Now there is no longer any doubt about the fact that in the distant and not very distant past of human civilization, some catastrophic phenomena of a global planetary scale took place, during which most of the previous civilizations were destroyed, and the survivors, after some time, restored what had survived and were used by these survivors. "Developments" of previous civilizations for their own purposes. At the same time, each time there was a new redistribution of the planet by new "elites", a rewriting of a new version of history and a gradual degradation of the level of development in connection with the loss of many technologies of civilizations of the "golden age" and their sacred knowledge.
In the presentation of the presenter and author of the ASPIK channel, a group of independent researchers of the real past - O. Pavlyuchenko, a hypothesis was put forward for three such global floods that occurred in the last centuries at the turn of the XIV-XV centuries and XVII-XVIII centuries, as well as in the middle of the XIX century. The evidence of the latest disaster is the ancient buildings with ground and sedimentary rocks on the ground floors located around the world. There are such buildings in the Moscow region, for example, in the city of Yegoryevsk, whose history goes back more than a century. Which of these buildings have I already drawn the attention of my readers to.
Also, as we found out, the evidence of the catastrophe that changed the position of the poles are churches and temples oriented to the antediluvian pole, which was previously located in Greenland. In all centuries, the orientation to the cardinal points of the same Christian churches was paid great attention, and if we found such a temple, then, most likely, it stands on a more ancient foundation of an “antediluvian” building and itself was built at the same location of the poles.
And according to most independent researchers of real history, the last pole shift occurred during the catastrophe at the turn of the 17th-18th centuries, when the ancient Vedic civilization perished, whose individual buildings and structures, restored during the inter-Flood civilization and partially dug out by ours, we can still observe. Although in the official version of history, pseudo-historical "myths" about their alleged "construction from scratch" in later times were invented on this occasion, by order of monarchs around the world who were strongly and synchronously "fanned from antiquity".
By the way, not only many ancient buildings and structures are oriented towards the old pole, but also the very layout of the streets of ancient cities. That is why, for example, the historical part of St. Petersburg, Kronstadt, Peterhof are oriented in this way. But we see the same in the Moscow region, as was discussed earlier on the example of Yegoryevsk, which, most likely, was built in the inter-Flood period on the ruins of a destroyed ancient city, and therefore retained the same orientation of streets, houses and temples in its historical part.
But today I want to draw your attention not to this, but to completely different traces of the last disaster, which can easily be found on the banks of the largest rivers in the Moscow region. Where earth-moving equipment worked, strengthening the banks and leaving the vertical sections of sedimentary rock layers exposed, even a very superficial study of them allows us to come to quite definite conclusions.
So, according to these very "sections", using the example of the lower course of the Moscow River, it is perfectly visible that the fertile layer is very thin and is only no more than 10 centimeters, and sometimes less. And this is very strange if you blindly believe in the official version of history. We don't live in the desert after all. In addition, ancient Russian chronicles and epics tell about centuries-old groves and dense, impassable forests. With our own eyes, we see that over 150-200 years old there are only individual, miraculously preserved trees, and in very small numbers. Where have all the centuries-old dense forests gone, along with the fertile layer?
Promotional video:
But if we take into account the hypothesis that all these trees, together with the bulk of the fertile layer, were washed away by the waters of the Flood, which came from the North, into the Black and Caspian Seas, then everything falls into place. Of course, during the inter-flood civilization, the vegetation of the Central Russian Plain was gradually restored. But then a new catastrophe came and covered the first floors of cities with streams of melted ice, mixed with various sedimentary rocks that fell from heaven. This happened because of a certain celestial body that collapsed in the Earth's atmosphere about which researchers have no consensus.
But it is precisely because of this catastrophic event that we clearly see layers of these sedimentary rocks in the form of sand and clay under a rather thin modern fertile layer. At the same time, even on these environments it is difficult to understand how deeply hidden from us are the artifacts of ancient and inter-flood civilizations. In some places of the Moscow region, this layer is at least 3 - 5 meters. And, by the way, the hypothesis of three floods quite logically explains to us where these layers of clay and sand were formed here (and not only in the Moscow region) on the site of centuries-old dense forests.
By the way, any of you, while walking along the rivers on ships or even during fishing and hiking trips, can study these characteristic traces of the latest planetary disaster. In addition, for example, in a number of places I have noticed that this layer of sedimentary rocks has a characteristic boundary between the clay (heavier) and sandy (lighter) fractions. And this difference between the upper and lower layers is clearly visible in different color shades. Of course, it should be so. After all, the particles of clay dissolved in the melted ice in the form of mud streams deposited faster than grains of sand. The latter, in the form of dust storms, fell out of the atmosphere much more slowly and longer. So all this is understandable.
But, of course, this is only a hypothesis, and not a 100% proven fact. And, nevertheless, it is worth reflecting on all this. For this hypothesis explains much more logically what we see with our own eyes, in contrast to the largely contradictory and hardly plausible myths of official historians with whom we are familiar from history textbooks. What do you think about this? Maybe there are some interesting assumptions and thoughts, supported by weighty arguments, and not unfounded criticism?
michael101063 ©