Beginning "Who was the liar?"
It is of interest to make a deep analysis not only of the identity of the king, but also of his possible ancestral roots, which allowed him to gain a foothold on the Russian throne and to impose the direction of development of domestic and foreign policy and the entire political system of Russia for almost three centuries.
Here are the reasons for this.
1. The use of the Latin language on awards and in official state documents is introduced
With the appearance of the liar on all medals and commemorative signs, the record of their dedication only in Latin. Who is it for and what is it about? The Latin language in Muscovy is little known, except perhaps to a small number of the hierarchy and clergy of Kiev, and is even ignored, since it is associated with heterodox Catholics and the Vatican and, moreover, is not used in state texts. The last medal approved by Tsar Peter for the capture of Azov was in Russian. It should be noted that later the inscription on the medals began to be translated into Russian (On the capture of Narva and others).
2. Medal of the victory and suppression of the rebellion of the archers
Promotional video:
The medal depicts a plot from ancient Greek mythology, at that time practically unknown in Russia, about the feat of Hercules (Hercules), who struck a hydra. According to the hidden meaning, this means the victory of the liar (Hercules) over the hydra (the Russian army - the archers). It should be noted here that the veneration and comparison of the exploits of Samson and Hercules took place among the representatives of the Israelite tribe of Dan.
Reference: The tribe of Dan is one of the tribes of Israel. It came from Dan, the fifth son of the patriarch Jacob. From Dan in Egypt came a tribe, which at the time of the exodus from Egypt numbered 62,700 people. The Dan tribe was of Greek origin - the Danians, who later joined the Israelite alliance of tribes.
This tribe was distinguished by its militancy and was second only to the tribe of Judah in number. The Danites were notable for their cunning and cunning, but they also made wonderful artists. King Solomon appointed (965 BC) the famous artist Hiram, descended from his mother from the tribe of Dan, as the builder of the Jerusalem Temple. Samson, who fought with the Philistines, came from the tribe of Dan. Constrained in their possession by the Philistines, the Danites were forced to look for new places for settlement. In the north, they captured the city and named it Dan, which later became the northernmost point of the land of Israel. The Danites, who lived far from the general Israeli spiritual center, built their own sanctuary in their city. Subsequently, the Israeli king Jeroboam (930 - 909 BC) tried to turn it, along with the sanctuary in Beit-El, into an alternative to the Temple of Solomon.
The prophecy of Jacob concerning Dan: “Dan will judge his people … Dan will be a serpent on the road, an adder on the way, biting the horse's leg” (Gen. 49: 16-17) - is interpreted differently, and can refer both to his own tribe and to others to the tribes who accepted his authority and supremacy. Samson, who came from the city of Tsora, the tribe of Dan, is best known among the Danites for his strength, he was also distinguished by his dexterity and cunning (Judg. 14, 15). A warlike spirit and cunning were the hallmarks of the entire tribe of Dan.
The foregoing predictions are compared with the listing in the Revelation of John the Theologian of one hundred and forty-four thousand people from all the tribes of Israel, having the seal of God on their foreheads (Rev. 7: 4), in which the tribe of Dan is completely excluded. Based on these predictions, a number of Holy Fathers conclude that the Antichrist will emerge from the tribe of Dan.
The tribe of Dan is considered to have disappeared from the historical scene after the fall of the one they created in 928 BC. e. The kingdom of Israel, like the other ten tribes of Israel,
After the death of Solomon, the people of Israel were divided into two kingdoms, of which the larger (ten tribes) went to Jeroboam from the tribe of Ephraim (about 928 BC). These halves began to be called the Kingdom of Judah and the Kingdom of Israel, and a fierce rivalry began between them, which drained their internal and external strength. With the rupture of political unity, a rupture of religious unity began, and a new cult was established in the kingdom of Israel in political forms, which was the worship of the God of Israel under the guise of a golden calf. The prophets, the great zealots of monotheism, protested against this in vain. The new cult took root and entailed an inevitable deviation into the most gross superstition and idolatry, which in turn was followed by a complete decline in morality and a weakening of the socio-political organism. The entire history of the Kingdom of Israel is a constant internal turmoil and political upheavals. All this was not slow to take advantage of the neighbors: the Egyptians and Assyrians,
The people of the kingdom of Israel taken captive were lost without a trace among the surrounding peoples of the East, and those freed from captivity did not always return to Israel, and remained there, creating their communities, or settled all over the world, where they could reach or swim, founded new colonies - settlements, and sometimes new kingdoms and principalities (kaganates). Legends of the "ten missing tribes" were popular in Jewish, Christian, and Muslim folklore, and are still prevalent among Eastern Jewish communities and among the Jewish movements. According to one version, they will return to Israel before the coming of the Messiah (Messiah).
