if we look at the countries through which the so-called Arab Spring has recently swept through, we will see that secular nationalist regimes have formed in all these countries.
Despite the specific conditions for Europeans, the development of nation states in the Middle East and North Africa is similar to the development of nation states in Europe from the late 19th century until the outbreak of World War II. After the collapse of the continental empires caused by the aftermath of the First World War, nationalist states were formed in Europe. In many of them, the rights of national minorities and religious confessions were respected. Roughly the same situation was in Libya and Egypt and still persists in Syria. By the way, Iran, one might say, follows the path of Spain during the reign of General Franco.
The strengthening of national states inevitably leads to the formation of an elite, vitally and financially interested in the preservation and enrichment of their national state. And even if the members of the elite were nourished by foreign states, these elites themselves begin to defend national interests, which often run counter to the interests of former sponsors.
For Iran, Syria, Egypt and Libya, the European market is the only one where oil and gas can be supplied with low transport costs. Which means a lower energy price for Europe. But this goes against the US plans for a new industrialization. It is no coincidence that unrest in Syria began exactly after agreements were reached between Syria, Iran and Iraq to lay a gas pipeline through which Iranian gas destined for Europe was to be supplied to Syrian LNG terminals.
In the 30s of the last century, in Europe, not without the influence of Nazi Germany and fascist Italy, with the tacit connivance of France and Great Britain, the elites of the new national states in a short time neutralized democratic institutions, establishing pro-Nazi or pro-fascist regimes. Persecutions of national and religious minorities gradually began. Organizations such as the Muslim Brotherhood, professing radical forms of Islam, can be classified, according to European tradition, as religious pro-fascist organizations. The Muslim Brotherhood, trying to establish radical religious regimes in the Arab world, is sponsored by the closest allies of the United States Qatar, Jordan and Saudi Arabia - countries that are, to put it mildly, not distinguished by either democracy or religious tolerance. Against their background, Iran can be called a state,making huge strides in democratization and in the development of a secular society.
After the chaos sown by the United States in the Middle East, radical religious regimes may form in the Arab world, which will be united into one huge caliphate. Like the Third Reich, this caliphate will have close ties to the US financial world. As in the case of Nazi Germany, many North American bankers and industrialists are interested in creating such a caliphate.
As the American economy emerges from the crisis and a new robotics industry develops in the United States, the religiously extremist caliphate will be able to stockpile enough weapons to wage full-scale war. At the same time, in Europe, which has found itself in a deep crisis, a socio-political situation will arise in which a new authoritarian empire may emerge. At the same time, the role of strangers, on whom it will be possible to write off all the troubles, and, above all, expensive oil, will be played by Muslims or Arabs. World war will become inevitable. The reason may be a terrorist attack on the territory of Europe, which will be a response step to the deportation of Muslims or the organization of concentration camps for Arab terrorists.
The Third World War will bring destruction on such colossal proportions that the United States will be able to develop systematically for more than 100 years without social upheavals on its territory. Not to mention the profits that the Americans are planning to get from the war itself.
In this regard, the unwillingness of Europe and the United States' main ally, Great Britain, to get involved in a war with Syria is understandable. The NATO bloc also decided to distance itself from the Syrian adventure. But, in principle, the US refusal of the alliance only plays into the hands. In the scenario described above, the Americans do not need NATO, because they will try to wage the third world war with someone else's hands, having entered it at the last stage, as was the case in the first and the second world wars. The North Atlantic bloc, on the other hand, may prematurely, and, quite possibly, on the wrong side, involve the Americans in the carnage. Most likely, NATO will face the fate of the UN, which the United States has long disregarded and uses it as a tool to advance its interests exclusively.
The interests of the United States and Europe have never been more opposed than they are now. However, just as in the 30s of the 20th century, France and Great Britain were more frightened by the chimera of the communist threat than by the obvious facts of Hitler's preparation for war, so now Europe prefers to see the threat in Russia rather than admit the obvious fact - the United States has ceased to be the guarantor of the European security and become a force pushing Europe and the world towards a third world war.
Author Maxim Reva
Based on media materials