From the ancient myths and legends of many peoples, it is known that once upon a time there were wars on Earth between certain highly developed beings who were called gods and demons. Researcher of the ancient history of mankind, candidate of geological and mineralogical sciences Alexander Koltypin describes the consequences of their battles:
“This led to a sharp deterioration in the climate - the tightening of the earth's surface with a continuous cover of clouds, abundant rainfall and a cold snap. Hunger began on Earth. In the end, irreconcilable rivals were forced to unite in order to carry out urgent measures to restore more or less suitable conditions for life on the planet.
These measures boiled down to the separation of a large piece from the Earth, which was supposed to become its satellite (at that time, apparently, there was no Moon on Earth), and the promotion of our planet due to its removal from it.
It is difficult to say what exactly this was required for - an increase in gravity and the ability to live on the surface of the Earth of giants, the preservation in the atmosphere of the remains of a water-vapor layer (and here), which raised the temperature of the Earth, restrained the penetration of harmful ultraviolet radiation and was the main factor in longevity, or creating conditions for immortals in the region of the north and south poles. It cannot be ruled out that the separation of the Moon from the Earth was necessary to change its orbit and the nature of its motion around the Sun - who can now say for sure about this?
The unwinding of the Earth and the detachment of a large piece from it, which later became the Moon, is apparently described in the Indian legend about the churning of the ocean in the region of the world Mount Meru (North Pole) by Adityas, Daityas, Danavas, snake-people and many-armed creatures headed by Vishnu and in the Aztec the legend of the spinning of the firmament around the world mountain Koualkan (the axis of the Earth), like a drill, Camastli - Mishcoatl, Tlaloc, Ship or Tezcatlipoca.
According to Indian legend, after the gods "whipped" the ocean with Mount Mandara, the Moon appeared in the sky. This happened, according to my estimates, at the turn of the Early and Middle Miocene (about 16 million years ago).
The appearance of the Moon in the sky is reflected in the Egyptian myth of the abdication of Ra from the throne in favor of Thoth, according to which they began to replace each other on the throne and day began to alternate with night, and the Moon appeared in the sky. It is also described in the Sumerian myth of the Mountain of Heaven - in the episode of the birth of Ninlil in the thickness of the Earth of the moon god Nannu, who was destined to ascend to heaven to illuminate the Earth and show mortals the change of times - and in the Akkadian and Babylonian poem "When Above" - in the episode on the creation of the moon by Marduk:
Promotional video:
Then he created the moon, entrusting the night to her. He bestowed the crown on the moon to measure time with its serrated horns. The day was given by Marduk to Shamash ….
The appearance of the Moon in the sky is described in the legends of almost all other peoples living on Earth - I have repeatedly drawn attention to this in the book "Battles of the Ancient Gods" and put a number of myths on this topic in the work "World coverage of legends about the separation of the Moon from the Earth" …
The separation of the Moon from the Earth led to one of the most terrible global catastrophes in the entire history of the Earth, which was accompanied by a great flood, strong earthquakes and large-scale volcanic eruptions. The Deluge and the Age of Darkness, described in most Nahua and Aztec myths as "the collapse of the heavens", marked the end of the Fourth World Age under the rule of Chalchiuhtlicue …"
Continuing the topic, Alexander Koltypin in one of the articles describes his further insights and discoveries:
“I finished the paragraph about the separation of the Moon from the Earth (the book“The Battles of the Ancient Gods”) and went to see a film about the Moon in order to rest a little. and new confirmations. The main ones are the same age of the Earth and the Moon (approximately 4.5 billion years), the presence on the Moon of the same rocks as on the Earth, and the presence on the Moon of typical terrestrial relief elements - mountain ranges, ridges and gorges.
Further more. Browsing the news on the Internet, I saw a huge number of pages telling about the supposedly classified NASA photographs of the ruins of an ancient city on the Moon, and then the photographs themselves appeared to my eyes.
All this was so interesting that I decided to delve into the materials on the geology of the Moon in more detail. And the time spent on this was not in vain. I came across the work of scientists from the Planetary Science Institute (NASA, USA) and Brown University (USA) under the guidance of Professor Peter H. Schults. They concentrated their research on the lunar mountains of volcanic origin in the region of Ina, about 3 km long, and found … that these mountains were formed from 1 to 10 million years ago. Professor Schultz and his staff claim that they have found at least four more similar zones on the lunar surface.
It was too much. Everything fit so well into the hypothesis just stated, or, to be more precise, into the tradition of the churning of the ocean, that I was ready to believe in the infallibility of everything that I wrote about in my articles. But, fortunately, I changed my mind in time.
