The Rothschilds And The Seizure Of Europe - Alternative View

The Rothschilds And The Seizure Of Europe - Alternative View
The Rothschilds And The Seizure Of Europe - Alternative View

Video: The Rothschilds And The Seizure Of Europe - Alternative View

Video: The Rothschilds And The Seizure Of Europe - Alternative View
Video: Rise of the Rothschilds: The World's Richest Family 2024, May
Anonim

At the end of the second book of this series, we observed a very curious event - the queen of the most powerful empire of that period in the history of mankind - Great Britain sent Sir Moses Montefiore to Russia to Nicholas I with her letter of recommendation. The Sheriff of London, a Jewish banker and Rothschild's friend rolled into one - Baron Moshe (Moses) Montefiore and Queen Victoria jointly solved an interesting task - to improve the life of the Jewish population in Russia.

Moreover, it was not about the liberation of Jews from the mythical Russian ghettos or the fight against poverty of the Jewish people, there were two specific urgent requests: first, to allow merchants and artisans to travel to the inner provinces, that is, to increase their economic territory so that they could collect more profits from Russians; the second, less important, is “to allow the service of Christians (Jews) …”. Pay attention - the changes in Europe by the beginning of the 50s of the 19th century were so great and significant that (!) The English queen lobbied the interests of the Jews even in details - for example, so that Christians, in this case Russians, could serve them. It was this period of history that the Jewish billionaire and politician J. Soros mysteriously called the beginning of the “Age of Reason” and the beginning of the “Golden Age” in the history of Jews.

Although this period was relatively initial, it was a logical continuation of the causal chain of events emanating from the emergence and development of Protestantism in Europe, as a split and decline of Christianity in Europe. And Protestantism, in turn, was a natural result of the processes of the Renaissance, as our outstanding Russian thinker of the first half of the 20th century Lossky correctly noted: "The triumph of Christianity ends with the Renaissance and the historical ascent of Israel begins."

It seems that in Western Europe, by the time Montefiore arrived in Russia, the Jews did not have such problems - they controlled the entire economic space and served them all. By this time, all the problems for Jews in Europe had been solved by numerous revolutions and Napoleon, who, as is well known, was wary of Jewish hegemony. It is worth noting, as we observed in the previous book from the history of the Freemasons, by this time the Freemasons, through the "great" revolution, seized power in France and, according to their worldview, established a republican form of government in France. And when General Napoleon came to power, and, pursuing aggressive goals, moved with the army outside France, the Freemasons happily supported him, because he spread the revolutionary Masonic spirit, their worldview throughout Europe,and in this sense Napoleon's army was a Masonic army.

The secret “civil” army of the Freemasons by this time was no less than the military Napoleon - under the rule of the French Masonic lodge “Great East” 826 lodges and 337 chapters were united, it was a large secret force of the underground, which helped to advance Napoleon's army across Europe. How the Freemasons seized power in Spain was described in some detail by none other than Francisco Franco himself in his book "Freemasonry" (published in Moscow in 2008):

“The entry of the French troops into Madrid was prepared by the Masonic introduction. Important agents of Napoleon carried out one of the most dexterous and darkest intrigues of all time. They spread the news that the emperor intended to visit the court and meet with the new king and persuaded the latter to leave to meet him. On April 10, 1808, accompanied by his Minister of State Ceballos and a group of aristocrats, the monarch left for Burgas, where, of course, he did not meet any Napoleon … He drove on and arrived in the provincial capital of Alava, where 40,000 French soldiers were waiting for him, who took up positions around the city. The king actually turned out to be a prisoner … Involuntarily, he had to go further, to the border, where, as they said, Napoleon was waiting. But a day after crossing the border, the head of the French police Savary bluntly announced to the (Spanish) king,that the emperor decided to depose him …

In all the cities of Spain, where Napoleonic troops marched, French lodges arose. The most significant of these was the Lodge of St. Julia, named after the patron saint of Corsica, Napoleon's small homeland."

It is worth noting that where the Freemasons came to power, they first of all equalized the rights of local Jews. Someone will say - this is normal, because their slogan-motto: “freedom, equality, brotherhood”, but … - Boers, Indians, American Indians, etc. no one was going to equalize like a brother.

Promotional video:

When Napoleon seized Prussia, the first thing he did was equalize the Jews in civil rights with the Germans. I repeat - and this despite the fact that, to put it mildly, he was wary of the Jews and repeatedly expressed himself sharply against them, which allowed Napoleon to be ranked as anti-Semites.

