Starting to write about the fictional history of mankind, which is set forth in history textbooks, I did not expect to find myself in the dense forest of the past, trying to independently understand the relationship of events in time and get out on the path of historical truth. True, what is historical truth, none of the people knows. Everyone talks about truth based on their subjective ideas about it.
The impetus for throwing myself into a temporary historical abyss was my disbelief in the official legend of the history of the founding of St. Petersburg. Too many obvious absurdities creep out of the official body of those fantasies about the capital on the Neva, which most modern historians, archaeologists, ethnographers, architects, heads of the cities of Leningrad and St. Petersburg and politicians of the highest level tell us about.
As a result of his construction and logical connection of past events on the basis of the history that is presented in textbooks and in the minds of the majority of the population, both in Europe and Asia, he came to the same practical conclusions that researchers, more significant for public opinion, did before me., such as Isaac Newton, Jean Hardouin, Wilhelm Kammeier, Morozov N. A., E. Gabovich, L. Groot, Fomenko A. T. and Nosovskiy G. V. (F&H, below) and many other authors who have also questioned the version of world history that is told by officials in academic robes to gullible citizens.
If the author came to the same "practical conclusions" that are already known, then why repeat them in another publication of a little-known Internet blogger?
I answer: the fact of the matter is that even such well-known to the public as the aforementioned names, they could not come to some statements, which will be set forth below, although individual provisions set forth in the work are contained in some articles of individual authors, such as A. Sibved, Yu. Stepanenko, A. Golubev (Kadykchanskiy), Yuri Shaposhnikov and others.
Many adherents of alternative history ask questions that haunt them:
- What forces are behind the action to destroy both the memory of the human civilization that existed in the recent past, up to the 14th century, and the bearers of the memory - people themselves?
- Were the authors of such a grandiose substitution of the past only the religious leaders of the Vatican and the usual human thirst for profit and the preservation of the power of the governing structures of human society, or was the Vatican led by the true rulers of the Earth, who from ancient times determined the direction of human development?
- What kind of catastrophe arose in the Middle Ages and why did it become necessary to completely destroy the memory of a highly developed civilization of people from biblical times to the middle, approximately, of the second millennium of our era?
- "Why is the historical memory of the peoples of the whole world erased so much that penetration beyond a certain temporary barrier, located somewhere in the Middle Ages, has become practically impossible?" Uwe Topper, "The Great Deception, the Fictional History of Europe."
- Did industrial technologies exist in the relatively recent past in the 11-12 centuries in society, which in their level and development surpassed the achievements of the current civilization of people?
- Is there a connection between the catastrophe in the Middle Ages and the destruction of traces of the memory of the scientific achievements of ancient civilization with the choice of the direction of the post-catastrophic technological development of society, which was carried out in the 16-20 centuries after the adoption by the scientific community of the Newtonian-Einstein-Bohr model of reality?
- Was there a global catastrophe in the 18th century, which destroyed only Tartaria, as many followers of alternative history claim, or was it a worldwide cataclysm a few centuries earlier, resulting in the destruction of hundreds, if not billions of human lives?
The very formulation of the question: "What forces are behind the action to destroy how the civilization of people that exists in the recent past, until the 14th century, and the memory of it?" May shock the reader, far from the problems of the truth of historiography, which he once studied at school …
There are many authors who, due to the one-sidedness of their education, cannot bring together such disparate facts about the disaster. They single out one of the many phenomena, one, and on the basis of their highly specialized knowledge, for example, archeology and the concept of the cultural layer, which is worshiped, as a certain deity draw their conclusions, far from the truth.
Promotional video:
Below is a sample of such writings:
But even these "adherents of a conservative persuasion" who piously believe in a story invented by religious fanatics and spread historical lies throughout the world, are no better than those they talk about with such disdain.
For some reason, their words must be absolutely believed, not trusting their own eyes: for almost a hundred years my family has been living in the city of St. Petersburg, and no one has ever seen the “cultural layer” that covered Nevsky Prospekt 2 meters deep !! !
That is why, not trusting the officialdom on the part of the professional state community, many people independently seek answers to the above questions.
This is especially evident on the Internet forums on alternative history, where there is a tendency to accept the version of researchers like F&N that world historiography, i.e. the stories about the history that modern people are studying is completely fictional. And in the story offered by F&H, periods that belong (according to tradition) from antiquity to the Renaissance are deleted, narrowing the history by thousands of years, with which other alternatives disagree.
When proposing our version of the historical picture, we have to refer to many works of historians and scientists who confirm this or that thesis, which coincide with our own ideas about the sequence of chronological events that create a model of the past of human history as the author of these lines sees it.
Unfortunately, numerous extracts from the works of other authors obscure the created model of the historical past. However, without referring to the opinion of those who much earlier came to the same conclusions that are set out in the article, it is impossible to overcome the skepticism of the reader who adheres to the traditional point of view on the historical past from the "Stone Age" to the present day.
The adherents of official history do not notice that even today, Western historians are engaged in the same thing as European historians of the Middle Ages - rewriting history.