Reference: Numerous theories have been put forward that identified the disappeared tribes with a variety of peoples: from the Japanese, the Karim tribes in Burma and the Cham tribes in Kampuchea to the British, and from Indians to Afghans, Armenians, Eskimos, etc. and placed the disappeared tribes in Africa, India, China, Iran, Kurdistan, North America, Great Britain, the Caucasus. Some of them reported that among the Jews of the Caucasus back in the 19th century. there was a lively legend that they were the descendants of the disappeared tribes settled in Media by the Assyrian kings.
Modern science considers this information reliable. It is known from TANAKH that the tribes of Dan and Zvulun were engaged in navigation in ancient Israel, therefore it is more than likely that they discovered America long before Columbus.
According to Genetic data from DNA research, the common ancestor of the Ashkenazi Jews and Vikings arrived around 800 from the Caucasus from the Khazar Kaganate to Scandinavia. Common genetic traits were found in one third of Ashkenazi Jews and one in four Icelanders (descendants of Viking Normans).
3. About the Merovingian dynasty
There is reason to believe that the Merovingian dynasty, the first dynasty of Frankish kings in French history, was founded by the Daniites. The kings of this dynasty ruled from the end of the 5th to the middle of the 8th century in the territory of modern France and Belgium. They came from the Salic Franks, who settled in Cambrai (Chlodion the Longhaired) and Tournai (Childeric I) in the 5th century. Contemporaries called the Merovingians "long-haired kings" (lat. Reges criniti). From pagan times until their fall, the Merovingians wore long hair, which was considered an obligatory attribute of the monarch. The Franks believed that the Merovingians possessed a sacred-magical power, which consisted in the extremely long hair of their owners and expressed in the so-called. "Royal happiness", personifying the well-being of the entire Frankish people. This hairstyle separated the monarch from his subjects,who wore short haircuts, popular in the Roman era and considered a sign of the low position of a servant or slave. Cutting off hair was considered the hardest insult to a member of the Merovingian dynasty, in practice it meant the loss of the right to possess power. As you know, the Liar also wore long hair, which determined his belonging to the Danish tribe.
There is, probably for oneself and for others, in all cases of the development of history and the advancement of their plans), three versions of the origin of the Merovingians.
- The first Frankish leader from the Merovingian dynasty was Faramond, son of Markomir. This version appeared and spread back in the Middle Ages, but later historians could not find evidence of the existence of this leader and came to the conclusion that he did not exist. In addition, medieval chroniclers wrote that Faramond and subsequent kings of the Franks descended from Trojans who survived and arrived in the territory of Gaul from time immemorial. There are numerous discrepancies here - most often the ancestors of the Merovingians were called King Priam or the hero of the Trojan War Aeneas.
- One of the ancestors of the kings of the Merovingian dynasty was the leader of the Salic Franks, Merovei, who ruled from about 448 to 457. It is to him that the Merovingians owe the name of their dynasty. Historians question the very fact of its existence, but the Merovingians were convinced that it once was, and were proud of their descent from it. According to legend, Merovei was born by the wife of Chlodion from a sea monster.
- Merovei, who gave the name to his family, is a direct descendant of Mary Magdalene and Jesus. All descendants of the Merovingian dynasty wore long hair, had a cross-shaped birthmark and had a special cut on the head, which was intended for communication with God (Jesus had a similar cut). There are still legends that the Merovingians were endowed with miraculous abilities: they knew how to turn water into wine, heal serious illnesses.