There is only one explanation for this phenomenon - by this time the heads of many powerful Masonic lodges and Jewish communities, according to many researchers (G. Bostunich, A. Dikiy, D. Duke, etc.) were the same persons, with whose opinion Napoleon could not help but be considered.

And only when Napoleon "suffered" - he turned into a dictator - "the father of France", and actually began to restore the monarchy, then the Freemasons turned sharply against him. After the expulsion of Napoleon to a distant island, the status of Masons and Jews in France did not change, moreover, as historical facts testify, it increased greatly, because by the time Queen Victoria turned to Nicholas I in 1846 - in 1840, the French parliament tried to unsuccessfully solve the problem - that to do with the hegemony of the Jews in the French economy. And to solve this problem, the French came up with the idea in the same year to establish a special position in the government - the Commissioner General for Jewish Affairs.

The fact that this measure did not solve the problem can be judged by the title of the analytical work of the French thinker Alphonse Toussaint, under the polymorphic title “Jews - Kings of Our Time” (1845). And in 1848, the Minister of Finance of the Provisional Government that emerged in France, the Freemason Jew Adolphe Cremier, said with utmost directness and frankness:

“The republic will do what Freemasonry will do” (B. Bashilov). The French thinker Flaubert Louise Colet said with a shudder about such hegemons as in A. Cremieux: “Republicans of all shades seem to me the most ferocious educators in the world” (BB).

After establishing their own order in Western Europe, the champions of freedom and democracy began to expand their zone of influence and “teach how to live” others, and in the person of the freemason Moshe (Moishe) Montefiore moved east to Russia, which, thanks to a small group of prominent thinkers-patriots, successfully defended already half a century from the attempts of the Freemasons to seize power (Decembrists, Speransky). Now is the time to take a look at England, from which the lobbyist Moshe Montefiore arrived.

As you know, at the beginning of the 19th century, during the reign of Napoleon, France fought for world supremacy for a long time with England, to which, by a special government decision on the initiative of Cromwell, Jews were invited from different countries, and by the time of the last battle with Napoleon they were in the economy and politics of England important, but not dominant place. But everything changed after the phenomenal story with Rothschild.

Meyer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812) - from him began a story that can be called the "beginning of the period of globalization" of Jewish finance in Europe. Young Rothschild began his financial career in the Jewish banking office of Oppenheim. Hereinafter we will call it - “the first Rothschild”. Before working in a banking house, the first Rothschild worked in his father's numismatic shop and, on the basis of numismatics, became friends with his landgrave, Frederick II (the Great), who was actively involved in trade with England. Including supplied to England a large number of mercenary soldiers. When Rothschild began working in a banking house, a nice acquaintance grew into cooperation. Amschel Rothschild soon opened his own banking office, serving the landgrave, and, thanks to his patron, quickly became rich.

The first Rothschild became even more rich thanks to the death of “Old Fritz” in 1786. All the enormous wealth acquired by Frederick II (56 million thalers in gold) passed to his young heir, Wilhelm the Ninth, who had long been taken care of by Amschel Rothschild. Thus, the first Rothschild received huge amounts of money for his operational use, which he began to boldly and actively turn around. And since the British did not always settle with the late William II with money, and often with securities - debt obligations, including government bonds, Rothschild was forced to have relations with England, with its stock exchange, in order to exchange these securities for money or goods. Thus, large consignments of tea, tobacco, textiles, wines, etc. went through Rothschild to Germany. And he had to delve into the specifics of the English economy and the work of the London Stock Exchange. By 1801, he had amassed his first million guilders, which in those days was equivalent to several billion modern euros.

An important historical moment came in 1804, when the Danish government asked him personally to borrow, to give a loan in the amount of 4 million guilders. And Rothschild gave this loan at good interest. So Rothschild went to the world level, and to a different quality of business. For states were much nicer debtor clients than private individuals. First, they were more reliable clients than private individuals. Secondly, - they had a great political advantage - they could, as an exception, facilitate imports or exports, reduce duties or make other concessions or privileges. In addition, it was important that the states had a big disadvantage in front of private borrowers, merchants, which was a big plus for Rothschild,for a large number of government officials have a completely different mentality compared to a private business owner and are very prone to bribery to the detriment of their people and state …

In addition, officials could not match the mind with the undeniably talented Amschel Rothschild. Not surprisingly, by 1812 Denmark owed the Rothschilds 12 million guilders.

Rothschild managed to make big money even in difficult historical conditions. When Napoleon occupied Prussia in 1806, the escaped Prussian king hid all his wealth in the Rothschild financial system, or rather, gave it to him for temporary use.

