For some reason, most people associate the term "UFO" with extraterrestrial civilizations, but in fact it means "unidentified flying object", i.e. an object that has not been identified. This means that anything can be hidden under this term. Can you imagine now how stupid they really look when they say in all seriousness: “I don’t believe in UFOs”? It turns out that they imagine themselves to be such "cool" specialists in the matter of identifying flying objects that they do not even admit the thought that they are not able to identify any flying object. Very reckless arrogance and inflated self-importance.
Well, if someone meant that they do not believe in the existence of extraterrestrial civilizations, then they should express themselves more clearly and more specifically, since the term "UFO" is actually quite capacious. For example, how he answered the question: "What is this - a UFO?" the famous Russian ufologist, candidate of technical sciences V. Azhazha on the pages of his book "Ufological mystery":
So UFOs are a much broader phenomenon than those who see an alien behind every bush believe. Of course, this does not mean that some part of the manifestation of the phenomenon cannot turn out to be alien devices of extraterrestrial intelligence. However, the scale and prevalence in space and time of the UFO phenomenon does not speak in favor of the alien version. That is why all UFOs should not be immediately considered alien objects. Although not all of them may turn out to be devices of earthlings or unknown natural phenomena. There is a version that highly developed civilizations live in the cavities of the Earth and at great ocean depths, and most of the UFO phenomenon may be associated precisely with their vehicles. But it would be wrong to consider them "aliens".
michael101063 ©