Indeed, for sure, different researchers will interpret the same age and composition of the lunar and terrestrial rocks, and the presence on the Moon of relief elements similar to the Earth, and the discovery of an ancient city on it in different ways.
Surely, many will find the participation of alien intelligence in this. Although, why should it be on the moon? A dead, lifeless planet.
Well, now it seems like the time has come to tell you about what thoughts were spinning in my head even before I turned on the TV.
The rocks that are 4-4.5 billion years old, which are similar in composition to earth's basalts, and the thickness of the lunar crust (60-100 km), comparable to the thickness of ancient continental platforms on Earth, discovered on the Moon by Soviet and American automatic stations and astronauts, speak of next. If the Moon was indeed part of the Earth, it belonged to an ancient continental plate. The tradition of the churning of the ocean strictly localizes the location of this platform to the northern polar latitudes. But before here
there was Hyperborea, inhabited by adityas at the highest level of development!
This means that the presence on the Moon of "ruins of cities, huge spherical objects made of glass" and even "stone towers and castles that hang in the air" is quite natural. All this may be the remnants of the ancient legendary Hyperborea that miraculously survived on the surface of the Earth's satellite!
Especially striking is the imagination of objects made of "glass" allegedly discovered on the Moon. After all, you may have heard the legend about Inis Vitrin or the Glass Island in the north - the stronghold of the mysterious Fomorian civilization. Probably, this type of architectural structures was inherited by them from more ancient times., which belonged to the heyday of Hyperborea.
The possible presence of a part of Hyperborea on the Moon makes it possible to understand much better the complex tectonic structure of the Arctic Ocean bed and find answers to many questions that almost every researcher encounters when trying to reconstruct the history of the development of this territory. I could never get rid of the thought that whole chapters were missed in the stone chronicle of this part of the Earth. And only now it becomes clear where their new repository may be.
Space geologists might argue with me. Their arguments will be approximately as follows. If the Moon was part of the Earth, then its separation from it occurred in the Precambrian time. There is no other way to explain the presence of such a large number of craters on it, by the density of which the age of the planet is usually determined. In addition, if the Moon was torn off from the Earth, it should first completely melt and only then acquire the shape of a ball.
No doubt it is. But only if the average probability of collision of planets with asteroids is taken into account and the formation of a celestial body from a gas-dust cloud is considered. And if, under the influence of the enormous gravitational force of the Earth, which existed at the initial stage of detachment of a large piece from it, which later became the Moon, it partially melted, and large blocks of the most durable rocks remained on the Moon, which remained on the surface like ice floes in the ocean or orange peels in jam. And if the Moon collided with the other numerous pieces of the Earth, which were at first its satellites, which were torn off with it, and fell on its surface when they reached the Roche limit, forming craters and new blocks and ridges, partially bogged down in the semi-solidified lunar crust. And if some of the lunar craters were formed on Earth during the wars between the Adityas and Daityas with the Danavas and are traces of the explosions of nuclear and other shells …
But you never know what else can be.
In short, the establishment of young relief elements on the Moon is an important argument in favor of its recent separation from the Earth. And the concentration of most of the lunar seas on the side of the Moon facing the Earth seems to confirm that the development of the Moon at first proceeded like the satellite of Jupiter Io, when, under the influence of the strongest attraction of the Earth, the rocks facing it first melted.
The Middle Miocene Moon must have been an amazing sight. At first, a fiery, bubbling mess, barely rising above the horizon and causing horror, splashed melted stone drops into the air and on the ground. Then, standing low above the horizon, a luminous disk, fascinating with its magnificence, several times larger than the sun.
As the Earth "spun", it appeared in the sky more and more often, perhaps just a few hours after it went beyond the horizon.
I just dream of standing in the silence of the night, illuminated by the light of that supernatural moon, amazing giant multi-armed and multi-headed creatures (and here) that inhabited our planet in those distant times. According to legend, many of them were nocturnal. And maybe, shining in the night sky, as big as they themselves, the moon was an important element in their lives. Perhaps they prayed for her. Perhaps she added strength to them. Perhaps it clouded their minds, and they became possessed and seized with a single desire to find a sacrifice to their night deity.
Whether it really was so is rather difficult to establish. Although, in my opinion, it is with the formation of the Moon and the beginning of the Earth's spinning in the Middle Miocene that the appearance on our planet of Rakshasas, Nairrits, Bhutts, Pisachas, Yakshas and other demonic creatures with gigantic dimensions (more than 5 m) should be associated. I had previously suggested that the first signs of their presence on Earth appeared at the end of the Oligocene or Neogene, but then my arguments were not supported by anything. Now they have received a more weighty justification."