And when Napoleon introduced an economic, continental blockade for England, Amschel Rothschild generally received super profits, since he perfectly organized the smuggling of English goods to the continent and was, undoubtedly, the first in this craft.

There is a very important historical connection here - from now on England will be a faithful companion, patron of the Jews, especially when it falls into economic dependence on the Rothschilds. From then on, England will defend their interests and promote them until the creation of an independent Jewish state in the middle of the 20th century and to this day.

Another unusual initiative of the first Rothschild had even greater consequences for the history of Europe and all mankind. Not wanting to rest on the laurels he had achieved and striving to further develop and expand his influence on the planet, Rothschild decided to create the most extensive international supranational financial organization in the history of mankind. And, thanks to his sons, he realized his plan. But it is also important that after the death of the first Rothschild, the sons were able to keep the organization in force and develop it further.

The success story of the Rothschilds was well described by the famous modern author of textbooks on management - Peter Drucker, who in his research claims that Rothschild at that time had a well-established effective communication-information system in European states, thanks to his agents, lobbyists and corrupt officials of various countries.

Realizing his global idea, Amschel Rothschild sent his most talented son Nathan to live and work on a prepared site in London (1803), James - in the same way to Paris, Solomon - to Vienna, Karl - to Naples. Amschel himself led his organization from Germany. Thus, the Rothschilds threw their financial network on Europe, covering all major capitals and states.

In this system, it was enough for one of the sons to be talented for the whole system to grow rich, prosper, squeezing the governments of European countries more and more tightly in the debt grip.

Such a son, worthy of his father, turned out to be Nathan Rothschild, who dealt a decisive blow to the richest country at that time in Europe and on the planet - Great Britain.

Here is a brief description of what happened. France, although it was the freest country for the Jews, was not interesting for the Rothschilds after Napoleon's defeat in Russia. And they connected all their main activities with England, including investing huge capitals in its securities. In England by this time a very favorable situation had developed for the Jews. For 150 years of staying in England, Jews have completely settled it. After the expulsion of the Jews from England by the English kings and the strict prohibition to “not let them in,” Cromwell in the middle of the 17th century did a lot to bring Jews back. Oliver Cromwell, looking at the flourishing and growing power of Holland, began, out of patriotic reasons, to persuade the English parliament and government to allow Jews to enter England for "practical economic reasons",as it will be "useful for the implementation of imperialist expansionist plans."

On this issue, very heated, heated debates and disputes flared up in English society. The government also did not have a unanimous opinion, it hesitated and did not dare to take anything positive towards the Jews. At the same time, it is worth noting that the question was about the legalization of the entry of Jews into England, because they were already illegally moving to England from Protestant Holland, whose capital Amsterdam they already called "New Jerusalem". The same could have been said even before this dispute about the City of London. Jewish historian W. Sombart wrote: “… in the field of English finance, the influence of the Jews is noticeably dominant. In England, the financial needs of the Long Parliament served as the first impetus to attract rich Jews there … in 1643 their influx was especially strong."

It is no accident that it was in 1643 that a bloody civil war broke out in England against the overthrow of the monarchy, in which rich Jews financed Oliver Cromwell's parliamentary army. Therefore, when Cromwell advocated the legalization of the Jews and their invitation to England, he thought not only about the development of England, but also about his debts to them. And the Jews were interested not only in their geographical distribution and the opportunity to do business in England, but they wanted England to follow in the footsteps of Holland. For in the absence of a clear and understandable national monarchical power, money begins to play the leading role in power, that is, wealthy merchants, manufacturers and bankers, who, if you look closely, for some reason always find themselves in the majority of one nationality.

And the goal was achieved - in 1646 the royal army was defeated, and King Charles the First was captured and, without presenting any significant evidence of his guilt before the English people, was executed on January 30, 1649 by beheading. From that moment on, a series of fundamental liquidations of monarchies began, which ended with the capture of Russia in 1917 and the bloody massacre of the Russian Emperor Nicholas II and his family. Therefore, O. Platonov noted in his research:

"On the day of the murder of Charles the First, Christendom crossed the fatal line."