According to the latest version, which in recent decades has been especially actively imposed by various media, Jesus Christ (as they call the Son of God) was married to Mary Magdalene and they had children. After his crucifixion, and according to their version it was some kind of staging, the family of Jesus moved to the south of France and lived in one of the Jewish communities. It is believed that this is why there are many cathedrals and churches dedicated to Mary Magdalene in the south of France.
In 928, the descendant of the Merovingians, Godfroy of Bouillon, created the Order of Zion. The main task of the order is to prove that Jesus did not die on the cross. The Merovingian goal is to destroy the Catholic Church. If the order of Zion promulgates and proves the earthly nature of Jesus, the church will lose its meaning and become unnecessary. The Order of Zion functions to this day. He became the source of the most mysterious secrets and hoaxes in the history of mankind. The Merovingians organized a Crusade to free the Holy Sepulcher from Muslims and returned it to Christians in 1099. The kings of Israel have regained their rightful place after more than a thousand years. Immediately, the Merovingians gave instructions to build on Mount Zion the well-fortified abbey of Notre Dame du Mont de Sion, which became the main base of the Order of Zion.
Another most mysterious branch of human history is the Order of the Poor Knights of Christ (Templars). The order was founded by the Grand Master of the Order of Zion, Hugo de Payne. It was believed that the Knights Templar was founded to help pilgrims moving along the roads of Palestine. But the Templars were not patrolling the Palestinian roads at all, they were looking for Formal Proof for the Order of Zion. And they supposedly found him.
It can be assumed that it was the Grail (a mythical vessel in which the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ crucified on the cross is supposedly located). And for what sacraments or "testimonies" do they need it? Found Merovingian Proof is hidden in Rennes-le-Château (formerly Razes), where all the Merovingian treasures were kept.
The Church decides to recognize the Knights Templar. The order itself is gaining strength, power and is rapidly growing rich. Since 1146, the Merovingian sign appeared on the cloaks of the Templars - a red cross with bifurcated ends. The time came when the Priory of Zion and the Order of the Templars were ruled by the same Grand Master Bertrand de Blanchefort. These organizations have merged into one. Bertrand de Blanchefort in 1156 called on the German miners, who, with the strictest secrecy, built underground storage facilities in abandoned mines. It was under de Blanchefort that the Knights Templar became the most powerful organization that intervened in the politics of world states at the highest level.
The entire subsequent history of Europe is filled with attempts by members of the Order of Zion to enter the highest echelons of power in all European countries, the return to the throne of the descendants of the Merovingians and the constant rocking of the foundation of the Catholic Church.
The Merovingian state was largely pagan. Christianization did not have the status of state policy in it: the Catholic faith was spread by volunteer missionaries, who often arrived from neighboring regions. In the 5th-7th centuries such preachers converted pagans who lived in the inner regions of the Frankish state, in the vicinity of Paris, Orleans, etc. The influence of the pope in the Frankish state was almost imperceptible. Perhaps that is why the Pope's approval was required to overthrow the Merovingians.
In 751, the throne of the Merovingian dynasty was seized by Karl Martel's son, Pepin the Short. The new ruler named his dynasty after his father - the Carolingians.
Pepin the Short, crowned by the church on the throne of the Roman Empire, was somehow convinced that he was occupying it illegally, because the throne of the Roman Empire could only be occupied by a descendant of the Merovingian dynasty. Therefore, the Carolingians marry Merovingian princesses. It follows from this that all subsequent descendants of the Carolingians, in the female line, also belong to the Merovingians.
Thus, almost all the kings of France were descendants of the Merovingians, as well as the rulers of other countries, for example, the Spanish Bourbons. Some of the rulers of Russia - Ivan the Terrible (? According to Western historians) and representatives of the Romanov dynasty are considered to be the descendants of Clovis.
4. About the Russian flag tricolor
The three colors on the Russian flag may be associated with heraldic fashion dating back to the Merovingian dynasty of Frankish kings.
For the first time, long before the appearance in Russia, one in one similar tricolor banner became a symbol of one of the provinces of the federal state of Prussia Holstein. It is interesting to note that Emperor Peter III also came from these places.
In Russia, this banner appeared during the reign of the first tsar from the Romanov dynasty, Mikhail Fedorovich. In 1634, an embassy from the Duke of Holstein Frederick III arrived at the Russian autocrat. The foreigners undertook to build ten ships on the Volga for the trip to Persia. The first ship was launched two years later. The Holstein flag was raised on the first ship, named Frederick.
But he was still considered a foreign banner, and this banner was made "Russian" by Alexei Mikhailovich, the father of Peter I, when he chose it for the first Russian frigate "Eagle". At that time, Russia did not yet have its own naval flag, and the ship's crew consisted entirely of the Dutch. Therefore, it was decided to hoist a flag identical to the Dutch one.
The first Russian emperor, he is also false Peter I, finally approved the status of one of the symbols of the state for this tricolor.
It is believed that the three colors of the flag correspond to the three words of the motto: "Freedom, equality, brotherhood."
5. Medal in honor and memory of the Great Embassy
Upon his return from the Great Embassy, the liar institutes a medal "In memory of the Great Embassy", which depicts a knight on horseback, slaying a snake. It is believed that this is St. George the Victorious, but is it so? The image of a rider on a horse, striking a snake, a plot common since the times of Ancient Egypt. In Russia, in iconography, this is the warrior George the Victorious. He was always depicted without a headdress and without armor, because they are useless against a snake and will even be a hindrance. And here is a full-fledged knight of the Western European model. So where did he come from and who did he defeat? And why was the victory over some kind of evil the main result of the Grand Embassy?
On the reverse side there is an image of a tsar, whose attire is significantly different from the traditional one adopted by the Russian tsars.
- There is no royal cap - a crown, instead of it a laurel wreath (however, there is no crown-cap on the medal for the capture of Azov, maybe this was some kind of omen of a future tragedy).
- There are no barmas, shoulder pads, donated at one time by the Byzantine emperors, as an obligatory attribute of royal power.
- Instead of a barm, a fur (ermine?) Stole, which is an obligatory attribute of the power of English (Scottish) kings, later, after the liar, included in the obligatory wardrobe of Russian emperors.
Reference: The rider-snake-fighter was approved as the coat of arms of the Moscow principality under Ivan III (reigned from 1462 to 1505) and coincided with the completion of the unification of the main part of the Russian lands around Moscow.
Under Ivan III's son Vasily III, this seal was completely preserved, only the name of the prince was replaced. Only under Ivan the Terrible, the first Russian prince, who took the royal title in 1547, on the golden bull of 1562, the two-headed eagle occupies the main position, and the rider, like the coat of arms of the Moscow principality, passes to the eagle's chest. This composition is preserved both on the Great State Seal of 1583, and on all subsequent Great State Seals of Russia and Russia.
Written evidence has been published about how contemporaries explained the significance of the figure of a horseman-snake-fighter on seals and coins of the 15th-17th centuries, which allows one to draw an unambiguous conclusion - Russian sources considered the rider to be the image of a prince or a tsar, and only foreigners called the Moscow horseman Saint George.
In 1728, it became necessary to draw up coats of arms for the flags of the regiments deployed in different cities of Russia. In May 1729, they were presented to the military college and were awarded the highest approval. A Senate decree on this followed on March 8, 1730. The first on the list of approved was the state emblem. Part of his description is dedicated to the Moscow coat of arms: "… in the middle of that eagle is George on a white horse, conquering the serpent, the epancha and the yellow spear, the crown is yellow, the serpent is black, the field is white all around, and in the middle is red." From that moment until the beginning of the 20th century, the rider on the Moscow coat of arms is officially called St. George.
The image of the coat of arms of Moscow in 2010 and the heraldic description of the horseman Saint George the Victorious, if he really is, do not correspond to the norms of Orthodox iconography, in which saints are usually depicted with a halo. The explanation of the heraldists is certainly wonderful, but only the victorious horseman is a foreign knight, but not George the Victorious. And the appearance of a rider on a horse almost completely corresponds to the image of the medal "In honor and memory of the Great Embassy" minted by the liar almost 300 years ago. What kind of evil does this foreign knight fight and whom does he defeat?
Digression: I would like to draw your attention to one more secret of Russian history - Tsar Ivan the Terrible. There are many analogies in the history of the reign of Ivan the Terrible and Peter I.
Parsun (icon-like image) of Ivan the Terrible from the collection of the National Museum of Denmark (Copenhagen), room XVI - early 17th century.
There are versions that Ivan the Terrible (1530 - 1588) was also changed, or he voluntarily left his throne, transferring it to the locum tenens appointed by him. In favor of them says:
- the change in the appearance of the tsar after the campaign and capture of Kazan, and then a serious illness in 1552 (?) or after the death of his wife in 1560 (?), after which his character and behavior changed completely, he sharply aged (exact time these changes are unknown, when he died at 55, he looked like a very old man). But it is possible that the change of the locum tenens of the royal throne also took place in 1570, when his attitude towards the guardsmen changed.
That is, four periods of a radical change in state policy or four different ruling tsars under the same name?
First date. connected with the illness of the tsar in 1552 with a "serious fiery illness", when tsar John prepared a tomb for himself and demanded from the boyars an oath of allegiance to his infant son, which not all boyars took. Tsarevich Dmitry Ivanovich, Dimitri Ioannovich (October 1552 - June 4, 1553) tragically died (was drowned) during a pilgrimage to monasteries in the absence of his sick mother, but in the presence of his father. The next possible period of the substitution of Tsar Ivan the Terrible or his voluntary withdrawal into the world refers to 1561-1565.
In 1553 he established trade relations between Russia and England through the White Sea and the Arctic Ocean, and gave privileges to English merchants.
On January 3, 1565, he abdicates the throne in favor of his eldest son, Tsarevich John, and after the request of the clergy and people to return to the throne, he establishes an oprichnina.
There are foreigners in the oprichnina, and its organization has signs of a secret order, very similar to the eastern secret order of the psoglavites.
In September 1567 (or in 1570?), He summons the English envoy to convey to him the request of the English Queen Elizabeth I for political asylum in England and at the same time a proposal to marry her (?).
Construction of the Intercession Cathedral or a temple in honor of St. Basil the Blessed 1555-1561 (some kind of secret connects the tsar and this saint, one can admit such a version that not Saint Basil the Blessed was buried there, but Tsar Ivan the Terrible himself), the Church of the Intercession was under construction, and the well-known name is different, since Saint Basil the Blessed was buried there (1479 - 1552), and then in 1588 a church named after him was added. The name of the builders, those who built it, remains a secret.
State reforms:
- the introduction of a privileged tsarist service - oprichnina to strengthen autocracy, the fight against the nobility, but under the liar, the nobility was given wealth and serfs, but deprived of political power;
- an attempt to attract foreign specialists for the development of the state economy;
In 1575, at the request of Ivan the Terrible, the baptized Tatar and Kasimov Khan Simeon Bekbulatovich was crowned king as “the Grand Duke of All Russia,” and John the Terrible himself called himself Ivan of Moscow and left the Kremlin for 11 months, but then returned.
The known and unknown events of the period of the reign of Ivan the Terrible predetermined the subsequent events of the Time of Troubles, and much and much more, similar to what happened later under Tsar Peter, and then under the liar.
One gets the impression that the events of the 16th century were a preparation for the events of the 17th - 18th centuries. And it is worth paying attention to such transitions: the Grand Duke of All Russia John Vasilyevich receives in 1547 the title of Sovereign, Tsar and Grand Prince of All Russia, and the Tsar and Grand Duke of All Russia Peter Alekseevich after 174 years, in 1721 becomes. Emperor and Autocrat of All Russia.