Why not rewrite history once again, if one day, having destroyed the previous segment of human history, do not try to repeat again such a heinous act of turning people into mankurt.
This is how the Anglo-Saxons are changing history ahead of the 75th anniversary of the victors in World War II.
From the latest publications …, in May 2019.
in March 2019 -
"There was no European imperialism." The West is rewriting its history"
Dmitry Kosyrev. "RIA NEWS"
You can find out that in:
If we only touch on the history of Russia, then there are hundreds of thousands of tons of books that tell about events, under a common brand, such as the Mongol-Tatar yoke, which never existed. A yoke, which is created by referring real events in the past along the time axis to earlier times, in those times that disappeared from the historical time of people, at the whim and will of other people or not people.
However, it is impossible with kilograms of new knowledge about the disappeared history of the previous state-civilization to outweigh the tons of lies that are in the heads of politicians and ordinary people, academics and schoolchildren. It is impossible that new knowledge of historical forgery, at the speed of light, flashes a bright glimpse of clarity in the eyes of most people.
To clarify the author's intentions about the structure of this work, a few words about what components will make up the content of the publication:
- Part 1. St. Petersburg is a thorn in the eyes of the official history of modern falsifiers of the past.
- Part 2. A global catastrophe that destroyed civilization in the middle of the second millennium AD. (according to the chronology of Scalius-Petius) and its possible causes.
- Part 3. Evidence of the catastrophe that destroyed the state-civilization created by people in the period from the moment the direct control of human society by the alien gods ceased to the mid-14th century.
- Part 4. Methods and techniques of the Vatican and its masters to destroy the memory of mankind about the recent, lost civilization of people.
- Part 5. A total lie from antiquity to the Middle Ages about the history of mankind, which became true for the majority, but not for all - an introduction to the summary of the book by AT Fomenko, GV Nosovsky. "Reconstruction of World History"
- Part 6. The unity of style and elements of architecture from antiquity to the Middle Ages in the previous civilization of people, as evidence of the existence of uniform building codes in all the back streets of the disappeared state-civilization.
- Part 7. Lost technologies and knowledge of the previous civilization. Einstein's theories of general relativity, special relativity, as alternative directions of development of the model of the physical picture of the world in comparison with the theoretical model of reality in a vanished civilization.
I would like to finish the preface with the words of Uwe Topper, from the book to which I will refer many times - “Great deception. The Fictional History of Europe :
Part 1
St. Petersburg is a thorn in the eyes of official history among modern falsifiers of the past
I'll start with the closing lines of an article written five years ago:
Unfortunately, I did not wait for some of the young scientists to start digging in the layers of the history of mankind covered with sand, trying to find a more or less real picture of the historical reality about St. Petersburg.
I wrote these lines and myself doubted their correspondence to the truth, since the abundance of publications on the topic of alternative history that can be found on the Internet refutes the words written earlier.
Perhaps the articles by Yuri Shaposhnikov “How memory was destroyed. Part 1 - Part 11”is not an attempt to understand all the inconsistency of official historical narratives with the inconsistencies that observational researchers find in the historical past? What a cognitive layer about the past of the peoples of Russia living in territories called Tartaria, was raised by Andrei Golubev (Kadykchansky), and Alexander's articles under the nickname Sibved, how much they shattered the hardened ideas about the methods of building St. Petersburg, about the traces of the flood.
After five years have passed since the writing of the article on the methods of erasing memory, it is necessary to clarify the authors of the deed action for the loss of memory among the peoples of the world - they were not Masons, but representatives of another secret order.
During this five-year period, one idea crystallized, connected with my ambivalent attitude towards Tsar Peter I, who is generally recognized by historical science as a great ruler who changed the course of Russia's development in historical perspective.
The duality lies in the fact that on the one hand, Peter I, who is a high-level Western Freemason, could not perform military deeds that glorify and multiply the power of the Russian Empire, by definition, as a representative of a secret Western society, always promoting, as is generally accepted, the interests of the West.
However, the actions of Peter I to strengthen the statehood of Russia contradict the ideas about the nature of the activities of secret agents of the West in the countries they oppose.
How can one explain the contradictory and ambiguous policy of Peter I in relation to the Russian Empire? Why did the Freemason Peter I not give the ruins of the city on the Neva to the Swedes, but secured the city for Russia, transferring the capital of the empire to such an uninhabited, swampy, cold place, which was the territory at the mouth of the Neva River and at the same time destroyed ancient manuscripts and written monuments of the Russian antiquity, and made incredible efforts to "Europeanize" the Russian population.
The answer to the question asked: why the ancient ruins of the city on the Neva should have become the capital of the Russian Empire, and not Sweden or the city of any other western state - from Holland to Germany, I received for myself, after I realized that that branch of the Masons, whom I represented Peter I, was, is in tough opposition to the Catholic Church.
And so writes the researcher of the activities of European Freemasonry Farah, in the book "Freemasonry and its Activities" published in 1930:
It seems that the person we know as Peter I personified the opposing forces of the remnants of the rulers of the civilization that was destroyed by the recent catastrophe in the Middle Ages.
Vsevolod Ivanov writes about the tasks and goals of Freemasonry in the book "Secrets of Freemasonry":
The events of recent days in April 2019 in France with the burning heart of Paris - Notre Dame Cathedral, do not contradict the idea of continuing battles between the Freemasons and the Catholic Church.
The burning Notre Dame de Paris is a symbol of the war that either subsides or breaks out between the opposing power clans of the past and future times of this human civilization.
Many Christians drew attention to the words of the President of France, Mr. Macron: - " Il nous revient de retrouver le fil de notre projet national, celui qui nous a faits, quinous unit: un projet humain, passionnément français " - "We must to find the thread of rebuilding our national project that made us, that unites us: The Human Project, passionate in French."
Time will tell whether the famous cathedral, rebuilt after the fire, as once in the "pre-middle ages" will be the center of unification of all people, regardless of who people believe in Jesus or Allah, will be a temple of worship of the one God of Catholics and Muslims. But the emergence of fears in the minds of the Christian flock that the cathedral, which stores the relics of Jesus, could become a place of worship for Islam as well, give reason to think that the Masons could be interested in the fire as preachers of the emergence of a new single world religion.
The warring side with the Freemasons were and are the Jesuits, who were the vanguard of monks fighting for the newly emerging Catholic spiritual power of the Vatican over the people. The Jesuits destroyed the memory of the old religion, the disappearing world, which is known to most under the term "pagan" without revealing the content of the essence of this faith.
Peter I, in historiography of not generally accepted execution, was delegated by the Masonic order to Russia to preserve the ruins of the Great City for the subsequent civilization of people, in the hope that someday true knowledge about the past time will become available to all people, and not just a handful of those close to secrets Masonic order.
If the Catholics seized the territory of the Neva Bay, where the ruins of a city covered with mud were found, then Russia and the rest of the world would be deprived of the beauty of architectural masterpieces that Saint Petersburg is filled with. The Jesuits would destroy North Palmyra, just like the 21st century barbarians are destroying the ruins of South Palmyra in Syria.
Remember the history of the Great Patriotic War, when Hitler wanted to raze the city on the Neva to the ground:
And not only so much for the reason that F. Halder writes in his diary - "in order to completely get rid of the population of these cities, which otherwise we will then be forced to feed during the winter", but also to fulfill the wishes of the Vatican about the destruction of such traces past civilization, which is the architectural wonder of Northern Palmyra.
In turn, I also try to imagine a picture of the past, proceeding from both the works of the aforementioned authors, as well as, as a resident of the city of St. many features of the architectural monuments of the most ancient city in the world.
Surprisingly, from the opponent of the ideas of Fomenko A. T. and Nosovsky G. V., relating to the new chronology, became, if not their follower, then an adherent in terms of a new understanding and understanding of the fact that the history that we were taught in schools and universities does not correspond to reality.
I came to these ideas not under the influence of the books of these authors, but on my own, as a result of reading the flow of information that fell upon the inhabitant of Leningrad-Petersburg with the advent of the Internet. I emphasize, on the city dweller of Leningrad-St. Petersburg, in which my family, with interruptions, lived since the thirties of the 20th century. Consider almost one century.
When you live in this city for a long time, when you walk through its streets, courtyards, squares, squares, enter old mansions, you are always amazed by the abundance of architectural masterpieces and small details that make you doubt the official point of view that the city is only three hundred years old. years, with a little hook.
Take a look at A. Zubov's engraving - Panorama of St. Petersburg, painted in 1715.
Here, we must admit A. Zubov is not an engraver, and not an artist who paints what he sees, but a science fiction writer who saw what the city will be like in five years, if in 12 years after the foundation of the city it is possible to build so many things on the embankment of the Neva and, even, manage to build the Peter and Paul Fortress, with a bell tower in shape so similar to the one that was completed in 1720.
Whom to believe? And to Zubov or G. Kachalov, who looked, but saw and painted, but each differently the same object - the Peter and Paul Cathedral!
The wooden church does not look like that depicted by A. Zubov, but Zubov's cathedral forms repeat its appearance, which was completed in 1732. The engraver A. Zubov looked far into the future, not like the draftsmen of the early 21st century, who could not see the needle of Gazprom in 2011, with the same accuracy as in the distant 1715, saw the exact image of the Peter and Paul Cathedral A. Zubov.
I suppose how the adherents of the three-hundred-year history of St. Petersburg will be outraged at the encroachment of the artist's creative imagination, who could foresee the image of the Peter and Paul Cathedral, and contemporary artists from the 21st century, supported by architectural drawings, could not see the exact shape of the needle of the national heritage.
On the left - photography, reality, on the right - drawing - an artistic image. You can compare how strikingly different models of the future are from reality, if they are really artistic images and a drawing made on the basis of a real existing object, such as the Cathedral of the Peter and Paul Fortress, seen by the engraver A. Zubkov, which could not have happened, if you believe the official historians about the date completion of the construction of the cathedral.
Continued: Part I-2
Damkin