And the story of the Jews moving to England ended with the fact that in 1655 Cromwell met with the leader of the Jewish community in Europe - Manass ben Israel. Then the Jews quietly and en masse began to enter England, and the government turned a blind eye to this. What happened in England next, was beautifully described in his book by the famous inventor and businessman - Henry Ford:

“In old England, many respectable customs prevailed among the merchant classes. So a respected merchant never had to start a business on his own initiative, but only when it was offered to him. Likewise, decorating shop windows with candles or paints, as well as an exhibition of goods designed to lure the public, was considered a shameful and unclean technique intended to discourage customers from a neighbor. Finally, it was considered completely indecent and repugnant to merchant customs to trade in more than one product. If, for example, someone was selling tea, then it seemed that he could also sell teaspoons? However, if someone made this kind of announcement, he would risk ruining his business …

One can imagine what happened when a Jewish merchant burst into this bowl of calm customs. He just smashed them to smithereens … Jewish shops became bazaars, the forerunners of modern department stores … He (the Jew) was the first to introduce "high turnover with little profit", he also introduced the sale by installments … He (the Jew) was the father of advertising in those days when even a simple announcement about what kind of product was in the store, led the public to think that the owner was in financial difficulties and that he was facing bankruptcy, which is why he resorted to a desperate last resort …”

All in all, the picture is clear and familiar.

The Rothschilds were large wholesale traders and successfully carried out trade between England and Germany, paying less attention to the losing France. But then Napoleon suddenly returns from exile, gathers a large army, and again a military mess begins in Europe.

Nathan Rothschild as a result of these events became fabulously rich, although before that he was very rich.

When in June 1815 in Belgium, at Waterloo, the decisive battle of the coalition forces with Napoleonic troops took place, Nathan Rothschild watched the battle, hiding behind a nearby hill. The outcome of the battle was very important for him, since his large funds were in the securities of England, which could lose the battle and Rothschild would have suffered large losses.

And when the result of the battle became clear, he rushed to the sea with all the speed of his horse. In a great storm, when there were no seafaring communications, a fisherman brought him to England for a large fee. And so Nathan Rothschild was ahead of the most important news at the time by three days. And the next morning, together with his agents, he played a wonderful performance on the London Stock Exchange - he collapsed this stock exchange and actually bought England in a few days for ridiculous money.

England - the strongest country at that time, the naval empire, the ruler of the seas and numerous colonies fell into dependence on the Jewish bankers and since then has become an instrument of the Jewish world community's policy and a place of fabulous enrichment. To understand the scale a little, I will give one curious example - when the commander-in-chief of the troops of the East India Company, Sir Robert Clive, was put on trial for the fact that he “not honestly” shared the loot with England, he gave the following testimony in one (!) Case:

“There were not many diamonds, only a few baskets. Here we have collected two or three barrels of emeralds … For myself, I took only two hundred thousand pounds. I'm surprised at my modesty, gentlemen."

Do you even have a rough idea - what fantastic sums are we talking about here?

Therefore, it is not surprising that when the government of England was headed by the Jew Disraeli-Beaconsfield, the Jew Ribbing also became Viceroy of India.

In addition, in 1818, the victorious powers of Napoleon, after the victory at Waterloo, organized a peace conference, at which they asked the Rothschilds to help sort out with France about the payment of reparations and indemnities to each winner. The Rothschilds agreed to this offer, naturally not for free.

Thus, the Jewish Rothschild family acted as an official international supranational structure, an organization - the first financial TNC. Considering, in addition, the debts on loans of various European states to the Rothschilds - we can confidently say that from that moment the Jews were not only equal in Europe, but ruled in it. And, for example, Austria even managed to get into debt dependence on the Rothschilds.

The Jews now had to achieve, at least, equality in Russia. That is why the legendary and tyrannical queen of England - Victoria carried out seemingly such petty assignments of the Jews - bothered the Russian monarch in 1846 to allow Jews to take Russians as servants. Behind the fragile shoulders of the Queen of England stood the famous Rothschilds and the Jewish politician Disraeli. Disraeli was descended from Spanish Jews who fled to the commercial Venice and then came to conquer England. For a career, Disraeli “dyed” into the Anglican faith and “made the right decision” - he twice served as Prime Minister of England, received the title of “Earl of Beaconsfield” from the Queen, and got into the House of Lords. Disraeli was engaged in scientific activities - he developed a racial theory of superiority, in which, of course, the best on the planet were two races - Jewish and English,and of course, the best of these two was Jewish, which the British should be in awe of for helping to take over half the world and build a superpower. Russia, powerful and lonely, hindered the satisfaction of complete domination on the planet. Therefore, the impending Crimean war of the coalition of Western European countries and Turkey against Russia was natural and inevitable.

From the book: "The terrorist war in Russia in 1878-1881." Author: Klyuchnik Roman

Recommended: